Binary Options Legality in Canada

1. Introduction

Purpose: This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the legal and regulatory framework governing the offering and trading of binary options for residents within Canada. It addresses the legality of these instruments, the roles of key regulatory bodies, distinctions between domestic and offshore platforms, the significant risks involved, and official warnings issued by Canadian authorities.

Definition: Binary options are financial instruments typically structured as a wager on the future price movement of an underlying asset, such as a currency, commodity, stock index, or share, within a defined, often very short, timeframe.1 The instrument is based on a ‘yes/no’ proposition: if the proposition regarding the asset’s price movement (e.g., will Asset X be above Price Y at Time Z?) is met at expiry, the holder receives a predetermined fixed payout; if not, the holder loses the entire amount wagered, or nearly all of it.3 This “all-or-nothing” characteristic distinguishes them from traditional options.1

Scope: The analysis herein is confined to the Canadian regulatory environment, drawing exclusively upon official statements, legislative instruments, notices, and warnings published by Canadian securities regulators.

Key Finding Preview: The central finding of this report is that the advertising, offering, selling, or trading of binary options with a term to maturity of less than 30 days to any individual is strictly illegal across all Canadian provinces and territories.2 Furthermore, a critical point consistently emphasized by regulators is that no individual or firm is currently registered or authorized to offer or sell any type of binary option product in Canada, regardless of its characteristics.2

related posts : Best Binary Options Brokers (in 2025)

2. Regulatory Oversight of Securities in Canada

Overview of the Decentralized System: Unlike many other major federations, Canada does not have a single, federal securities regulator.11 Instead, the authority to regulate securities trading and markets is vested in the governments of Canada’s ten provinces and three territories.11 Consequently, each province and territory maintains its own securities commission or equivalent authority, operating under its distinct securities legislation.11 This decentralized structure necessitates mechanisms for coordination and harmonization, particularly for national and cross-border regulatory issues.

Role of the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA): The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) serves as the primary coordinating body, functioning as an umbrella organization that brings together the 13 provincial and territorial securities regulators.12 The CSA’s mandate is to improve, coordinate, and harmonize the regulation of Canadian capital markets.11 It achieves this by developing harmonized policies and national instruments – legally binding rules adopted by participating jurisdictions – designed to apply consistently across the country.11 The CSA also operates critical national electronic systems for regulatory filings, such as the National Registration Database (NRD), the System for Electronic Disclosure by Insiders (SEDI), and the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR+).13 Key provincial members, often leading policy initiatives due to the size of their markets, include the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC), the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) in Quebec, the Alberta Securities Commission (ASC), and the British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC).11

The existence and actions of the CSA are particularly relevant in addressing complex issues that transcend provincial borders, such as the proliferation of online investment fraud schemes. Binary options fraud, frequently perpetrated through online platforms based overseas 1, presents a challenge that isolated provincial regulators might struggle to combat effectively. The CSA taking the initiative to propose 8 and subsequently implement 2 Multilateral Instrument 91-102 Prohibition of Binary Options underscores the necessity of a coordinated, pan-Canadian approach to protect investors nationwide from such pervasive threats. This multilateral action reflects a recognition that certain risks require a unified regulatory response within Canada’s decentralized system.

Table: Canadian Securities Regulators

The following table lists the primary securities regulatory authority for each Canadian province and territory, which collectively form the CSA 11:

Province/TerritorySecurities Regulator
AlbertaAlberta Securities Commission (ASC)
British ColumbiaBritish Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC)
ManitobaManitoba Securities Commission (MSC)
New BrunswickFinancial and Consumer Services Commission (FCNB)
Newfoundland and LabradorFinancial Services Regulation Division, Digital Government and Service NL
Northwest TerritoriesOffice of the Superintendent of Securities
Nova ScotiaNova Scotia Securities Commission (NSSC)
NunavutOffice of the Superintendent of Securities
OntarioOntario Securities Commission (OSC)
Prince Edward IslandFinancial and Consumer Services Division
QuebecAutorité des marchés financiers (AMF)
SaskatchewanFinancial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan (FCAA)
YukonOffice of the Yukon Superintendent of Securities

