Can You Use Any Stock With Binary Options Trading

I. Introduction: Binary Options and the Role of Underlying Assets

A. Defining Binary Options

Binary options represent a distinct category of financial derivatives characterized by a predetermined, fixed payout structure. Unlike traditional options, where profit or loss can vary significantly based on the magnitude of price movement, a binary option resolves to one of two outcomes: either a fixed monetary payout if the option expires “in the money,” or the complete loss of the amount invested if it expires “out of the money”.¹ This structure is often referred to as “all-or-nothing” or “digital”.²

Trading binary options involves speculating on the directional movement of an underlying asset’s price relative to a specific price level, known as the “strike price,” within a defined expiration time.² The trader does not acquire ownership of the underlying asset itself but rather places a wager on a “yes” or “no” proposition: Will the asset’s price be above (a “call” option bet) or below (a “put” option bet) the strike price at the moment of expiration?.² These instruments often feature very short durations, with expirations ranging from minutes or even seconds to hours, days, or occasionally weeks.³

related posts : Best Binary OptionS Brokers (in 2025)

B. The Concept of Underlying Assets

The outcome of a binary option is entirely dependent on the price behavior of its “underlying asset”.¹ This underlying asset can be any quantifiable financial instrument or benchmark, such as a share of stock, a currency pair (Forex), a commodity like gold or oil, or a market index like the S&P 500.⁵ The binary option contract derives its value from the price fluctuations of this underlying asset.¹ However, a critical distinction exists between binary options and traditional (“vanilla”) options: trading binary options does not grant the holder the right or potential to own the underlying asset.⁴ Vanilla options, conversely, may offer the potential for ownership or physical delivery of the asset, or represent the right (but not the obligation) to buy or sell it at the strike price.⁴

The fundamental structure of binary options—their fixed payout, lack of asset ownership, and often very short-term nature—positions them primarily as instruments for speculation rather than traditional investment or sophisticated hedging strategies. While hedging is occasionally mentioned as a potential use ¹², the core mechanism aligns more closely with short-term directional betting. Traditional options allow for a spectrum of profit and loss outcomes depending on how far the underlying price moves beyond the strike, facilitating complex risk management strategies.⁴ Binary options simplify this to a binary outcome, making them accessible ³ but also structurally similar to gambling propositions.⁵ This inherent characteristic likely fuels both their appeal to certain market participants seeking simplicity and high potential (though fixed) returns, and the significant investor protection concerns raised by global regulators.²⁵

Furthermore, the detachment from actual asset ownership is a defining feature. It lowers the barrier to market participation, as traders do not need the capital to purchase the underlying asset itself.³ However, this also disconnects the trading activity from the tangible economic value or utility of the asset, focusing solely on short-term price direction.³ This pure speculation on price movement, divorced from ownership rights or obligations, reinforces the instrument’s speculative nature and distinguishes it sharply from traditional stock or options investing.

C. Focus of the Report

This report addresses the question of whether any publicly traded stock can serve as the underlying asset for binary options trading. It examines the typical range of assets offered, investigates the factors determining the availability of specific stocks, clarifies the role of brokers and exchanges in this selection process, and analyzes the significant impact of financial regulations on the accessibility of stock-based binary options for traders globally.

II. Asset Classes in Binary Options Trading

A. Overview of Common Underlying Assets

Binary options brokers and regulated exchanges typically offer contracts based on a range of underlying asset classes, allowing traders to speculate on various market movements. The most common categories include:

1. Forex (Foreign Exchange Currency Pairs): Major pairs like EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/JPY, as well as minor and exotic pairs, are widely offered due to their high liquidity and continuous trading hours.³
2. Commodities: Assets such as gold, silver, crude oil, and natural gas are popular choices, often reflecting global economic trends and supply/demand dynamics.³
3. Stock Market Indices: Broad market indicators like the S&P 500 (US 500), NASDAQ 100 (US Tech 100), Dow Jones Industrial Average (Wall Street 30), FTSE 100, and Nikkei 225 allow speculation on overall market direction.³ Often, these binary options are based on the corresponding stock index futures contracts.¹⁰
4. Individual Stocks: Shares of specific publicly listed companies, such as Apple, Google, or Colgate-Palmolive, are offered by some brokers, allowing traders to bet on the performance of individual firms.³
5. Economic Events: Some platforms offer binary options based on the outcome of scheduled economic events, like central bank interest rate decisions or unemployment data releases.¹¹ These may sometimes be structured as distinct “event contracts” rather than standard binary options.²³

