Are Nadex Binary Options More Profitable Than Stock Options

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

Purpose:

Financial markets offer a diverse array of instruments for speculation, hedging, and investment. Among these are derivative products, whose value is derived from underlying assets. This report provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of two distinct derivative types: Nadex binary options and traditional stock options (also known as equity options). The primary objective is to examine their structures, risk profiles, cost implications, strategic applications, and ultimately, address the question of relative profitability potential for traders and investors.

Context:

Both Nadex binary options and traditional stock options operate within regulated frameworks in the United States, albeit under different oversight bodies and with fundamentally different mechanics. Traditional stock options, primarily traded on exchanges like the Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have a long history as tools for managing equity exposure.1 Binary options gained traction in the US retail market following SEC approval for exchange listing in 2008.1 Nadex (North American Derivatives Exchange) emerged as the premier US-based, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulated exchange for these instruments, offering binary options, knock-outs, and call spreads on various underlying markets.4 It is crucial to distinguish Nadex’s offerings from unregulated offshore binary options platforms, which have been associated with significant risks, including fraud and manipulation, as highlighted by regulatory bodies like the CFTC and SEC.1 This analysis focuses exclusively on Nadex binary options and exchange-listed traditional stock options.

Roadmap:

This report will systematically compare Nadex binary options and traditional stock options across several key dimensions. It begins by defining each instrument, detailing their core structure, underlying markets, payout mechanisms, and regulatory status. Subsequently, it compares profit calculations, potential return on investment (ROI), and risk structures, including maximum potential losses. The analysis then contrasts typical trading strategies employed for each instrument and examines the influence of market volatility and time decay. Transaction costs associated with trading both products are compared. Finally, the report synthesizes these elements to evaluate arguments regarding inherent profitability potential, considering factors such as complexity, required skill, and trader risk tolerance.

related posts : Best Binary Options Brokers (in 2025)

2. Defining the Instruments: Nadex Binary Options

Core Structure: The Yes/No Proposition:

Nadex binary options are fundamentally defined by their reliance on a “yes or no” proposition concerning the price of an underlying asset at a specific future time.1 The core question a trader addresses is simple: “Will this market be above this price at this time?”.4 If the trader believes the answer is yes, they buy the binary option; if they believe the answer is no, they sell.4 This binary outcome structure dictates the payout: the contract settles at a fixed value ($100) if the proposition is true at expiration, and at zero if it is false.4 This contrasts significantly with traditional options, which grant the buyer a right (not an obligation) to buy or sell the underlying asset and do not automatically exercise based solely on a yes/no condition relative to the strike price at expiration.2 Nadex binary options, however, exercise automatically based on the settlement value relative to the strike price.1

While the framing of the trade as a simple “yes/no” question appears straightforward ⁴, the mechanism through which these options are priced introduces a layer of complexity. The price of a Nadex binary option fluctuates between $0 and $100 prior to expiration, reflecting the market’s real-time assessment of the probability that the “yes” condition will be met.¹ Nadex materials explicitly state that the midpoint between the bid and ask prices approximates the market’s perceived probability of the event occurring.⁹ Therefore, engaging successfully with these instruments requires more than a simple directional bias; it necessitates an understanding of how probabilities are assessed and priced by the market, challenging the notion that their operational simplicity translates directly to ease of achieving consistent profitability.

Underlying Markets and Contract Specifications:

Nadex offers binary options contracts on a diverse range of underlying markets. These include major stock index futures (e.g., US 500, Wall Street 30, reflecting indices like the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average), foreign exchange (forex) currency pairs, commodities like crude oil and gold, and even specific economic events such as Non-Farm Payrolls reports or Federal Reserve interest rate decisions.4 It is important for traders to note that Nadex stock index binary options are based on the corresponding futures contracts, requiring analysis to be focused on the futures market rather than the cash index itself.8 Nadex also lists related derivative products like Knock-Outs (also known as Touch Brackets) and Call Spreads, which have different payout structures but share the characteristic of defined risk.6

Each binary option contract is defined by three key elements: the specific underlying market, the strike price (the price level central to the yes/no question), and the expiration date and time.⁴ Nadex provides a variety of expiration times, catering to different trading styles. These range from very short-term intraday contracts, such as 5-minute or 20-minute binaries, to hourly, daily, and weekly contracts.⁴ This allows traders to speculate on price movements over different time horizons.

Expiration and Settlement Process:

Upon reaching the specified expiration time, Nadex binary options are automatically settled into cash.10 There is no delivery of the underlying asset; outcomes are purely financial.10 The settlement value is determined by Nadex’s calculation of the underlying market’s price at expiration, known as the “expiration value” or “indicative index value”.10 If this expiration value is greater than the strike price, the binary option contract settles at $100. Buyers of the contract receive the $100 payout, while sellers receive $0. Conversely, if the expiration value is equal to or less than the strike price, the contract settles at $0. Buyers receive $0, and sellers receive the $100 payout.10

Nadex emphasizes the transparency and fairness of its expiration value calculation process, contrasting it with potential ambiguities at non-regulated brokers.¹⁹ As a CFTC-regulated exchange, Nadex adheres to strict rules outlined in its Rulebook.¹⁰ The specific calculation methodology varies slightly depending on the underlying market. For contracts based on futures, Nadex typically uses trade prices from the underlying market in the period immediately preceding expiration. To prevent manipulation, especially during periods of high activity (e.g., 25 or more trades in the last 10 seconds), Nadex removes outlier prices (highest and lowest 20%) before averaging the remaining trades.¹⁹ For forex contracts, which trade over-the-counter, Nadex uses midpoint prices (between best bid and offer within a certain pip range) from a proprietary data feed based on major bank data. Similar outlier removal procedures (e.g., removing highest/lowest 30% during high activity) are applied to ensure a representative market price.¹⁹ This robust methodology aims to ensure that all contracts on the same underlying market and expiration time settle based on a single, fairly determined value.¹⁶

Payout Mechanism: The $0 or $100 Outcome:

The defining characteristic of a Nadex binary option is its fixed, binary payout structure. At expiration, the contract is worth either exactly $100 or exactly $0, with no intermediate values.1 If a trader’s prediction is correct (bought and price finished above strike, or sold and price finished at or below strike), they receive $100 per contract held. If their prediction is incorrect, they receive $0.4

