How Does Binary Option Trading Work?

Table of Contents

I. Understanding Binary Options: The All-or-Nothing Proposition

A. Defining the Binary Option: A Financial Derivative Explained

A binary option is a specific type of financial derivative contract, often categorized within the realm of exotic options.¹ Its value and ultimate payout are derived not from the intrinsic value of an underlying asset itself, but rather from the price movement of that asset or the occurrence of a predetermined event within a specified timeframe.² Unlike traditional options, such as American or European style vanilla options, binary options do not confer upon the holder the right, potential, or obligation to buy or sell the underlying asset.² Consequently, they do not facilitate ownership or the taking of a position in the underlying security or commodity itself. Their function is almost exclusively speculative ², often characterized more accurately as a wager on a future outcome.²

Reflecting their unique structure, binary options are known by various names in financial markets. These include “all-or-nothing options” ¹, emphasizing the binary payout structure; “digital options,” a term more common in foreign exchange (forex) and interest rate markets ¹; “Fixed Return Options” (FROs), as they were known on the NYSE American ¹; and sometimes simply “bet options”.⁶ The existence of multiple names, ranging from the technically descriptive (“digital”) to the seemingly straightforward (“fixed return”), can potentially obscure the inherent risks. Terminology like “fixed return” might imply a level of security or predictability that contrasts sharply with the high probability of losing the entire investment, a characteristic that has drawn significant regulatory scrutiny regarding potentially misleading marketing practices aimed at less sophisticated investors.⁷

related posts : Best Binary Options Brokers (in 2025)

B. The Core Concept: A “Yes or No” Outcome

The fundamental mechanism of a binary option revolves around a simple “yes or no” proposition concerning whether a specific condition related to an underlying asset or event will be met at a precisely defined future point in time.¹ This condition typically involves the price of an asset relative to a predetermined level, known as the strike price. For instance, a common proposition might be: “Will the price of Stock ABC be above $25 per share at 1:30 PM on Friday?”.² Other examples include predictions about economic data releases (“Will this week’s jobless claims be higher than market expectations?” ⁵), currency movements (“Will the Euro decline against the US Dollar today?” ⁵), or even non-financial events (“Will a hurricane make landfall in Florida before a specified date?” ¹¹).

The trader’s role is to analyze the proposition and place a wager, effectively betting on whether the outcome will be “yes” (true) or “no” (false) when the option reaches its expiration.¹ This conceptual simplicity is often highlighted as a key feature, making binary options appear accessible, particularly to individuals new to trading.⁵ However, this surface-level simplicity belies the profound difficulty of accurately and consistently predicting short-term market movements or event outcomes. The ease of understanding the question does not translate into ease of predicting the answer correctly, especially given the very short time horizons often involved. This disconnect between conceptual simplicity and predictive difficulty contributes significantly to the high loss rates observed among retail traders and fuels regulatory concerns about the suitability of these products for the general public.¹

C. Payout Structure: Fixed Monetary Amount or Nothing

The defining financial characteristic of a binary option is its payout structure, which adheres strictly to one of two possible outcomes. If the trader’s prediction proves correct at the moment of expiration – meaning the option expires “in the money” – they receive a predetermined, fixed monetary sum or a fixed percentage of their initial investment as profit.¹ Conversely, if the prediction is incorrect and the option expires “out of the money,” the trader typically forfeits their entire investment – the premium paid to acquire the option.¹

There is generally no partial gain or loss based on the magnitude of the price movement; being correct by a large margin yields the same fixed payout as being correct by the smallest possible margin.² Similarly, being incorrect results in the full loss of the staked amount. While some platforms might offer a nominal refund (e.g., 5% or 15%) on out-of-the-money options, this is not standard practice and does little to alter the fundamental risk dynamic.⁷

Two primary types of binary options are distinguished based on their payout:

Cash-or-Nothing: Pays a fixed amount of cash if the option expires in-the-money.¹ This is the most common structure encountered on retail trading platforms.
Asset-or-Nothing: Pays the value of the underlying asset itself if the option expires in-the-money.¹

This “all-or-nothing” payout mechanism creates a highly asymmetric risk profile. The potential profit is capped and known in advance, but the potential loss is typically 100% of the capital risked on that specific trade. This structure inherently disadvantages the trader unless their prediction accuracy is substantially better than random chance, particularly when the payout for a correct prediction is less than the amount risked (a common scenario on unregulated platforms). This differs fundamentally from traditional investments or even other derivatives like vanilla options, where profit potential can be significantly larger relative to the risk, losses can often be managed more dynamically, and outcomes are graded based on price movement rather than being purely binary. This structure is a core reason why binary options are considered high-risk ¹ and often compared to gambling.¹

II. Anatomy of a Binary Option Trade

A. Underlying Assets: The Basis of the Bet

Every binary option contract is linked to an underlying asset, benchmark, or event, the performance or outcome of which determines the option’s settlement.² The range of potential underlyings is broad, offering apparent versatility.¹² Common examples include:

Stocks: Individual company shares, such as Colgate-Palmolive.²
Stock Indices: Major market indices like the S&P 500, NASDAQ 100, or FTSE 100.⁵ Regulated exchanges like Nadex typically base these options on the corresponding index futures contracts.¹⁶
Foreign Exchange (Forex): Currency pairs, such as EUR/USD, GBP/USD, or USD/JPY.⁵ Currency binary options are particularly popular for short-term speculation.²⁰
Commodities: Raw materials like gold, silver, platinum, or oil.³
Economic Events: Scheduled data releases or decisions, such as unemployment claims figures, central bank interest rate announcements, or non-farm payroll numbers.⁵

While the diversity of underlying assets might suggest broad market applicability, the extremely short expiration times frequently associated with binary options trading (often minutes or hours ⁵) significantly alters the nature of the activity. Traditional fundamental analysis, which assesses the long-term value or economic drivers of an asset, becomes largely irrelevant for predicting price movements over such brief intervals.³ Success in these timeframes often depends more on predicting short-term volatility, market noise, or momentary sentiment shifts rather than underlying value. This focus inherently pushes binary options trading further into the realm of pure speculation or chance-based wagering, rather than informed, analysis-driven investment.²

B. Strike Price: The Critical Threshold

The strike price is a pivotal component of any binary option contract. It represents the specific, predetermined price level against which the underlying asset’s price will be compared at the moment of expiration.² The trader’s task is to predict whether the actual price of the underlying asset will finish above or below this critical threshold when the contract expires.²

On regulated exchanges such as Nadex, traders are typically presented with a range of available strike prices for a given underlying asset and expiration time.¹⁶ This allows them to select a level that aligns with their specific market forecast and risk tolerance. The price of the binary option contract itself (the premium paid by the buyer or received by the seller) is not fixed but fluctuates dynamically between $0 and $100.¹ This price is influenced by the relationship between the strike price and the current market price of the underlying asset, the time remaining until expiration, and the perceived market volatility.¹⁹ Essentially, the contract price on these exchanges reflects the market’s collective assessment of the probability that the option will expire in-the-money.¹² A contract with a strike price far from the current market price (deep out-of-the-money) will trade at a low price, indicating low perceived probability, while a contract whose condition is already met (deep in-the-money) will trade closer to $100, reflecting high perceived probability. This dynamic pricing mechanism is a key feature of regulated exchange trading.