B. Stocks and Stock Indices in Focus

When stocks serve as the underlying asset, the binary option contract revolves around the future price of a specific company’s share. For example, a trader might purchase a binary call option predicting that Apple Inc. (AAPL) stock will close above $175 per share at 4:00 PM on a given day.⁴

Trading binary options on stock indices offers a different exposure. Instead of betting on a single company, the trader speculates on the overall movement of a market segment represented by the index.¹⁰ As noted, these are frequently based on index futures contracts.¹⁰ This allows traders to take positions on broader market sentiment or trends without the idiosyncratic risk associated with individual stocks.

The prevalence of certain asset types, particularly major stock indices and Forex pairs, is not arbitrary. These markets typically exhibit high liquidity, meaning there are many buyers and sellers, resulting in tighter bid-ask spreads and smoother price movements.³⁵ They also generate a constant stream of news and data, facilitating the technical and fundamental analysis strategies commonly employed by short-term traders.¹² Binary options, often expiring rapidly ³, rely heavily on predictable price action and reliable data feeds, characteristics more commonly found in these highly liquid markets. Individual stocks, especially those with lower trading volumes (illiquid stocks), can present challenges such as wider spreads, sudden price gaps, and less continuous pricing data. This makes it more difficult for brokers (particularly unregulated ones acting as the counterparty ³⁰) to accurately price the options and manage their own risk. Consequently, the asset lists often favor instruments amenable to the specific demands of short-term, derivative-based speculation.

The inclusion of “Economic Events” as a tradable category further stretches the definition of an underlying asset beyond traditional financial instruments.¹¹ Binary options based on discrete, non-financial outcomes (e.g., election results, policy decisions) bear a strong resemblance to prediction markets or conventional betting. This expansion has attracted specific regulatory attention, with bodies like the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) scrutinizing and sometimes taking enforcement action against platforms offering such event contracts, questioning their classification as legitimate financial instruments versus potentially illegal gambling.²³ This indicates that the “underlying asset” concept within the binary options sphere is notably flexible, extending into areas that regulators view with significant concern.

III. Availability of Stocks for Binary Options: A Limited Selection

A. Addressing the Core Question: Universality of Stock Availability

The central question is whether any stock listed on an exchange can be used for binary options trading. The definitive answer is no. Unlike traditional stock brokerage accounts where investors can typically buy or sell shares of almost any publicly listed company, the universe of stocks available for binary options trading is significantly restricted.¹³

B. Broker and Exchange Discretion

The specific roster of available underlying assets, including individual stocks, is determined solely by the binary options broker or the regulated exchange offering the contracts.³ There is no standardized, universal list of stocks accessible across all platforms. Each provider curates its own selection based on various business, risk, and potentially regulatory factors.

C. Typical Characteristics of Offered Stocks

Analysis of broker offerings reveals a pattern: platforms tend to list binary options primarily on stocks that are:

• Widely Recognized: Shares of large, well-known multinational corporations (e.g., major tech companies, blue-chip industrials).
• Highly Liquid: Stocks with substantial daily trading volume, ensuring continuous price discovery and tighter spreads.¹³
• Major Exchange Listings: Typically stocks listed on major global exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Nasdaq, London Stock Exchange (LSE), etc..²⁰

It is also common for platforms, particularly regulated exchanges like the North American Derivatives Exchange (Nadex) in the US, to offer a broader selection of binary options on stock indices rather than a vast array of individual stocks.¹⁰

This limitation on available stocks is not merely a matter of preference but stems from the fundamental business logic and operational practicalities inherent to the binary options product. Offering options on thousands of stocks, including illiquid or less-followed names, would introduce significant challenges. Brokers require reliable, real-time price feeds to set strike prices and accurately determine contract settlement.⁷ Such feeds may be less robust or more expensive for obscure stocks. Furthermore, brokers, especially those acting as market makers or counterparties, need to manage their financial risk. Pricing options on illiquid stocks is complex due to erratic price movements and wider spreads; hedging such positions is also difficult and costly.³⁵ Conversely, offering options on major, liquid stocks or indices provides more predictable pricing inputs, attracts greater trader interest due to familiarity ³⁵, and allows for more manageable risk hedging. Curating a limited list simplifies platform operations and reduces overhead.

