Are Binary Options Legal in the UK

1. Executive Summary

Binary options trading is subject to strict regulation within the United Kingdom (UK). The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the UK’s financial services regulator, has implemented a permanent ban prohibiting the sale, marketing, and distribution of binary options to retail consumers. This measure was enacted due to significant concerns regarding consumer harm stemming from the inherent risks of these products, widespread misconduct by firms offering them, and their frequent association with financial scams.¹ Consequently, binary options are effectively illegal for retail investors in the UK.

However, the prohibition specifically targets the retail market segment. Appropriately authorised firms may still offer binary options to clients who meet the stringent criteria for classification as professional clients under the FCA’s rules.¹ This distinction reflects a regulatory approach that provides heightened protection for less experienced investors while allowing sophisticated market participants access to higher-risk products, assuming they possess the necessary expertise to understand and manage the associated risks. Any offer of binary options to UK retail consumers should be treated with extreme caution, as it likely originates from an unauthorised firm or constitutes a scam.²

related posts : Best Binary OptionS Brokers (in 2025)

2. Defining Binary Options in Financial Trading

Binary options are a specific type of financial derivative contract characterized by their unique payoff structure and operational mechanics. Fundamentally, they represent a wager based on a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’ proposition concerning the future price movement of an underlying asset.⁵ These underlying assets can encompass a wide range, including individual stocks, foreign exchange (forex) currency pairs, commodities like gold or oil, and market indices.⁷ The core of the contract involves a prediction: will the price of the chosen asset be above or below a specific price level (the strike price) at a predetermined future point in time (the expiry time)?.⁹

The term “binary” derives from the two possible outcomes at expiration. If the trader’s prediction proves correct (the option expires ‘in-the-money’), they receive a fixed, predetermined monetary payout.⁹ Conversely, if the prediction is incorrect (the option expires ‘out-of-the-money’), the trader typically loses their entire initial investment, often referred to as the stake or premium.⁹ This “all-or-nothing” outcome is a defining feature.⁶ Unlike traditional options (often termed ‘vanilla options’), binary options do not grant the holder the right or potential to own the underlying asset itself; they are purely speculative instruments based on price movements.⁹

Binary options are typically associated with very short-term trading horizons, with contracts often expiring within minutes, hours, or days, although longer durations are possible.⁷ Their primary application is for speculation on short-term market fluctuations rather than for conventional investment strategies or long-term hedging purposes.⁷ The structure, particularly the fixed loss/gain and short timeframes, has led many commentators and regulators to compare binary options trading to gambling rather than investing.²

The inherent structure of many binary options offerings, especially those traded over-the-counter (OTC) directly with a broker, presents significant potential for conflicts of interest. Often, the firm offering the binary option acts as the direct counterparty to the client’s trade.¹⁴ This means the firm typically profits when the client loses, creating an incentive structure that can run counter to the client’s interests.¹⁴ This counterparty model, combined with the product’s characteristics, contributes to the information asymmetry between providers and clients. While presented as straightforward ‘yes/no’ bets, accurately valuing binary options and assessing the probability of success requires understanding complex factors like volatility and time decay, similar to traditional options.⁹ This complexity, masked by apparent simplicity, makes it challenging for retail investors to make fully informed decisions, a factor central to the regulatory concerns leading to intervention.¹⁴

3. The UK Financial Regulatory Authority: The FCA

The principal body responsible for overseeing the conduct of financial services firms and the functioning of financial markets in the United Kingdom is the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).¹⁷ The FCA was formally established on April 1, 2013, under the provisions of the Financial Services Act 2012.²⁰ This Act restructured the UK’s financial regulatory landscape, dissolving the previous single regulator, the Financial Services Authority (FSA), and creating two successor bodies: the FCA and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), which operates within the Bank of England.²⁰

The FCA operates with a distinct mandate focused on conduct regulation. Its statutory objectives, as defined by the Financial Services Act 2012, are threefold ¹⁹:

1. Consumer Protection: To secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers of financial services.
2. Market Integrity: To protect and enhance the integrity of the UK financial system.
3. Competition: To promote effective competition in the interests of consumers.