Role of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO): The Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) is the national self-regulatory organization (SRO) responsible for overseeing investment dealers and mutual fund dealers across Canada.11 CIRO was formed through the consolidation of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (MFDA).15 Provincial and territorial securities commissions rely on CIRO to regulate the conduct, proficiency, and financial condition of its member firms (dealers) and the registered individuals acting on their behalf.11 CIRO plays a significant role in investor protection through setting and enforcing rules for its members, conducting compliance reviews, taking disciplinary actions, and providing investor education resources.14 It also issues investor alerts regarding potential scams or unregistered activities, sometimes involving entities falsely claiming affiliation or offering prohibited products like binary options.16

While the CSA members (the provincial/territorial commissions) establish the overarching rules like the ban on short-term binary options (MI 91-102), CIRO ensures that the legitimate, registered investment firms under its purview comply with these regulations. CIRO and its predecessor, IIROC, have actively reinforced the prohibition. For instance, IIROC explicitly warned investors about fraudulent entities offering binary options while falsely claiming IIROC regulation.17 These warnings reiterated that binary options cannot be legally offered or sold to retail investors in Canada and directed concerned investors to contact their provincial securities regulator.17 This demonstrates a clear alignment between the statutory regulators (CSA members) and the SRO (CIRO) in enforcing the ban and participating in public warnings, ensuring the prohibition is understood and adhered to within the regulated investment community.

3. The Prohibition of Short-Term Binary Options: Multilateral Instrument 91-102

Background and Rationale: The move by Canadian securities regulators to ban certain binary options was driven by a significant increase in investor complaints and substantial financial losses linked to these products.1 Prior to the ban, regulators across Canada were receiving hundreds of complaints annually, with estimates exceeding 800 in the year leading up to the prohibition.1 The CSA explicitly identified binary options as the “leading type of investment fraud facing Canadians today,” citing the “staggering” impact on individuals.1

The primary concerns articulated by regulators centred on several key issues:

  • Unregistered Offshore Platforms: The vast majority of binary options were being marketed through online platforms operating outside of Canada, typically based in jurisdictions with minimal or non-existent financial regulation, and crucially, not registered to conduct business in Canada.1
  • Prevalence of Fraud: Regulators found that in many instances, no actual trading occurred on these platforms. The operations were often purely fraudulent schemes designed solely to steal investors’ money.1
  • Difficulty Recovering Funds: Due to the offshore location and often opaque nature of the operators, investors who lost money found it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to recover their funds.1
  • Associated Risks: Beyond financial loss, individuals providing personal or credit card information to these platforms faced a high risk of identity theft.1

In response to these widespread problems, the CSA developed Multilateral Instrument 91-102 Prohibition of Binary Options (MI 91-102). The stated purpose of this instrument is to protect investors from becoming victims of binary options fraud and from the illegal promotion of products deemed extremely high-risk and unsuitable for individuals.2 The ban aims to achieve this by raising public awareness that these specific products are illegal to offer to individuals and by disrupting the distribution channels used by fraudulent operators, including payment processing and advertising.6

Definition of “Binary Option” under MI 91-102: To ensure clarity and prevent evasion, MI 91-102 provides a precise legal definition of the prohibited instrument. A “binary option” is defined as:

“a contract or instrument that provides for only:

(a) a predetermined fixed amount if the underlying interest referenced in the contract or instrument meets one or more predetermined conditions, and

(b) zero or another predetermined fixed amount if the underlying interest referenced in the contract or instrument does not meet one or more predetermined conditions.”.3

This definition is intentionally broad, designed to capture the core characteristics of the “yes/no proposition” and the fixed win/loss outcome, irrespective of the specific name used by the platform.6 Regulators noted that these products are marketed under various names, including “all-or-nothing options,” “asset-or-nothing options,” “bet options,” “cash-or-nothing options,” “digital options,” “fixed-return options,” and “one-touch options”.1 Any instrument fitting the legal definition is subject to the prohibition, regardless of its label.