This structure directly determines the profit and loss potential. The price paid to enter the trade (which ranges from $0 to $100, excluding fees) represents the maximum possible loss for the buyer and the maximum possible profit for the seller.¹ Conversely, the maximum possible profit for the buyer is $100 minus the entry cost, which equals the maximum possible loss for the seller.¹ The sum of the maximum potential profit and maximum potential loss for any given trade always equals $100 per contract.¹ This creates a system of inherently defined risk and reward, known before the trade is initiated. While the primary outcome is determined at expiration, Nadex also allows traders to close their positions before the contract expires by placing an offsetting order (selling if they initially bought, buying if they initially sold). The profit or loss in this case is determined by the difference between the entry price and the exit price, allowing traders to potentially lock in profits or cut losses early based on the current market price of the binary option.⁴

The fixed $0/$100 settlement structure inherently mandates defined risk and reward for both buyers and sellers from the outset.¹ This is not merely an optional feature but a fundamental consequence of the binary payout design itself. When a trader buys a binary option for, say, $40, their maximum loss is capped at that $40 cost, and their maximum potential profit is $60 ($100 – $40).¹ The seller of that same option receives $40, their maximum profit is capped at $40, and their maximum risk is $60. This pre-defined, symmetrical risk profile is structurally embedded in the instrument, contrasting sharply with traditional options where the risk and reward depend significantly on the magnitude of the underlying asset’s price movement after the trade is initiated.

Regulatory Standing: The Nadex/CFTC Framework:

Nadex operates as a Designated Contract Market (exchange) and a Derivatives Clearing Organization (clearinghouse) registered with and regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), a US government agency.4 This regulatory oversight is a cornerstone of Nadex’s operations and market positioning. CFTC regulation mandates adherence to rules concerning market integrity, fair trade practices, transparency (e.g., in settlement calculations), and the protection of customer funds, which must be held in segregated accounts at major US banks.5 Trading on a regulated exchange like Nadex provides participants with the safeguards embedded in US commodities laws.6

The emphasis Nadex places on its CFTC-regulated status ⁴ serves not only as a statement of compliance but also as a critical market differentiator. The broader binary options market, particularly platforms operating offshore and outside US jurisdiction, has been subject to numerous regulatory warnings regarding fraudulent practices, software manipulation, and refusal to pay customer funds.¹ Nadex actively contrasts its regulated environment with these risks, positioning itself as a secure and legitimate venue for US residents to trade binary options.⁶ This regulatory standing is thus a key element of Nadex’s identity and a signal intended to build trust within a market segment that has faced significant reputational challenges.

3. Defining the Instruments: Traditional Stock Options

Core Structure: Calls, Puts, and the Right vs. Obligation:

Traditional stock options, also referred to as equity options, are derivative contracts that grant the buyer a specific right, but crucially, not an obligation. This right pertains to either buying or selling shares of an underlying stock at a predetermined price, known as the strike price (or exercise price), on or before a specific expiration date.2 Typically, one standard equity option contract corresponds to 100 shares of the underlying stock.20

There are two fundamental types of stock options:

Call Options: Give the holder the right to buy the underlying stock at the strike price. Call buyers are typically bullish, anticipating a rise in the stock price above the strike price.²
Put Options: Give the holder the right to sell the underlying stock at the strike price. Put buyers are typically bearish, anticipating a fall in the stock price below the strike price.²

This structure differs fundamentally from binary options. Stock options provide the potential for acquiring or disposing of the underlying asset itself (physical settlement for equity options ²²), rather than representing a simple yes/no proposition settled only in cash.¹ Furthermore, the option buyer retains control over the decision to exercise the option.²⁰ In contrast, the seller (or writer) of the option takes on an obligation: the call writer must sell the stock if the buyer exercises, and the put writer must buy the stock if the buyer exercises.²⁰

Deriving Value: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Components:

The price of a stock option in the market is known as the premium.2 This premium is paid by the option buyer and received by the option seller.25 The premium is composed of two distinct components: intrinsic value and extrinsic value (also commonly called time value).2

Intrinsic Value: Represents the immediate value an option would have if it were exercised instantly. For a call option, intrinsic value exists if the current stock price is above the strike price; it is calculated as (Stock Price – Strike Price). For a put option, intrinsic value exists if the current stock price is below the strike price; it is calculated as (Strike Price – Stock Price). An option with intrinsic value is said to be “in-the-money” (ITM). If an option has no intrinsic value (i.e., the stock price is at or below the strike for a call, or at or above the strike for a put), it is “at-the-money” (ATM) or “out-of-the-money” (OTM).² Intrinsic value cannot be negative.
Extrinsic Value (Time Value): This is the portion of the option premium that exceeds its intrinsic value.²⁸ It represents the market’s perceived value of the possibility that the option could become more profitable before expiration. Extrinsic value is influenced primarily by two factors: the time remaining until the option expires and the expected future volatility of the underlying stock’s price (implied volatility).²⁵ Options that are OTM or ATM have premiums consisting entirely of extrinsic value.²¹ As an option approaches its expiration date, its extrinsic value decays, a phenomenon known as time decay or Theta.²⁰

Key Pricing Determinants:

The premium of a stock option is dynamically influenced by several key factors 25:

Underlying Stock Price: As the stock price rises, call premiums generally increase, and put premiums generally decrease. The opposite occurs when the stock price falls.²⁵
Strike Price: For calls, premiums decrease as the strike price increases (higher strikes are harder to reach). For puts, premiums increase as the strike price increases (higher strikes offer more protection or profit potential on a down move).²⁵
Time to Expiration: Generally, options with more time until expiration have higher premiums (more extrinsic value) because there is more time for the underlying stock price to move favorably.²⁰ The rate of time decay (Theta) accelerates as expiration approaches.²⁰
Implied Volatility (IV): This reflects the market’s expectation of future price fluctuations in the underlying stock. Higher IV leads to higher option premiums for both calls and puts, as increased potential for large price swings enhances the chance of the option finishing significantly ITM.²⁰ IV is derived from current option prices using pricing models and is a critical factor assessed by traders.²⁷ The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) is a widely followed measure of market-wide implied volatility based on S&P 500 index options.³
Interest Rates: Higher risk-free interest rates tend to slightly increase call premiums and slightly decrease put premiums.²⁵ This effect (Rho) is generally less significant than other factors for shorter-dated options.
Dividends: Expected cash dividends paid by the underlying stock before expiration tend to decrease call premiums and increase put premiums, as dividends reduce the stock price on the ex-dividend date.²⁵