These objectives guide the FCA’s regulatory activities, including its rule-making, supervision of approximately 42,000 firms (as of recent data), and enforcement actions.²¹ The FCA possesses significant powers to investigate firms and individuals, impose penalties, and establish binding rules for authorised entities.¹⁹

Crucially, the FCA functions as an independent public body, operating independently of the UK Government.¹⁹ It is accountable to HM Treasury, which holds overall responsibility for the UK’s financial system, and ultimately to Parliament.¹⁹ Its funding is derived entirely from fees levied on the firms it regulates, not from government finances.¹⁹ This funding model reinforces its operational independence. Firms seeking to conduct regulated financial activities in the UK, including offering investment products or consumer credit, must obtain authorisation from the FCA.¹⁹

The FCA’s strong emphasis on consumer protection within its mandate is a critical factor in understanding its actions regarding binary options. The evidence of widespread harm experienced by retail consumers trading these products directly conflicted with this core objective, ultimately leading the regulator to deploy significant intervention powers.¹⁸ The decision to ban binary options for retail clients demonstrates the FCA’s commitment to its consumer protection objective, even when it involves prohibiting an entire product category for a specific market segment.

4. The FCA’s Permanent Ban on Binary Options for Retail Consumers

In a decisive regulatory action, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) implemented a permanent prohibition on the sale, marketing, and distribution of binary options specifically to retail consumers.¹ This ban applies to all firms conducting relevant activities either in or from the UK.¹

The FCA’s justification for this comprehensive ban was based on extensive evidence of significant consumer detriment associated with these products.² Key factors underpinning the decision include:

• Widespread Consumer Harm: Documented evidence showed that retail consumers frequently incurred large and unexpected financial losses when trading binary options.¹ Data suggested a majority of retail clients lost money.¹⁶
• Inherent Product Risks: The FCA identified fundamental issues with the products themselves, citing their complexity, lack of transparency in pricing and payouts, and the inherent difficulty for retail consumers to accurately assess their value and risks.¹⁴
• Poor Firm Conduct: The regulator highlighted concerns about the behaviour of firms involved in selling binary options. This included aggressive and often misleading marketing tactics, frequently deployed through online advertising and social media, which exaggerated potential profits.² Significant conflicts of interest were also noted, particularly where firms acted as counterparties and thus profited directly from client losses.¹⁴
• Association with Fraud: Binary options were identified as a significant source of investment fraud targeting UK consumers.⁴
• Addictive Potential: The gambling-like nature of the products, combined with extremely short contract durations, raised concerns about the potential for addictive trading behaviour leading to substantial accumulated losses.¹⁶

The scope of the FCA’s ban is comprehensive, deliberately encompassing all forms of binary options offered to retail clients. This includes not only standard over-the-counter (OTC) binary options but also products termed ‘securitised binary options’.¹ This latter category involves binary options that might be listed on a trading venue and subject to prospectus requirements.¹⁴ Notably, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), during its period of temporary EU-wide restrictions, had eventually excluded securitised binary options from the scope of its renewed ban.¹⁴ However, the FCA concluded that these products posed the same fundamental risks of harm to retail consumers due to their similar binary payoff structure and valuation difficulties.¹ By including them in the permanent UK ban, the FCA aimed to prevent a market from developing in these potentially harmful alternatives and close off avenues for regulatory arbitrage.² This decision to extend the ban beyond ESMA’s final temporary scope, despite limited evidence of active trading or harm specifically from securitised binary options in the UK at that time, underscores a proactive regulatory approach focused on preventing potential future harm and maintaining a consistent protective perimeter for retail investors against complex, high-risk products.¹