Typical characteristics of these instruments include being based on the performance of an underlying asset (like a stock or currency) or the occurrence of an event (like an interest rate change or election outcome) within a specified, often very short, timeframe (sometimes minutes or hours).1 They generally exercise automatically at expiry, and settlement is typically in cash, without granting any right or obligation to buy or sell the underlying asset itself.23

Scope and Mechanics of the Prohibition: The core prohibition articulated in MI 91-102 is clear: “No person or company may advertise, offer, sell or otherwise trade a binary option with or to an individual”.3 The term “trade” is interpreted broadly under Canadian securities law, encompassing solicitation and any act in furtherance of a trade.23

To prevent circumvention, the prohibition also extends to trading binary options with any “person or company that was created, or is used, solely to trade a binary option”.3 This clause aims to stop operators from advising individuals to set up shell corporations simply to bypass the ban on trading directly with individuals.

A crucial element defining the scope of this prohibition is its limitation based on the instrument’s duration. Sections 2 and 3 of MI 91-102 explicitly state that the prohibitions do not apply in respect of “a binary option having a term to maturity of 30 days or longer”.1 The “term to maturity” is considered the period from when the option contract is entered into until the specified time or expiry of the time period for determining whether the yes/no condition has been met.23

This 30-day threshold represents a significant legal distinction. It specifically targets the short-term, speculative, wager-like binary options that were overwhelmingly associated with the fraud and investor complaints documented by regulators.1 By focusing the ban on instruments with less than 30 days to maturity, regulators addressed the most prevalent and problematic segment of the market being aggressively marketed to retail investors. This suggests a policy decision to prioritize combating the gambling-like products causing the most harm, while technically leaving longer-term binary option structures outside the scope of this specific prohibition against trading with individuals. However, as discussed in the following section, the practical ability to offer even longer-term options remains constrained by registration requirements.

Effective Date and Jurisdictional Application: Multilateral Instrument 91-102 came into force on December 12, 2017, following its proposal earlier that year and a period of public comment.3 The instrument was adopted by all provincial and territorial securities regulators in Canada except for the British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC).4

However, British Columbia did not permit the offering of these products. Concurrently with the CSA’s implementation of MI 91-102, the BCSC issued BC Notice 2017/02 – Binary Options.4 This notice announced a ban, effective September 29, 2017, on the advertising, offering, selling, or trading of over-the-counter (OTC) binary options with a term to maturity of less than 30 days to retail investors in British Columbia.27 The BCSC determined that offering these specific products was contrary to the public interest.27

Therefore, despite utilizing slightly different regulatory instruments (a Multilateral Instrument versus a Commission Notice), the substantive outcome was consistent across the country. The near-simultaneous actions by the CSA members and the BCSC established a unified regulatory stance effectively prohibiting the offering and trading of short-term (less than 30 days maturity) binary options to individuals throughout Canada. This harmony, achieved through parallel measures, underscores the shared view among all Canadian regulators regarding the unsuitability and risks of these products for retail investors.

4. Registration Requirements and Binary Options

General Requirement for Registration: A cornerstone principle of Canadian securities regulation is the requirement for registration. Any individual or company that is in the business of trading securities or derivatives, or advising others about investing in these instruments, must be registered with the securities regulatory authority in each province and territory where they conduct business, unless a specific exemption applies.2 This includes entities operating online platforms that solicit or accept clients residing in Canada.6

Registration is not merely an administrative formality; it serves a critical investor protection function. Registered firms and individuals must meet prescribed standards for proficiency, solvency, and business conduct.2 They are subject to ongoing regulatory oversight and compliance requirements. Investors are strongly encouraged by regulators to verify the registration status of any person or company offering an investment opportunity before sending any money or personal information. Resources such as the CSA’s National Registration Search tool (available via aretheyregistered.ca) and CIRO’s AdvisorReport provide publicly accessible means to check registration.2

Status of Binary Options Registration: In the context of binary options, the regulatory position regarding registration is unambiguous and has been consistently communicated. Canadian securities regulators have stated repeatedly, both before and after the implementation of MI 91-102 and BCN 2017/02, that there are no registered individuals or firms permitted to advertise, offer, sell, or otherwise trade binary options products in Canada.2

This blanket statement has significant implications. While MI 91-102 and BCN 2017/02 specifically prohibit binary options with terms less than 30 days from being offered to individuals, the complete absence of any registered entity authorized to deal in binary options creates a broader de facto prohibition. Even if a binary option structure were designed to fall outside the explicit ban (e.g., having a maturity of 30 days or longer, or being offered only to institutional or accredited investors), there is currently no legally registered channel through which such an instrument could be offered or sold within Canada.

