Are Stock Options American or European?

Executive Summary

This report addresses the exercise style conventions for exchange-traded options, specifically focusing on whether US stock options are typically American or European. The analysis confirms that the standard for options on individual equities (stocks) listed on major US exchanges is overwhelmingly American-style. This grants the option holder the right to exercise the contract—to buy (call) or sell (put) the underlying shares at the agreed strike price—at any point up to and including the expiration date. This contrasts sharply with the standard for options on major broad-based US stock indices (such as the S&P 500 index options, ticker SPX), which are predominantly European-style. European-style options restrict exercise solely to the expiration date itself.

The divergence in standard exercise styles stems from fundamental differences in the underlying assets and the practicalities of settlement. The American style for stock options provides valuable flexibility, particularly the ability for call holders to exercise early to capture dividends paid by the underlying company, aligning well with the physical settlement process where actual shares are exchanged. Conversely, the European style for index options facilitates a more operationally manageable cash settlement process, based on a single, officially calculated index value at expiration, which is necessary given the impracticality of physically delivering a large basket of constituent stocks. While these are the prevailing standards, exceptions exist, most notably through FLexible EXchange® (FLEX) Options, which allow market participants to customize contract terms, including selecting either American or European exercise styles for both equity and index options on an exchange-traded, centrally cleared basis. Understanding the specific exercise style and settlement method of an option contract is crucial for traders, as these features significantly impact valuation, risk exposure (such as early assignment risk for American option sellers), and strategic application.

related posts : Best Binary OptionS Brokers (in 2025)

I. Understanding Option Exercise Styles: American vs. European

A. Defining the Core Concepts

Options are versatile derivative contracts that provide the buyer (holder) the right, but not the obligation, to either buy (a call option) or sell (a put option) an underlying asset at a predetermined price, known as the strike or exercise price, within a specific timeframe culminating in the expiration date.¹ The buyer pays a price, known as the premium, to the seller (writer) for this right.¹ The value and utility of an option contract are significantly influenced by its “style,” which primarily dictates when the holder can exercise their rights.³ The two dominant styles globally are American and European.³

• American-Style Option Definition: An American-style option contract allows the holder to exercise their right to buy or sell the underlying asset at the strike price on any trading day from the time of purchase up to and including the option’s expiration date.¹ This feature provides maximum flexibility to the option holder regarding the timing of exercise.⁶
• European-Style Option Definition: A European-style option contract restricts the holder’s ability to exercise their right to buy or sell the underlying asset only on the option’s specified expiration date (also referred to as the exercise date or maturity date).¹ Exercising the option before this single, pre-defined date is not permitted.¹⁰

It is crucial to understand that the terms “American” and “European” are merely conventions referring to the exercise rules and bear no relation to the geographic location where the option is traded, where the underlying asset is based, or the nationality of the traders involved.¹

B. The Key Differentiator: Timing of Exercise Rights

The fundamental distinction between American and European options lies solely in the timing of when the exercise right can be invoked.¹ American options offer the holder continuous exercise opportunities throughout the contract’s life, whereas European options provide only a single exercise opportunity at the very end of the contract’s life.¹⁰

This difference pertains specifically to the act of exercising the option – that is, demanding the purchase or sale of the underlying asset at the strike price.¹ Importantly, both American and European style options can typically be traded (bought or sold to other market participants) in the secondary market at any point before their expiration date.¹⁰ An investor holding a European option that has gained value does not need to wait until expiration to realize a profit; they can often sell the option contract itself back to the market before it expires.¹⁰

C. Implications of Exercise Style

The difference in exercise timing has several significant implications for option pricing, risk management, and trading strategy:

• Premium Value: Because the right to exercise early provides additional flexibility and strategic advantages, American options generally command a higher premium compared to otherwise identical European options (i.e., same underlying asset, strike price, and expiration date).¹ The market recognizes the value inherent in the ability to exercise at any time, and this desirability translates into a higher upfront cost for the buyer and higher proceeds for the seller.¹ This consistent price differential underscores that option valuation reflects not just factors like the underlying asset’s price relative to the strike and time remaining, but also the specific rights, such as early exercise flexibility, embedded within the contract’s style.⁴ The market effectively quantifies and prices this flexibility.
• Early Assignment Risk (for Sellers): Sellers (writers) of American-style options face the possibility of being “assigned” an exercise notice at any time before the option expires, provided the option is in-the-money (meaning exercise would be potentially profitable for the holder).¹⁴ This early assignment compels the seller to fulfill their obligation – delivering the underlying asset if they sold a call, or buying the underlying asset if they sold a put. This introduces an element of uncertainty for the seller regarding the timing of potential assignment.¹⁵ In contrast, sellers of European-style options are free from this risk of early assignment; they only face assignment risk at the point of expiration.¹⁵ This certainty can be advantageous for certain strategies.¹⁵
• Strategic Considerations (for Buyers): The flexibility of American options allows buyers to act opportunistically. They can exercise to lock in profits if the underlying asset’s price moves favorably, or they can exercise to acquire (call) or dispose of (put) the underlying asset at a strategically chosen moment before expiration.⁶ A key example is exercising a call option just before an ex-dividend date to capture the dividend payment on the stock.⁶ Buyers of European options lack this timing flexibility for exercise; while they can profit from favorable price movements by selling the option contract itself, they must wait until expiration to exercise the right to buy or sell the underlying asset.¹⁰
• Pricing Models: The possibility of early exercise complicates the mathematical valuation of American options. The widely known Black-Scholes-Merton model, a cornerstone of option pricing theory, was originally developed for European options and assumes exercise occurs only at expiration.¹⁰ Accurately valuing an American option typically requires more complex numerical methods, such as binomial or trinomial tree models, or finite difference methods, which can account for the optimal strategy of deciding when (or if) to exercise early.³ The need for these different valuation approaches highlights how the exercise style fundamentally alters the nature of the pricing problem itself.

Table 1: Comparison of American vs. European Option Characteristics

Feature	American Style	European Style
Exercise Timing	Any time up to and including expiration date 1	Only on the expiration date 1
Premium (General)	Typically higher than comparable European option 1	Typically lower than comparable American option 10
Early Assignment Risk (Seller)	Yes, seller can be assigned at any time before expiration 14	No, seller only faces assignment risk at expiration 15
Buyer Flexibility	High; can exercise whenever advantageous before expiry 6	Lower; exercise restricted to expiry, but can trade option before expiry 10
Pricing Model Complexity	Higher; requires models accounting for early exercise possibility 3	Lower; standard models like Black-Scholes applicable 10
Typical Settlement (US Listed)	Physical delivery (for stocks/ETFs) 17	Cash settlement (for broad-based indices) 17
Common Underlying (US Listed)	Individual Stocks, ETFs 1	Broad-Based Stock Indices (e.g., SPX) 1

II. The Prevailing Standard: Exercise Style of US Exchange-Traded Stock Options

A. Confirmation: American-Style Dominance for Equities

For options contracts traded on individual stocks (equities) listed on major US exchanges, such as the CBOE Options Exchange (the world’s largest options exchange ²⁰) and NYSE options markets, the standard and overwhelmingly prevalent exercise style is American-style.¹ This convention applies not only to standard options with shorter maturities but also to long-dated options known as Equity LEAPS® (Long-Term AnticiPation Securities), which can have expirations up to approximately three years from listing.²²

The rules and product specifications published by the exchanges themselves explicitly codify this standard. For instance, CBOE documentation clearly defines standard equity options and Equity LEAPS® as American-style.⁷ Similarly, materials comparing different option types confirm that single stock options and ETF options utilize the American exercise style.¹⁷ While investors usually do not get a choice between American or European versions for a standard listed stock option ¹⁰, the established market structure dictates the American style for these products.

B. Link to Physical Settlement

The prevalence of the American style for US stock options is closely related to their standard settlement method: physical settlement.¹⁷ When an American-style stock option is exercised, it results in the actual delivery of the underlying shares.¹⁸ If a call option is exercised, the holder receives 100 shares (per standard contract) of the stock into their brokerage account, typically on the business day following exercise.¹⁸ If a put option is exercised, the holder delivers 100 shares of the stock from their account.¹⁷

The American-style exercise feature—the ability to exercise at any time—aligns naturally with this physical delivery mechanism. It empowers the option holder to demand receipt (call) or initiate delivery (put) of the specific underlying shares whenever they deem it strategically advantageous before the contract expires.¹⁸ This combination provides direct and flexible control over acquiring or disposing of the actual equity shares, a key function often desired by participants trading options on individual companies.

C. Significance for Traders: The Dividend Capture Case

A significant practical application highlighting the value of the American style for stock options involves dividends. Holders of options contracts do not receive dividends paid by the underlying company.⁶ However, stockholders who own shares before the ex-dividend date are eligible for the dividend payment.⁶

The American exercise style allows holders of in-the-money call options on dividend-paying stocks to exercise their option before the ex-dividend date.⁶ By doing so, they become owners of the stock in time to qualify for the upcoming dividend payment.⁶ This strategy, known as dividend capture, is a tangible economic benefit directly enabled by the early exercise feature of American-style options.⁶ Since many individual stocks pay dividends, this provides a recurring, concrete rationale for the preference and associated higher premium of the American style in the equity options market. European-style options, which cannot be exercised early, preclude this specific strategy. This use case underscores the practical value derived from the flexibility tied directly to the characteristics (i.e., potential dividend payments) of the underlying stock.