Theoretical option pricing models, such as the Black-Scholes model, provide a mathematical framework for estimating option premiums based on these inputs.²⁵ Associated with these models are the “Greeks” (Delta, Gamma, Theta, Vega, Rho), which measure the sensitivity of an option’s premium to changes in each of these key factors, providing traders with tools to manage specific risks.²¹

The intricate interplay of these multiple factors ²⁵ and the quantitative measures provided by the Greeks ²¹ introduce a level of complexity far exceeding that of Nadex binary options, where the price primarily reflects the probability of a single, specific outcome.⁹ However, this very complexity is what empowers traders to employ a vast spectrum of sophisticated strategies. Stock options allow traders to move beyond simple directional bets and construct positions designed for hedging existing portfolios, generating income, or speculating on nuanced market conditions like changes in volatility or the passage of time.²² The ability to isolate and trade specific risk factors (e.g., selling premium to capture time decay via Theta, or buying options to profit from expected increases in volatility via Vega) enables strategies such as complex spreads, straddles, and covered calls, which have no direct equivalent in the binary options world. Thus, the complexity of stock options is not merely a hurdle but the foundation of their strategic versatility.

Expiration and Exercise Styles:

Stock options are listed with standardized expiration dates. Traditionally, these were monthly, typically expiring on the third Friday of the month.23 However, the market has evolved to include weekly options (Weeklys) that expire on Fridays, and even options with daily expirations (0DTE or zero-days-to-expiry options) have gained popularity for very short-term trading.22 Longer-term options, known as LEAPS (Long-Term Equity AnticiPation Securities), are also available, with expirations extending years into the future.23

A key distinction relates to exercise style. Most US equity options are “American style,” meaning the buyer can choose to exercise their right to buy or sell the stock at any time up to the expiration date.²² In contrast, many broad-based index options (like those on the S&P 500) are “European style,” meaning they can only be exercised on the expiration date itself.²²

Settlement procedures also differ. Exercising an equity option typically results in “physical settlement,” where the actual shares of the underlying stock are delivered (if a call is exercised or a put is assigned) or received (if a put is exercised or a call is assigned).²² Index options, however, are typically “cash-settled.” Upon exercise, a cash payment is made based on the difference between the option’s strike price and the index’s official settlement value at expiration, multiplied by a contract multiplier (e.g., $100).²²

Stock options introduce significant leverage, as one contract controls 100 shares of the underlying stock for a premium that is typically a fraction of the cost of buying those shares outright.² This leverage amplifies potential percentage returns but also magnifies risk, creating a notable asymmetry, particularly between buyers and sellers. While an option buyer’s maximum loss is strictly limited to the premium paid ²⁰, an uncovered (or “naked”) option seller faces substantially greater risk. A naked call seller faces theoretically unlimited potential losses, as the stock price can rise indefinitely.²⁰ A naked put seller faces substantial risk, equivalent to buying the stock at the strike price if the stock price falls to zero.²⁰ This inherent risk asymmetry for sellers necessitates the use of margin accounts and sophisticated risk management techniques ²⁰, standing in stark contrast to the symmetrically defined, capped risk profile characteristic of Nadex binary options for both buyers and sellers.⁴

Implied volatility (IV) plays a uniquely prominent role in stock option trading, extending beyond being merely a pricing input.²⁵ It represents a distinct dimension of the market that can be actively traded. Option strategies like straddles and strangles are designed specifically to profit from significant price movements, effectively allowing traders to speculate on an increase in future volatility itself, regardless of the direction of the price change.²⁶ Conversely, strategies like selling strangles or iron condors aim to profit from periods of low or decreasing volatility. The existence and widespread use of the VIX index ³, derived from S&P 500 option prices, further underscores the concept of volatility as a tradable asset class. This ability to directly trade or hedge volatility exposure has no direct parallel in the Nadex binary options market. While volatility certainly influences the probability assessment priced into a Nadex binary ⁹, traders cannot isolate and trade the “Vega” (sensitivity to IV) of a binary option as an independent factor.

Regulatory Standing: The SEC/Exchange Framework (e.g., CBOE):

Traditional stock options are classified as securities and fall under the regulatory purview of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).1 Trading occurs on registered national securities exchanges, with Cboe Global Markets (formerly the Chicago Board Options Exchange) being the largest and pioneering options exchange.1 These exchanges play a critical role in standardizing option contracts (defining strike prices, expiration dates, contract sizes), providing electronic trading platforms and, in some cases, physical trading floors, maintaining orderly markets, and enforcing trading rules.3 The Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) acts as the central counterparty and clearinghouse for all US-listed options trades, guaranteeing contract performance and mitigating counterparty risk.3 Exchanges like CBOE also invest heavily in trader education through resources like The Options Institute.3 Brokerage firms offering options trading to clients must be registered with the SEC and FINRA, and typically require customers to meet certain qualifications and acknowledge the risks involved before granting trading approval.20

4. Profit Potential and ROI Comparison

Calculating Profits: Fixed vs. Variable Outcomes:

The mechanisms for calculating profit and loss differ fundamentally between Nadex binary options and traditional stock options, stemming directly from their distinct payout structures.

Nadex Binary Options: Profit and loss are predetermined by the binary outcome and the entry price.

If the option expires in-the-money (settles at $100): Profit = $100 – Entry Cost (per contract, excluding fees).¹
If the option expires out-of-the-money (settles at $0): Loss = Entry Cost (per contract, excluding fees).¹ The maximum profit per contract is always less than $100, and the maximum loss is always the price paid (for buyers) or $100 minus the price received (for sellers).
Traditional Stock Options (Buyer): Profit potential is variable and depends on the magnitude of the underlying stock price movement relative to the strike price and the premium paid.

Call Buyer Profit: (Stock Price at Expiration/Sale – Strike Price – Premium Paid) * 100 shares. Profit potential is theoretically unlimited as the stock price can rise indefinitely.²
Put Buyer Profit: (Strike Price – Stock Price at Expiration/Sale – Premium Paid) * 100 shares. Profit potential is substantial, maximized if the stock price falls to zero.²
Buyer Loss: Limited to the Premium Paid if the option expires OTM or is sold for less than its cost.²⁰
Traditional Stock Options (Seller/Writer): Profit potential is capped, while loss potential can be significant.

