1PrimeOptions Binary Option Broker Review (Updated 2025)

1. Executive Summary

This report provides an assessment of the binary options broker identified as 1PrimeOptions, based on an analysis of publicly available information and regulatory warnings. The core finding is that 1PrimeOptions appears to be an unregulated entity operating within the high-risk binary options market, presenting significant potential dangers to investors. Multiple international financial authorities have issued warnings concerning 1PrimeOptions or entities closely associated with it, strongly suggesting involvement in unauthorized and potentially fraudulent activities.

There is no evidence to suggest that 1PrimeOptions holds legitimate authorization from reputable financial regulatory bodies such as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), or the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The absence of oversight from such bodies is critical, as regulation serves to protect investors through measures like licensing requirements, conduct monitoring, client fund segregation, and dispute resolution mechanisms.¹ Trading with unregulated brokers carries inherent hazards, leaving investors without recourse in cases of insolvency or malpractice.¹

The primary risks associated with 1PrimeOptions stem from its unregulated status and its documented association with entities flagged by financial regulators. Specifically, warnings from the Spanish CNMV ² and the Belgian FSMA (citing Portugal’s CMVM) ³ directly link the website https://1primeoptions.com/ to Global Options Ltd, another entity apparently operating without authorization. Furthermore, the operations of such platforms align closely with fraudulent schemes commonly observed in the binary options sector, including the refusal to process withdrawals, misrepresentation of potential profits, and potentially the manipulation of trading outcomes.⁴ The binary options market itself is characterized by high speculation and a structure that often results in a net loss for the customer.¹

Given the lack of regulatory oversight, the explicit warnings issued by financial authorities, and the high-risk nature of its purported business activities, engaging with 1PrimeOptions represents an extremely high risk. Investors are strongly cautioned against depositing funds or providing personal information to this entity or any associated platforms, due to the substantial likelihood of financial loss and the absence of investor protection frameworks.

related posts : Best Binary Options Brokers (in 2025)

2. Introduction: Profiling 1PrimeOptions

The subject of this review is 1PrimeOptions, an entity identified as operating in the online binary options trading market. Its primary online presence appears to be associated with the website https://1primeoptions.com/, an address explicitly mentioned in warnings issued by European financial regulators.²

Crucially, attempts to gather specific information about the services offered by 1PrimeOptions directly from its website yielded minimal results. A browse of 1primeoptions.com revealed only the text “BINARIAS 1PRIMEOPTIONS”, providing no details regarding its trading platform, account types, available assets, fee structures, or other essential operational characteristics.⁷ This profound lack of transparency regarding its core business offering is a significant deficiency for any entity purporting to offer financial services.

Further complicating the assessment is the existence of a similarly named entity, “PrimeXOptions,” operating via the website primexoptions.com.⁸ This entity claims to offer Mirror Trades (including Forex, Copy Trading, Option Trading, Stocks), Planning Services (Estate, Retirement, Financial, Private Wealth), and access to Forex, Fixed Income, and Infrastructure markets.⁹ PrimeXOptions lists contact emails (info@primexoptions.com, support@primexoptions.com) and claims to have been in business since 2012.⁹ However, this entity is the subject of a specific fraud alert issued by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) on October 19, 2021.⁸ The DFPI alert details allegations of an “Advance Fee scheme” where a victim was induced to transfer Bitcoin, shown fabricated profits, encouraged to deposit more funds, and then told they needed to pay thousands in taxes and fees before any withdrawal could be made – a request refused when the victim asked to pay from the supposed profits.⁸

The similarity in names between “1PrimeOptions” and “PrimeXOptions” introduces considerable ambiguity and elevates the overall risk profile. Whether these are the same operation under slightly different branding, related entities, or entirely separate actors capitalizing on potential name confusion is unclear from the available data. However, this ambiguity itself is problematic. Fraudulent operators often employ slight variations in names to confuse investors, hinder due diligence efforts, and attempt to circumvent regulatory warnings or blacklists. The documented fraud alert against primeXoptions.com casts a long shadow, raising immediate and serious concerns about any similarly named entity operating in the same high-risk financial space (binary options/crypto trading). The lack of substantive information from 1primeoptions.com ⁷ makes it impossible to definitively distinguish it from the entity flagged by the DFPI, necessitating extreme caution for anyone encountering either name.