C. Expiration Time/Date: The Moment of Truth

Every binary option contract possesses a precisely defined expiration date and time, marking the exact moment when the trade concludes and its outcome is determined.² The duration of these contracts varies widely, but the market has become characterized by extremely short-term expirations. While longer terms exist, many platforms offer options expiring in minutes (e.g., five minutes ⁵), hourly ⁵, daily ⁵, or weekly.⁵ Nadex, for example, lists intraday, daily, and weekly contracts.⁵ This prevalence of short durations contrasts with traditional options, which can have expirations months or even years in the future. Regulatory actions have often targeted these short-term contracts specifically; Canada’s ban applies to terms under 30 days ³¹, while EU and UK bans had exclusions for certain options with terms of 90 days or more.³³

At the exact moment of expiration, the binary option automatically exercises or settles.² The platform determines whether the option finished in-the-money or out-of-the-money by comparing the underlying asset’s price at that instant to the contract’s strike price. The specific methodology for determining this final price might involve averaging the last few trades or using the midpoint of recent bid/ask prices to prevent manipulation.⁵

A significant feature available on some platforms, notably regulated exchanges like Nadex, is the ability for traders to close their position before the scheduled expiration time.¹ This allows a trader to potentially lock in a smaller profit if the market has moved favorably or cut losses if the market has moved against them. However, closing early typically results in receiving the current market price of the option contract, which may be less than the full payout if held to expiration.² Importantly, not all venues offer this flexibility; some exchanges, potentially including CBOE for binary options or CME for its similar event futures, may require positions to be held until expiration, removing this risk management tool.¹⁹

The dominance of very short-term expirations profoundly shapes the character of binary options trading, amplifying its speculative nature. Accurately predicting market direction over intervals measured in minutes is exceptionally challenging, as short-term price action is often dominated by random fluctuations or “market noise” rather than discernible trends or fundamental factors.²⁰ This reliance on forecasting highly unpredictable movements pushes the activity closer to gambling than strategic investing and is a primary driver of regulatory concern and the resulting bans or restrictions seen globally.²⁰ The availability (or absence) of an early exit feature further differentiates platforms and significantly impacts a trader’s ability to manage risk actively.

D. Payout Determination: Calculating Wins and Losses

The financial outcome of a binary option trade is predetermined and known by the trader before they commit capital.² The calculation depends on whether the trader bought or sold the option and whether the platform operates as a regulated exchange or an over-the-counter (OTC) broker, often acting as the counterparty.

On Regulated US Exchanges (e.g., Nadex):

Contracts are typically priced between $0 and $100.¹
If Buying: The trader pays the ‘offer’ price (e.g., $44.50 ¹⁹).

In-the-money at expiration: The contract settles at $100. The profit is $100 minus the price paid (e.g., $100 – $44.50 = $55.50 profit).¹
Out-of-the-money at expiration: The contract settles at $0. The loss is the full price paid for the contract (e.g., $44.50 loss).¹
If Selling: The trader receives the ‘bid’ price (e.g., $42.50 ¹⁹) and must post collateral equal to the maximum possible loss ($100 minus the price received).⁵

Out-of-the-money at expiration: The contract settles at $0. The seller keeps the premium received. The profit is the price received (e.g., $42.50 profit).¹⁹
In-the-money at expiration: The contract settles at $100. The loss is $100 minus the price received (e.g., $100 – $42.50 = $57.50 loss).¹
This structure represents a zero-sum game between the buyer and seller, excluding exchange fees. The total potential value of each contract is $100, fully collateralized by the combined capital of the buyer (paying the premium) and the seller (posting the remaining amount).¹ The exchange facilitates the transaction and earns fees.¹²
On Non-Exchange / OTC Platforms (Often Unregulated):

The payout is typically presented as a fixed percentage return on the initial investment amount (e.g., 70%, 85%, etc.).²
If the prediction is correct (in-the-money): The trader receives their initial investment back plus the advertised percentage payout. For a $100 investment with a 70% payout, the total return is $170 ($100 stake + $70 profit).²
If the prediction is incorrect (out-of-the-money): The trader loses their entire initial investment (e.g., $100 loss).²
In this model, the platform itself usually acts as the direct counterparty to the client’s trade.¹⁴ This means the platform pays out winnings from its own funds but keeps the entirety of clients’ losing stakes.

This difference in payout determination models has profound implications. The zero-sum nature of exchange-traded options, where one trader’s gain is another’s loss, is facilitated by a neutral exchange. In contrast, the OTC model, where the platform is the counterparty, creates a direct conflict of interest: the platform profits when its clients lose.¹⁴ This inherent conflict provides a strong incentive for fraudulent practices on unregulated platforms, such as software manipulation designed to generate losing trades for clients, refusal to process withdrawals, or misleading marketing – issues frequently cited in regulatory warnings and enforcement actions.¹ Regulated exchanges are designed to mitigate this specific conflict by matching buyers and sellers and earning revenue through transparent transaction fees.¹²

III. Executing a Binary Option Trade

A. The “Call” Option: Betting on a Price Increase

Placing a “call” binary option signifies a trader’s belief that the price of the underlying asset will finish above the specified strike price at the contract’s expiration time.⁶ This action is analogous to holding a bullish outlook or taking a long position in traditional markets.

On regulated exchange platforms like Nadex, executing this view involves selecting the relevant contract, which is typically formatted to explicitly state the condition, such as “US 500 > 3262.5 (4:15 p.m.)”.¹⁶ The trader then chooses the ‘Buy’ action. The price paid for each contract is the current ‘offer’ price displayed on the platform. This price represents the cost of entering the trade and also constitutes the trader’s maximum potential loss for that specific contract.¹⁶ For example, if a trader anticipates the price of gold will exceed $1,830 at the 1:30 p.m. expiration, they would locate the “Gold > $1830 (1:30 PM)” contract and execute a buy order.¹⁹

B. The “Put” Option: Betting on a Price Decrease

Conversely, expressing a belief that the underlying asset’s price will finish at or below the strike price at expiration involves taking a “put” position.⁴ This is equivalent to holding a bearish outlook or taking a short position.

The execution method for this view varies depending on the platform structure. On exchanges like Nadex, which primarily frame contracts as “>” propositions (e.g., “Market > Strike”), a bearish prediction is executed by selling the relevant contract.¹ When a trader sells a contract, they receive the current ‘bid’ price as a premium. However, they must also provide collateral equal to the maximum potential loss on the position, which is calculated as $100 minus the premium received.⁵ The seller’s maximum potential profit is limited to the premium received, realized if the option expires worthless (i.e., the price finishes at or below the strike).¹⁹

Some other platforms, particularly non-exchange OTC brokers, might offer distinct “Put” contracts that explicitly represent the prediction that the price will finish below the strike level.⁶ In this case, the trader would simply buy the “Put” option.