Seller Profit: Limited to the Premium Received if the option expires worthless (OTM).²¹
Naked Call Seller Loss: (Stock Price at Expiration/Assignment – Strike Price – Premium Received) * 100 shares. Loss potential is theoretically unlimited.²⁰
Naked Put Seller Loss: (Strike Price – Stock Price at Expiration/Assignment – Premium Received) * 100 shares. Loss potential is substantial, capped only if the stock price falls to zero.²⁰ (Loss profiles differ for covered calls/cash-secured puts).

Illustrative Return on Investment (ROI) Scenarios:

The difference in profit structures leads to vastly different ROI profiles under various market conditions. Consider the following simplified scenarios (excluding fees and bid-ask spreads for clarity):

Scenario 1: Small Favorable Move (Just ITM at Expiration)

Nadex Binary: Buy an OTM binary for $20. It expires ITM (settles at $100). Profit = $80. ROI = ($80 / $20) * 100% = 400%.¹³
Stock Option: Buy an ATM call option for a $2.00 premium ($200 per contract). Stock moves up $1. Option intrinsic value is $1.00 ($100 per contract). Net Loss = $100 – $200 = -$100. ROI = -50%. (Option needed to move >$2 past strike to be profitable).
Scenario 2: Large Favorable Move

Nadex Binary: Buy the same OTM binary for $20. It expires deep ITM (settles at $100). Profit = $80. ROI = 400%. Profit is capped.
Stock Option: Buy the same ATM call for $2.00 premium ($200). Stock moves up $10. Option intrinsic value is $10.00 ($1000 per contract). Profit = $1000 – $200 = $800. ROI = ($800 / $200) * 100% = 400%. (Note: ROI could be much higher if the stock move is larger).
Scenario 3: Small Unfavorable Move (Just OTM at Expiration)

Nadex Binary: Buy binary for $40. Expires OTM (settles at $0). Loss = $40. ROI = -100%.
Stock Option: Buy call for $2.00 premium ($200). Expires OTM. Loss = $200. ROI = -100%.
Scenario 4: Large Unfavorable Move

Nadex Binary: Buy binary for $40. Expires deep OTM (settles at $0). Loss = $40. ROI = -100%.
Stock Option: Buy call for $2.00 premium ($200). Expires deep OTM. Loss = $200. ROI = -100%.

These examples illustrate a key trade-off. Nadex binary options can generate very high percentage ROI on the capital risked, particularly when OTM options are purchased cheaply and expire ITM.1 However, the absolute dollar profit per contract is inherently limited (always less than 100).Traditionalstockoptions,whilepotentiallyrequiringalargerpricemovetoovercometheinitialpremiumcostandachieveprofitability,offersignificantlygreaterpotentialforabsolutedollarprofitpercontractduetotheiruncappedupside(forbuyers).[2,21,26]ThechoicebetweenprioritizinghighpercentageROIonsmallercapitalversusseekinglargerabsolutedollargainsisacriticalconsiderationfortradersevaluatingtheseinstruments.∗∗Table4.1:ComparativeProfit/LossScenarios(BuyerPerspective,Simplified)∗∗∣InstrumentType∣Role∣EntryCost/Premium∣Scenario∣UnderlyingMoveExample∣Profit/LossAmount() | ROI (%) | Notes |

| :——————- | :—- | :—————— | :————— | :———————- | :——————— | :——– | :—————————————– |

(Note: Examples are illustrative and exclude fees, commissions, and bid-ask spreads. Actual results will vary.)

Furthermore, the pricing structure of Nadex binary options creates an explicit link between potential ROI and the perceived probability of success.⁹ Purchasing cheaper, OTM binaries (e.g., price of $20) offers a higher potential percentage return ($80 profit on $20 risk = 400% ROI) but corresponds to a lower market-implied probability of the event occurring (approx. 20% probability).¹³ Conversely, buying more expensive, ITM binaries (e.g., price of $70) offers a lower potential ROI ($30 profit on $70 risk = ~43% ROI) but reflects a higher market-implied probability of success (approx. 70%). This forces traders into a direct and transparent trade-off between risk, reward, and probability with every Nadex trade. While stock option premiums are also influenced by the probability of finishing ITM, they incorporate additional complex factors like time value and implied volatility premium ²⁵, making the relationship between price, probability, and potential ROI less direct than in the Nadex structure.

5. Risk Structure and Maximum Loss Comparison

The risk profiles associated with Nadex binary options and traditional stock options exhibit fundamental differences, particularly concerning the exposure of sellers.

Risk Exposure for Buyers:

For buyers of both instrument types, the maximum potential loss is known and limited at the time the trade is initiated.

Nadex Binary Option Buyer: The maximum loss is strictly capped at the amount paid to purchase the binary option contract (the entry cost or premium).¹ If the option expires worthless (settles at $0), the entire premium is lost.
Traditional Stock Option Buyer (Call or Put): Similarly, the maximum loss for a buyer is limited to the premium paid for the option contract.² If the option expires out-of-the-money, the buyer loses the entire premium paid.

Risk Exposure for Sellers:

The risk exposure for sellers presents the most significant divergence between the two instruments.

Nadex Binary Option Seller: The maximum loss for a seller is also strictly defined and capped. It is calculated as $100 minus the premium received for selling the contract.¹ For example, if a binary option is sold for $70, the maximum potential loss for the seller is $30 ($100 – $70). This maximum loss occurs if the option settles at $100 (expires ITM for the buyer). Like the buyer, the seller’s maximum risk is known upfront.
Traditional Stock Option Seller (Writer): The risk exposure for sellers can be substantially higher and, in some cases, theoretically unlimited.

Naked Call Seller: Selling a call option without owning the underlying stock (selling “naked”) exposes the seller to potentially unlimited losses. If the stock price rises significantly above the strike price, the seller is obligated to buy shares at the high market price to deliver them at the lower strike price (or cash settle the difference), and there is no theoretical limit to how high a stock price can go.²⁰ This strategy requires a margin account.²³
Naked Put Seller: Selling a put option without holding a corresponding short position exposes the seller to substantial losses. If the stock price falls below the strike price, the seller is obligated to buy the shares at the higher strike price. The maximum loss occurs if the stock price drops to zero, resulting in a loss equal to (Strike Price * 100) minus the premium received.²⁰ This also requires a margin account.²³
Covered Call Seller: Selling a call option while owning at least 100 shares of the underlying stock significantly limits risk compared to selling naked. The primary risk is the opportunity cost if the stock price rises substantially above the strike and the shares are called away.²⁵
Cash-Secured Put Seller: Selling a put option while setting aside enough cash to buy the shares at the strike price if assigned. The risk is equivalent to buying the stock at the strike price (less the premium received).³

Contrasting Defined Risk (Nadex) with Variable Risk (Stock Options):

The core distinction lies in the universality of defined risk. Nadex binary options inherently provide defined, capped risk and reward for both the buyer and the seller on every transaction, directly resulting from the $0-or-$100 payout structure.4 This symmetry means the buyer’s maximum loss equals the seller’s maximum risk, and the buyer’s maximum gain equals the seller’s maximum profit (relative to the $100 total potential value).

