Are There Real Binary Options Account Manager

I. Executive Summary

This report addresses the question of whether legitimate, regulated “binary options account managers” exist. The core finding is definitive: such services, as commonly advertised—promising high, guaranteed returns through managed trading of binary options—do not exist within the regulated financial industry. The term “binary options account manager” is overwhelmingly associated with fraudulent schemes operating outside established regulatory frameworks, primarily on unregulated online platforms.

Binary options themselves are inherently high-risk, speculative instruments, often compared to gambling rather than investing. Their “all-or-nothing” payout structure over very short timeframes makes consistent profitability extremely difficult.¹ Compounding this risk is the alarming prevalence of fraud associated with the binary options market. Numerous complaints reported to global financial regulators detail issues such as the refusal to credit customer accounts or process withdrawals, identity theft, and the manipulation of trading software to generate losses for clients.³

Reflecting these significant investor protection concerns, financial regulators worldwide—including the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)—have banned or severely restricted the sale of binary options to retail investors.⁵ While binary options trading is permitted in the United States, it is legal only on exchanges regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).⁸ The vast majority of online binary options trading occurs on unregulated platforms, many based offshore, which are the primary source of fraud.⁴

Individuals and platforms offering “binary options account management” services typically operate within this unregulated space, making unrealistic promises and employing tactics characteristic of investment fraud. Therefore, extreme caution and skepticism are warranted regarding any such offering. Investors are strongly advised against engaging with these services and should instead focus on verifying the regulatory status of any financial service provider and utilizing established, regulated alternatives for investment management.

related posts : Best Binary Options Brokers (in 2025)

II. Binary Options Explained: High Risk, Low Transparency

A. Definition and Mechanics

Binary options are a type of derivative financial instrument where the payoff depends entirely on the outcome of a simple yes/no proposition.¹⁰ This proposition typically relates to whether the price of an underlying asset—such as a stock, currency pair (forex), commodity, or market index—will be above or below a specific price (the strike price) at a predetermined expiration time.¹ These contracts are often very short-term, with expirations ranging from minutes to hours or days.²

The defining characteristic is the “binary” or “all-or-nothing” payout structure.³ If the trader’s prediction about the asset’s price direction relative to the strike price at expiry is correct (the option expires “in the money”), they receive a predetermined fixed payout, often expressed as a percentage of the initial investment (e.g., 70-90%).¹ If the prediction is incorrect (the option expires “out of the money”), the trader loses their entire invested amount.¹ The price of a binary option contract on regulated US exchanges typically ranges between $0 and $100, reflecting the market’s perceived probability of the event occurring, with the final settlement being either $0 or $100.¹⁰

This structure differs significantly from traditional “vanilla” options. While vanilla options also derive value from an underlying asset, they grant the holder the right (but not the obligation) to buy or sell the underlying asset at the strike price, potentially leading to ownership.¹⁰ Their profit and loss potential can vary significantly depending on how much the underlying asset’s price moves. Binary options, conversely, do not offer any potential ownership of the underlying asset; they are purely speculative wagers on price movement.¹⁰ Both the potential profit and the potential loss are capped and known at the outset of the trade.⁸

B. Inherent Risks and Gambling Comparisons

The fundamental nature of binary options makes them highly speculative. Predicting short-term price movements accurately and consistently, especially over durations as short as minutes, is exceptionally difficult, even for seasoned financial professionals.² The structure, where a losing bet results in a 100% loss of the invested capital, combined with the fact that the payout on a winning bet is typically less than 100% of the investment, means that a trader must be correct significantly more often than not just to break even, let alone profit.² This payout structure gives the broker or platform a statistical edge over the trader.

Furthermore, the binary options market operates as a zero-sum game: for every dollar won by a trader, another trader (or the platform itself, acting as counterparty) must lose a dollar.¹⁴ These characteristics—high risk, reliance on short-term predictions, fixed odds favoring the house, and an all-or-nothing outcome—have led many regulators and financial experts to compare binary options trading more closely to gambling than to traditional investing.¹

The apparent simplicity of the “yes/no” proposition can be deceptive.⁸ While easy to grasp superficially, understanding the underlying probabilities, the impact of volatility, and the mechanisms determining the strike price and payout requires significant sophistication.¹ This combination of perceived simplicity and underlying complexity, coupled with the high-risk, gambling-like nature, creates an environment ripe for exploitation, particularly of inexperienced investors.¹⁷

C. The Problematic Regulatory Landscape

Concerns over significant investor harm have led to a global regulatory crackdown on binary options. Major regulatory bodies in key markets have taken decisive action:

• Europe (ESMA): Banned the marketing, distribution, and sale of binary options to retail clients across the European Union, citing complexity, lack of transparency, and significant investor losses.⁶
• United Kingdom (FCA): Prohibited firms from selling binary options to retail consumers, classifying them as highly speculative.⁵ Initially regulated as gambling, the FCA took over and subsequently banned them as financial products for retail investors.
• Australia (ASIC): Banned the issue and distribution of binary options to retail clients, deeming them high-risk and unpredictable investments likely to result in losses.⁶
• Israel: Banned the entire industry from operating, following investigations revealing widespread fraud targeting international clients.⁶

In the United States, the situation is nuanced. Binary options are legally permitted only when traded on exchanges specifically designated and regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), such as Nadex (North American Derivatives Exchange) or as event futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME).² These regulated exchanges offer standardized contracts and operate under CFTC oversight, providing a degree of transparency and counterparty risk mitigation.⁹

However, this regulated segment represents only a small fraction of the global binary options market.³ The vast majority of binary options trading occurs through internet-based platforms that are not registered or compliant with U.S. regulations, often operating offshore.³ These unregulated platforms are the source of numerous fraud complaints received by the CFTC and SEC.³ The existence of a small, legitimate US market can inadvertently lend a veneer of credibility that fraudulent offshore operators exploit. Scammers leverage the concept of regulated binary options trading to confuse investors and lure them onto unsafe platforms, despite explicit warnings from regulators to stick with CFTC-registered exchanges.⁴ The FBI specifically notes this distinction between regulated U.S. platforms and the largely fraudulent international online market.⁴

D. Implications for Investors

The inherent structure of binary options—their all-or-nothing nature, extremely short durations, and often opaque pricing mechanisms—makes them fundamentally different from traditional investments like stocks or bonds. This structure renders them highly susceptible to manipulation and misrepresentation, particularly when offered through unregulated channels. The superficial simplicity attracts novice investors, while the underlying mechanics can be complex and stacked against them, creating fertile ground for fraudulent activities, as evidenced by the numerous warnings from global financial watchdogs.³ The very design of the product facilitates practices that disadvantage the retail client.