Using the previous example, if a trader believes gold will be at or below $1,830 at 1:30 p.m., on Nadex they would sell the “Gold > $1830 (1:30 PM)” contract.¹⁹ On a platform offering distinct put options, they might buy a contract structured as “Gold < $1830 (1:30 PM)” or similar.¹⁵

C. The Trading Platform Interface and Order Placement

Binary options trading is predominantly conducted through internet-based trading platforms.² These platforms typically provide users with an interface displaying the available markets (such as indices, forex pairs, commodities, and sometimes events), various expiration times (ranging from minutes to days or weeks), and a selection of strike prices for each underlying asset.³

For each specific contract (uniquely defined by its underlying asset, strike price, and expiration time), the platform presents the terms for trading. On regulated exchanges, this involves displaying a dynamic bid price (the price at which a trader can sell) and an ask/offer price (the price at which a trader can buy).¹ These prices fluctuate based on market activity and perceived probabilities.¹⁹ In contrast, many non-exchange platforms present a fixed payout percentage (e.g., “75% return”) for a correct prediction.²

To place a trade, the user selects their desired contract, chooses the direction of their prediction (Buy/Call for ‘above’, Sell/Put for ‘below’), and specifies the size of their trade, either by the number of contracts (on exchanges) or by the monetary amount they wish to invest (common on OTC platforms).² Reputable, regulated platforms like Nadex are designed to clearly display the maximum potential profit and the maximum potential loss associated with the trade before the order is confirmed and executed, enhancing transparency for the user.¹⁶

The design of many trading platforms often prioritizes apparent simplicity and ease of use.⁵ While this can make the process seem straightforward, it can also potentially obscure the underlying complexity and significant financial risks involved. The fundamental difference in how trades are priced and presented – dynamic bid/ask prices reflecting market probability versus a static percentage payout determined by the broker – represents a crucial distinction between the regulated exchange model and many unregulated OTC broker models. The exchange model generally offers greater transparency regarding market sentiment and the risk/reward trade-off inherent in the contract’s current price, whereas the fixed percentage payout model can mask the true odds and often embeds the platform’s profit margin, making it harder for users to accurately assess the proposition’s fairness and risk. This difference in transparency is a key factor contributing to the higher potential for investor harm on unregulated platforms.

IV. The High-Stakes Game: Risk vs. Reward in Binary Options

A. Defined Risk, Defined Reward: The Surface Appeal

One of the most frequently highlighted characteristics, often promoted as a primary advantage of binary options, is the predefined nature of both risk and reward.² Before a trader even enters a position, they know the exact maximum amount they stand to lose (typically the premium paid or collateral required) and the exact maximum profit they can achieve if their prediction is correct.² This feature of capped risk ensures that a trader cannot lose more than their initial stake on any individual trade.¹²

This contrasts favorably with some other leveraged financial instruments, like Contracts for Difference (CFDs) or traditional margin trading in stocks or forex, where, in the absence of specific protections like guaranteed stop-losses or negative balance protection (which regulators like ESMA later mandated for CFDs ³⁶), losses can potentially exceed the trader’s initial deposit, leading to significant debt. The appeal of knowing the absolute worst-case scenario for each trade beforehand can be psychologically comforting for traders.

However, while the term “defined risk” accurately describes the capped nature of the loss on a single trade, it can be misleading if interpreted as low risk overall. The “defined risk” in binary options is frequently defined as a 100% loss of the capital committed to that specific trade. Given the often very short timeframes involved, a trader can experience multiple such “defined risk” events (i.e., complete losses) in rapid succession, leading to a swift depletion of their overall trading capital. Therefore, the emphasis on “defined risk” in marketing materials ¹³ must be viewed critically, ensuring it doesn’t obscure the high probability of realizing that maximum loss and the potential for rapid cumulative losses across multiple trades.

B. The Inherent Downside: Potential for 100% Loss

The most critical risk inherent in binary options trading is the potential – indeed, the typical outcome for an incorrect prediction – to lose the entire amount invested in that single trade.¹ This “all-or-nothing” loss structure is not an occasional occurrence but the fundamental mechanism defining failure in this market.¹

This risk is significantly amplified by the predominantly short-term nature of most binary option contracts.²⁰ The ability to place trades that expire in minutes or hours means a trader can engage in numerous high-risk bets within a single day, accumulating losses rapidly if their predictions are inaccurate. Furthermore, the binary outcome offers no buffer or mitigation for near misses. Unlike traditional trading where a small adverse price movement results in a correspondingly small loss, in binary options, being wrong by even the smallest possible margin (e.g., one price tick or 0.1 pips) at expiration triggers the same 100% loss as being wrong by a large margin (unless an early exit option is available and successfully utilized before expiry ¹⁹). This lack of gradation in outcomes, where the result is digitally either a fixed win or a total loss ¹⁵, makes binary options structurally riskier than instruments where profit and loss scale more proportionally with market movements.

C. Analyzing the Payout Structure: Odds and Expectations

The relationship between potential profit and potential loss in binary options often presents a significant challenge for traders seeking profitability. On many OTC platforms, particularly those operating outside strict regulatory oversight, the payout offered for a winning trade is typically less than 100% of the amount risked – often ranging from 60% to 90%.² This creates an asymmetric structure: a winning trade yields a profit of, say, 70% of the stake, while a losing trade results in a 100% loss of the stake.

This asymmetry has critical mathematical implications. To simply break even over time, a trader needs a win rate significantly above 50%.⁷ For instance, with a 70% payout ($70 profit on a $100 win, $100 loss on a $100 loss), a trader must win approximately 58.8% of their trades (calculated as Loss / (Loss + Profit) = $100 / ($100 + $70)) just to cover their losses, before considering any transaction fees or potential spreads. Achieving such a high win rate consistently, especially on short-term predictions where market noise is prevalent, is extremely difficult even for experienced professionals.²⁰ Consequently, regulators often conclude that the structure itself results in a negative expected return for the retail client, meaning the average trader is statistically likely to lose money over time.¹ The platform or broker, acting as the counterparty, often benefits from this built-in statistical edge.¹

On regulated exchanges like Nadex, the dynamic pricing mechanism ($0-$100 per contract) offers a different perspective. The price paid for an option theoretically reflects the market’s consensus on the probability of the event occurring. A contract priced at $50 suggests roughly even odds. Buying a contract at $40 (implying lower perceived probability) offers a potential profit of $60 ($100 – $40) for a $40 risk – a 150% return on the capital risked for that trade. Conversely, buying at $70 (implying higher perceived probability) offers a potential profit of $30 ($100 – $70) for a $70 risk – approximately a 43% return on risk.¹ While this allows traders to potentially find trades with favorable risk/reward ratios based on their own analysis differing from the market consensus, the zero-sum nature of the exchange (excluding fees) ¹⁹ still means that for every dollar won, a dollar is lost by another participant. Consistently overcoming the bid-ask spread and transaction costs requires a demonstrable predictive edge, a challenging feat in highly speculative, short-term markets.