Beyond the website address cited in warnings, the research provides no verifiable information regarding 1PrimeOptions’ corporate structure, registration details, physical headquarters, management team, or operational history. This absence of fundamental company information is a major red flag, commonly associated with illegitimate or transient operations that seek to avoid accountability and scrutiny.⁵ Legitimate financial service providers typically provide clear details about their legal status and location.

3. Regulatory Landscape and the Imperative of Oversight

Understanding the regulatory environment is crucial when assessing any financial services provider, particularly in high-risk sectors like binary options. Financial regulators worldwide, such as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), serve critical functions to protect investors and maintain market integrity.¹ Their responsibilities include issuing licenses only to firms meeting stringent requirements, monitoring the ongoing conduct of licensed entities, investigating complaints and suspicious activities, establishing reporting standards, and enforcing rules against market abuse and fraud.¹ A key mandate is the protection of customer funds, often requiring brokers to hold client money in segregated bank accounts, separate from the firm’s operational capital.¹ They also promote transparency by requiring risk disclosures.¹

Reputable regulators impose specific protective measures, particularly for retail clients. For instance, under ESMA guidelines followed by many European regulators, brokers must provide negative balance protection, ensuring traders cannot lose more than their account deposit.¹ Strict limits on leverage are applied, varying by instrument volatility (e.g., 1:30 for major forex pairs, 1:2 for cryptocurrency CFDs for retail clients), and financial incentives like bonuses to encourage trading are prohibited.¹ Brokers are also required to provide clear risk warnings about the high probability of loss, automatically close positions if margin levels fall below a certain threshold (e.g., 50%), and adhere to best execution rules to ensure fair pricing for client orders.¹ These measures stand in stark contrast to the environment offered by unregulated brokers, where such protections are typically absent, leaving investors exposed.¹

The regulatory treatment of binary options can be complex. Depending on the underlying asset (e.g., stocks, commodities, currencies) and contract terms, binary options may be classified as securities or commodity options.⁴ In the United States, offering binary options that qualify as securities requires registration with the SEC, unless an exemption applies.⁴ Similarly, offering commodity options (like those based on foreign currencies or metals) to U.S. citizens generally requires the transactions to be conducted on a designated contract market registered with the CFTC.⁴ Firms soliciting or accepting funds for such transactions may need to register as Futures Commission Merchants (FCMs), and those acting as counterparties for retail forex options might need registration as Retail Foreign Exchange Dealers (RFEDs).⁴ Both the SEC (via its PAUSE list) and the CFTC (via its RED List) maintain public lists of entities flagged for operating without registration or engaging in potentially fraudulent solicitation of U.S. investors.⁶ Similar warning lists are maintained by regulators globally, including FINMA in Switzerland ¹² and the FCA in the UK.¹⁴

Dealing with brokers licensed overseas presents jurisdictional challenges. National regulators like New Zealand’s FMA, for example, have limited power over foreign-licensed firms, meaning investors may have little or no recourse if an overseas broker becomes insolvent or engages in misconduct.¹ The risks are particularly acute when dealing with brokers based in offshore jurisdictions known for weak regulatory oversight.⁵

The apparent absence of registration for 1PrimeOptions with any of the major financial regulators mentioned in the research materials ¹ is profoundly significant. This is not merely a bureaucratic oversight; it strongly suggests a deliberate decision to operate outside the established legal and supervisory frameworks governing financial services. Legitimate brokers typically seek and prominently display their regulatory credentials as a mark of credibility and compliance. By contrast, operating without authorization means 1PrimeOptions is not subject to the capital adequacy requirements, client fund segregation rules, regular audits, conduct standards, mandatory risk disclosures, or dispute resolution processes (like access to the Financial Ombudsman Service or protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme mentioned by the FCA ¹⁴) enforced by reputable bodies.¹ This lack of oversight creates an environment where fraudulent activities, such as the refusal to return client funds or the manipulation of trading platforms – practices frequently cited in complaints about binary options platforms ⁴ – can occur with impunity. Therefore, the absence of regulation is a critical indicator of potential illegitimacy and significantly heightens the risk for any prospective client.