The lack of registration means that any platform or individual soliciting Canadians for binary options trading is operating illegally, regardless of the specific terms of the options being offered. This situation likely arises either because no firms have sought registration to offer such products, perhaps recognizing the significant regulatory hurdles and suitability concerns, or because regulators have been unwilling to grant registration for any type of binary option product, viewing them as inherently problematic even beyond the short-term versions explicitly banned for individuals. The practical result is that the entire category of binary options is effectively off-limits within the regulated Canadian market framework.

5. Offshore vs. Registered Platforms

Irrelevance to Legality of Prohibited Options: It is essential to understand that the legal prohibition established by MI 91-102 and BCN 2017/02 applies universally to any person or company targeting Canadian individuals, irrespective of the platform’s purported location. Advertising, offering, or selling binary options with a term to maturity of less than 30 days to individuals residing in Canada is illegal, whether the platform falsely claims a Canadian presence or operates from an offshore jurisdiction.2 The location of the operator does not alter the illegality of the prohibited activity within Canada.

The Reality of Offshore Platforms: Despite the theoretical possibility of a Canadian-based entity attempting to offer these products (which would be illegal and unregistered), the overwhelming reality documented by regulators is that the platforms actively marketing binary options to Canadians are based offshore.1 These platforms typically operate from jurisdictions with weak or non-existent financial oversight and, critically, are not registered with any Canadian securities regulator.4 They often use sophisticated online marketing techniques, including social media advertising and unsolicited communications, to reach potential victims in Canada.5

Specific Risks Associated with Unregistered Offshore Platforms: Dealing with unregistered offshore platforms exposes investors to significantly heightened risks beyond the inherent risks of binary options themselves. Regulators consistently warn Canadians about these specific dangers:

  • Pervasive Fraud: The primary risk is outright fraud. Numerous regulatory warnings state that many offshore binary options platforms do not engage in legitimate trading activities. Instead, they function purely as vehicles to steal deposited funds.1 Promises of unrealistically high and rapid returns are a common lure used by these fraudulent operations.5
  • Lack of Recourse: Investing through platforms located offshore, particularly those in poorly regulated jurisdictions, makes recovering funds exceptionally difficult, if not impossible, should problems arise (e.g., inability to withdraw funds, platform disappearance).1 Canadian regulators have limited jurisdiction over foreign entities, leaving investors with little practical legal recourse.
  • Identity Theft: The process of opening an account or attempting to withdraw funds (often futilely) typically requires investors to provide sensitive personal and financial information, including copies of identification documents and credit card details. Sharing this information with unregulated, often fraudulent, offshore entities creates a substantial risk of identity theft.1
  • Misleading Tactics: These platforms frequently employ deceptive practices to appear legitimate. This can include using Voice over IP (VOIP) phone numbers with Canadian area codes to mask their offshore location, posting fake testimonials and reviews, offering enticing ‘bonus’ money that locks in deposits, and utilizing aggressive, high-pressure sales tactics by call center agents working from scripts.5

While offering prohibited short-term binary options to individuals is illegal regardless of the platform’s location, the practical consequences for investors are far more severe when dealing with unregistered offshore entities. The offshore nature dramatically amplifies the risk profile, shifting it from a regulatory breach to a high probability of outright financial theft with virtually no prospect of recovery. The consistent regulatory focus on warning against offshore platforms reflects this reality – they represent the primary vector through which Canadians have been victimized by binary options schemes.