Therefore, regardless of the platform type, the inherent structure and dynamics of binary options present significant hurdles to sustained profitability for retail traders, underpinning the widespread regulatory concerns and frequent comparisons to gambling activities.¹

V. Navigating the Global Regulatory Maze

The regulatory treatment of binary options varies dramatically across major financial jurisdictions, creating a complex and often hazardous landscape for potential traders. Understanding the specific rules and the status of platforms within one’s own jurisdiction is paramount.

A. Regulatory Oversight in the United States (CFTC, SEC, Nadex)

In the United States, the trading of binary options is legal but strictly regulated. For a platform to legally offer binary options to US residents, it must be registered either as an exchange with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or as a Designated Contract Market (DCM) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).² The relevant regulator depends on the underlying asset: the SEC generally oversees options based on securities, while the CFTC regulates options based on commodities (including forex, metals, agricultural products) and futures contracts.⁷

It is explicitly illegal for platforms located outside the US, operating without the necessary CFTC or SEC registration, to solicit or accept funds from US citizens for binary options trading.⁷ Despite this, a vast number of such offshore platforms exist and actively market their services globally.

Currently, only a very small number of regulated venues are authorized to offer binary options or similar products (like event futures, which share the binary payout structure ¹⁹) in the US. The most prominent exchange for retail binary options trading is the North American Derivatives Exchange (Nadex).⁵ Other designated contract markets include the CME Group (offering event futures ⁵) and Cantor Exchange LP.⁸ While the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) has historically been involved ¹², its current offerings or rules (e.g., regarding early exit ¹⁹) may differ.

Trading on these regulated US exchanges provides several key protections mandated by the CFTC and SEC. These include fair and transparent trading practices, mitigation of counterparty risk through central clearing mechanisms, segregation and protection of customer funds, and established procedures for dispute resolution.⁵ Furthermore, exchanges like Nadex enforce rules prohibiting third-party individuals or entities (“brokers”) from trading on behalf of members, requiring members to manage their own accounts.¹⁶ Both the CFTC and SEC actively issue investor alerts warning about the pervasive fraud associated with unregistered binary options platforms.⁷

The US approach maintains a legal avenue for binary options trading but confines it to a tightly controlled environment. This contrasts sharply with the outright bans implemented in many other developed markets. However, the existence of this legal framework does not diminish the significant risks posed by the multitude of illegal, unregulated offshore platforms that continue to target US residents. Potential US traders must exercise extreme diligence in verifying that any platform they consider using is genuinely registered with the CFTC or SEC, as listed on the regulators’ official websites. Engaging with an unregistered entity means forfeiting regulatory protections and significantly increasing exposure to fraud.

B. Restrictions and Bans in Major Markets (EU/ESMA, UK/FCA, Canada/CSA, Australia/ASIC)

Outside the regulated US market, the international regulatory consensus has moved decisively against allowing retail access to binary options, primarily due to widespread evidence of consumer harm and fraud.

European Union (EU): The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) took coordinated action, initially imposing temporary EU-wide prohibitions on the marketing, distribution, and sale of binary options to retail clients beginning in July 2018.¹ These temporary bans were renewed several times.³⁵ Subsequently, national competent authorities in many EU member states, such as France’s AMF ⁴¹ and Ireland’s Central Bank ³³, adopted permanent national measures to maintain the prohibition. ESMA’s measures, and often the national ones, included narrow exclusions for certain binary options meeting specific criteria, such as having a term of at least 90 days, being accompanied by a prospectus, being fully hedged by the provider, or structured such that the client’s initial investment was not at risk.³³
United Kingdom (UK): Following Brexit, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) implemented its own permanent ban on the sale, marketing, and distribution of binary options to retail clients, effective from April 2, 2019.¹⁴ The FCA’s ban explicitly included “securitised binary options,” extending slightly beyond ESMA’s scope to prevent a potential loophole.¹⁴ The FCA justified the ban by citing inherent product risks, poor conduct by firms leading to significant consumer harm (estimated potential savings of £17 million per year for consumers), and the product’s similarity to gambling (binary options were regulated by the Gambling Commission prior to MiFID II implementation).¹⁴
Canada: The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), representing the provincial and territorial securities regulators (with British Columbia having parallel regulations), implemented Multilateral Instrument 91-102 in December 2017.³¹ This instrument prohibits the advertising, offering, selling, or otherwise trading of binary options with a term to maturity of less than 30 days with or to any individual.⁹ The CSA identified binary options as the leading type of investment fraud affecting Canadians.⁹ The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) has confirmed that none of its regulated investment dealers are authorized to offer or sell binary options to retail investors ⁴⁵, and warnings are frequently issued about fraudulent entities falsely claiming IIROC affiliation.⁴⁵ Investor protection bodies note the difficulty in enforcing the ban against offshore operators and the limited recourse for Canadians investing through such channels.²⁷
Australia: The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) utilized its product intervention powers to ban the issue and distribution of binary options to retail clients, effective May 3, 2021.¹ Citing reviews that found approximately 80% of retail clients lost money and aggregate net losses were substantial ($14 million over 13 months pre-ban), ASIC deemed the products harmful.²² Finding the initial ban effective, ASIC extended it in September 2022, with the prohibition now set to last until October 1, 2031.¹ This aligns Australia’s stance with other major jurisdictions.²²
Israel: Authorities took strong action, linking the industry to criminal syndicates and enacting a ban on the sale of binary options in 2017.¹

This consistent pattern of prohibition across the EU, UK, Canada, Australia, and Israel constitutes a powerful international regulatory consensus. It signals that financial authorities in these major markets view binary options, particularly the short-term variants commonly offered online, as fundamentally unsuitable and excessively risky for retail investors due to their inherent structure, documented loss rates, and strong association with fraudulent operations. This near-global rejection outside the specific regulated US market underscores the extreme caution warranted for anyone encountering these products.

C. The Importance of Trading on Regulated Exchanges

Given the prevalence of fraud and the stark differences in regulatory approaches globally, the regulatory status of the trading platform emerges as arguably the most critical factor for anyone contemplating binary options trading. Engaging with a properly regulated exchange, where legally permitted, offers crucial protections often entirely absent on unregulated platforms.⁵

Key advantages of using regulated venues (like CFTC-designated contract markets in the US) include:

Regulatory Oversight: Operations are subject to rules and monitoring by authorities like the CFTC or SEC, aimed at ensuring market integrity and investor protection.⁵
Transparency: Pricing mechanisms (bid/ask reflecting probabilities) and trade execution processes are generally more transparent.⁵
Counterparty Risk Mitigation: Trades are typically cleared through a central clearinghouse, reducing the risk that a winning trade won’t be paid due to the failure of the counterparty.⁵
Fund Security: Regulations mandate the segregation of customer funds from the platform’s operational capital, often requiring them to be held in reputable banks, safeguarding client money in case of platform insolvency.⁸
Dispute Resolution: Established procedures exist for addressing complaints and resolving disputes.²³

Conversely, unregulated platforms, frequently operating from offshore jurisdictions with minimal oversight, present significantly elevated risks.¹ These risks include:

Outright fraud (e.g., theft of deposits).
Manipulation of prices or software to ensure client losses.
Refusal or unreasonable delays in processing withdrawals.
Misuse of personal data.
Lack of legal recourse for victims due to jurisdictional challenges.