III. The Legitimate Role of Account and Investment Managers in Finance

Understanding the functions of legitimate financial professionals is crucial to recognizing the illegitimacy of the “binary options account manager” offering. In regulated financial markets, various roles exist to serve client needs, each with specific responsibilities, qualifications, and regulatory obligations.

A. Defining Financial Account Management Roles

• Account Manager (General/Brokerage/Client Service): This role primarily focuses on maintaining relationships with existing clients of a firm (which could be a bank, insurance brokerage, technology company, etc.). Responsibilities include ensuring client satisfaction, managing the day-to-day operational aspects of accounts, addressing client inquiries and concerns, and potentially identifying opportunities for cross-selling or upselling additional products or services offered by the firm.²⁹ They often act as the main point of contact after an initial sale is made.³² In a brokerage context, they might assist with service requests, provide account information, or process client-directed transactions, but they typically do not make investment decisions for the client unless specifically licensed and operating under a formal managed account agreement.³⁰
• Account Executive: Similar to an account manager, but often with a greater emphasis on sales, including acquiring new clients and negotiating contracts or service agreements.²⁹
• Investment Manager / Portfolio Manager / Money Manager: These terms refer to professionals or firms entrusted with managing investment portfolios on behalf of individuals or institutions. Their core function involves developing and implementing investment strategies, selecting appropriate securities (like stocks, bonds, mutual funds), monitoring portfolio performance, and making ongoing buy and sell decisions, often on a discretionary basis (meaning they can trade without needing client approval for each transaction).³³ They typically charge fees based on a percentage of assets under management (AUM) and operate under a fiduciary duty to act in their clients’ best interests.³⁵ Major investment management firms include BlackRock, Vanguard, Morgan Stanley Investment Management, and Nuveen.³⁸
• Financial Advisor / Investment Adviser Representative: These professionals provide investment advice tailored to their clients’ financial situations, goals, and risk tolerance.³⁶ Registered Investment Advisers (RIAs) and their representatives (IARs) are regulated by the SEC or state authorities and have a fiduciary duty.⁴³ Broker-dealer representatives (often called stockbrokers or financial advisors) are regulated by FINRA and the SEC and must adhere to standards like Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI), requiring recommendations to be in the client’s best interest, and previously, a suitability standard.⁴²
• Financial Planner: This role often involves providing broader financial planning services beyond just investments, potentially including budgeting, insurance analysis, retirement planning, tax strategies, and estate planning.³⁷ Regulation depends on the specific services offered; if they provide investment advice or sell securities, they must hold the appropriate licenses and registrations (e.g., as an RIA or broker-dealer representative).⁴⁸ Some may hold certifications like Certified Financial Planner (CFP®).³⁶

B. Key Characteristics of Legitimate Management

Legitimate financial and investment management services share several core characteristics rooted in regulation and professional standards:

• Regulation and Licensing: Professionals and firms operate within established legal and regulatory frameworks. They must register with appropriate authorities (e.g., SEC, CFTC, FINRA, state regulators) and individuals must hold necessary licenses (e.g., Series 7, Series 65, Series 66) to conduct business.³⁵
• Duty of Care: Investment advisers operate under a fiduciary standard, legally obligated to place their clients’ interests above their own.³⁵ Broker-dealers have obligations of fair dealing and making recommendations that are in the client’s best interest.⁴²
• Transparency: Clients receive clear disclosures regarding the services provided, the fees charged (often based on AUM for ongoing management, or commissions per trade in brokerage accounts), potential conflicts of interest, and the investment strategies employed.³⁵
• Professional Qualifications: Managers and advisors often possess relevant academic backgrounds (e.g., finance, economics, accounting) and may hold professional designations such as Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) or Certified Financial Planner (CFP®), which require rigorous examination, experience, and adherence to ethical codes.³⁵
• Focus on Regulated Assets: Investment portfolios typically consist of well-understood, regulated securities like stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and ETFs, or potentially alternative investments within a regulated structure. They generally do not involve managing highly speculative, unregulated products like offshore binary options on behalf of retail clients.³⁵

C. Implications for Investors

The term “account manager” within the legitimate financial industry signifies roles centered on client service, relationship management, or regulated portfolio management under strict oversight.²⁹ This contrasts sharply with how the term is deployed in the context of binary options, where it typically refers to individuals offering unsupervised, high-risk trading, often on unregulated platforms and promising unrealistic returns.²¹ This appropriation of a legitimate title appears designed to mislead investors and create a false sense of security.

Furthermore, the robust regulatory structure, encompassing licensing, supervision, and defined duties of care (fiduciary or best interest/suitability), forms the bedrock of investor protection in legitimate investment management.³⁵ The conspicuous absence of this framework in the typical “binary options account manager” scenario is a critical deficiency. This lack of oversight, registration, and accountability directly correlates with the high incidence of fraud and abuse reported by regulators and victims in the binary options space.³

IV. Deconstructing the “Binary Options Account Manager”

Having established the nature of binary options and the roles of legitimate financial managers, it is possible to analyze the specific offering of a “binary options account manager.”

A. Analyzing the Offering

Services advertised under the banner of “binary options account manager” are frequently found on freelance platforms, forums, social media, or promoted through unsolicited emails and calls.²¹ Common elements of these offerings include:

• Managing Binary Options Accounts: Taking control of a client’s trading account on a binary options platform.²¹
• Providing Trading Strategies: Claiming to possess winning strategies or algorithms.⁵⁴
• Executing Trades: Actively placing binary options trades on the client’s behalf.²⁷
• Promising High/Guaranteed Returns: Often making explicit claims of extraordinarily high, rapid, and sometimes guaranteed profits (e.g., turning $100 into $1400 daily, 75-85% wins per hour).²⁴
• Profit Splitting: Offering to manage the account in exchange for a share (e.g., 50%) of the generated profits.⁵⁵

Crucially, these services are almost invariably linked to unregulated binary options brokers and platforms, many of which operate offshore and have reputations marred by complaints of fraud.⁵ A fundamental logical inconsistency arises: if an individual truly possessed a strategy capable of generating the consistently high returns claimed (e.g., 70%+ daily), it is highly improbable they would need to manage small retail accounts for a profit split; they could generate substantial wealth trading their own capital.⁵⁵