The FCA estimated that implementing this permanent prohibition would save UK retail consumers substantial amounts, potentially up to £17 million annually, primarily by preventing trading losses on these inherently flawed products.² Furthermore, the ban was expected to reduce the risk of consumers falling victim to fraud perpetrated by unauthorised entities falsely claiming to offer legitimate binary options investments.² This intervention represents a clear policy determination that the risks associated with binary options were fundamentally incompatible with the standards of consumer protection required for the retail market, necessitating a complete prohibition rather than less stringent measures like enhanced warnings or conduct rules.¹

5. Timeline of the UK Regulatory Action

The regulatory landscape for binary options in the UK evolved significantly over a relatively short period, culminating in the current permanent ban for retail consumers. Key dates and developments include:

• January 3, 2018: Binary options were officially brought within the scope of FCA regulation, being classified as financial investments under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) transposition.¹⁶ Prior to this date, they were generally regulated by the UK Gambling Commission.⁴ This change meant firms offering binary options trading in or from the UK required FCA authorisation.¹⁶
• July 2, 2018: The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), exercising its product intervention powers, implemented temporary EU-wide restrictions on the marketing, distribution, and sale of binary options to retail clients.¹ These measures were initially set for three months and subsequently renewed, although later renewals saw the exclusion of ‘securitised binary options’.³ UK firms were required to comply with these ESMA measures while they were in effect.³²
• December 7, 2018: The FCA published Consultation Paper CP18/37, proposing to introduce permanent rules in the UK that would mirror ESMA’s initial restrictions but crucially, would also include securitised binary options within the scope of the ban.¹ This consultation signalled the FCA’s intent to establish a lasting domestic prohibition.
• March 29, 2019: Following the consultation period, the FCA published Policy Statement PS19/11, confirming its final rules for a permanent ban on the sale, marketing, and distribution of all binary options (including securitised ones) to retail consumers.¹
• April 2, 2019: The FCA’s permanent ban on binary options for retail consumers officially came into force.¹ Firms were required to comply with these UK rules, which applied alongside ESMA’s temporary measures until those measures expired or ceased to apply in the UK (particularly relevant in the context of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU).¹

This timeline illustrates a rapid regulatory response. Within approximately six months of binary options falling under the FCA’s remit, temporary EU-wide measures were imposed. Less than a year after that, the FCA had consulted on and implemented its own permanent, slightly broader, domestic ban. This accelerated pace reflects the significant level of concern among regulators regarding the severity and immediacy of the risks posed by these products to retail investors, prompting swift and decisive intervention rather than a prolonged period of observation or incremental adjustments to conduct rules.¹ The FCA’s move to establish its own permanent rules also ensured regulatory continuity and clarity for UK firms and consumers, independent of the evolving EU measures and the Brexit process, while reinforcing the UK’s commitment to high consumer protection standards.¹

6. Binary Options and Professional Clients

The FCA’s prohibition on binary options is specifically targeted at retail consumers.¹ The regulations do not extend this ban to clients who are correctly classified as professional clients. Firms holding the necessary regulatory permissions are permitted to market, distribute, and sell binary options to individuals or entities meeting the criteria for professional client status.¹

This distinction has direct implications for firms previously authorised to offer binary options. Following the implementation of the retail ban, firms wishing to continue offering these products were required to apply to the FCA for a Variation of Permission (VoP). This VoP would either remove the authorisation for binary options entirely or formally restrict the permission, limiting the offering solely to professional clients.¹

The classification of a client as ‘professional’ is strictly defined within the FCA Handbook, primarily in the Conduct of Business Sourcebook (COBS) section 3.5.³⁴ There are two main categories:

1. Per se Professional Clients: These are entities considered inherently professional due to their nature, size, and activities. Examples include regulated financial institutions (banks, investment firms, insurance companies), large undertakings meeting specific financial thresholds (e.g., balance sheet total, net turnover, own funds), national governments, central banks, and certain institutional investors.³⁴ These clients are automatically treated as professional.
2. Elective Professional Clients: These are clients who would normally be classified as retail but can choose (‘elect’) to be treated as professional clients if they meet specific qualitative and quantitative criteria, and follow a defined procedure.³⁴