Financial regulators worldwide consistently and emphatically warn investors to deal only with appropriately registered and licensed entities and to independently verify a platform’s registration status through official regulatory channels before depositing any funds.⁷ The difference in potential safety, fairness, and accountability between a regulated exchange and an anonymous offshore website is immense. Choosing an unregulated platform layers operational, counterparty, and fraud risks on top of the already substantial market risks inherent in binary options themselves.

D. Table: Summary of Binary Options Regulatory Status (Retail Clients)

The following table summarizes the regulatory status of binary options for retail clients in key jurisdictions:

Jurisdiction	Key Regulator(s)	Status for Retail Clients	Key Details / Permitted Venues	Supporting Information
United States	CFTC / SEC	Legal & Regulated (on specific exchanges)	Must trade on CFTC DCMs (e.g., Nadex, CME) or SEC-reg. exchanges. Offshore platforms illegal.	²
European Union	ESMA / National Regulators	Banned (with narrow exceptions)	Initial ESMA ban (July 2018), now permanent national bans (e.g., France, Ireland).	¹
United Kingdom	FCA	Banned	Permanent ban effective April 2019, includes securitised binary options.	¹⁴
Canada	CSA / Provincial Regulators / IIROC	Banned (<30 day expiry)	MI 91-102 prohibits short-term (<30 days) binary options for individuals (Dec 2017).	⁹
Australia	ASIC	Banned	Product intervention order banning issue/distribution to retail clients, extended to Oct 2031.	¹
Israel	ISA	Banned	Ban enacted in 2017, citing links to criminal syndicates.	¹

Note: This table reflects the general status for retail clients. Specific rules, definitions, and narrow exceptions may apply. Status can change; always verify with the relevant regulator.

VI. Warning Signs: Fraud and Other Non-Market Risks

Beyond the inherent market risks associated with predicting price movements, the binary options market, particularly the unregulated segment, is plagued by significant non-market risks, primarily related to fraud and unethical platform practices. Regulatory bodies worldwide have issued numerous warnings detailing common fraudulent schemes.⁷

A. Common Fraudulent Schemes

Investors should be aware of the following prevalent types of fraud associated with binary options platforms:

Refusal to Credit Accounts or Reimburse Funds: A frequent complaint involves platforms readily accepting deposits but subsequently refusing or ignoring customer requests to withdraw funds or profits.⁷ Platforms might invent reasons for denial, demand excessive documentation, impose hidden fees, become unresponsive, or simply cancel withdrawal requests.⁷ In some cases, associated “brokers” encourage clients to deposit more funds shortly before cutting off communication.⁷
Identity Theft: Some platforms solicit excessive amounts of sensitive personal information during the account opening or withdrawal process, such as copies of credit cards, driver’s licenses, passports, or utility bills.⁷ This information can then be misused for identity theft or sold to other criminals.⁷
Software Manipulation: There are numerous allegations that certain platforms manipulate their trading software to disadvantage clients and ensure losses.⁷ Tactics reported include distorting the displayed prices of underlying assets, altering the payout ratios after trades are placed, or, most egregiously, arbitrarily extending the expiration time of trades that are currently “winning” until the market moves against the client and the trade results in a loss.⁷
Fraudulent Marketing and Misrepresentation: This encompasses a range of deceptive practices, including grossly overstating potential returns and minimizing risks ⁸, using fake testimonials or fabricated celebrity endorsements (e.g., Richard Branson’s name has been falsely used ¹), presenting manipulated historical performance charts ⁸, falsely claiming to be regulated or affiliated with legitimate financial institutions or regulators (like Canada’s IIROC ⁴⁵), and operating entirely without the required licenses or registrations in the jurisdictions they target.¹

The scale of this problem is substantial. The U.S. FBI has estimated that binary options scams steal approximately US$10 billion annually from victims worldwide.¹ Investigations in Israel, once a major hub for binary options operations, explicitly linked the industry to organized crime syndicates before the country banned the practice.¹ These documented fraud types demonstrate that the risks extend far beyond poor trading decisions; they include the potential for deliberate deception, manipulation, and outright theft by the platform operators themselves. The lack of regulatory oversight in many parts of the market creates an environment where such criminal activity can thrive, particularly exploiting the inherent opacity of online platforms and the allure of quick profits.

B. The Dangers of Unregulated Offshore Platforms

A significant portion of the global binary options market operates through internet-based platforms that are intentionally domiciled in offshore jurisdictions with weak or non-existent financial regulation.¹ These entities often actively solicit clients in highly regulated countries like the US, Canada, UK, EU member states, and Australia, despite lacking the necessary licenses or registrations to do so legally.⁷

Choosing to trade with such an unregulated, offshore platform dramatically increases investor risk. Key dangers include:

Lack of Oversight: These platforms are not subject to the rules, monitoring, or consumer protection standards enforced by reputable regulators.
Increased Fraud Risk: The absence of oversight makes these platforms havens for the fraudulent schemes described above.
Limited Recourse: If funds are stolen, withheld, or disputes arise, investors have virtually no effective legal recourse. Pursuing action against an entity in a distant, uncooperative jurisdiction is often impractical or impossible.¹ The CFTC maintains a Registration Deficient (RED) List to warn investors about entities operating without proper registration, many of which are based offshore.⁸

Operating offshore and avoiding regulation is often a deliberate strategy employed by fraudulent operators to shield themselves from accountability. This geographic and regulatory distance makes it exceedingly difficult for victims to recover losses and for authorities in the victims’ home countries to take effective enforcement action. The decision by a platform to operate outside established regulatory frameworks should therefore be considered a major red flag, strongly suggesting an intent to avoid compliance and potentially engage in predatory practices.

C. Misleading Marketing and Unrealistic Promises

The marketing strategies employed by many binary options providers, especially unregulated ones, are frequently aggressive and deceptive.¹ Common tactics include:

Exaggerated Profit Potential: Advertisements often showcase unrealistic returns and portray binary options as an easy path to wealth (“get rich quick” schemes), downplaying or ignoring the high probability of loss.¹
Misleading Simplicity: Marketing emphasizes the simple “yes/no” nature of the bet, implying that trading success is equally simple.⁵
Aggressive Sales Tactics: Potential clients may be targeted through unsolicited emails, text messages, phone calls, or pervasive online and social media advertising.⁸ High-pressure tactics may be used to encourage immediate deposits.
False Scarcity or Urgency: Creating a sense of needing to invest quickly before an “opportunity” disappears.