B. Contrasting with Legitimate Roles

The “binary options account manager” profile stands in stark contrast to legitimate financial professionals:

• Regulation: Legitimate managers and advisors are registered and operate within regulatory frameworks; these individuals typically are not.⁴
• Asset Focus: Legitimate managers handle portfolios of regulated assets (stocks, bonds, etc.); these individuals focus on highly speculative, often unregulated binary options.
• Credentials: Legitimate professionals often have verifiable qualifications (degrees, certifications); these individuals usually do not.
• Duty of Care: Legitimate advisors/managers have defined duties (fiduciary, best interest); these individuals operate without such obligations and often against the client’s interest.
• Account Control: On regulated platforms like Nadex, granting control of one’s account to another person is explicitly prohibited by the terms of service.⁶⁷ Engaging someone to trade an account like this violates platform rules.
• Registration Requirements: In the US, individuals or entities managing commodity interests (which can include certain forex or commodity-based binary options) on behalf of others generally must register with the CFTC as a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA) or Commodity Pool Operator (CPO), unless exempt.⁵⁰ Those offering “binary options account management” almost never hold such registrations.

C. Red Flags Associated with the Offering

Investors should be alert to numerous red flags commonly associated with “binary options account manager” solicitations:

• Unrealistic Return Promises: Guarantees of high, fast, or risk-free profits are the most prominent warning sign.⁵ Legitimate investments always involve risk.
• Association with Unregulated Platforms: The service relies on trading through unregulated, often offshore, binary options brokers.³
• Lack of Verifiable Credentials or Regulation: The “manager” cannot provide proof of registration with recognized financial regulators (SEC, CFTC, FINRA, FCA, ASIC, etc.).⁴
• Pressure Tactics: Urgency to deposit funds, claims of limited-time opportunities, or pressure to invest more after seeing initial (often fake) profits.²¹
• Withdrawal Difficulties: Reports of inability to withdraw funds, excessive delays, demands for additional payments (taxes, fees) before withdrawal, or account freezing are common complaints.³
• Requests for Account Control: Asking for login credentials or remote access to trading accounts.

D. Implications for Investors

The evidence strongly suggests that the “binary options account manager” is not a recognized or legitimate profession within the financial services industry. Instead, it serves as a marketing guise, frequently employed as part of fraudulent schemes designed to lure unsuspecting investors.²¹ This tactic deliberately leverages the credibility associated with legitimate financial titles like “account manager” or “investment manager” to build unwarranted trust and deceive potential victims.²²

Furthermore, the core proposition—entrusting funds to an often anonymous individual for the purpose of trading inherently high-risk, gambling-like products with the promise of guaranteed high profits—is fundamentally flawed.⁵⁵ It directly contradicts the principles of sound investment management, which emphasize realistic returns, risk assessment, diversification, and regulatory compliance. This inherent contradiction between the nature of the product and the promises made should serve as an immediate and strong warning signal of potential fraud.⁵

V. A Magnet for Fraud: Regulatory Actions and Warnings

The association between binary options and fraud is not merely anecdotal; it is extensively documented through warnings, enforcement actions, and policy decisions by financial regulators across the globe.

A. Overview of Global Regulatory Stance

As previously noted, major financial centers including the European Union, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Israel have implemented outright bans or severe restrictions on the sale of binary options to retail investors, citing unacceptable risks and widespread investor harm.⁵ In the US, the limited legality on regulated exchanges stands in stark contrast to the vast, problematic offshore market.²

B. Specific Regulator Warnings (CFTC & SEC – USA)

The primary US regulators overseeing derivatives and securities markets have issued strong warnings:

• Joint Alerts: The CFTC and SEC have jointly alerted investors about the high prevalence of fraud associated with internet-based binary options trading platforms.³
• Common Fraud Tactics: These alerts specifically list common complaints, including platforms refusing to credit customer accounts or reimburse funds, identity theft through demands for excessive personal data, and manipulation of trading software to generate losing trades.³
• Scale of Fraud: The FBI is actively investigating binary options scams originating worldwide and estimates annual global losses in the billions of dollars.⁴
• Enforcement Actions: The CFTC has brought enforcement actions against individuals and companies for fraudulent solicitation and operation of commodity pools involving binary options trading, often involving misappropriation of funds and Ponzi-like payments. These cases explicitly mention the fraudulent use of “managed accounts” and failure to register as required CTAs or CPOs.⁶⁶
• Platform & Manager Warnings: The CFTC maintains a Registration Deficient (RED) List identifying unregistered foreign entities soliciting US residents, often for binary options.⁴ Nadex, a regulated US exchange, has issued specific warnings about entities like “Peak Nadex Trader” soliciting clients by offering prohibited “Nadex managed account services”.⁶⁷ The CFTC also warns against individuals impersonating CFTC employees to demand fake taxes or fees for fund withdrawal.⁷⁰
• Advance Fee Fraud: The SEC warns about advance fee fraud, where victims are asked to pay fees (e.g., for “software upgrades” or fake taxes) to access their funds or supposed profits, a tactic reported in connection with binary options platforms.⁶³

C. Specific Regulator Warnings (FCA – UK)

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority has been similarly active:

• Retail Ban: The FCA banned the sale, marketing, and distribution of binary options to retail consumers in 2019.⁵
• Managed Account Scams: The FCA explicitly warns consumers about unauthorized forex and binary options firms promising very high returns via “managed accounts” where the firm supposedly trades on the investor’s behalf.⁵
• Fraud Pattern: They describe a common scam pattern: initial small returns are paid out to build trust and encourage larger investments, after which returns cease, accounts are suspended, and the firm becomes unreachable.⁵
• Police Warnings: Action Fraud, the UK’s national fraud reporting center, has echoed these warnings, highlighting intelligence from convicted fraudsters who identified binary options involving “managed accounts” traded by supposed “experts” as a major investment scam vector.⁵⁶
• Ombudsman Cases: Decisions from the UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service detail complaints from victims of binary options scams and address the responsibilities of banks in detecting and warning customers about potentially fraudulent transactions involving unregulated binary options dealers.⁶⁸

D. Specific Regulator Warnings (ASIC – Australia)

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has also taken significant action:

• Retail Ban: ASIC banned the issuance and distribution of binary options to retail clients effective May 2021.⁶
• Enforcement Against Brokers: ASIC has pursued legal action against AFS licensees involved in binary options and CFDs, such as Forex CT, alleging unconscionable conduct, misleading statements, and importantly, conflicted remuneration structures. These structures incentivized “account managers” based on the amount of client deposits (‘net deposits’) rather than client profitability, creating a clear conflict of interest.⁷
• Banning Individuals: ASIC has banned individuals, including former account managers at firms like Forex CT, from providing financial services. Reasons cited include making misleading statements about profitability and risk, using high-pressure sales tactics, engaging in unconscionable conduct by encouraging deposits while hindering withdrawals, and providing inappropriate advice.²⁴
• Parliamentary Recognition: The issue of binary options fraud and the role of account managers in pressuring clients has been acknowledged in Australian parliamentary proceedings.²⁶

E. Specific Regulator Warnings (ESMA – Europe & Others)

Beyond the UK, EU-wide and other national regulators have issued warnings:

• ESMA Concerns: The European Securities and Markets Authority’s ban was driven by concerns about product complexity, lack of transparency, excessive leverage, the disparity between expected return and risk of loss, and aggressive marketing practices, including inappropriate benefits offered to clients.⁶
• National Regulators: Authorities in Germany (BaFin), Austria (FMA), Cyprus (CySEC), and New Zealand (FMA) have also issued warnings about the high risks, speculative nature, and potential for fraud associated with binary options and related products like CFDs, often highlighting significant retail client losses.⁶⁵

F. Table: Summary of Key Regulatory Warnings on Binary Options Fraud & Account Management

Regulator(s)	Key Warning/Action	Relevance to “Account Managers” / Managed Accounts	Snippet(s)
CFTC / SEC (USA)	Joint alerts on widespread fraud via internet platforms; common complaints: fund withholding, ID theft, software manipulation.	Fraudulent solicitation for managed pools/accounts; failure to register as CTA/CPO; specific warnings against prohibited “managed account services” on regulated platforms.	3
FBI (USA)	Investigating global scams; estimates $10 billion annual losses worldwide.	Implies significant scale of fraud, often involving solicitation tactics like managed services.	4
FCA (UK)	Ban on retail binary options; warnings on unauthorized firms promising high returns via forex/binary options trading.	Explicitly warns scams often involve “managed accounts” where the firm trades on the client’s behalf, showing fake initial profits.	5
Action Fraud (UK Police)	Reports binary options as a common investment scam vector, based on fraudster intelligence.	Highlights scams involving “managed accounts” offered by supposed “experts.”	56
ASIC (Australia)	Ban on retail binary options; legal action against firms for unconscionable conduct, misleading statements.	Actions target conflicted remuneration where “account managers” incentivized by client deposits; individuals banned for misleading clients & hindering withdrawals.	6
ESMA (EU)	Ban on retail binary options across EU due to significant investor protection concerns (complexity, risk, marketing).	Concerns include aggressive marketing and inappropriate benefits offered to clients, potentially encompassing managed service promises.	6
Other National Regulators (BaFin, FMA, CySEC, FMA NZ)	Warnings about high risks, complexity, speculation, and significant investor losses.	Reinforces the overall negative view of the product often associated with fraudulent management offers.	65

G. Implications for Investors

The consistency and severity of these global regulatory warnings paint a clear picture. Binary options fraud, frequently facilitated by individuals posing as “account managers” or “expert traders,” is a recognized and pervasive international problem, not merely a series of isolated incidents or unlucky investments.⁴ The sheer volume of concordant warnings from independent authorities across multiple continents underscores the systemic risks embedded within the largely unregulated online binary options ecosystem.

Furthermore, while regulators strive to protect investors, their actions often lag behind the rapid proliferation of online scams, particularly those operating from offshore jurisdictions with limited oversight.⁴ Bans implemented in regulated markets may inadvertently displace fraudulent activities, pushing operators to target investors in regions with less stringent regulations or to employ more covert methods. This reality highlights the critical importance of individual investor vigilance and thorough due diligence, as regulatory protection alone cannot eliminate the threat posed by determined fraudsters operating across borders.

VI. Identifying and Avoiding Binary Options Scams

Given the high risk of fraud, investors must be equipped to identify the common tactics used by illegitimate binary options operators and understand the due diligence steps necessary for protection.

A. Common Tactics of Fraudulent Operators

Scammers employ a range of deceptive strategies:

• Aggressive and Unsolicited Marketing: Contacting potential victims out of the blue via cold calls, emails, or social media messages, often promising unrealistic returns and pressuring for quick investment decisions.²¹ They may also use fake celebrity endorsements or testimonials to appear legitimate.⁶
• Promises of Unrealistic Profits: Guaranteeing high, rapid, or risk-free returns is a classic hallmark of investment fraud. Claims of proprietary “secret” trading systems or algorithms are common.⁵
• The “Managed Account” Lure: Offering to have an “expert trader” or “account manager” trade the account on the client’s behalf, promising superior results.²¹
• Fake Initial Profits and Withdrawal Obstacles: Manipulating the online platform to show fictitious early gains, thereby encouraging the victim to deposit more money. When the victim attempts to withdraw funds, they face refusals, endless delays, demands for spurious taxes or fees, or complete unresponsiveness from the company.³ Complex bonus terms with unattainable trading volume requirements may also be used to lock funds.⁵⁶
• Software Manipulation: Rigging the trading platform’s software to distort prices or payouts, ensuring that client trades result in losses.³
• Identity Theft: Requesting copies of sensitive personal documents like credit cards, driver’s licenses, or passports under the guise of account verification, then potentially using this information for identity theft.³
• Illegitimate Platforms: Operating through websites that are either entirely fake or “clone firms” that mimic the details of legitimate, regulated financial institutions to deceive investors.⁴ Hundreds of websites may use the same template text.⁶³
• Reload Scams: Targeting previous victims again, sometimes posing as recovery agents or government officials, offering to help retrieve lost funds for an upfront fee.²⁸

B. Due Diligence Steps for Investors

To avoid falling victim, investors should practice rigorous due diligence:

• Verify Registration and Licensing: This is the most critical step. Before sending any funds or personal information, independently verify whether the broker, platform, or individual offering services is registered with the relevant financial regulatory authority in their stated jurisdiction and in the investor’s jurisdiction. Use official regulator websites and tools like FINRA BrokerCheck (USA), SEC IAPD (USA), CFTC NFA BASIC Search (USA), FCA Financial Services Register (UK), ASIC Connect (Australia), and similar databases provided by national regulators.⁴ Check the CFTC’s RED List for known unregistered foreign entities targeting US residents.⁴
• Maintain Healthy Skepticism: Treat promises of guaranteed high returns, “risk-free” investments, or secret winning formulas with extreme skepticism. Remember the adage: if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.²¹
• Reject Unsolicited Offers: Be inherently wary of investment opportunities presented through cold calls, unsolicited emails, or unexpected social media messages.²² Legitimate firms rarely use such high-pressure tactics.
• Conduct Independent Research: Look beyond the company’s own website. Search for independent reviews, forum discussions, and news articles about the firm and its principals. Be aware that positive reviews and testimonials can be faked.²¹ Check domain registration details (using Whois services) to see when a website was created and who owns it, which can reveal newly created or anonymously registered sites.²¹ Search for regulatory warnings related to the entity.²¹
• Understand the Investment: Never invest in a product or service without fully understanding how it works, the associated risks, and the fee structure.¹⁴ Recognize the inherently high-risk nature of binary options.
• Guard Personal Information: Do not provide copies of credit cards, passports, utility bills, or other highly sensitive personal data unless dealing with a thoroughly vetted and confirmed legitimate financial institution for standard account opening procedures.⁴

C. Implications for Investors

The fraudulent tactics employed in binary options scams often mirror those used in other investment frauds. However, they find particular traction in this area due to the product’s superficial simplicity and the allure of rapid returns, which can be especially tempting to inexperienced or financially vulnerable individuals.⁸ The promise of quick riches from seemingly simple “yes/no” bets makes the scam narrative more plausible to those unfamiliar with financial markets.⁵⁶

Furthermore, the operational structure of many binary options scams—often involving offshore entities, the use of cryptocurrencies for payments, layers of intermediaries, and anonymity—makes tracing funds and recovering losses exceptionally difficult for victims.⁴ Regulators frequently state their inability to assist in recovering funds from unlicensed, overseas operators.⁵ This underscores the critical importance of prevention through diligent verification and skepticism, as remediation after the fact is often impossible.

VII. Viable and Regulated Alternatives for Investment Management

Investors seeking professional assistance with managing their investments or looking for ways to invest have numerous legitimate, regulated alternatives to the fraudulent “binary options account manager” model. The appropriate choice depends on the investor’s goals, risk tolerance, capital, desired level of involvement, and need for personalized advice.

A. Self-Directed Brokerage Accounts

• Description: These accounts, offered by regulated brokerage firms (e.g., Fidelity, Charles Schwab, Interactive Brokers, JP Morgan Self-Directed Investing, Merrill Edge, Robinhood), allow investors to make their own investment decisions and execute trades directly.³³
• Features: Offer access to a wide range of regulated investments like stocks, bonds, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), and mutual funds. Many offer commission-free trading for stocks and ETFs.⁷⁸
• Pros: Maximum control and flexibility, potentially the lowest cost for execution, broad investment selection.³³
• Cons: Requires significant investor knowledge, time for research and management, and emotional discipline. No personalized advice is provided.³³
• Regulation: Firms are regulated by the SEC and FINRA in the US. Client assets held in brokerage accounts are typically protected by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) against brokerage failure (up to certain limits).⁴²

B. Registered Investment Advisers (RIAs) / Financial Advisors

• Description: Professionals or firms providing personalized investment advice and potentially ongoing portfolio management. RIAs operate under a fiduciary standard, legally obligated to act in the client’s best interest.³⁶ They can be independent or affiliated with large wealth management firms like Morgan Stanley or UBS.⁴⁰
• Features: Tailored strategies based on individual circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance. May offer comprehensive financial planning.⁴³
• Pros: Personalized, expert advice; potential for holistic financial planning; fiduciary duty (RIAs); ongoing relationship and guidance.³⁵
• Cons: Typically higher costs (fees often 1% or more of AUM); may require substantial minimum investment amounts; advice quality can vary; potential for human biases.³⁵
• Regulation: RIAs are regulated by the SEC (for larger firms) or state securities regulators. Investors can verify registration and disciplinary history via SEC’s IAPD website or FINRA’s BrokerCheck.⁴³

C. Managed Accounts (including Separately Managed Accounts – SMAs)

• Description: Professionally managed investment portfolios offered by banks, brokerage firms, or investment management companies (e.g., TIAA, BlackRock, Fidelity, Schwab, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch).⁵³ SMAs involve direct ownership of individual securities within the account, allowing for greater customization.⁵⁰
• Features: Tailored strategies based on client objectives; professional management; SMAs offer potential for tax optimization (e.g., tax-loss harvesting) and personalization (e.g., excluding specific stocks, aligning with values).⁵⁰
• Pros: Professional oversight; customization and personalization (especially SMAs); transparency of holdings (SMAs); access to potentially sophisticated strategies.³⁵
• Cons: Generally higher minimum investment requirements and fees compared to mutual funds or robo-advisors, although accessibility is increasing.³⁵
• Regulation: Offered by regulated financial institutions (banks, broker-dealers, RIAs) subject to oversight.⁴⁶

D. Robo-Advisors

• Description: Digital platforms (e.g., Betterment, Wealthfront, Fidelity Go, Schwab Intelligent Portfolios) that use algorithms to create and manage diversified investment portfolios, typically using low-cost ETFs, based on an investor’s answers to an online questionnaire about goals and risk tolerance.³³
• Features: Automated portfolio construction, diversification, automatic rebalancing, often include tax-loss harvesting features.⁸¹
• Pros: Low management fees (typically 0.25%-0.50% AUM); very low or no account minimums; easy to use and accessible; automated, disciplined investing approach removes emotion; good for beginners or passive investors.⁷⁸
• Cons: Limited personalization and investment choices (mostly ETFs); lack of human interaction and nuanced advice (though some offer hybrid models with access to human advisors); may not be suitable for complex financial situations; algorithms rely on historical data.⁷⁸
• Regulation: Typically operate as Registered Investment Advisers (RIAs) regulated by the SEC or state authorities.⁷⁸

E. Mutual Funds and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

• Description: Pooled investment vehicles that allow investors to buy shares representing ownership in a portfolio of underlying assets (stocks, bonds, etc.). Professionally managed, either actively (attempting to outperform a benchmark) or passively (tracking an index).³⁹
• Features: Provide instant diversification; available for nearly every asset class and investment strategy. ETFs trade on exchanges like stocks, offering intraday liquidity.⁹¹
• Pros: Easy diversification; professional management; accessibility and generally low investment minimums; high liquidity (ETFs); very low costs for passive index funds/ETFs.⁵³
• Cons: Lack of control over specific holdings; management fees (expense ratios) apply; mutual funds may generate taxable capital gains distributions; active funds may underperform.⁸⁶
• Regulation: Offered by registered investment companies and subject to regulations governing prospectuses, holdings disclosure, and operations.³⁹