For a firm to treat a client as an elective professional client for MiFID (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive) business, such as trading binary options, the following conditions must be met ³⁴:

• Qualitative Assessment: The firm must conduct a thorough assessment of the client’s expertise, experience, and knowledge to ensure they are capable of making their own investment decisions and understanding the associated risks.
• Quantitative Test: The client must meet at least two out of the three criteria summarised in the table below.
• Procedural Requirements:

• The client must explicitly request in writing to be treated as a professional client.
• The firm must provide a clear written warning detailing the specific regulatory protections and compensation rights the client will lose (e.g., access to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS)).
• The client must confirm in writing, in a document separate from the main client agreement, that they are aware of the consequences of losing these protections.

Table 1: Quantitative Criteria for Elective Professional Client Status (COBS 3.5.3R(2) – MiFID Business)

Criterion	Description	Threshold
Trading Activity	Carried out transactions in significant size on the relevant market	Average frequency of 10 per quarter over the previous four quarters
Portfolio Size	Size of the client’s financial instrument portfolio (including cash deposits and financial instruments)	Exceeds EUR 500,000
Professional Experience	Works or has worked in the financial sector	At least one year in a professional position requiring knowledge of the relevant transactions/services

Source: FCA Handbook, COBS 3.5.3R.³⁴ Note: At least two of these three criteria must be met, in addition to the qualitative assessment and procedural requirements.

The existence of the professional client category, while allowing access for sophisticated investors, presents a supervisory challenge. There is a risk that firms might improperly encourage or pressure retail clients, who do not genuinely meet the criteria, to opt-up to professional status simply to circumvent the retail ban and gain access to restricted products like binary options.³⁵ Doing so would inappropriately strip these clients of crucial protections. The FCA is aware of this risk and has taken enforcement action against firms found engaging in such practices, highlighting the importance of correct client classification and the regulator’s focus on preventing the misuse of the elective professional client regime.³⁵ The detailed criteria in COBS 3.5 represent an attempt to establish objective measures of sophistication, but the reliance on firm assessment and client declarations means vigilance is required to ensure the system functions as intended to protect vulnerable consumers while facilitating market access for genuinely professional investors.³⁴

7. FCA Consumer Warnings and Identified Risks

Concurrent with its regulatory actions, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued numerous public warnings to consumers regarding the significant risks associated with binary options, particularly highlighting the prevalence of scams.⁴ These warnings underscore the rationale behind the retail ban and serve to educate the public on potential dangers.

The FCA consistently emphasizes several key risks inherent in binary options trading for retail investors ¹⁶:

• High Likelihood of Loss: Data indicated that the majority of consumers lose money trading binary options, making sustained profitability extremely difficult.
• Speculative Nature: The products are characterized as high-risk and speculative, more akin to betting than traditional investing.
• Complexity and Valuation Issues: The short durations and complex pricing mechanisms make it difficult for consumers to make informed decisions or accurately value the options.
• Addictive Potential: The rapid pace of trading and fixed-odds betting structure can encourage addictive behaviour and lead to significant losses.
• Conflicts of Interest: The common business model where the provider profits from client losses creates an inherent conflict.

A major focus of the FCA’s warnings has been the strong link between binary options and outright fraud and scams.⁴ The regulator has detailed common tactics employed by fraudulent operators:

• Misleading Advertising: Scammers frequently use social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, etc.) and search engines to promote their schemes, often using professional-looking websites and enticing imagery of luxury lifestyles.⁴
• Unrealistic Return Promises: Offers often promise exceptionally high or guaranteed returns to lure victims.¹⁶
• False UK Presence: Many fraudulent firms are based overseas but falsely claim a UK address (e.g., in the City of London) to appear legitimate.⁴
• Operational Fraud: Tactics include manipulating trading software to generate losing trades, distorting prices and payouts, refusing to process withdrawals, and abruptly closing client accounts or ceasing communication.⁴