6. Regulatory Warnings and Enforcement Actions

Volume and Consistency of Warnings: Canadian securities regulators, both collectively through the CSA and individually at the provincial/territorial level (including the OSC, BCSC, AMF, and others), along with CIRO (and its predecessor IIROC), have issued numerous and consistent warnings to the public about the dangers of binary options.1 These warnings predate the formal ban and have continued since its implementation, highlighting the ongoing threat. The CSA established a dedicated investor education website, binaryoptionsfraud.ca, to provide information and resources on recognizing and avoiding these scams.2

Specific Platform Warnings: Provincial regulators frequently update investor caution lists that name specific entities, often unregistered offshore binary options platforms, known to be soliciting residents within their jurisdiction without authorization. Examples include warnings issued by the BCSC against platforms like Binary Banc, Ten Options, RBOptions, Hedgestone Group, OptionStars, and Titan Trade 32, and the AMF’s publication of extensive lists of unauthorized websites targeting Quebec residents.7 CIRO/IIROC has also issued alerts against specific entities like RxD Options that falsely claimed regulatory oversight while offering binary options.17

Highlighting Binary Options as Fraud: Regulatory communications consistently frame binary options not merely as high-risk investments but as a primary vehicle for investment fraud. The description of binary options as the “leading type of investment fraud facing Canadians” 1 and the assessment that the trading advertised to retail investors is “overwhelmingly fraudulent” 20 underscore the regulators’ grave concerns and the perception that legitimate offerings are virtually non-existent in the retail space.

Enforcement Actions: Despite the challenges posed by online platforms, particularly those operating from offshore, Canadian regulators have demonstrated a willingness and ability to take enforcement action against entities violating the binary options ban, especially when a connection to their jurisdiction can be established.

A notable example is the settlement reached by the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) in April 2025 with Blockratize Inc. and Adventure One QSS Inc., the operators of the online platform Polymarket.25 The OSC alleged, and the companies admitted in the settlement, that between June 2020 and May 2023, they violated Ontario securities law, specifically MI 91-102, by offering binary options (often structured as event-based or prediction market contracts) with terms to maturity of less than 30 days to residents of Ontario through the Polymarket platform.25 Data indicated thousands of visits from Ontario IP addresses and estimated revenues attributable to Ontario residents.38 The settlement included significant sanctions: two-year market participation bans for the companies, an administrative penalty of $200,000 CAD, a voluntary payment (disgorgement) of $22,966.75 USD (representing estimated Ontario-derived revenue), and payment of $25,000 CAD towards the OSC’s investigation costs.25

The Polymarket case serves as a clear indication that the prohibition under MI 91-102 is not merely symbolic. It demonstrates that regulators can pursue enforcement action against operators, even those involved in newer platform types like crypto-based prediction markets, when their activities breach the ban and impact residents within the regulator’s jurisdiction. This enforcement capability sends a deterrent message to the market about the potential consequences of non-compliance.

Broader Regulatory Efforts: Beyond direct enforcement against specific platforms, Canadian regulators, coordinated through the CSA’s Binary Options Task Force (established in 2016), have pursued a multi-faceted strategy to combat this fraud.1 This includes proactive engagement with essential third parties that fraudulent operators rely upon, such as credit card companies (to block payments), technology companies (like Google and Facebook, urging them to ban advertisements), and online advertisers.1 International cooperation with regulators in other countries, particularly those where fraudulent operators were suspected to be based, has also been part of the strategy.18

7. Conclusion: Overall Legal and Regulatory Status

Summary of Prohibition: The legal status of binary options in Canada is definitive and restrictive. Pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 91-102 (applicable in all provinces and territories except British Columbia) and BC Notice 2017/02 (applicable in British Columbia), it is illegal to advertise, offer, sell, or otherwise trade binary options that have a term to maturity of less than 30 days with or to any individual residing in Canada.2 This prohibition came into effect in late 2017 and remains firmly in place.

Reiteration of Registration Status: Compounding the explicit ban on short-term options for individuals is the critical fact, consistently emphasized by all Canadian securities regulators, that no individual or firm holds the necessary registration to legally offer or sell any type of binary option product in Canada.2 This absence of registered entities creates a comprehensive de facto ban that extends beyond the scope of MI 91-102/BCN 2017/02. Consequently, any solicitation received by a Canadian resident regarding binary options trading, regardless of the option’s term or the platform’s claims, should be treated as illegitimate, unregistered, and highly likely to be fraudulent.