A noticeable difference often exists between the asset offerings of regulated exchanges and unregulated offshore brokers. Regulated entities, operating under stricter oversight regarding market integrity and product suitability ⁹, tend to offer a more constrained list, often emphasizing indices.¹⁰ Unregulated brokers, operating outside these legal frameworks ⁴, may advertise a wider, sometimes more exotic, range of underlying assets, including a greater number of individual stocks. However, this apparent variety often comes with substantial risks, as many such platforms engage in fraudulent activities.⁸ The limited selection on regulated platforms can thus be seen as a byproduct of compliance and a more conservative risk management approach.

IV. Broker Criteria for Selecting Stocks

Binary options providers utilize several criteria when deciding which specific stocks (and other assets) to include in their offerings. While transparency on exact selection processes is often limited, analysis suggests the following key factors are influential:

1. Liquidity and Trading Volume: This is arguably the paramount criterion.¹³ High liquidity ensures that there are consistently buyers and sellers, leading to smoother price charts with fewer gaps, tighter bid-ask spreads, and reliable price discovery. This is essential for the short-term nature of binary options and allows brokers to offer more competitive payouts and manage their own potential hedging activities more effectively.³⁵
2. Market Capitalization: While not always explicitly stated, a preference for large-cap stocks is often implied by the focus on liquidity. Larger companies generally have more actively traded shares, greater analyst coverage, and are perceived as less susceptible to sudden, drastic price manipulation compared to smaller, micro-cap stocks.
3. Volatility: Binary options trading thrives on price movement, but excessive or unpredictable volatility can be problematic.¹⁰ Brokers need assets with sufficient movement to create trading opportunities but prefer volatility that is somewhat predictable or manageable within their risk models. Strategies focusing on volatility exist ¹², but brokers might adjust payouts or limit availability during periods of extreme market turmoil or around major news events affecting a specific stock.¹⁰
4. News Flow and Market Sentiment: Stocks that are frequently in the news, subject to significant corporate events (like earnings reports, mergers, acquisitions), or experiencing strong investor sentiment tend to attract trader interest.¹⁰ Brokers may add or feature options on such “hot” stocks to capitalize on this demand.
5. Geographic Market and Client Base: Brokers often tailor their asset lists to their primary customer base, offering stocks from major exchanges within those regions (e.g., US stocks for US clients, European stocks for EU clients).²⁰
6. Client Demand: Market forces play a role; brokers are more likely to offer options on assets that are popular and actively traded by their existing clientele. Low demand for options on a particular stock might lead to its removal.
7. Data Availability and Reliability: The entire binary options mechanism relies on accurate, real-time price data for the underlying asset. Brokers must have access to reliable and low-latency data feeds for any stock they offer to set strike prices, display current market levels, and determine contract settlement precisely.⁷
8. Regulatory Considerations: Even in jurisdictions with less stringent oversight, brokers might consider the regulatory implications of offering options on certain stocks. For instance, if a binary option on a specific stock could be easily classified as a security under influential regulatory regimes (like the US SEC’s), it might deter some brokers due to potential future compliance issues or legal risks.³⁸

The broker’s specific business model can also influence asset selection. In the over-the-counter (OTC) binary options market, the broker often acts as the direct counterparty to the client’s trade, meaning the broker profits when the client loses.³⁰ While difficult to prove, this conflict of interest could theoretically incentivize brokers to select assets or structure options in ways they perceive might disadvantage the average retail trader. This contrasts with an exchange-traded model (like Nadex), where the platform facilitates trades between different participants and earns revenue through fees, rather than directly from client losses.²⁴

Ultimately, the selection criteria heavily favor assets that offer a degree of predictability and risk manageability for the broker. High liquidity, substantial market capitalization, and reliable data feeds minimize the operational and financial risks associated with offering fixed payouts on short-term price movements.³⁵ Pricing binary options involves assessing the probability of an outcome ⁸, and this assessment is far more reliable in deep, liquid markets than in thin, erratic ones. Therefore, the curated lists of available stocks reflect assets that fit within the broker’s risk management framework and pricing models.