III. Exceptions and Customization: When Stock Options Deviate

A. FLEX Options: Tailoring Exercise Styles on Exchanges

While American style is the standard for regular exchange-traded stock options, there is a notable exception that allows for customization: FLexible EXchange® Options (FLEX Options).²³ Offered by exchanges like CBOE since 1993, FLEX Options are designed primarily for institutional and other sophisticated investors who need to tailor contract specifications beyond what standard listed options provide.²³

Crucially, FLEX Options permit users to define key contract terms, including the strike price, the expiration date (which can extend up to 15 years), and, significantly, the exercise style. Users can specify either American or European exercise for FLEX Options contracts on both major stock indices and individual equities.²³ This means it is possible to trade an exchange-listed, centrally cleared option on an individual stock with European-style exercise characteristics through the FLEX framework.²³

The existence of FLEX Options signals that while standardization (like American style for stocks) meets the needs of the broad market, certain participants require greater precision to match specific risk management profiles or implement unique trading strategies. FLEX Options bridge this gap, offering the customization often associated with the over-the-counter (OTC) market but with the benefits of exchange trading, such as price transparency through competitive auction markets and reduced counterparty risk due to clearing by The Options Clearing Corporation (OCC).²³

B. Rationale for European-Style Equity Options

The ability to choose a European exercise style for equity options, whether via FLEX or on certain non-US exchanges like Eurex ¹⁶, caters to specific needs, particularly for those writing (selling) options. The primary motivation is the elimination of early assignment risk.¹⁶

As discussed earlier, sellers of American-style options face the uncertainty of potentially being assigned at any time before expiration.¹⁵ This can be disruptive, especially for portfolio managers implementing strategies like covered call writing (selling calls against owned stock) or cash-secured put writing (selling puts backed by cash).¹⁶ Early assignment on a short call forces potentially unwanted delivery of stock, while early assignment on a short put forces potentially unwanted purchase of stock.¹⁶ This risk is often heightened around ex-dividend dates, as call holders have an incentive to exercise early.¹⁰

By choosing or creating a European-style equity option, the seller gains certainty that assignment can only occur at expiration, if the option is in-the-money at that time.¹⁶ This predictability simplifies risk management and prevents unexpected disruptions to the portfolio or strategy.¹⁶ This is also valuable for more complex strategies, such as dispersion trades, which involve positions in both index and individual equity options; unexpected early assignment on the equity option leg could undermine the entire trade structure.¹⁶ The demand for European-style equity options thus largely stems from a desire by certain participants, mainly institutions and strategy implementers, to mitigate a specific operational risk inherent in the standard American-style product.

C. Over-the-Counter (OTC) Market Context

Beyond the realm of exchange-traded products, options are also traded in the over-the-counter (OTC) market. In the OTC market, contracts are negotiated bilaterally between two parties, allowing for complete customization of terms. While this report focuses on exchange standards, it is plausible that parties in the OTC market could agree on European-style exercise for options on individual stocks if it suited their specific needs. Some sources suggest European options are commonly traded OTC ⁹, although this may encompass various underlying assets beyond just equities.

IV. Contrasting Worlds: Stock Options vs. Index Options

A. Index Options: The European-Style Standard

A clear distinction emerges when comparing options on individual stocks to options on broad-based stock indices. The standard exercise style for options listed on major US stock indices – such as the S&P 500 Index (SPX), Nasdaq-100 Index (NDX), Russell 2000 Index (RUT), and Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (DJX) – is European-style.¹

This convention applies to the most actively traded index option products.¹⁴ Even newly introduced index options, like the CBOE’s S&P 500 Equal Weight Index options (SPEQX) launched in 2025, adhere to this standard, featuring European-style exercise.¹⁹

B. The Role of Cash Settlement

The preference for European style in index options is intrinsically linked to their settlement method: cash settlement.¹¹ Unlike stock options which involve the physical delivery of shares, exercising an index option does not result in the delivery of the hundreds of underlying stocks that make up the index; such a process would be logistically prohibitive.²¹ Instead, at expiration, if the option is in-the-money, a cash payment is made.¹⁷ The amount is calculated as the difference between the index’s official final settlement value and the option’s strike price, multiplied by the contract’s multiplier (typically $100 for standard index options).¹⁷