Offshore Platform Warning: The overwhelming majority of binary options platforms targeting Canadians operate from offshore locations without Canadian registration. Engaging with these platforms carries extreme risks, prominently including the high probability of financial loss through fraudulent schemes where no actual trading occurs, the near impossibility of recovering invested funds, and the significant danger of identity theft resulting from the disclosure of personal and financial information.1

Final Recommendation: Based on the clear legal prohibitions, the lack of any registered providers, and the documented high prevalence of fraud, Canadian residents are strongly advised to exercise extreme caution and avoid any engagement with individuals or platforms offering binary options trading. Before making any investment, individuals should always verify the registration status of the firm and advisor through official regulatory channels, such as the CSA’s aretheyregistered.ca portal or CIRO’s AdvisorReport tool.2 Any unsolicited offer related to binary options, or any concerns about a particular platform, should be promptly reported to the investor’s local provincial or territorial securities commission.1 In summary, binary options are effectively illegal and inaccessible through legitimate channels for Canadian retail investors.

Download PDF

Works cited

  1. Canadian Securities regulatory group announces ban on short-term binary options, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://bwmonline.com/legal/canadian-securities-regulatory-group-announces-ban-on-short-term-binary-options/
  2. Canadian securities regulators announce ban on binary options, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.securities-administrators.ca/news/canadian-securities-regulators-announce-ban-on-binary-options/
  3. Multilateral Instrument 91-102 Prohibition of Binary Options | OSC, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.osc.ca/en/securities-law/instruments-rules-policies/9/91-102/multilateral-instrument-91-102-prohibition-binary-options
  4. Securities Regulators Ban Short-Term Binary Options – McMillan LLP, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://mcmillan.ca/insights/publications/securities-regulators-ban-short-term-binary-options/
  5. A Losing Bet: Binary Options – Canadian Securities Administrators, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.securities-administrators.ca/uploadedFiles/General/pdfs/CSA_BinaryOptionsFraud_EN_2017.pdf
  6. CSA Multilateral Notice of Publication: Regulation 91-102 respecting Prohibition of Binary Options and Policy Statement to Regul, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://lautorite.qc.ca/fileadmin/lautorite/reglementation/instruments-derives/reglements/91-102/2017-09-28/2017sept28-91-102-avis-publ-en.pdf
  7. Binary options – AMF cautions consumers – Autorité des marchés financiers, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://lautorite.qc.ca/en/general-public/media-centre/news/fiche-dactualites/binary-options-amf-cautions-consumers-1
  8. Canadian securities regulators propose to ban advertising, offering, selling and trading in binary options, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.securities-administrators.ca/news/canadian-securities-regulators-propose-to-ban-advertising-offering-selling-and-trading-in-binary-options/
  9. Canadian securities regulators announce ban on binary options, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.osc.ca/en/news-events/news/canadian-securities-regulators-announce-ban-binary-options
  10. Canadian securities regulators announce ban on binary options | BCSC, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.bcsc.bc.ca/about/media-room/news-releases/2017/74-canadian-securities-regulators-announce-ban-on-binary-options
  11. Canadian securities regulation – Wikipedia, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_securities_regulation
  12. Who we are – Canadian Securities Administrators, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.securities-administrators.ca/about/who-we-are/
  13. Canadian Securities Administrators – Wikipedia, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Securities_Administrators
  14. Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.ciro.ca/
  15. What is CIRO focusing on for the next year? – Wealth Professional, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://wealthprofessional.ca/news/industry-news/what-is-ciro-focusing-on-for-the-next-year/388874
  16. Investor Alerts – Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.ciro.ca/office-investor/investor-alerts
  17. Investor Alert: RxD Options | Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.ciro.ca/newsroom/publications/investor-alert-rxd-options
  18. Canada passes complete binary options ban, urges Israel to follow suit, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/canada-passes-complete-binary-options-ban-urges-israel-to-follow-suit/
  19. www.osc.ca, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.osc.ca/sites/default/files/pdfs/irps/csa_20170927_91-102_binary-options.pdf