F. Table: Comparison of Legitimate Investment Management Services

Service Type	Description	Typical Cost Structure	Minimum Investment	Level of Personalization	Investor Involvement	Regulation/Oversight	Key Pros	Key Cons
Self-Directed Brokerage	Investor makes all decisions and trades via a regulated broker.	Low (often $0 commission for stocks/ETFs).	Often $0.	None (by default).	High.	SEC, FINRA, SIPC (US).	Max control, flexibility, low cost, wide choice.	Requires knowledge, time, discipline; no advice.
RIA / Financial Advisor	Professional provides personalized advice & potentially manages portfolio; fiduciary duty (RIAs).	Higher (often 1%+ AUM fee, commissions, or flat fees).	Often high ($100k+).	High.	Medium to Low.	SEC or State Securities Regulators.	Personalized advice, holistic planning, expertise, fiduciary duty.	Higher cost, high minimums, potential bias.
Managed Account / SMA	Professional manages a tailored portfolio; SMAs offer direct security ownership & customization.	Moderate to High (AUM fees, potentially other fees).	Moderate to High.	High (especially SMAs).	Low.	Offered by regulated Banks, Brokers, RIAs.	Professional management, customization (tax, values), transparency (SMAs), institutional access.	Higher cost & minimums than funds/robos.
Robo-Advisor	Automated platform builds & manages diversified ETF portfolio based on algorithms & user input.	Low (typically 0.25%-0.50% AUM + underlying ETF fees).	Low to $0.	Limited to Moderate.	Very Low.	SEC or State (as RIAs).	Low cost, low minimums, easy access, automated diversification/rebalancing, removes emotion, tax features.	Limited flexibility/choices, lacks human nuance, may not suit complex needs, algorithmic limitations.
Mutual Fund / ETF	Pooled investments offering diversification; professionally managed (active or passive index tracking).	Low to Moderate (Expense Ratio; trading commissions for ETFs may apply).	Low to Moderate.	Low (fund level only).	Low (fund selection).	SEC (Investment Company Act).	Diversification, professional management, accessibility, liquidity (ETFs), very low cost (index funds/ETFs).	No control over holdings, fees apply, potential tax inefficiency (mutual funds).

G. Implications for Investors

The legitimate financial services marketplace provides a wide spectrum of regulated options, accommodating diverse investor needs, capital levels, and preferences for involvement.³³ This variety stands in stark contrast to the singular, high-risk, unregulated proposition typically offered by fraudulent binary options schemes. The existence of choices ranging from fully self-directed trading to fully delegated professional management within a regulated environment demonstrates a mature industry focused on serving clients with varying requirements, unlike the deceptive, one-size-fits-all promises of binary options scams.⁵⁵

While all legitimate investment services involve costs—whether commissions, advisory fees, or fund expense ratios—these charges are generally transparent and associated with clearly defined services provided under regulatory oversight.³⁵ This contrasts sharply with the “costs” incurred in binary options scams, which often manifest as hidden charges, manipulated trading losses, refusal to return principal, or outright theft, far exceeding any disclosed fees and representing a fundamental betrayal of trust rather than a fee for service.³ Understanding this difference between legitimate service costs and fraudulent extraction of funds is crucial for investor protection.

VIII. Conclusion and Recommendations for Investors

A. Definitive Answer

Based on extensive analysis of regulatory warnings, industry practices, and documented fraud cases, the conclusion is unequivocal: “Binary options account managers,” as typically advertised online and through unsolicited contacts, are not legitimate, regulated financial professionals. The services they purport to offer—managing binary options trades on behalf of clients for guaranteed high profits—are overwhelmingly associated with fraudulent schemes operating outside the bounds of financial regulation. Legitimate financial account managers and investment managers operate under strict regulatory oversight, adhere to defined duties of care, manage regulated assets, and do not promise unrealistic or guaranteed returns from highly speculative products.

B. Summary of Dangers

Engaging with purported binary options account managers or trading on unregulated binary options platforms exposes investors to severe risks, including:

• Inherent Product Risk: Binary options are highly speculative, short-term wagers with an unfavorable risk/reward structure, often compared to gambling.
• Prevalence of Fraud: The unregulated online binary options market is rife with fraudulent operators who employ deceptive tactics.
• Loss of Capital: Victims frequently lose their entire investment through manipulated trades, refusal of withdrawals, or platform disappearance.
• Identity Theft: Providing personal information to unregulated entities carries a significant risk of identity theft.
• Difficulty in Recourse: Recovering funds lost to offshore, unregulated entities is extremely difficult, often impossible.

C. Actionable Recommendations

Investors seeking to protect themselves should adhere to the following recommendations:

1. Avoid Unsolicited Offers and High-Return Promises: Immediately dismiss any unsolicited emails, calls, or social media messages offering binary options trading, management services, or guaranteeing high/quick profits. Treat such claims as major red flags.²¹
2. Verify Regulatory Status: Before engaging with any financial professional, platform, or investment provider, independently verify their registration and licensing status. Use official regulatory databases such as FINRA BrokerCheck, SEC IAPD, CFTC BASIC Search (in the US), or the equivalent registers of the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), or other relevant national regulators.⁴ Do not rely solely on information provided by the entity itself.
3. Prioritize Regulated Entities: Conduct investment activities exclusively through firms and individuals that are properly regulated within established financial jurisdictions. Avoid offshore, unregulated brokers, especially for complex or high-risk products like binary options or CFDs. If considering binary options in the US, use only CFTC-regulated exchanges.⁴
4. Understand Before Investing: Do not invest in any financial product or service without fully understanding its mechanics, risks, costs, and regulatory status. If something seems overly complex or opaque, exercise caution.¹⁴
5. Utilize Legitimate Alternatives: Explore the range of regulated investment management options outlined in Section VII (e.g., self-directed brokerage, RIAs, managed accounts, robo-advisors, mutual funds/ETFs) that align with your financial goals, risk tolerance, and desired level of involvement.
6. Seek Professional Advice (If Needed): If uncertain about investment decisions or financial planning, consult with a verified, regulated financial advisor (e.g., a CFP® professional or a representative of a registered investment adviser firm) who operates under a fiduciary or best interest standard.
7. Report Suspicious Activity: If you encounter or fall victim to a suspected investment scam, report it promptly to relevant financial regulators (e.g., CFTC, SEC, FCA, ASIC), consumer protection agencies, and potentially law enforcement. This can help authorities track fraudulent activities and warn other investors.²²