The European exercise style (exercise only at expiration) works efficiently with this cash settlement system. It allows for a single, definitive settlement value for the index to be calculated based on a standardized procedure – typically using the opening prices of the constituent stocks on the morning of the expiration day (usually the third Friday of the month).¹⁴ This single value is then used universally to determine the cash payout for all expiring in-the-money options of that series.¹⁴ Attempting to calculate a universally agreed-upon cash settlement value for a complex index at any arbitrary point in time before expiration, as would be required for American-style exercise, would introduce significant operational complexity and potential for disputes.¹⁰ The combination of European style and cash settlement thus offers considerable operational simplicity for exchanges, clearinghouses, brokers, and traders dealing with index products.¹⁰

C. Settlement Timing and Risk Differences

The specific mechanism for determining the final settlement value of European-style index options introduces a unique risk. Because the settlement value is based on the opening prices of potentially hundreds of individual stocks on expiration Friday morning, which may occur at slightly different times and may be influenced by overnight news or order imbalances, the official settlement value can sometimes differ significantly from the index level observed at the close of trading the previous day or even from the indicative index levels seen at the market open.¹⁰ This potential discrepancy can lead to “surprises” for traders holding options near the strike price, as an option might settle in- or out-of-the-money based on this calculated value, contrary to expectations based on prior market levels.¹⁰ This phenomenon represents a form of basis risk specific to the settlement process of these European-style, cash-settled index products.

In contrast, the exercise decision for American-style stock options is typically based on the direct comparison between the current market price of the stock and the option’s strike price. While market prices can be volatile, there is generally less ambiguity about whether an option is in-the-money at the time an exercise decision is considered, leading to fewer “surprises” related to the exercise outcome itself near expiration.¹⁴

Table 2: Comparison of Standard US Exchange-Traded Stock vs. Index Options

Feature	Standard Stock Options	Standard Index Options (Broad-Based)
Typical Exercise Style	American 1	European 1
Typical Settlement	Physical Delivery (shares) 17	Cash Settlement 15
Key Driver for Style Choice	Flexibility (e.g., dividend capture), Physical Link	Operational Simplicity for Cash Settlement
Primary Exercise-Related Risk (Seller)	Early Assignment 14	Settlement Price Surprise / Basis Risk 10
Tax Treatment (US – General)	Standard Capital Gains Rates 17	May benefit from 60% Long-Term / 40% Short-Term Rates* 15
Example Product Ticker (Option on)	AAPL (Apple Inc. stock)	SPX (S&P 500 Index) 14

*Note: Tax treatment can be complex and depends on individual circumstances and specific product rules. Investors should consult a tax professional.

V. Historical Context and Rationale: Why the Divergence in Styles?

The divergence between the standard American style for US stock options and the European style for US index options appears rooted in both the inherent characteristics of the underlying assets and the practical evolution of the options market.

A. The Value of Flexibility for Individual Stocks

For options on individual stocks, the American style’s flexibility offers tangible benefits. As previously detailed, the ability to exercise early allows holders to capture dividends ⁶ or react swiftly to company-specific news or events (like earnings announcements, mergers, or regulatory changes) that could dramatically affect the stock’s price before the option’s scheduled expiration.¹⁵ The direct link to potentially owning or delivering the physical shares through physical settlement makes this timing flexibility particularly relevant for participants focused on individual equities.¹⁸ It allows for direct interaction with the underlying stock ownership at a time chosen by the option holder.

B. Practicalities Favoring European Style for Broad Market Indices

Conversely, for options on broad-based indices composed of numerous stocks, the practicalities of settlement strongly favor the European style. Calculating a fair, indisputable cash settlement value for a complex index at any arbitrary moment before expiration would be operationally challenging. The European style, restricting exercise to expiration, allows for a standardized, albeit potentially surprising ¹⁴, calculation based on constituent opening prices, greatly simplifying the process for all market infrastructure participants, including exchanges and the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC).¹⁰ Furthermore, many strategies involving index options are focused on hedging broad market exposure or expressing macroeconomic views over a defined period ending at expiration. For these purposes, the precise timing of exercise before expiration is often less critical than it might be for an option on a single stock subject to idiosyncratic events, making the European style a suitable fit for the typical use cases of index options.

C. Evolution of the Options Market

The historical development of the listed options market also played a role. Exchange-traded options began in the US in 1973 with the launch of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), initially listing only call options on a small number of individual stocks.²⁰ Given the focus on individual equities and the desire to provide maximum utility related to the underlying shares, the American style, offering the greatest flexibility, likely became the natural standard from the outset.