This creates an inherent tension: brokers need to offer assets with enough volatility to attract traders seeking profit opportunities ¹², yet they also need to manage the risk associated with that volatility.⁸ Highly volatile assets can lead to significant payouts if traders predict correctly, potentially impacting the broker’s profitability (if acting as counterparty). Brokers might manage this tension by dynamically adjusting the list of offered assets, varying the payout percentages based on perceived risk (lower payouts for higher volatility) ²¹, or restricting the availability of certain contracts around high-impact news releases.¹²

V. The Impact of Regulation on Stock Availability

A. Overview of the Global Regulatory Landscape

The binary options industry has faced intense and increasing regulatory scrutiny globally over the past decade. Concerns center on the high-risk nature of the product, the prevalence of fraudulent operators, aggressive marketing tactics, and significant investor losses.⁴ This scrutiny has led to significant regulatory interventions in major financial markets.

B. Bans and Restrictions in Major Markets

• European Union (ESMA/National Authorities): Starting in July 2018, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) implemented temporary EU-wide measures prohibiting the marketing, distribution, and sale of binary options to retail clients.²⁹ These measures were renewed several times before individual EU member states (such as Ireland, France, Germany, etc.) adopted permanent national bans or restrictions mirroring the ESMA measures, citing significant investor protection concerns related to the product’s characteristics.³¹
• United Kingdom (FCA): Following ESMA’s lead, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) implemented a permanent ban on the sale, marketing, and distribution of all binary options (including variations like ‘securitised binary options’) to retail consumers, effective from April 2, 2019.²⁵ The FCA explicitly stated that binary options are “gambling products dressed up as financial instruments” and highlighted widespread consumer harm and poor conduct by firms selling them as key reasons for the ban.²⁵
• United States (SEC/CFTC): The US regulatory approach differs from a complete ban. Binary options are legal to trade, but only if listed and traded on exchanges regulated by either the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), designated as Designated Contract Markets (DCMs), or the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).⁹ Currently, only a very small number of exchanges, such as Nadex (North American Derivatives Exchange), Cantor Exchange, and CME Group (offering related event contracts), meet these requirements.⁹ Crucially, the vast majority of online platforms soliciting US residents operate outside this regulated framework, making their activities illegal.⁴ Both the CFTC and SEC frequently issue warnings about widespread fraud associated with these unregistered platforms ⁹, and the CFTC maintains a Registration Deficient List (RED List) identifying unregistered foreign entities believed to be soliciting US persons illegally.⁹
• Other Jurisdictions: Similar restrictive actions have been taken elsewhere. Australia’s ASIC banned the sale of binary options to retail clients effective May 2021.⁸ Canadian regulators (CSA) have issued warnings and taken action against fraudulent platforms.²⁶ Israel enacted a ban on the industry following investigations revealing widespread fraud.⁸

C. How Regulation Restricts Asset Availability (Especially Stocks)

Regulatory frameworks directly impact the types and availability of underlying assets offered, particularly individual stocks.

• Securities Classification: In the US, a binary option based on the price movement of an individual company’s stock may itself be considered a security under federal securities laws.³⁸ Offering such a product would legally require the offer and sale to be registered with the SEC, or qualify for an exemption. Furthermore, the platform offering these options might need to register as a securities exchange or a broker-dealer.³⁸ These registration processes are complex and costly, creating significant compliance hurdles that likely deter even regulated platforms from offering a wide variety of individual stock binary options.
• Commodities Regulation: Binary options based on commodities, currencies, or potentially stock indices derived from futures contracts often fall under the jurisdiction of the CFTC in the US.¹⁰ Trading these legally requires the platform to be registered as a DCM.⁹
• Outright Bans: In jurisdictions like the EU and UK, the comprehensive bans on marketing, distribution, and sale to retail clients effectively eliminate the availability of any binary options, regardless of the underlying asset (including stocks), from firms operating legally within or from those regions.²⁵

D. The Unregulated Market Problem

The stringent regulations and outright bans in major developed markets have inadvertently pushed a significant portion of the binary options trading activity towards offshore platforms that operate outside of any meaningful regulatory oversight.⁴ These platforms may appear to offer a wider selection of underlying assets, including numerous individual stocks from various global markets. However, engaging with these entities carries extreme risks. Regulators and law enforcement agencies consistently warn that many of these offshore platforms are fraudulent operations designed solely to steal customer funds.⁹ Common fraudulent practices include refusing to process withdrawals, manipulating trading software to ensure client losses, demanding excessive personal information for identity theft, and simply disappearing with client funds.⁹ The FBI estimates that binary options scams steal billions of dollars annually worldwide.⁸