The problematic nature of this marketing became so widespread that major online advertising platforms, including Google, Facebook, and Twitter, implemented bans on binary options advertisements around 2018 to protect their users from fraudulent schemes.¹ This action underscores the scale and severity of the deceptive marketing practices prevalent in the industry. Potential traders must approach any marketing materials related to binary options with extreme skepticism. Promises of easy money, guaranteed returns, or overly simplistic portrayals of trading are strong indicators of potential fraud or, at a minimum, a gross misrepresentation of the product’s inherent risks.

D. Recommendation: Due Diligence Steps

Given the significant risks of fraud and misconduct, particularly in the unregulated space, rigorous due diligence is essential before engaging with any binary options platform. Key steps include:

Verify Registration: Crucially, confirm if the platform is registered and regulated by the appropriate financial authority in your jurisdiction. For US residents, check the CFTC’s list of Designated Contract Markets ⁷ and the SEC’s EDGAR database and list of Exchanges.⁷ In Canada, use the CSA’s National Registration Search (aretheyregistered.ca).⁹ In the UK, check the FCA register. In Australia, check the ASIC register. Be aware that in many jurisdictions (EU, UK, Canada, Australia), retail binary options are banned, so any platform offering them is likely operating illegally.⁷
Check Location and Contact Information: Be extremely wary of platforms with no physical address, vague contact details, or operations based solely in offshore jurisdictions known for lax regulation.⁸
Assess Fund Security: Legitimate, regulated firms typically hold client funds in segregated accounts at reputable banks, separate from their own operating capital. Inquire about these arrangements.⁸
Understand Withdrawal Policies: Clearly understand the platform’s procedures, timelines, fees, and conditions for withdrawing funds before depositing any money. Any ambiguity, difficulty, or refusal related to withdrawals is a major warning sign.⁷
Reject Managed Accounts/Brokers: Be highly suspicious of any individual or service claiming they can trade your binary options account for you, guaranteeing profits. This is often a precursor to fraud. On regulated exchanges like Nadex, members are required to trade their own accounts.¹⁶
Ignore High-Pressure Sales Tactics and Unrealistic Promises: Immediately dismiss unsolicited offers, guarantees of high returns, pressure to deposit funds quickly, or claims that binary options are low-risk or easy money.²⁴

VII. Binary Options in Context: Comparisons with Alternatives

To fully grasp the nature of binary options, it is useful to compare them with more traditional financial instruments and other forms of speculation.

A. Binary Options vs. Traditional Vanilla Options: A Detailed Comparison

While both binary options and traditional “vanilla” options (standardized call and put options traded on major exchanges) are derivatives whose value depends on an underlying asset, they differ fundamentally in structure, risk, reward, and purpose.

Ownership Potential: Vanilla options grant the buyer the right (but not the obligation) to buy (call) or sell (put) the underlying asset at the strike price on or before expiration. This creates the potential pathway to actual ownership of the asset.² Binary options provide no such right or potential; they are purely cash-settled contracts based on a price proposition.²
Risk Profile (Buyer): Both types of options offer buyers capped risk, limited to the premium paid to acquire the option.² However, if a binary option expires out-of-the-money, the loss is typically 100% of the premium.² A vanilla option expiring out-of-the-money also results in the loss of the premium, but its value prior to expiration fluctuates, and strategies exist to manage or mitigate losses.
Reward Profile (Buyer): Binary options offer a fixed, predetermined maximum payout if they expire in-the-money, regardless of how far the price moves beyond the strike.² Vanilla options offer variable profit potential. For a call buyer, profit increases as the underlying asset’s price rises above the strike price (plus premium paid); for a put buyer, profit increases as the price falls below the strike (minus premium paid). This profit potential is theoretically unlimited for buyers.²
Complexity: Binary options are often marketed as simpler due to their straightforward “yes/no” structure and fixed outcomes.² Vanilla options are inherently more complex, involving multiple factors that influence their price (the “Greeks”: delta, gamma, theta, vega, rho), including the underlying asset’s price, strike price, time to expiration, volatility, and interest rates. This complexity allows for a vast array of sophisticated trading and hedging strategies.¹
Expiration and Exercise: Binary options typically have very short-term expirations (minutes, hours, days) and exercise automatically at expiration.² Vanilla options offer a wider range of expiration dates (weeks, months, years). American-style vanilla options can be exercised anytime before expiration, while European-style options (which some binary options resemble ⁴) can only be exercised at expiration.
Regulation: Vanilla options predominantly trade on highly regulated public exchanges (like CBOE, NYSE Arca, Nasdaq in the US), subject to stringent oversight.² While regulated venues for binary options exist (primarily in the US), a large segment of the historical and global market has operated through unregulated or poorly regulated online platforms, leading to widespread bans in many jurisdictions.¹
Purpose: Binary options serve almost exclusively as vehicles for short-term speculation.² Vanilla options are also used for speculation but serve critical functions in risk management and hedging for investors and institutions.³

In essence, the perceived simplicity and defined risk/reward of binary options come at a significant cost: limited profit potential, a payout structure often biased against the trader, no utility beyond speculation, and substantial exposure to regulatory and fraud risks in the largely unregulated global market. Vanilla options, though more complex to understand and trade, offer greater strategic flexibility, potentially uncapped profits for buyers, legitimate hedging applications, and operate within a much more robust and transparent regulatory framework. For individuals seeking genuine investment or sophisticated speculation tools, vanilla options provide a more versatile and better-regulated alternative.

B. Table: Key Differences Between Binary and Vanilla Options

Feature	Binary Options	Vanilla Options (Traditional)	Supporting Information
Underlying Asset Ownership	No potential for ownership	Potential via exercise (right to buy/sell asset)	²
Payout Structure	Fixed amount or nothing (“All-or-Nothing”)	Variable, based on difference between asset price and strike price at exercise/expiration	¹
Profit Potential (Buyer)	Capped / Fixed	Potentially Unlimited (scales with favorable price movement)	²
Loss Potential (Buyer)	Typically 100% of premium paid	100% of premium paid (value can decay before expiry)	²
Complexity	Perceived as simple (“Yes/No” outcome)	More complex (influenced by “Greeks”, allows complex strategies)	²
Typical Expiration	Very short-term (minutes, hours, days)	Wider range available (weeks, months, years)	³
Regulation	Mixed: Regulated on few US exchanges; Largely unregulated/banned elsewhere globally	Predominantly traded on highly regulated exchanges worldwide	¹
Primary Use	Speculation / Often compared to gambling	Speculation & Hedging	²