Broad-based index options were introduced later. Faced with the impracticality of physical delivery for an entire index basket, the market adopted cash settlement. This, combined with the operational advantages discussed above, led to the European exercise style becoming the standard for these newer, more complex products. The concurrent development and popularization of the Black-Scholes model, which readily applied to European options ¹⁰, may have also facilitated the adoption of this style for index products by providing a robust initial pricing framework.²⁴

VI. Conclusion

In summary, the answer to whether US exchange-traded stock options are American or European is clear: the standard is American-style. These options grant the holder the right to exercise at any time prior to or on the expiration date. This convention provides valuable flexibility, particularly relevant for options on individual stocks due to factors like dividend capture opportunities and the direct link to physical share settlement.

This stands in stark contrast to the standard for options on major broad-based US stock indices (e.g., SPX, NDX), which are predominantly European-style. The restriction of exercise to the expiration date only for index options is primarily driven by the practical necessities of cash settlement for a complex basket of underlying assets, ensuring operational efficiency for the market.

While these are the dominant standards, the existence of FLEX Options provides a mechanism for sophisticated market participants to access non-standard exercise styles (such as European-style for individual stocks or American-style for indices) within the regulated, centrally cleared exchange environment.

Ultimately, the exercise style is a critical feature of any option contract. Investors and traders must be aware of whether they are dealing with an American or European-style option, as well as its settlement method (physical or cash), before entering into a position. These characteristics fundamentally shape the option’s valuation, risk profile, strategic applications, and potential outcomes.¹²

Download PDF

Works cited

1. What Are Options? Types, Spreads, Example, and Risk Metrics – Investopedia, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/option.asp
2. What Are Stock Options? Parameters and Trading, With Examples – Investopedia, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stockoption.asp
3. Option style – Wikipedia, accessed April 19, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Option_style
4. Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.theocc.com/getmedia/a151a9ae-d784-4a15-bdeb-23a029f50b70/riskstoc.pdf
5. Option (finance) – Wikipedia, accessed April 19, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Option_(finance)
6. American Style Options Explained: Key Differences and Benefits – Cbonds, accessed April 19, 2025, https://cbonds.com/glossary/american-option/
7. Rules of Cboe Exchange, Inc., accessed April 19, 2025, https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/regulation/rule_book/C1_Exchange_Rule_Book.pdf
8. Understanding the Difference: European vs. American Style Options – CME Group, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.cmegroup.com/education/courses/introduction-to-options/understanding-the-difference-european-vs-american-style-options.html
9. American Option vs European Option: What is the Difference? – SoFi, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.sofi.com/learn/content/american-vs-european-options/
10. European Option: Definition, Types, Versus American Options – Investopedia, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/europeanoption.asp
11. American-style Options vs European-style Options: Key Differences Explained – Moomoo, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.moomoo.com/us/learn/detail-american-options-vs-european-options-117194-240531139
12. What is the difference between American-style and European-style options?, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.optionseducation.org/news/what-is-the-difference-between-american-style-and
13. American vs European Options: What’s the Difference? – IncomeShares, accessed April 19, 2025, https://incomeshares.com/en-eu/insights/american-vs-european-options
14. American vs. European Options: What’s the Difference? – Investopedia, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/optioninvestor/08/american-european-options.asp
15. Benefits of Index Options – European Style – Cboe Global Markets, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.cboe.com/tradable_products/index-options-benefits-european-style/
16. Now is the time to consider European style equity options – Eurex, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.eurex.com/ex-en/find/news-center/news/Now-is-the-time-to-consider-European-style-equity-options-3985066
17. The Facts About Options – Cboe Global Markets, accessed April 19, 2025, https://optionsfacts.cboe.com/
18. Equity Options Specifications – Cboe Global Markets, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.cboe.com/exchange_traded_stock/equity_options_spec/
19. Cboe Begins Trading in S&P 500® Equal Weight Index Options on April 14, 2025, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.stocktitan.net/news/CBOE/cboe-begins-trading-in-s-p-500-equal-weight-index-options-on-april-b36stgigxl3x.html
20. CBOE Options Exchange Definition – Investopedia, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cboe.asp
21. Why Option Settlement Style Matters – Cboe Global Markets, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.cboe.com/insights/posts/why-option-settlement-style-matters/
22. Equity LEAPS Options Product Specifications – Cboe Global Markets, accessed April 19, 2025, https://ww2.cboe.com/tradable_products/equity_indices/leaps_options/specifications
23. FLEX Options – Cboe Global Markets, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.cboe.com/tradable_products/equity_indices/flex_options/
24. U.S. equity options market models – NYSE, accessed April 19, 2025, https://www.nyse.com/data-insights/us-equity-options-market-models