Traditional stock options, conversely, exhibit significant risk asymmetry.²⁰ While buyers enjoy defined risk (limited to the premium), sellers, particularly those trading uncovered or naked positions, face variable and potentially unlimited (naked calls) or substantial (naked puts) risk. This necessitates the use of margin accounts, involves more complex risk calculations (e.g., margin requirements based on underlying price and volatility ²³), and demands rigorous risk management protocols from sellers.

Table 5.1: Summary of Risk Profiles

Instrument Type	Role	Maximum Potential Gain	Maximum Potential Loss	Margin Required
Nadex Binary Option	Buyer	$100 – Cost	Cost (Premium Paid)	No
Nadex Binary Option	Seller	Premium Received	$100 – Premium Received	No
Stock Option Call	Buyer	Unlimited (Theoretically)	Premium Paid	No
Stock Option Put	Buyer	Strike Price * 100 – Premium Paid	Premium Paid	No
Stock Option Call	Seller	Premium Received	Unlimited (Naked) / Limited (Covered)	Yes (Naked)
Stock Option Put	Seller	Premium Received	Strike Price * 100 – Premium (Naked)	Yes (Naked)

(Note: Table simplifies risk for sellers; covered/secured positions have different risk profiles than naked positions. Margin requirements can vary by broker and strategy.)

While Nadex offers the apparent safety of defined monetary risk per trade, certain implicit risks warrant consideration. The availability of very short-term contracts (e.g., 5-minute binaries ¹³) combined with the all-or-nothing payout structure ¹ could potentially encourage over-trading or behavior akin to gambling if not approached with strict discipline and a statistically validated edge. The defined risk on one trade does not prevent the rapid accumulation of losses over many trades if the win rate is insufficient to overcome costs and the inherent probabilities. Furthermore, the CFTC has cautioned that binary option payout structures can be designed such that the expected return on investment is negative, even with defined payouts, if the loss potential significantly outweighs the gain potential relative to the probability of success.⁷ This underscores that defined monetary risk per trade does not automatically equate to a safe or profitable trading strategy; a positive expectancy based on accurately assessing probabilities remains essential.

6. Trading Strategies: Approaches and Complexity

The structural differences between Nadex binary options and traditional stock options directly influence the range and complexity of trading strategies applicable to each.

Typical Nadex Binary Option Strategies:

Given the yes/no proposition and fixed payout, Nadex strategies often center on correctly predicting whether the underlying market will be above or below a specific strike price at expiration.

Simple Directional Bets: The most basic approach involves buying a binary option if anticipating the market will finish above the strike, or selling if anticipating it will finish at or below the strike.⁴
Probability-Based Trading: Traders may select strikes based on their risk/reward tolerance, which correlates with the market-implied probability reflected in the option’s price. Buying cheaper OTM options offers higher potential ROI but lower probability, while buying more expensive ITM options offers higher probability but lower potential ROI.⁹ Selling follows the inverse logic.
News and Volatility Trading: Traders might use binary options around significant news releases or periods of expected high volatility. A Nadex “strangle,” for instance, might involve buying an OTM binary and selling an ITM binary (or vice-versa) around the current price. The goal is to profit if the market makes a large enough move in either direction such that the profit from the winning leg ($100 settlement minus cost, or premium received if sold) exceeds the loss on the losing leg (cost, or $100 minus premium received if sold).¹⁷ This differs mechanically from a traditional option strangle but aims to capitalize on volatility.
Short-Term Scalping: The availability of very short-duration contracts, like 5-minute binaries, facilitates strategies focused on capturing small, rapid price movements.¹³

Common Stock Option Strategies:

The variable payout structure and sensitivity to multiple factors enable a much broader and more complex array of strategies with traditional stock options.

Directional Speculation: Buying calls for bullish outlooks or buying puts for bearish outlooks remains a fundamental strategy, offering leveraged exposure to price movements.²
Income Generation: Strategies like selling covered calls (selling calls against shares already owned) or selling cash-secured puts (selling puts while holding sufficient cash to buy the shares if assigned) aim to generate income from option premiums.³
Hedging: Options are widely used for risk management. Buying put options can protect a long stock portfolio from downside risk (protective put), while buying call options can hedge a short stock position.²
Volatility Trading: Strategies designed to profit from expected changes in volatility, often independent of price direction. Buying straddles (call and put, same strike/expiry) or strangles (OTM call and put, same expiry) profits from large price moves in either direction (increase in volatility).²⁶ Selling these structures profits if volatility remains low.
Spreads: Combining the purchase and sale of different option contracts (varying by strike price, expiration date, or both) allows traders to create precisely defined risk/reward profiles, reduce capital outlay, or target specific market outcomes. Examples include vertical spreads (bull call spread, bear put spread), calendar spreads, diagonal spreads, and more complex multi-leg strategies like iron condors and butterflies.³

Comparative Flexibility and Strategic Depth:

Nadex binary options offer simplicity, which can be advantageous for traders seeking straightforward ways to express a binary market view with defined risk.12 However, this simplicity comes at the cost of strategic flexibility.

Traditional stock options provide vastly greater strategic depth. Their structure allows traders to construct positions based on nuanced forecasts involving not just direction, but also the magnitude of expected price movement, the timing of that movement, and anticipated changes in implied volatility.²¹ The ability to utilize the Greeks (Delta, Gamma, Theta, Vega) allows for the isolation, management, and trading of specific risk factors, enabling sophisticated portfolio management and speculative strategies far beyond the scope of binary options.

The range and complexity of available strategies are, therefore, direct consequences of each instrument’s fundamental structure. Nadex’s binary nature restricts strategies primarily to variations on predicting the final state relative to the strike. In contrast, the variable payouts and multi-factor sensitivity of stock options permit the construction of custom payoff profiles through multi-leg strategies, offering a toolkit for addressing nearly any market hypothesis or risk management need. Even when similar terminology is used, such as “strangle,” the underlying mechanics and objectives differ significantly due to the core instrument characteristics. A Nadex binary strangle ¹⁷ operates within the fixed $0/$100 framework, aiming for one leg’s capped gain to exceed the other’s capped loss. A traditional stock option strangle ²⁸ profits from the magnitude of the price move beyond the strikes, offering potentially unlimited gains while risking the combined premium paid. This highlights how strategies must fundamentally adapt to the unique payoff structure of the instrument being traded.