The scale of the problem was significant, with reports indicating substantial financial losses incurred by UK consumers due to binary options scams – figures cited include £59.4 million lost by over 2,600 victims since 2012, and losses averaging over £87,000 per day at one point.¹⁶ This pervasive fraudulent activity appears to have been a major catalyst for the FCA’s decisive intervention, complementing the concerns about the risks of the legitimate (though flawed) product itself.²

Crucially, the FCA advises that following the permanent ban, any firm currently offering binary options services to retail consumers in the UK is highly likely to be operating illegally without authorisation, or is simply a scam.²

To help consumers protect themselves, the FCA strongly recommends:

• Checking the FCA Register: Always verify if a firm is authorised by the FCA before dealing with them. The Register provides details of authorised firms and their permitted activities.⁴
• Consulting the Warning List: Check the FCA’s Warning List for details of firms known to be operating without authorisation.⁴ The FCA has published lists specifically naming unauthorised binary options providers.³¹
• Using ScamSmart Resources: Utilise the FCA’s ScamSmart campaign materials for guidance on identifying and avoiding investment scams.²
• Being Wary of Unsolicited Contact: Exercise caution if contacted unexpectedly about investment opportunities, especially if pressured to invest quickly or promised unrealistic returns.⁴

These public warnings and tools serve a dual purpose: directly cautioning consumers and acting as regulatory signals that reinforce the illegitimacy of the retail binary options market in the UK, thereby aiming to deter unauthorised activity and shrink the operating space for fraudulent entities.⁴

8. Conclusion

The regulatory position regarding binary options in the United Kingdom is unambiguous for the retail market: they are illegal. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) enacted a permanent ban, effective April 2, 2019, prohibiting the sale, marketing, and distribution of all forms of binary options to retail consumers by firms operating in or from the UK.¹

This prohibition stems from profound consumer protection concerns. The FCA concluded, based on substantial evidence, that binary options pose inherent risks due to their complexity, lack of transparency, and speculative nature. Furthermore, the market was plagued by poor conduct from selling firms, including aggressive marketing and significant conflicts of interest, and was heavily associated with widespread investment fraud causing substantial consumer losses.² The ban reflects a regulatory judgment that these products are fundamentally unsuitable for retail investors.

However, the regulatory framework differentiates between client categories. The ban explicitly applies only to retail consumers. Firms that hold the appropriate FCA authorisation are permitted to offer binary options to clients who meet the strict criteria for classification as professional clients, as defined in the FCA Handbook (COBS 3.5).¹ This requires satisfying specific qualitative and quantitative tests related to financial expertise, trading experience, and portfolio size, along with explicit client consent acknowledging the loss of retail protections.

Therefore, while not entirely eradicated from the UK market, binary options are confined to a segment of sophisticated investors deemed capable of understanding and bearing the high risks involved. For the average investor, binary options are off-limits. Any unsolicited offer or advertisement promoting binary options to UK retail consumers should be treated as highly suspicious and likely indicative of an unauthorised firm or an outright scam.² Consumers are strongly advised to verify any firm’s authorisation status on the FCA Register before engaging with them and to utilise the FCA’s ScamSmart resources and Warning List to avoid potential fraud. The UK’s stance demonstrates a robust, consumer-focused regulatory approach, prioritising the protection of retail investors from products deemed excessively risky or prone to misuse.