C. Binary Options vs. Other Speculative Activities (Forex, Gambling)

Comparison with Spot Forex Trading: Traditional spot forex trading involves buying one currency while selling another, aiming to profit from fluctuations in their exchange rate. Profit or loss is directly proportional to the size of the rate movement and the amount of leverage used. Leverage can amplify both gains and losses, potentially leading to losses exceeding the initial deposit.²⁰ Binary options based on forex pairs offer a different approach: a fixed payout determined solely by whether the exchange rate is above or below a specific strike price at expiration, with loss capped at the initial stake.⁵ While sometimes presented as a simpler way to speculate on currencies ⁵, the fixed payout structure and often unfavorable odds make binary options arguably riskier in terms of the probability of loss compared to potentially managing a traditional spot forex position.²⁰
Comparison with Gambling: The comparison between binary options and gambling is frequently made by market participants, regulators, and critics.¹ Key similarities include:

Wager-like Structure: Trading binary options often resembles placing a bet on the outcome of a future event (price movement).²
All-or-Nothing Outcome: The fixed win or total loss mirrors payouts in many forms of gambling.
Short Timeframes: The emphasis on rapid outcomes over very short durations is characteristic of many betting activities.
House Edge: On unregulated platforms, the payout structure (e.g., <100% win vs. 100% loss) often creates a statistical advantage for the platform, similar to the house edge in a casino.¹
Element of Chance: Particularly over very short timeframes, predicting market direction can be heavily influenced by random noise rather than skill or analysis, increasing the role of luck.²⁰ Notably, UK regulators initially classified binary options as gambling products before they were brought under financial regulation by MiFID II.¹⁸ While binary options traded on regulated exchanges operate within a financial market context, their fundamental structure, especially in the unregulated sphere, shares many characteristics with traditional gambling activities. This comparison underscores their highly speculative nature and distinguishes them sharply from conventional investing approaches focused on long-term value and risk management.

VIII. Final Considerations: Evaluating Binary Options Trading

A. Recap of Key Characteristics

Binary options are derivative financial instruments characterized by their unique structure:

They are based on a simple “yes or no” proposition regarding the future price of an underlying asset (such as stocks, indices, forex, commodities) relative to a predetermined strike price, or the occurrence of a specific event.
They have a fixed expiration time, often very short-term (minutes to days).
Trading involves choosing a “call” (predicting the outcome is “yes” or price is above strike) or a “put” (predicting “no” or price is at/below strike).
The payout is binary: a fixed, predetermined amount if the prediction is correct (in-the-money), or typically the complete loss of the invested amount if incorrect (out-of-the-money).
While regulated exchanges exist (primarily in the US, like Nadex and CME), a significant portion of the global market historically operated through unregulated online platforms, leading to widespread bans or restrictions in major jurisdictions like the EU, UK, Canada, and Australia.

B. Emphasis on Extreme Risk and Regulatory Concerns

It is impossible to evaluate binary options trading without acknowledging the extreme risks and significant regulatory concerns associated with these products. Overwhelming evidence gathered by financial regulators across multiple countries points to severe consumer harm:

High Loss Rates: Regulatory reviews consistently found that a vast majority of retail clients (often around 80%) lost money trading binary options.¹⁴ Aggregate losses often ran into millions or even billions of dollars annually.¹
Prevalence of Fraud: The market, particularly the unregulated segment, has been rife with fraudulent activities, including platforms refusing withdrawals, stealing personal data for identity theft, and manipulating trading software to ensure client losses.¹
Global Regulatory Condemnation: The documented harm led to coordinated regulatory actions, resulting in outright bans or severe restrictions on the sale of binary options to retail clients in the European Union, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Israel, and other jurisdictions.¹ This near-global consensus highlights the perceived unsuitability of these products for most individuals.
Gambling Comparisons and Negative Expectation: The structure often results in a negative mathematical expectation for the trader, particularly on platforms with asymmetric payouts, leading to frequent and justified comparisons with gambling rather than investing.¹

C. Concluding Recommendations for Potential Traders

Based on the analysis of their mechanics, risks, and regulatory status, the following considerations are crucial for anyone encountering or contemplating binary options trading:

Exercise Extreme Caution: Binary options should be viewed as extremely high-risk, speculative instruments, fundamentally different from traditional investments. They are not suitable for capital preservation, long-term growth, or retirement savings.
Prioritize Regulation Above All Else: If considering trading in a jurisdiction where it remains legal for retail clients (primarily the US), interact only with platforms that are demonstrably registered and regulated by the relevant national authority (e.g., CFTC-regulated DCMs in the US).⁷ Avoid all unregulated and offshore platforms without exception, as the risk of fraud and loss of funds is unacceptably high.
Fully Understand the Risks: Be acutely aware of the all-or-nothing payout structure, the high probability of losing the entire stake on any given trade, the often unfavorable odds embedded in payout percentages, the extreme difficulty of consistently predicting short-term market movements, and the pervasive risk of platform fraud and manipulation.
Risk Only Disposable Capital: Due to the high risk of rapid and complete loss, never trade binary options with money you cannot afford to lose entirely. This includes funds needed for living expenses, education, retirement, or other essential financial goals.
Maintain Extreme Skepticism Towards Marketing: Treat any claims of easy money, high or guaranteed returns, low risk, or simple paths to profitability with profound skepticism. Such marketing is almost invariably misleading and often a hallmark of fraudulent operations.¹
Evaluate Alternatives: Carefully consider whether other, more conventional and better-regulated financial instruments might be more appropriate for achieving speculation or investment objectives. Traditional options, futures, ETFs, or even direct stock or forex trading (with appropriate risk management) offer different risk/reward profiles and operate within more established regulatory frameworks.²

In conclusion, the evidence strongly suggests that binary options, particularly as offered by unregulated online platforms, represent a highly hazardous activity for retail participants. The combination of a challenging product structure, widespread fraudulent practices, and near-universal regulatory condemnation outside the limited US regulated market indicates that these instruments are unsuitable for the vast majority of individuals. Any potential engagement should only be considered with a complete understanding of the profound risks involved, an unwavering commitment to using only regulated venues where legal, and the use of capital that is entirely disposable.