7. The Influence of Volatility and Time Decay

Market volatility and the passage of time (time decay) are critical factors influencing the pricing and profitability of both Nadex binary options and traditional stock options, although their impact manifests differently.

Role in Nadex Binary Option Pricing (Probability Assessment):

Nadex binary options do not have explicitly quoted sensitivities to time decay (Theta) or implied volatility (Vega) in the same way traditional options do. However, these factors are implicitly embedded within the binary option’s price ($0-$100), as they directly influence the market’s perceived probability of the contract finishing in-the-money.9

Volatility: Higher market volatility increases the likelihood of larger price swings before expiration. This can increase the perceived probability of an OTM strike being reached, thus potentially increasing the price (premium) of OTM binary options and decreasing the price of ITM options (as the chance of moving back OTM increases). Lower volatility generally has the opposite effect.
Time Decay: As a binary option approaches its expiration time, the uncertainty surrounding the outcome diminishes. The probability of the market finishing above or below the strike becomes more certain. Consequently, the price of the binary option tends to converge more rapidly towards either $0 or $100.²⁰ This effect is particularly pronounced for near-the-money strikes and in the final minutes or hours of the contract’s life. For very short-term binaries (e.g., 5-minute), the effect of time decay is compressed into a very short window, making immediate price action paramount.¹³

Role in Stock Option Pricing (Vega and Theta Dynamics):

In contrast, time decay and implied volatility are explicit, quantifiable components of traditional stock option premiums, measured by the Greeks Theta and Vega.

Implied Volatility (Vega): IV directly impacts the extrinsic value portion of an option’s premium. Higher IV inflates premiums for both calls and puts because it signifies market expectations of larger potential price moves, increasing the chance the option will expire significantly ITM.²⁰ Conversely, lower IV leads to lower premiums. Changes in IV can significantly affect an option’s price, even if the underlying stock price remains unchanged. Vega measures this sensitivity. The VIX index serves as a key benchmark for overall market IV expectations.³
Time Decay (Theta): Theta measures the rate at which an option’s extrinsic value erodes solely due to the passage of time.²⁰ All else being equal, an option loses value each day as it approaches expiration. This decay is generally slow for longer-dated options but accelerates significantly as the expiration date nears, particularly in the final month or weeks.²⁰ Theta is a negative factor for option buyers (eroding their investment) and a positive factor for option sellers (decay works in their favor).²¹

Differential Impact on Profitability Over Time:

The way these factors influence pricing leads to different considerations for profitability over the life of a trade.

Nadex Binary Options: Profitability ultimately hinges on the binary outcome at expiration. Volatility affects the likelihood of reaching the strike and thus influences the entry price (cost/risk) and potential exit price if closing early. Time decay manifests as the price moving towards $0 or $100, impacting the decision of whether to hold to expiration or exit prematurely. However, the final profit/loss is fixed based on the settlement value relative to the strike.
Traditional Stock Options: Profitability is continuously influenced by the dynamic interplay of underlying price movement, changes in implied volatility, and time decay. A trader might correctly predict the direction of the underlying stock but still lose money if, for example, implied volatility collapses after an event (“IV crush”), rapidly deflating the option’s premium, or if time decay erodes the premium faster than the stock price moves favorably.²⁰ Conversely, option sellers can profit purely from the passage of time (Theta decay) or a decrease in implied volatility, even if the underlying price doesn’t move significantly.²¹

This reveals a fundamental difference: Nadex prices implicitly incorporate time and volatility through their effect on the probability of the binary event. Stock options explicitly price time (Theta) and expected volatility (Vega) as distinct, measurable components of the premium.²¹ This distinction allows stock option traders to actively manage, hedge, or speculate on these factors independently, a capability not directly available to Nadex traders who must contend with their combined influence on the probability reflected in the binary’s price. Furthermore, the manifestation of time decay differs: for Nadex, it represents the increasing certainty towards the $0 or $100 outcome as expiration approaches; for stock options, it represents a more gradual, quantifiable erosion of extrinsic value ²⁰, impacting holding period decisions and favoring sellers over buyers as time passes.

8. Comparing Transaction Costs

Transaction costs are an unavoidable aspect of trading and can significantly impact net profitability. The cost structures for Nadex binary options and traditional stock options differ in their components.

Nadex Fee Structure:

Nadex charges explicit fees on a per-contract basis. Typically, there is an exchange fee for opening a position and another fee for closing the position or upon settlement at expiration.8 A notable feature is that Nadex often waives the settlement fee if a binary option expires out-of-the-money (settles at $0) [Implied by fee structures, needs verification on current Nadex site]. As Nadex operates as an exchange where traders interact directly (matched buyers and sellers, potentially with market maker participation), there are no separate broker commissions.5 While Nadex does not require a minimum deposit to open an account, traders must have sufficient funds in their account to cover the maximum potential loss (the entry cost) for any trade they wish to place.8

Stock Option Costs:

Trading traditional stock options involves several potential cost components:

Broker Commissions: Historically a significant cost, many online brokers now offer zero-commission trading for stocks and options. However, brokers may still generate revenue through other means, such as payment for order flow (PFOF), which can indirectly affect execution quality [Implied by market structure].
Per-Contract Fees: Even with zero commissions, brokers and/or exchanges often charge a small fee per option contract traded.² These fees apply to both opening and closing trades.
Exercise/Assignment Fees: Brokers may charge additional fees if an option is exercised by the buyer or assigned to the seller.
Bid-Ask Spread: This is a critical, often overlooked implicit cost. The bid price is the highest price a buyer is willing to pay, while the ask price is the lowest price a seller is willing to accept. The difference between these prices (the spread) represents an immediate cost to traders who cross it (buyers paying the ask, sellers receiving the bid). For actively traded, liquid options (e.g., on major ETFs like SPY), the spread might be narrow (e.g., $0.01). However, for less liquid options (e.g., on individual stocks with lower volume or further OTM/ITM strikes), the spread can be significantly wider, representing a substantial transaction cost, especially for strategies involving multiple legs or frequent trading.