4. Documented Warnings and Allegations Against 1PrimeOptions and Associated Entities

Multiple financial regulatory bodies and related organizations have issued public warnings concerning 1PrimeOptions or entities directly linked to it, reinforcing concerns about its legitimacy and operational practices.

Direct Warnings Concerning 1PrimeOptions:

• Spain (CNMV): On January 18, 2021, the Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV), Spain’s securities market regulator, added HTTPS://1PRIMEOPTIONS.COM/ to its warning list. Notably, this warning explicitly grouped 1PrimeOptions together with another entity, GLOBAL OPTIONS LTD.²
• Belgium (FSMA) / Portugal (CMVM): Also on January 18, 2021, the Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) of Belgium published a warning that originated from the Comissão do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários (CMVM), the Portuguese Securities Market Commission. This warning mirrored the CNMV’s alert, identifying https://1primeoptions.com/ and associating it directly with GLOBAL OPTIONS LTD as entities operating without necessary authorization.³

The fact that two separate European regulators issued coordinated warnings on the same date, specifically linking 1primeoptions.com with Global Options Ltd, strongly suggests a connection between these entities and indicates they were concurrently identified as problematic by authorities in different jurisdictions. This pattern points towards a shared operational structure or control, rather than isolated incidents.

Warnings Concerning Associated Entities:

• Global Options Ltd / Global Option Trading: The association established by the CNMV and CMVM warnings ² is further corroborated by actions against similarly named entities. The Financial Commission, an external dispute resolution organization (not a government regulator), issued a scam alert for “Global Option Trading” on September 3, 2021.¹⁵ This alert was based on trader complaints and led the Commission to conclude the company and its website might be involved in scamming and defrauding investors, advising against doing business with them.¹⁵ Additionally, resources like Australia’s Moneysmart investor alert list exist to warn against unlicensed entities targeting Australian residents, potentially including firms like “Global Option Trading Co Ltd”.¹⁶ The emergence of warnings against the slightly varied name “Global Option Trading” after the initial flags on “Global Options Ltd” could represent a common tactic used by illicit operators: slightly altering a name or brand to continue soliciting victims after the original name has drawn regulatory attention. This suggests an attempt at evasion rather than cessation of questionable activities.
• PrimeXOptions: As detailed previously, the DFPI issued a specific fraud alert against primeXoptions.com on October 19, 2021, concerning an alleged advance fee scheme involving cryptocurrency investments.⁸ While the connection to 1PrimeOptions is based on name similarity rather than a direct regulatory link in the warnings, the serious nature of the allegations against PrimeXOptions contributes to the overall pattern of risk surrounding entities with similar branding in this sector.
• Your Options Ltd: The UK’s FCA issued a warning on May 28, 2021, against “Your Options Ltd,” stating it was targeting UK residents without authorization.¹⁴ While distinct from Global Options Ltd, this serves as another example of regulatory action against unauthorized firms with similar names operating in the options space, highlighting a recurring theme of unauthorized entities in this market segment.

The following table summarizes the key warnings identified in the research:

Table 1: Summary of Regulatory Warnings and Alerts

Regulator/Body	Date of Warning	Entity Named	Associated Website/Entity	Key Concern	Source Document
CNMV (Spain)	18/01/2021	HTTPS://1PRIMEOPTIONS.COM/	GLOBAL OPTIONS LTD	Operating without authorization	2
FSMA (Belgium) / CMVM (Portugal)	18/01/2021	https://1primeoptions.com/	GLOBAL OPTIONS LTD	Operating without authorization (citing CMVM warning)	3
Financial Commission	03/09/2021	Global Option Trading	Associated website	Potential scam/fraud based on trader complaints	15
DFPI (California, USA)	19/10/2021	primeXoptions.com	https://t.me/AmeliaWhite_fx	Appears engaged in fraud (Advance Fee scheme involving crypto)	8
ASIC/Moneysmart (Australia)	Implied	Potentially Global Option Trading Co Ltd	–	Unlicensed entity offering services in Australia (based on list function)	16
FCA (UK)	28/05/2021	Your Options Ltd	https://youroptions.co.uk	Providing financial services in UK without authorisation (Pattern context)	14

This pattern of warnings from multiple jurisdictions, the direct linking of 1PrimeOptions with the flagged Global Options Ltd, and the emergence of alerts against entities with slight name variations collectively paint a picture of a high-risk operation attempting to function outside regulatory boundaries.