E. Table: Regulatory Status of Binary Options for Retail Clients (Major Markets)

The following table summarizes the regulatory environment for binary options aimed at retail clients in key financial jurisdictions:

Jurisdiction	Key Regulator(s)	Status for Retail Clients	Key Restrictions/Notes	Supporting References
United States	SEC / CFTC	Legal ONLY on CFTC-designated contract markets (DCMs) or SEC-regulated exchanges	Very few authorized exchanges (e.g., Nadex, Cantor, CME mentioned). Most online platforms soliciting US residents are unregistered and operate illegally. High fraud risk associated with unregistered platforms.	9
European Union	ESMA / National Competent Authorities	Prohibited	Initial ESMA temporary bans (2018-2019) were adopted as permanent or national measures by member states. Marketing, distribution, and sale to retail clients are banned.	8
United Kingdom	Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)	Prohibited	Permanent ban effective April 2, 2019. Includes securitised binary options. FCA considers them “gambling products dressed up as financial instruments.”	25
Australia	ASIC	Prohibited	Ban on issuance and distribution to retail clients effective May 2021. Considered high-risk and unpredictable.	8
Canada	Provincial Regulators (CSA members)	Generally Prohibited / Highly Restricted	Strong warnings against platforms; considered illegal in many provinces. Enforcement actions taken.	26
Israel	Israel Securities Authority (ISA)	Prohibited	Complete ban enacted in 2017 following investigations into widespread fraud originating from the country.	8

The global regulatory crackdown reflects a fundamental judgment by financial authorities. After initial warnings proved insufficient to curb widespread fraud and consumer harm ²⁵, major regulators concluded that binary options, particularly as offered by many online OTC platforms, pose inherent and unacceptable risks to retail investors.²⁵ The complexity, potential for conflicts of interest (broker vs. client), and the sheer volume of fraudulent activity led authorities like ESMA and the FCA to opt for outright prohibition for retail clients, rather than attempting mitigation through enhanced disclosure or conduct rules.²⁵ This progression from warnings to bans suggests a deep skepticism about the product’s suitability and the business models commonly associated with it.

The US approach, permitting trading only within the confines of highly regulated exchanges ⁹, creates a small, theoretically safer, but limited environment. However, this simultaneously highlights the vastness and danger of the unregulated offshore market that illegally targets US residents.⁹ This regulatory bifurcation creates a potentially confusing landscape. While legal avenues exist, they offer a restricted range of products (often focusing on indices, FX, and commodities rather than a wide array of individual stocks ¹⁰). This limitation might inadvertently push individuals seeking broader asset choices, including specific stocks, towards the very illegal and high-risk offshore platforms that regulators explicitly warn against.

VI. Conclusion: Stock Availability is Broker-Dependent and Highly Regulated

In conclusion, the ability to use stocks as underlying assets in binary options trading is subject to significant limitations and cannot be assumed for any given stock.

Summary of Findings:

• Limited Availability: It is not possible to trade binary options on any publicly listed stock. The selection offered is restricted and varies considerably between platforms.¹³
• Broker/Exchange Discretion: The specific list of available stocks and other underlying assets is determined by the individual binary options brokers or the regulated exchanges providing the service.³
• Preference for Liquid Assets: Providers typically favor binary options based on highly liquid, large-capitalization stocks and major market indices, driven by factors like reliable pricing, trader demand, and risk management considerations.¹³

Emphasis on Regulatory Constraints:

• Financial regulations play a decisive role in the availability of binary options, especially those based on individual stocks. In major markets like the European Union and the United Kingdom, binary options are effectively banned for retail clients, rendering stock-based binary options inaccessible through regulated channels.²⁷
• In the United States, while legally permissible, binary options trading is confined to a small number of CFTC or SEC-regulated exchanges, which tend to offer a limited range of products, often focusing on indices, commodities, and Forex rather than a wide selection of individual stocks.⁹ The regulatory hurdles associated with classifying and registering stock-based binary options likely contribute to this limited offering on regulated platforms.³⁸

The answer to whether any stock can be used is therefore not just a simple “no.” It is “no” due to a complex interplay of factors: the economic realities faced by brokers in pricing and managing risk for these specific instruments, the inherent suitability (or lack thereof) of different asset types for short-term binary speculation, and, most critically, a global regulatory environment that views these products with extreme caution, leading to outright bans or severe restrictions in many key jurisdictions, particularly concerning retail investors.