Download PDF

Works cited

1. The Most Important Technical Indicators for Binary Options – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/022615/most-important-technical-indicators-binary-options.asp
2. Currency Binary: What It is, How it Works, Examples – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currency-binary.asp
3. CFTC/SEC Investor Alert: Binary Options and Fraud, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/fraudadv_binaryoptions.html
4. Binary Options Fraud – FBI, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/binary-options-fraud
5. Investor Alert- Unregulated Investment Business – 13 August 2020 updated version.pdf, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.fsc.org.ai/documents/Publications/Investor%20Alerts/Investor%20Alert-%20Unregulated%20Investment%20Business%20-%2013%20August%202020%20updated%20version.pdf
6. Binary option – Wikipedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_option
7. 20-161MR ASIC sues Forex Capital Trading Pty Ltd for unconscionable conduct and conflicted remuneration, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/find-a-media-release/2020-releases/20-161mr-asic-sues-forex-capital-trading-pty-ltd-for-unconscionable-conduct-and-conflicted-remuneration/
8. What are Binary Options and How Do They Work? – Nadex, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/learning/what-are-binary-options-and-how-do-they-work/
9. Beware of Off-Exchange Binary Options Trades | CFTC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/beware_of_off_exchange_binary_options.htm
10. Binary Option: Definition, How They Trade, and Example – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/binary-option.asp
11. www.cftc.gov, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/fraudadv_binaryoptions.html#:~:text=A%20binary%20option%20is%20a,fall%20below%20a%20specified%20amount.
12. www.investopedia.com, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/052014/binary-options-strategies.asp#:~:text=8-,Understanding%20Binary%20Options,they%20are%20short%2Dterm%20trades.
13. Trading Forex With Binary Options – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/022415/trading-forex-binary-options.asp
14. A Guide to Trading Binary Options in the US – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/061114/guide-trading-binary-options-us.asp
15. How to Hedge Stock Positions Using Binary Options – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/073015/how-hedge-stock-positions-using-binary-options.asp
16. Binary Options Strategies You Should Know – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/052014/binary-options-strategies.asp
17. The Basics of Investing In Binary Options – Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://dfi.wa.gov/financial-education/information/basics-investing-binary-options
18. Risks vs Return with Binary Option Trading – Theseus, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/10024/120432/2/Kiiskinen_Eemi.pdf
19. L_2018136EN.01005001.xml – EUR-Lex.europa.eu., accessed on April 21, 2025, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32018X0601(02)
20. Central Bank of Ireland Contracts for Difference Intervention Measure pursuant to Article 42 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.centralbank.ie/docs/default-source/regulation/industry-market-sectors/investment-firms/mifid-firms/regulatory-requirements-and-guidance/central-bank-cfd-intervention-measure.pdf?sfvrsn=8
21. How To Avoid Financial Scams – Shifting Shares, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.shiftingshares.com/how-to-avoid-financial-scams/
22. Forex trading scams | FCA, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/forex-trading-scams
23. CP16/40: Enhancing conduct of business rules for firms providing contract for difference products to retail clients, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/consultation/cp16-40.pdf
24. 20-151MR ASIC bans former Forex Capital Trading Pty Ltd employee from providing financial services, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/find-a-media-release/2020-releases/20-151mr-asic-bans-former-forex-capital-trading-pty-ltd-employee-from-providing-financial-services/
25. Crypto assets – Moneysmart.gov.au, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://moneysmart.gov.au/investment-warnings/crypto-assets
26. Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=881b08c4-d42d-489b-ac7b-098e2479910b
27. Follow the money: How one defrauded binary options ‘investor’ got his cash back, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/follow-the-money-how-one-defrauded-binary-options-investor-got-his-cash-back/
28. Beware of Online Binary Options Schemes – Missouri Secretary of State, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.sos.mo.gov/bewareofonlinebinaryoptionsschemes
29. What Is an Account Executive? Responsibilities and Required Skills – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/account-executive.asp
30. Account Manager (Personal Lines) – Brokers Trust, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://brokerstrust.ca/about/careers/account-manager-personal-lines-march-2020/
31. Account Manager Explained | Tickeron, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://tickeron.com/trading-investing-101/what-account-manager/
32. What Is an Account Manager? Job Description, Salary, and Benefits – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/account-manager.asp
33. Brokerage Account Management | AAII, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aaii.com/journal/article/15237-brokerage-account-management
34. What are the duties of an assigned Account Manager? : r/fidelityinvestments – Reddit, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/fidelityinvestments/comments/y5s3qu/what_are_the_duties_of_an_assigned_account_manager/
35. Money Manager: Definition, Duties, Examples, Compensation – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/moneymanager.asp
36. What Is an Investment Manager? – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/investment-manager.asp
37. Popular Careers in the Financial Sector – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-careers/08/financial-career-options-professionals.asp
38. Nuveen | Investment Management, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nuveen.com/
39. BlackRock: Investment Management & Financial Services, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.blackrock.com/us/individual
40. Morgan Stanley Investment Management, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.morganstanley.com/im.html
41. Top 50 Investment Management firms in the United States (2025) – 50Pros, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.50pros.com/top-50/investment-management
42. Registered Financial Professionals | FINRA.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.finra.org/investors/investing/working-with-investment-professional/registered-financial-professionals
43. Investment Advisers | FINRA.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.finra.org/investors/investing/working-with-investment-professional/investment-advisers
44. Information About Registered Investment Advisers and Exempt Reporting Advisers, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/data-research/sec-markets-data/information-about-registered-investment-advisers-exempt-reporting-advisers
45. Regulation of Investment Advisers by the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission – SEC.gov, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/about/offices/oia/oia_investman/rplaze-042012.pdf
46. Brokerage to Managed Conversion – J.P. Morgan, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.jpmorgan.com/wealth-management/wealth-partners/legal/brokerage-to-managed-conversion
47. Working With an Investment Professional | FINRA.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.finra.org/investors/investing/working-with-investment-professional
48. Financial Planners | FINRA.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.finra.org/investors/investing/working-with-investment-professional/financial-planners