5. Understanding Binary Options Risks and Common Fraud Tactics

Beyond the specific warnings related to 1PrimeOptions, it is essential to understand the inherent risks of the binary options market itself and the common fraudulent practices associated with it. Regulators explicitly warn that trading such instruments is highly speculative and generally suitable only for advanced traders.¹

Binary options are typically structured as yes/no propositions about whether the price of an underlying asset will be above or below a certain level at a specific expiration time.⁴ If the trader’s prediction is correct, they receive a predetermined payout; if incorrect, they typically lose their entire investment on that trade.⁴ This “all-or-nothing” nature contributes to their high-risk profile. Furthermore, the payout structure is often designed such that the potential loss on an incorrect prediction significantly outweighs the potential gain on a correct one. This means that even with a 50/50 chance of being right on any given trade, the expected return for the trader is often negative over time, leading to a net loss.⁴

Compounding these inherent product risks is the prevalence of fraud within the online binary options industry. Both the SEC and CFTC have reported receiving numerous complaints related to fraudulent internet-based binary options platforms.⁴ These complaints highlight several recurring types of misconduct:

• Refusal to Credit Accounts or Reimburse Funds: A common complaint involves platforms readily accepting customer deposits but subsequently refusing or ignoring withdrawal requests. Brokers may cancel requests, become unresponsive to calls and emails, or invent spurious reasons (like the need to pay unexpected fees or taxes, as alleged in the PrimeXOptions case ⁸) to avoid returning client money.⁴
• Identity Theft: Some fraudulent platforms collect excessive personal information, such as copies of credit cards and driver’s licenses, potentially for illicit purposes beyond account verification.⁴ Investors are explicitly warned not to provide such sensitive data if requested in this manner.⁴
• Software Manipulation: Allegations persist that certain platforms manipulate their trading software to ensure customer trades result in losses, thereby benefiting the platform.⁴
• Misrepresentation of Profit and Risk: Fraudulent operators often lure customers by overstating potential returns, advertising unrealistic success rates (e.g., “95% win rate!”), or even promising guaranteed profits – a major red flag, as genuine market investments always carry risk.⁴ They simultaneously downplay the substantial likelihood of losing the invested capital.⁴
• Aggressive Sales Tactics and Upselling: Brokers, particularly those from unregulated entities, may employ high-pressure tactics to encourage initial and subsequent deposits.⁴ They might push clients towards “VIP” accounts or signal services with exaggerated claims of success ⁵, often targeting individuals identified through social media or messaging apps.⁸
• Phony Websites and Impersonation: Sophisticated scams can involve creating professional-looking websites that mimic legitimate brokers or even regulatory agencies to gain trust.¹⁰ Some entities falsely claim registration or licensing they do not possess.¹³ This underscores the importance of independently verifying a broker’s credentials through official regulatory databases.⁵
• Advance Fee Schemes: As exemplified by the DFPI alert concerning PrimeXOptions ⁸, this involves demanding payments for fabricated taxes, brokerage fees, or other charges as a prerequisite for withdrawing supposed profits or even the initial deposit.⁵

The specific warnings issued against 1PrimeOptions and its associates ², indicating unauthorized operation, align closely with these widely reported fraudulent tactics. The lack of regulation creates the conditions for such abuses, and the allegations against the similarly named PrimeXOptions ⁸ directly mirror the withdrawal refusal and advance fee tactics described in general regulatory alerts.⁴ This convergence strongly suggests that the risks associated with 1PrimeOptions are not merely theoretical possibilities stemming from its unregulated status; rather, they reflect the documented reality of fraudulent schemes prevalent in the binary options sector. The entity appears to fit the profile of operations that regulators actively warn the public about.