  20. Many Binary Options Websites Are Just Out to Steal Money: BCSC Director | Finance Magnates, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.financemagnates.com/binary-options/regulation/many-binary-options-websites-just-steal-money-bcsc-director/
  21. Quebec public warned against binary options | Wealth Professional, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.wealthprofessional.ca/news/industry-news/quebec-public-warned-against-binary-options/217937
  22. Binary options – Suspicious schemes target Quebeckers – Autorité des marchés financiers, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://lautorite.qc.ca/en/general-public/media-centre/news/fiche-dactualites/binary-options-suspicious-schemes-target-quebeckers
  23. Companion Policy 91-102 Prohibition of Binary Options – Justice, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.justice.gov.nt.ca/en/files/securities-regulatory-instruments/9/91-102/91-102.2017-12-12.02.en.pdf
  24. CSA proposes ban on sale of binary options – Advisor.ca, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.advisor.ca/investments/market-insights/csa-proposes-ban-on-sale-of-binary-options/
  25. OSC reaches settlement with current and former operators of Polymarket on breach of binary options ban – Ontario Securities Commission, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.osc.ca/en/news-events/news/osc-reaches-settlement-current-and-former-operators-polymarket-breach-binary-options-ban
  26. Ontario Securities Commission Reaches Settlement With Current And Former Operators Of Polymarket On Breach Of Binary Options Ban – Mondo Visione, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://mondovisione.com/media-and-resources/news/ontario-securities-commission-reaches-settlement-with-current-and-former-operato-2025417/
  27. BCN2017/02 – Binary Options [BCN] | BCSC, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.bcsc.bc.ca/securities-law/law-and-policy/bc-notices/current/bcn201702-binary-options-bcn
  28. AMF sounds alarm on binary options – Autorité des marchés financiers, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://lautorite.qc.ca/en/general-public/media-centre/news/fiche-dactualites/amf-sounds-alarm-on-binary-options-1
  29. CSA Notice and Request for Comment – Proposed National Instrument 91-102 Prohibition of Binary Options and Related Proposed Companion Policy – Ontario Securities Commission, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.osc.ca/en/securities-law/instruments-rules-policies/9/91-102/csa-notice-and-request-comment-proposed-national-instrument-91-102-prohibition-binary-options-and
  30. Search Outside CIRO | Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.ciro.ca/office-investor/looking-investment-advisor-or-firm/search-outside-ciro
  31. Binary options – Investor Alerts – Canadian Securities Administrators, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.securities-administrators.ca/investor-alerts/binary-options-6/
  32. BCSC warns of binary options trading platforms – Investment Executive, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.investmentexecutive.com/news/from-the-regulators/bcsc-warns-of-binary-options-trading-platforms/
  33. Canada’s BCSC Warns Against Belize-Regulated Binary Options Firm – Finance Magnates, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.financemagnates.com/binary-options/regulation/canadas-bcsc-warns-belize-regulated-binary-options-firm/
  34. Binary Banc & Ten Options (Binary Banc) | BCSC – BC Securities Commission, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.bcsc.bc.ca/enforcement/early-intervention/investment-caution-list/2018/binary-banc–ten-options
  35. BCSC warns investors about trading in online binary options – Business in Vancouver, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.biv.com/news/economy-law-politics/bcsc-warns-investors-about-trading-in-online-binar-8238595
  36. Canadian regulator BCSC warns against Binary Options websites OptionStars and Titan Trade – LeapRate, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.leaprate.com/news/canadian-regulator-bcsc-warns-against-binary-options-websites-optionstars-and-titan-trade/
  37. AMF proposes ban on binary options – Investment Executive, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.investmentexecutive.com/news/from-the-regulators/amf-proposes-ban-on-binary-options/
  38. REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF A SETTLEMENT: ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION (Applicant) – and – BLOCKRATIZE INC. and ADVENTURE ONE QSS I – Capital Markets Tribunal, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.capitalmarketstribunal.ca/sites/default/files/2025-04/rad_20250417_osc-blockratize-2.pdf
  39. Crypto-based prediction market settles with OSC – Investment Executive, accessed on April 20, 2025, https://www.investmentexecutive.com/news/from-the-regulators/crypto-based-prediction-market-settles-with-osc/

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top