49. 3110. Supervision | FINRA.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/3110
50. Separately Managed Accounts (SMAs) – vestr – the engine behind active management, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.vestr.com/financial-products/separately-managed-accounts
51. Financial Analyst: Career Path and Qualifications – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-advisors/121815/financial-analyst-career-path-qualifications.asp
52. Investment Management | U.S. Bank, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.usbank.com/investing/investment-management.html
53. Separately Managed Accounts – BlackRock, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.blackrock.com/us/financial-professionals/investments/products/managed-accounts
54. binary options account manager – Freelancer, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.freelancer.com/projects/business-plans/binary-options-account-manager
55. I NEED A TRADER TO TRADE BINARY OPTIONS FOR ME, HOURLY TRADE | Freelancer, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.freelancer.com/projects/research-financial-research/need-trader-trade-binary-options.1699879
56. Fraudsters claim “Binary Options are being used for investment scams” | Action Fraud, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.actionfraud.police.uk/alert/fraudsters-claim-binary-options-are-being-used-for-investment-scams
57. multiple blog ads | Semalt Q&A – SEO, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://semalt.com/qa/multiple-blog-ads.html
58. superior internal or – Mashirika, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://mashirika.com/2018/03/01/superior-internal-or/
59. Shuva Din – Image FM 97.9, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.imagefm.com.np/shuva-din/
60. Rwanda: Judiciary to Try Over 100 Cases in Week long Anti-Graft Campaign, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://trustchambers.rw/2017/02/07/the-system-for-fate-to-frequently-again-2/
61. Cyklo Klub Kučera Znojmo, accessed on April 21, 2025, http://www.cykloklubznojmo.cz/comment.php?akce=fullview&cisloclanku=2007090006
62. I NEED A TRADER TO TRADE BINARY OPTIONS FOR ME, HOURLY TRADE | Freelancer, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.freelancer.es/projects/research/need-trader-trade-binary-options-12657816
63. Alleged Cryptocurrency Exchange, Eucoinotrade.com Appears to be Engaged in Fraud, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://dfi.wa.gov/consumer/alerts/alleged-cryptocurrency-exchange-eucoinotradecom-appears-be-engaged-fraud
64. Binary Options Experiences – In case of losses, trade immediately. – Law Firm Herfurtner, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://kanzlei-herfurtner.com/binary-options/
65. Research Article Binary options trading: A deep dive into user perspective and satisfaction – Semantic Scholar, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5a25/be81673bab4d8469ab53acae452c1446c170.pdf
66. CFTC Orders North Carolina Man and His Company to Pay $2.6 Million for Fraudulent Solicitation, Pool Fraud, and Failure to Register, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8496-22
67. Warning – Peak Nadex Trader a/k/a Peak Binary Option Soliciting Nadex Members, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/notices/warning-peak-nadex-trader-aka-peak-binary-option-soliciting-nadex-members/
68. Decision Reference DRN-3042682 – Financial Ombudsman Service, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/decision/DRN-3042682.pdf
69. SEALED – Commodity Futures Trading Commission, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/media/4156/%20enfsuissegroupcomplaint061520/download
70. Case 4:18-cv-00807-O Document 1 Filed 09/28/18 Page 1 of 36 PageID 1 – Commodity Futures Trading Commission, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/sites/default/files/2018-09/enfmorganhuntcomplaint092818.pdf
71. Decision Reference DRN-3549881 – Financial Ombudsman Service, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/decision/DRN-3549881.pdf
72. Swedish binary options victim tracks brokers to Israel, files police complaint, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/swedish-binary-options-victim-tracks-brokers-to-israel-files-police-complaint/
73. EUROPEAN SECURITIES AND MARKETS AUTHORITY DECISION (EU) 2018/ 796 – EUR-Lex.europa.eu., accessed on April 21, 2025, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018X0601(02)&from=ES
74. Binary Options Trading Guide for UK, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.binaryoptions.co.uk/
75. General Administrative Act pursuant to Article 42 of Regulation (EU) – BaFin, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/EN/Aufsichtsrecht/Verfuegung/vf_190801_allgvfg_Differenzgeschaefte_en.html
76. All – Financial Markets Authority, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.fma.govt.nz/library/warnings-and-alerts/downloadWarnings/?date=all
77. Check Out Your Investment Professional | Investor.gov, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/getting-started/working-investment-professional/check-out-your-investment
78. Choosing a Robo-Advisor vs. Brokerage Account – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/robo-advisor-vs-brokerage-account-7574383
79. Best Brokerage Accounts for Stock Trading: 2025 Top Picks – NerdWallet, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nerdwallet.com/best/investing/online-brokers-for-stock-trading
80. Robo-Advisor vs. Self-Directed Investing: What’s the Difference? – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/robo-advisor-vs-self-directed-7571205
81. Online Broker vs. Robo-Advisor: Which Is Right for You? – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/online-broker-vs-robo-advisor-7568136
82. Robo-Advisor vs. Financial Advisor – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/robo-advisor-vs-financial-advisor-4775377
83. What Is a Robo-Advisor? – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/roboadvisor-roboadviser.asp
84. Managed Investment Accounts & Portfolios – TIAA, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.tiaa.org/public/invest/financial-products/investment-management
85. Advisor Managed Accounts | Schwab Retirement Services, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://workplacefinancialservices.schwab.com/retirement-services/401k-plan-services/advisor-managed-accounts
86. Separately Managed Accounts | Targeted Stock or Bond Portfolio – Fidelity Investments, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/managed-accounts/separately-managed-accounts/overview
87. Fidelity Managed Accounts | Straightforward Investing, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/managed-accounts/overview
88. Separately Managed Accounts – Morgan Stanley, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-us/individual-investor/product-and-performance/separately-managed-accounts.html
89. Merrill Lynch Managed Account Service ™ Wrap Fee Program Brochure, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://mlaem.fs.ml.com/content/dam/ML/pdfs/MAS-ADV.PDF
90. Robo-Advisor: Advantages and Disadvantages – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/010616/pros-cons-using-roboadvisor.asp
91. Robo-Advisor vs. Index Fund – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/robo-advisor-vs-index-funds-7568061
92. ETFs vs. Robo-Advisors: What’s the Difference? – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/etfs-vs-robo-advisors-7571319
93. Are Robo-Advisors Worth It? – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/are-robo-advisors-worth-it-7568057
94. Robo-Advisors and Young Investors – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/121615/are-roboadvisors-good-idea-young-investors.asp
95. AXA Investment Managers | AXA IM Corporate, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.axa-im.com/
96. Investment Management – NOMURA, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nomuraholdings.com/services/im/
97. PGIM: Global Asset Management, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.pgim.com/