6. Overall Assessment of 1PrimeOptions

Synthesizing the findings from the available information leads to a deeply concerning assessment of 1PrimeOptions. The analysis reveals a confluence of critical red flags that strongly indicate the entity is an illegitimate, unauthorized, and potentially fraudulent operation posing extreme risks to investors.

First, there is a fundamental lack of transparency. The inability to gather basic information about the broker’s services, corporate structure, location, or leadership team directly from its associated website ⁷ prevents any meaningful due diligence and is characteristic of entities seeking to evade scrutiny.

Second, and most critically, there is no evidence that 1PrimeOptions is registered or authorized by any reputable financial regulatory authority mentioned in the research materials.¹ As established, this absence of regulation removes essential investor protections related to fund security, fair dealing, and dispute resolution, and is a hallmark of potentially fraudulent operations.¹

Third, direct warnings have been issued by financial regulators in Spain (CNMV) ² and Portugal (CMVM, cited by Belgium’s FSMA) ³, explicitly naming https://1primeoptions.com/ and linking it to Global Options Ltd as unauthorized entities. Such official warnings are serious indictments of an entity’s legitimacy.

Fourth, the association with Global Options Ltd ² and the subsequent warnings against the similarly named “Global Option Trading” ¹⁵ suggest a pattern of operation and potential evasion tactics, further undermining any claim to legitimacy. The serious fraud allegations against the similarly named PrimeXOptions ⁸ add another layer of concern, highlighting the risks associated with entities using this type of branding in the financial services space.

Fifth, the operational context – the high-risk binary options market – is known to be rife with fraud.⁴ The characteristics and warnings associated with 1PrimeOptions align closely with the common fraudulent tactics identified by regulators, such as operating without authorization and potential issues related to fund withdrawals and misrepresentation.⁴

While any single one of these factors would be cause for concern, their combination creates an overwhelming case against 1PrimeOptions. The lack of transparency prevents verification; the absence of regulation removes safeguards; the direct regulatory warnings provide official censure; the association with other flagged entities suggests a persistent pattern; and the alignment with known fraud tactics indicates likely intent. The cumulative weight of this evidence makes it highly improbable that 1PrimeOptions is a legitimate business facing minor compliance issues. Instead, the evidence consistently points towards an operation deliberately structured to function outside legal and regulatory frameworks, likely with the intention of defrauding investors.

Consequently, the risk level associated with any engagement with 1PrimeOptions must be assessed as extremely high. There is a significant probability of losing any invested funds, potential exposure to identity theft ⁴, and virtually no realistic prospect of recovering losses or seeking recourse through official channels due to the broker’s unregulated and unauthorized status.¹

7. Recommendations for Investors

Based on the comprehensive analysis of the available information and the significant risks identified, the following recommendations are strongly advised for investors encountering 1PrimeOptions or similar entities:

• Avoid All Engagement: Investors should strictly avoid depositing any funds, providing personal or financial information, or engaging in any transactions with 1PrimeOptions, Global Options Ltd, PrimeXOptions, Global Option Trading, or any individual or website claiming affiliation with these entities. The evidence overwhelmingly points to these being high-risk, unauthorized operations.¹
• Prioritize Regulatory Verification: Before investing with any broker or trading platform, it is absolutely critical to independently verify its registration and authorization status with the relevant financial regulatory body in the investor’s jurisdiction or the jurisdiction where the broker claims to be regulated. Resources include official regulator websites and databases like the SEC’s EDGAR system, the CFTC’s RED List ⁶, the National Futures Association’s (NFA) BASIC system ¹⁰, FINRA’s BrokerCheck ⁵, the FCA’s Financial Services Register ¹⁴, ASIC’s registers, FINMA’s authorized list ¹², and lists maintained by other national regulators.¹⁰ Do not rely solely on claims made on the broker’s own website.¹⁰
• Recognize Warning Signs (Red Flags): Investors should be highly vigilant for common red flags associated with investment scams. These include, but are not limited to: promises of unrealistically high or guaranteed returns ⁵; high-pressure sales tactics urging immediate deposits ⁴; lack of transparency regarding the company’s legal status, address, and management ⁵; difficulties or delays in processing withdrawals, or demands for additional fees before withdrawal ⁴; requests for sensitive personal data beyond standard verification needs ⁴; operation from offshore jurisdictions with notoriously weak financial oversight ⁵; and unsolicited contact via social media, email, or phone.⁵
• Exercise Extreme Caution with Binary Options: Investors should be aware of the inherent high risks and often unfavorable payout structures associated with binary options trading itself.¹ Many reputable regulators have significantly restricted or banned the sale of binary options to retail investors due to these risks (implied by measures like leverage limits and bonus bans ¹). Consider less speculative investment alternatives.
• Report Suspicious Activities: Individuals who believe they have been targeted or victimized by a fraudulent broker or investment scam should report the activity immediately. Reports should be filed with relevant national financial regulators (e.g., SEC, CFTC, FCA, ASIC, DFPI, CNMV, etc.) ⁴ and potentially local law enforcement. If funds have already been transferred, contact the bank or payment provider used for the transaction without delay to report the fraud and explore possibilities for recalling the funds.⁵
• Conduct Thorough Due Diligence: Always perform comprehensive, independent research before committing funds. Look beyond the broker’s marketing materials and website. Consult independent sources, check regulatory warning lists ², and be critical of overly positive reviews, especially those hosted by the broker itself.⁵ Remember that trading with unregulated entities offers little to no protection if things go wrong.¹

Works cited

1. Forex Regulation – ESMA vs ASIC vs FCA vs CySec vs VFS vs IFSC – MoneyHub NZ, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.moneyhub.co.nz/forex-regulation.html
2. Engine for Warned Companies – CNMV, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.cnmv.es/portal/resultadobusqueda?tipo=1&nombre=&page=118&lang=en&sortExpression=Fecha&sortDirection=0
3. ARCHIEF 2021 – Waarschuwingen van buitenlandse autoriteiten, lid van ESMA-Pol | FSMA, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.fsma.be/nl/archief-2021-waarschuwingen-van-buitenlandse-autoriteiten-lid-van-esma-pol
4. Investor Alert: Binary options and Fraud – SEC.gov, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/ia_binary.pdf
5. Most Common Options Trading Scams and How to Avoid Them – OptionsTrading.org, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.optionstrading.org/blog/options-trading-scams-and-how-to-avoid/
6. CFTC Charges Two Binary Options Firms with Fraud, Illegal Off-Exchange Activity, and Operating in an Unregistered Capacity, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/7341-16
7. 1primeoptions.com, accessed April 24, 2025, https://1primeoptions.com/
8. Cryptocurrency broker primeXoptions.com appears to be engaged in fraud against California consumers. – DFPI, accessed April 24, 2025, https://dfpi.ca.gov/alert/cryptocurrency-broker-primexoptions-com-appears-to-be-engaged-in-fraud-against-california-consumers/
9. PrimeX Options – Your Trusted Broker, accessed April 24, 2025, https://primexoptions.com/
10. Fraud Advisory: Phony Futures and Options Websites, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/fraudadv_phonywebsites.html
11. Regulators – Tradefora, accessed April 24, 2025, https://tradefora.com/regulators/
12. Warning list | FINMA, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.finma.ch/en/finma-public/warning-list/
13. Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE) – SEC.gov, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/public-alerts-unregistered-soliciting-entities
14. Your Options Ltd | FCA, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/warnings/your-options-ltd
15. Scam ALERT: Global Option Trading Added to Warning List – Financial Commission, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.financialcommission.org/2021/09/03/scam-alert-global-option-trading-added-to-warning-list/
16. Investor warning – Global Option Trading Co Ltd – Moneysmart, accessed April 24, 2025, https://moneysmart.gov.au/check-and-report-scams/investor-alert-list#!-450
17. Warnings and alerts | Financial Markets Authority, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.fma.govt.nz/library/warnings-and-alerts/
18. h, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.afm.nl/en/consumenten/waarschuwingen/bekijk-de-waarschuwingen/h