Net Profitability Considerations:

These costs directly impact the breakeven point for any trade.

For Nadex binaries, the breakeven requires the $100 payout (if successful) to cover both the initial entry cost and the round-trip exchange fees. The relatively low, fixed fees might appear advantageous for high-frequency strategies, but profitability still demands a win rate sufficient to overcome the cost basis and the inherent probabilities.
For stock options, the breakeven point must account for the premium paid, any commissions and per-contract fees, and the implicit cost of crossing the bid-ask spread. While zero commissions reduce explicit costs, the impact of contract fees and, more importantly, the bid-ask spread can significantly erode profits, particularly for complex multi-leg strategies (where fees and spreads are incurred on each leg) or active trading styles.

A key difference emerges in the nature of the costs. Nadex costs are predominantly explicit, fixed exchange fees per contract.¹³ Stock option trading involves explicit commissions/fees plus the variable and often substantial implicit cost of the bid-ask spread. While Nadex, as an exchange matching buyers and sellers ⁵, also has a bid-ask spread, its impact relative to the fixed $100 potential payout may differ compared to stock options, where profits are variable and spreads on less liquid contracts can consume a larger portion of potential gains. Therefore, a true comparison of trading costs must look beyond advertised commissions and account for all explicit fees and the implicit cost embedded in the bid-ask spread, which can be a dominant factor in stock option trading costs. The differing cost structures also influence strategy choices: Nadex’s simpler fee structure might favor high-frequency, single-contract strategies ¹³, whereas the cumulative impact of fees and spreads in stock options necessitates careful cost management, especially for complex, multi-leg strategies.²⁸

9. Synthesizing Profitability: Which Instrument Holds More Potential?

Evaluating whether Nadex binary options or traditional stock options offer inherently higher profitability potential requires synthesizing the structural, risk, strategic, and cost differences discussed previously, while acknowledging the critical role of the individual trader.

Arguments Favoring Nadex Binaries:

Simplicity: The fundamental yes/no structure is relatively easy to grasp, lowering the initial barrier to understanding.⁴
Defined Risk/Reward: The maximum potential profit and loss are known upfront for every trade, appealing to traders prioritizing capital preservation or those uncomfortable with the potential for large, unexpected losses.¹ This applies equally to buyers and sellers.
Low Capital Requirement: The maximum risk per contract is capped at less than $100 (the entry cost), making it accessible for traders with smaller account sizes.¹
High Percentage ROI Potential: OTM binaries bought cheaply can yield very high percentage returns on the capital risked if they expire ITM.¹³
Regulated Accessibility: Nadex provides a CFTC-regulated platform specifically designed for these products, offering a secure environment for US traders.⁵

Arguments Favoring Stock Options:

Higher Absolute Profit Potential: The variable payout structure and inherent leverage offer the potential for significantly larger absolute dollar profits per contract compared to the capped $100 payout of binaries. This is particularly true for option buyers experiencing large favorable price movements.²
Strategic Flexibility: Stock options support a vastly wider range of strategies for speculation, hedging, income generation, and expressing complex market views (e.g., on volatility or time decay).²²
Trading Specific Factors: They allow traders to directly manage or speculate on distinct market factors like implied volatility (Vega) and time decay (Theta) using the Greeks.²¹
Potential Asset Ownership: Equity options offer the possibility of taking ownership of the underlying stock through exercise.¹
Established Ecosystem: Stock options have a longer history, a larger market, and a more extensive ecosystem of educational resources, analytical tools, and brokerage platforms.³

The Critical Role of Trader Profile:

The suitability and potential profitability of each instrument are heavily dependent on the individual trader’s characteristics:

Skill Level: Nadex binaries, despite their apparent simplicity, require strong skills in probability assessment, precise timing (especially for short durations), and disciplined execution to overcome the inherent probabilities and fees consistently. Traditional stock options demand a broader and deeper skillset, encompassing underlying asset analysis, volatility forecasting, understanding complex option pricing dynamics (including the Greeks), strategy construction, and sophisticated risk management.
Risk Tolerance: Nadex’s defined risk profile is well-suited for traders with lower risk tolerance or those seeking strict loss limits on every trade. Traditional stock options, particularly strategies involving selling naked options, require a significantly higher risk tolerance and the capacity (both financial and psychological) to handle potentially large or even unlimited losses.
Capital Availability: Nadex is accessible with relatively small amounts of capital per trade. While basic stock option buying can also be done with modest capital, many advanced strategies, positions requiring margin, or strategies involving holding the underlying stock generally necessitate larger account sizes.
Trading Style and Goals: Traders focused on very short-term speculation (e.g., minutes) might find Nadex’s short-duration contracts appealing. Those focused on longer-term positions, portfolio hedging, or income generation will find stock options more suitable. Similarly, traders prioritizing high percentage ROI on small bets might lean towards Nadex OTM options, while those seeking larger absolute dollar gains might prefer stock options.

Addressing the “More Profitable” Question: A Nuanced Perspective:

Ultimately, neither Nadex binary options nor traditional stock options can be declared inherently more profitable. Profitability in trading is not a feature of the instrument itself, but rather a result of the trader’s ability to consistently identify and exploit a statistical edge within the specific rules and characteristics of that instrument.

Success with Nadex binaries depends on developing a strategy that can accurately predict the binary outcome (price relative to strike at expiration) with sufficient frequency and/or favorable risk/reward ratios (via entry price) to overcome transaction costs and generate a positive expectancy.
Success with traditional stock options relies on developing strategies that profit from accurately forecasting market direction, magnitude of movement, timing, changes in volatility, or combinations thereof, while effectively managing the complex interplay of pricing factors (Greeks) and the associated risks.

The CFTC’s warning that binary option payout structures can be designed for negative expected returns ⁷ serves as a reminder that defined risk and payout do not guarantee profitability. Success in either domain requires discipline, continuous learning, robust risk management, and, most importantly, a well-defined trading plan based on a demonstrable, repeatable edge. The question is not which instrument is better, but which instrument’s characteristics best align with a specific trader’s validated edge and psychological makeup.

Choosing Nadex for its perceived simplicity and defined risk profile might mean foregoing the potentially larger gains and strategic versatility offered by traditional options. This represents an opportunity cost. Conversely, the complexity and potential for substantial losses associated with stock options (especially for sellers) present a steeper learning curve and require more sophisticated risk controls; mishandling this complexity can lead to significant financial damage. The optimal choice involves a careful assessment of one’s own skills, resources, risk appetite, and trading objectives, matching them to the instrument whose structure provides the best framework for executing a profitable strategy.