Download PDF

Works cited

Binary option – Wikipedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_option
Binary Option: Definition, How They Trade, and Example, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/binary-option.asp
Binary Options Strategies You Should Know – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/052014/binary-options-strategies.asp
Asset-or-Nothing Put Option: What It is, How It Works, Example – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/aonp.asp
Trading Forex With Binary Options – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/022415/trading-forex-binary-options.asp
What is Binary Options? Definition of Binary Options, Binary Options Meaning – The Economic Times, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/definition/binary-options
CFTC/SEC Investor Alert: Binary Options and Fraud | CFTC, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/fraudadv_binaryoptions.html
Beware of Off-Exchange Binary Options Trades | CFTC, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/beware_of_off_exchange_binary_options.htm
INCLUDES COMMENT LETTERS – Alberta Securities Commission, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.asc.ca/-/media/ASC-Documents-part-1/Regulatory-Instruments/2018/10/5345680-CSA-Notice-Proposed-NI-91-102-Binary-Options.pdf
Canadian securities regulators propose to ban advertising, offering, selling and trading in binary options | ASC, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.asc.ca/en/news-and-publications/news-releases/2018/10/canadian-securities-regulators-propose-to-ban-advertising-offering-selling-and-trading-in-binary-opt
Futures Glossary | CFTC, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/CFTCGlossary/index.htm
Binary options – MarketsWiki, A Commonwealth of Market Knowledge, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.marketswiki.com/wiki/Binary_options
The Basics of Investing In Binary Options – Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://dfi.wa.gov/financial-education/information/basics-investing-binary-options
PS19/11: Product intervention measures for retail binary options – Financial Conduct Authority, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/impact-assessments/product-intervention-retail-binary-options.pdf
Binary Options Definition | Forexpedia™ by Babypips.com, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.babypips.com/forexpedia/binary-options
Trade Stock Indices with Binary Options – Nadex, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/learning/understanding-indices-trading-with-binary-options/
Investor Alert: Binary options and Fraud – SEC.gov, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/ia_binary.pdf
Product intervention measures for retail binary options Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) RPC rating: validated – GOV.UK, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d1df9c340f0b609f39009e5/RPC-4371_1_-HMT-FCA_-_product_intervention_measures_for_retail_binary_options_-_IA_f__opinion.pdf
A Guide to Trading Binary Options in the US – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/061114/guide-trading-binary-options-us.asp
Currency Binary: What It is, How it Works, Examples – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currency-binary.asp
Compliance Corner: UK Bans Binary Options For Retail Investors – Wealth Briefing, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.wealthbriefing.com/html/article.php/compliance-corner%3A-uk-bans-binary-options-for-retail-investors-
22-243MR ASIC’s binary options ban extended until 2031, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/find-a-media-release/2022-releases/22-243mr-asic-s-binary-options-ban-extended-until-2031/
Are binary options legal in the US? – Nadex, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/blog/are-binary-options-legal-in-the-us/
ESMA’s stop to binary options in Europe | Boccadutri, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.boccadutri.com/esma-stop-to-binary-options-in-europe/
21-064MR ASIC bans the sale of binary options to retail clients, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/find-a-media-release/2021-releases/21-064mr-asic-bans-the-sale-of-binary-options-to-retail-clients/
UK FCA Charges Four Individuals with £1.2M Binary Options Fraud – Finance Magnates, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.financemagnates.com/binary-options/uk-fca-charges-four-persons-in-12m-binary-options-fraud/
Bulletin: Binary options are highly risky and can leave investors with no protection, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.obsi.ca/en/news/posts/bulletin-binary-options-are-highly-risky-and-can-leave-investors-with-no-protection/
Nadex: trading binary options on a regulated US exchange – The Armchair Trader, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.thearmchairtrader.com/nadex-trading-binary-options-regulated-us-exchange/
ASIC extends binary options ban – Money Management, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.moneymanagement.com.au/news/policy-regulation/asic-extends-binary-options-ban
ASIC extends binary options ban until 2031 – NGM Lawyers, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://ngm.com.au/asic-binary-options-ban/
CSA Multilateral Notice of Multilateral Instrument 91-102 Prohibition of Binary Options and Related Companion Policy – Ontario Securities Commission, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.osc.ca/en/securities-law/instruments-rules-policies/9/91-102/csa-multilateral-notice-multilateral-instrument-91-102-prohibition-binary-options-and-related
Canadian securities regulators announce ban on binary options, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.osc.ca/en/news-events/news/canadian-securities-regulators-announce-ban-binary-options
The Central Bank, Binary Options and CFDs, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.mccannfitzgerald.com/knowledge/financial-services-regulation/the-central-bank-binary-options-and-cfds
Binary option ban extended, subject to certain exclusions – Taylor Wessing, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.taylorwessing.com/en/insights-and-events/insights/2018/09/binary-option-ban-extended-subject-to-certain-exclusions
ESMA to renew prohibition on binary options for a further three months – European Union, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-renew-prohibition-binary-options-further-three-months
Europe wide ban on risky binary options – DLA Piper, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.dlapiper.com/es-pr/insights/publications/2018/10/finance-and-markets-global-insight-issue-15/europe-wide-ban-on-risky-binary-options
Europe wide ban on risky binary options – DLA Piper, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2018/10/finance-and-markets-global-insight-issue-15/europe-wide-ban-on-risky-binary-options
Nadex Warns Against US-Based Binary Options Broker Daily Options – Finance Magnates, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/regulation/nadex-warns-against-us-based-binary-options-broker-daily-options/
The end of CFDs and Binary Options? – Why the EU has put a stop & what comes next, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.planetcompliance.com/news/the-end-of-cfds-and-binary-options-why-the-eu-has-put-a-stop-what-comes-next/
ESMA renews binary options prohibition for a further three months from 2 April 2019, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-renews-binary-options-prohibition-further-three-months-2-april-2019
Binary options and CFDs: the AMF adopts national intervention measures – Autorité des marchés financiers, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news-releases/amf-news-releases/binary-options-and-cfds-amf-adopts-national-intervention-measures
UK Financial Conduct Authority Implements Permanent Ban of Sale of Binary Options to Retail Consumers – A&O Shearman | FinReg, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://finreg.aoshearman.com/UK-Financial-Conduct-Authority-Implements-Permane
FCA Introduces Permanent Ban on Binary Options to Retail Consumers – objectivus, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://objectivus.com/fca-introduces-permanent-ban-on-binary-options-to-retail-consumers/
UK: Regulator to permanently ban binary options trading – PYMNTS.com, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.pymnts.com/cpi-posts/uk-regulator-to-permanently-ban-binary-options-trading/
IIROC warns against illegal sales of binary options, cryptocurrencies – Investment Executive, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investmentexecutive.com/news/from-the-regulators/iiroc-warns-against-illegal-sales-of-binary-options-cryptocurrencies/
Investors beware: fraudsters are misrepresenting themselves as IIROC‑regulated investment dealers, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.ciro.ca/newsroom/publications/investors-beware-fraudsters-are-misrepresenting-themselves-iiroc-regulated-investment-dealers
Binary options ban extended until 2031 – Sophie Grace, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://sophiegrace.com.au/binary-options-ban-extended-until-2031/
Australian regulator extends binary options ban to 2031 | Investment Executive, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investmentexecutive.com/news/from-the-regulators/australian-regulator-extends-binary-options-ban-to-2031/
ASIC Extends Binary Options Ban until October 2031 – Finance Magnates, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.financemagnates.com/binary-options/regulation/asic-extends-binary-options-ban-until-october-2031/
ASIC update: proposal to extend ban on binary options | Addisons | Sydney Law Firm, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://addisons.com/article/asic-update-proposal-to-extend-ban-on-binary-options/
Canadian securities regulators issue warning about fraudulent investment solicitations involving crypto assets, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.securities-administrators.ca/news/canadian-securities-regulators-issue-warning-about-fraudulent-investment-solicitations-involving-crypto-assets/