Final Cautionary Note:

Binary options trading carries substantial risks, including the potential for the rapid and complete loss of invested capital due to the all-or-nothing payout structure.³ Furthermore, the market is plagued by fraudulent operators, particularly among unregulated offshore platforms that may offer a seemingly wider array of assets, including numerous stocks.⁴ For retail traders in highly regulated regions (EU, UK, Australia), accessing stock-based binary options legally is practically impossible due to bans. In the US, the legal options are restricted to a few exchanges with limited offerings. Seeking wider stock availability almost invariably involves engaging with unregulated, potentially illegal, and high-risk platforms against which regulators strongly advise. Extreme caution, thorough due diligence regarding platform registration and legitimacy, and a clear understanding of the profound risks involved are imperative before considering any involvement in binary options trading.

Download PDF

Works cited

1. m.economictimes.com, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/definition/binary%20options#:~:text=DEFINITION%3A%20A%20binary%20option%20is,future%20for%20a%20fixed%20amount.
2. What is Binary Options – Definition – The Economic Times, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/definition/binary%20options
3. Binary Option: How It Works & Examples – Acquire.Fi, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.acquire.fi/glossary/binary-option-definition-how-they-trade-and-example
4. Binary Option: Definition, How They Trade, and Example – Investopedia, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/binary-option.asp
5. Options | FINRA.org, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.finra.org/investors/investing/investment-products/options
6. What is Binary Options Trading? Benefits, Risks & Legality in India | 5paisa, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.5paisa.com/stock-market-guide/generic/what-is-binary-trading
7. How to Start a Binary Options Broker in 2024 – Liquidity Provider, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://liquidity-provider.com/articles/how-to-start-a-binary-options-broker-detailed-guide/
8. Binary option – Wikipedia, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_option
9. Beware of Off-Exchange Binary Options Trades | CFTC, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/beware_of_off_exchange_binary_options.htm
10. Trade Stock Indices with Binary Options – Nadex, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/learning/understanding-indices-trading-with-binary-options/
11. What are Binary Options and How Do They Work? – Nadex, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/learning/what-are-binary-options-and-how-do-they-work/
12. Binary Options Strategies You Should Know – Investopedia, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/052014/binary-options-strategies.asp
13. Understanding Binary Options Trading – Alphanome.AI, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.alphanome.ai/post/understanding-binary-options-trading
14. A Beginner’s Guide to Binary Options Trading – TIOmarkets, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://tiomarkets.com/es/article/a-beginner-s-guide-to-binary-options-trading
15. Trade Commodities with Binary Options – Nadex, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/learning/understanding-commodities-trading-with-binary-options/
16. Binary Options Trading: Risks, Benefits & Strategies | Bajaj Broking, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.bajajbroking.in/blog/binary-option-trading
17. How to Trade Binary Options | Nadex, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/learning/how-to-trade-binary-options/
18. Stock indices – contract specifications – Nadex, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/contract-specs-stock-index/
19. Trading Nadex Binary Options: Keeping It Simple Strategies – Amazon.com, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.amazon.com/Trading-Nadex-Binary-Options-Strategies/dp/1537780255
20. Choosing Binary Options Assets – TradingPedia, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.tradingpedia.com/binary-options-academy/assets/
21. Ultimate Guide to Binary Options | Complete Controller, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://completecontroller.com/binary-options-all-there-is-to-know-before-you-invest/
22. Avoid Unregistered Binary Options Trading Platforms | CFTC, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/avoid_unregistered_binary_options_platforms.htm
23. CFTC Jurisdiction Should Not Extend to Event Contracts – CLS Blue Sky Blog, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/2024/09/23/cftc-jurisdiction-should-not-extend-to-event-contracts/
24. A Guide to Trading Binary Options in the US – Investopedia, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/061114/guide-trading-binary-options-us.asp
25. FCA confirms permanent ban on the sale of binary options to retail …, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/fca-confirms-permanent-ban-sale-binary-options-retail-consumers
26. UK FCA Charges Four Individuals with £1.2M Binary Options Fraud – Finance Magnates, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.financemagnates.com/binary-options/uk-fca-charges-four-persons-in-12m-binary-options-fraud/