10. Conclusion

Recapitulation:

This report has undertaken a detailed comparative analysis of Nadex binary options and traditional stock options. Key differences have been identified across multiple dimensions:

Structure: Nadex offers a binary (yes/no) outcome with a fixed ($0 or $100) cash settlement, while stock options provide the right (not obligation) to buy or sell an underlying asset with variable profit/loss potential.
Profit/Loss Profile: Nadex features capped profit and loss known upfront for both buyers and sellers. Stock options offer capped loss but potentially unlimited/substantial profit for buyers, and capped profit but potentially unlimited/substantial loss for sellers (especially naked).
Risk Characteristics: Nadex provides symmetrical, defined risk. Stock options exhibit risk asymmetry, demanding more complex risk management, particularly for sellers.
Strategic Depth: Nadex strategies are generally simpler, focused on predicting the binary outcome. Stock options allow for a vast array of complex strategies targeting direction, volatility, time decay, hedging, and income generation.
Market Factors: Volatility and time decay are implicitly priced into Nadex binaries via probability assessment. They are explicit, tradable components (Vega, Theta) of stock option premiums.
Costs: Nadex involves explicit exchange fees. Stock options involve commissions/fees plus the significant implicit cost of the bid-ask spread.

Concluding Statement:

The central question of whether Nadex binary options are “more profitable” than traditional stock options does not have a definitive, universal answer. Profitability is not an inherent characteristic of either instrument but rather a function of the trader’s proficiency. Success hinges on the ability to develop, test, and consistently execute a trading strategy with a positive statistical expectancy, tailored to the unique structure, risks, and opportunities presented by the chosen instrument.

Nadex binary options may appeal to traders seeking simplicity, strictly defined risk on every trade, and the potential for high percentage returns on small capital, particularly over short timeframes. However, success requires precise timing and accurate probability assessment. Traditional stock options offer greater potential for large absolute profits, unparalleled strategic flexibility for diverse market conditions and objectives (including hedging and income), but demand a higher level of knowledge, skill, capital, risk tolerance, and sophisticated risk management.

Ultimately, the choice between Nadex binary options and traditional stock options should be guided by a thorough self-assessment of the trader’s individual skills, experience, risk tolerance, capital resources, and trading goals. Neither instrument offers a guaranteed path to profits; both require education, discipline, and a rigorously developed edge.

Final Emphasis on Regulation:

Regardless of the instrument chosen, it is imperative for traders to operate solely through regulated entities. For binary options in the US, this means trading on a CFTC-regulated exchange like Nadex. For stock options, trading should occur through reputable brokers offering access to SEC-regulated exchanges like Cboe. Engaging with unregulated offshore platforms exposes traders to significant risks, including potential fraud, market manipulation, and difficulty in accessing funds, as repeatedly warned by regulatory authorities.1 Adhering to regulated venues is a critical first step in responsible trading.

Download PDF

Works cited

Binary Option: Definition, How They Trade, and Example – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/binary-option.asp
What Are Stock Options? Parameters and Trading, With Examples – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stockoption.asp
CBOE Options Exchange Definition – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cboe.asp
What are Binary Options and How Do They Work? – Nadex, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/learning/what-are-binary-options-and-how-do-they-work/
About Us – Nadex, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/company/
Products to Trade | Nadex, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/product-market/
CFTC/SEC Investor Alert: Binary Options and Fraud, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/fraudadv_binaryoptions.html
Trade Stock Indices with Binary Options – Nadex, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/learning/understanding-indices-trading-with-binary-options/
How to Trade Binary Options | Nadex, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/learning/how-to-trade-binary-options/
Expiration time and date definition – Nadex, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/glossary/expiration-time-date-definition/
NADEX Trade Practice Rule Enforcement Review, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/ssLINK/rernadex072817
Trade Binary Options with No Minimum Deposit – Nadex, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/products/binary-options/
Nadex 5-minute binary options explained, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/learning/nadex-5-minute-binary-options-explained/
Five Nadex Political Event Derivatives® (Democratic Majority in the United States House – Commodity Futures Trading Commission, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/sites/default/files/stellent/groups/public/@rulesandproducts/documents/ifdocs/rul121911nadex002.pdf
What are Nadex Knock-Outs and how do they work?, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/learning/what-are-knock-outs-and-how-do-they-work/
October 28, 2022 Via CFTC Portal Submissions Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick Secretary of the Commission Office of the Secretariat C, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://assets.ctfassets.net/8c2uto3zas3h/5tyG4dtY0iFwAhi7kQavmd/98252fe5522bcce434ce7efd45aa86a7/Notice_1667_Product_Certification.pdf
Nadex Strangle Strategy Examples with Binary Options, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/learning/examples-of-strangle-strategies-with-binary-options/
Top 7 myths about binary options – Nadex, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/blog/the-top-7-myths-about-binary-options/
Expiration value definition | Nadex, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/glossary/expiration-value-definition/
What Is Options Trading? A Beginner’s Overview – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/options-basics-tutorial-4583012
What Are Options? Types, Spreads, Example, and Risk Metrics – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/option.asp
The Facts About Options – Cboe Global Markets, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://optionsfacts.cboe.com/
Equity Options Specifications – Cboe Global Markets, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cboe.com/exchange_traded_stock/equity_options_spec/
Options Basics, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.optionseducation.org/optionsoverview/options-basics
How Options Are Priced – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/optioninvestor/07/options_beat_market.asp
What Is a Call Option and How to Use It With Example – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/calloption.asp
Factors That Determine Option Pricing – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/trading/factors-determine-option-pricing/
Option Premium: Definition, Factors Affecting Pricing, and Example – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/option-premium.asp
How Implied Volatility (IV) Works With Options and Examples – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/iv.asp
CBOE Volatility Index (VIX): What Does It Measure in Investing? – Investopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/vix.asp
Rules of Cboe Exchange, Inc., accessed on April 21, 2025, https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/regulation/rule_book/C1_Exchange_Rule_Book.pdf
Cboe Options Exchange Overview, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cboe.com/us/options/overview/
Cboe Options Exchange Overview, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cboe.com/us/options/
Cboe Options Institute, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cboe.com/optionsinstitute/
Options Institute Options Basics, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cboe.com/optionsinstitute/options_basics/
Index Options 101: An introduction with instructors from the Cboe – YouTube, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TB8_9NAb1d0