Download PDF

Works cited

1. PS19/11: Product intervention measures for retail binary options | FCA, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/publications/policy-statements/ps19-11-product-intervention-measures-retail-binary-options
2. FCA confirms permanent ban on the sale of binary options to retail consumers, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/fca-confirms-permanent-ban-sale-binary-options-retail-consumers
3. PS19/11: Product intervention measures for retail binary options – Financial Conduct Authority, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/policy/ps19-11.pdf
4. Binary options scams | FCA, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/binary-options-scams
5. Binary Option: Definition, How They Trade, and Example – Investopedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/binary-option.asp
6. Binary option – Wikipedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_option
7. www.investopedia.com, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/052014/binary-options-strategies.asp#:~:text=8-,Understanding%20Binary%20Options,they%20are%20short%2Dterm%20trades.
8. Binary Options Strategies You Should Know – Investopedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/052014/binary-options-strategies.asp
9. The Most Important Technical Indicators for Binary Options – Investopedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/022615/most-important-technical-indicators-binary-options.asp
10. How to Hedge Stock Positions Using Binary Options – Investopedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/073015/how-hedge-stock-positions-using-binary-options.asp
11. The Basics of Investing In Binary Options – Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, accessed April 20, 2025, https://dfi.wa.gov/financial-education/information/basics-investing-binary-options
12. Currency Binary: What It is, How it Works, Examples – Investopedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currency-binary.asp
13. Trading Forex With Binary Options – Investopedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/022415/trading-forex-binary-options.asp
14. PS19/11: Product intervention measures for retail binary options – Financial Conduct Authority, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/impact-assessments/product-intervention-retail-binary-options.pdf
15. FCA Introduces Permanent Ban on Binary Options to Retail Consumers – objectivus, accessed April 20, 2025, https://objectivus.com/fca-introduces-permanent-ban-on-binary-options-to-retail-consumers/
16. Consumer warning about the risks of investing in binary options | FCA, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/news-stories/consumer-warning-about-risks-investing-binary-options
17. Financial Conduct Authority | FCA, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/
18. Financial Conduct Authority – GOV.UK, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/financial-conduct-authority
19. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA): The UK’s Financial Regulator – Investopedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/financial-conduct-authority-uk-fca.asp
20. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) – Practical Law – Thomson Reuters, accessed April 20, 2025, https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/5-107-5761?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)
21. Financial Conduct Authority – Wikipedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_Conduct_Authority
22. Financial Services Authority (FSA): What It Was, What Replaced It – Investopedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/financial-services-authority-fsa.asp
23. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) | United Kingdom – Journal of Regulation & Compliance, accessed April 20, 2025, https://thejournalofregulation.com/en/article/financial-conduct-authority-fca/
24. About us | FCA, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/about
25. Apply for Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) authorisation – GOV.UK, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/find-licences/registration-with-the-financial-conduct-authority
26. FCA confirms permanent ban on the sale of binary options to retail consumers – CCTA, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.ccta.co.uk/fca-confirms-permanent-ban-on-the-sale-of-binary-options-to-retail-consumers/
27. FCA warns of increased risk of online investment fraud, as investors lose £87k a day to binary options scams, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-warns-increased-risk-online-investment-fraud-investors-scamsmart
28. Product intervention measures for retail binary options Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) RPC rating: validated – GOV.UK, accessed April 20, 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d1df9c340f0b609f39009e5/RPC-4371_1_-HMT-FCA_-_product_intervention_measures_for_retail_binary_options_-_IA_f__opinion.pdf
29. CP18/37: Product intervention measures for retail binary options – Financial Conduct Authority, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/consultation/cp18-37.pdf
30. FCA proposes permanent measures for retail CFDs and binary options, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-proposes-permanent-measures-retail-cfds-and-binary-options
31. FCA issues list of unauthorised binary options providers, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-issues-list-unauthorised-binary-options-providers
32. FCA statement on onshoring ESMA’s temporary intervention measures on retail CFD and binary options products, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/onshoring-esma-temporary-intervention-measures-retail-cfd-binary-options
33. COBS 22.4 – Rule-making and Amending Instruments – FCA Handbook, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/COBS/22/4.html?section=cobs%2022.4&view=instrument
34. COBS 3.5 Professional clients – FCA Handbook, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/COBS/3/5.html
35. FCA fines FXTB for unfair customer treatment practices, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-fines-fxtb-unfair-customer-treatment-practices
36. Binary Crypto Trading LTD | FCA, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/warnings/binary-crypto-trading-ltd
37. 365 Binary Option | FCA, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/warnings/365-binary-option-owned-oproserv-ltd