27. FCA Introduces Permanent Ban on Binary Options to Retail Consumers – objectivus, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://objectivus.com/fca-introduces-permanent-ban-on-binary-options-to-retail-consumers/
28. Beware of Online Binary Options Schemes – Missouri Secretary of State, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.sos.mo.gov/bewareofonlinebinaryoptionsschemes
29. Central Bank of Ireland Binary Options Intervention Measure pursuant to Article 42 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.centralbank.ie/docs/default-source/Regulation/industry-market-sectors/investment-firms/mifid-firms/regulatory-requirements-and-guidance/central-bank-binary-options-intervention-measure.pdf
30. PS19/11: Product intervention measures for retail binary options – Financial Conduct Authority, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/impact-assessments/product-intervention-retail-binary-options.pdf
31. ESMA adopts final product intervention measures on CFDs and …, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-adopts-final-product-intervention-measures-cfds-and-binary-options
32. Types of Binary Options and Underlying Assets – TradingPedia, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.tradingpedia.com/binary-options-academy/types-of-binary-options-and-underlying-assets/
33. Introduction to Binary Options Trading – NerdWallet, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/investing/binary-options-trading
34. Nadex Search, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.nadex.com/searching/
35. Binary Options Trading Guide: Choosing the Right Asset, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.financemagnates.com/binary-options/analysis/trading-guide-choosing-right-asset-trade-binary-options/
36. CFTC Issues Cease and Desist Order to Binary Options Operator Using Smart Contracts, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.proskauer.com/blog/cftc-issues-cease-and-desist-order-to-binary-options-operator-using-smart-contracts
37. Finding the Best Binary Options Brokers – Dazeinfo, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://dazeinfo.com/2022/04/19/finding-the-best-binary-options-brokers/
38. CFTC/SEC Investor Alert: Binary Options and Fraud, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/fraudadv_binaryoptions.html
39. Beware of Binary Options Mobile Apps | CFTC, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/beware_of_binary_options_mobile.htm
40. Binary Options Fraud – FBI, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/binary-options-fraud
41. Binary Options Fraud | CFTC, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/BinaryOptionsFraud/index.htm
42. US CFTC Takes Action Against Unregistered Crypto and Binary Options Platforms, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://charltonsquantum.com/us-cftc-takes-action-against-unregistered-crypto-and-binary-options-platforms/
43. The Central Bank, Binary Options and CFDs, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.mccannfitzgerald.com/knowledge/financial-services-regulation/the-central-bank-binary-options-and-cfds
44. Binary options and CFDs: the AMF adopts national intervention measures – Autorité des marchés financiers, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news-releases/amf-news-releases/binary-options-and-cfds-amf-adopts-national-intervention-measures
45. Notice of ESMA’s Product Intervention Renewal Decision in relation to binary options, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.centralbank.ie/regulation/markets-update/esma-guidelines-and-recommendations/markets-update-issue-14-2018/european-securities-and-markets-authority-(esma)/notice-of-esma-s-product-intervention-renewal-decision-in-relation-to-binary-options
46. ESMA renews binary options prohibition for a further three months from 2 January 2019, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-renews-binary-options-prohibition-further-three-months-2-january-2019
47. Notice of ESMA’s Product Intervention Renewal Decision in relation to binary options, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/notice-esma%E2%80%99s-product-intervention-renewal-decision-in-relation-binary-option-1
48. ESMA renews binary options prohibition for a further three months from 2 April 2019, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-renews-binary-options-prohibition-further-three-months-2-april-2019
49. PS19/11: Product intervention measures for retail binary options | FCA, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/publications/policy-statements/ps19-11-product-intervention-measures-retail-binary-options
50. PS19/11: Product intervention measures for retail binary options – Financial Conduct Authority, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/policy/ps19-11.pdf
51. Compliance Corner: UK Bans Binary Options For Retail Investors – Family Wealth Report, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://www.familywealthreport.com/article.php/Compliance-Corner:-UK-Bans-Binary-Options-For-Retail-Investors-
52. Product intervention measures for retail binary options Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) RPC rating: validated – GOV.UK, accessed on April 22, 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d1df9c340f0b609f39009e5/RPC-4371_1_-HMT-FCA_-_product_intervention_measures_for_retail_binary_options_-_IA_f__opinion.pdf