GC Option Binary Option Broker Review (Updated 2025)

By /

I. Executive Summary

This report provides an analysis of GC Option, an entity presenting itself as a provider of binary options trading services, primarily accessible through the website gcoption.com. The platform offers users access to several trading interfaces, a tiered account structure with varying features, and notably low minimum deposit and trade size requirements, potentially appealing to novice traders. Trading involves predicting the price direction of assets like currency pairs, futures, and metals, with advertised payouts reaching up to 86%.1

However, the investigation reveals critical concerns regarding GC Option’s operational legitimacy and safety for investors. Foremost among these is the apparent lack of oversight by any recognized financial regulatory authority.1 This absence is explicitly highlighted by external bodies. The Financial Commission, an independent dispute resolution organization, clearly states it does not handle complaints related to the entity operating gcoption.com (identified as Grand Capital Ltd., registered in St. Vincent and the Grenadines), as it is not an approved member, unlike a similarly named but distinct entity operating grandcapital.net.2 Furthermore, the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) includes “Grand Capital Option & GC Option” in its public warnings list.3

The confluence of operating without recognized regulatory supervision and offering high-risk binary options products positions GC Option as a significant risk to potential clients. Key dangers identified include the potential lack of security for client funds, the absence of guaranteed fair trading practices, limited avenues for effective dispute resolution, and no access to investor compensation schemes in case of broker insolvency. The findings strongly suggest that GC Option operates in a high-risk environment, potentially leveraging brand ambiguity while lacking essential investor protections.

Based on the evidence gathered, potential users are strongly advised to exercise extreme caution. The significant regulatory red flags, coupled with the inherent risks of binary options and the lack of independent validation, suggest that engaging with this broker carries substantial financial risk. Investors should prioritize platforms operating under the supervision of reputable financial regulators.

related posts : Best Binary Options Brokers (in 2025)

II. GC Option: Broker Profile and Background

A. Identifying GC Option

GC Option positions itself as a broker specializing in binary options trading. Its primary online presence is the website gcoption.com.1 The platform is listed among other binary options brokers in market overview reports, indicating some level of recognition within this specific niche.4 The core offering involves allowing traders to speculate on the price movements of various assets through binary contracts.1

Significant confusion arises due to the similarity in name with “Grand Capital,” a separate brokerage entity operating the website grandcapital.net. It is crucial to distinguish between these two. The Financial Commission, an external dispute resolution body for the financial services industry, explicitly clarifies this distinction. It confirms that Grand Capital Ltd., registered in Seychelles and operating grandcapital.net, is an active member, and complaints against this entity can be processed. Conversely, the Financial Commission explicitly states it cannot accept complaints from customers of Grand Capital Ltd., registered in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, which operates gcoption.com, because this entity is not an approved member of the organization.2 While a document purportedly related to Grand Capital’s regulations mentions “GC Option” 7 (though the document itself was inaccessible for direct review 7), and the registration process for Grand Capital (grandcapital.net) is detailed elsewhere 8, the official stance from the Financial Commission firmly separates the two entities in terms of membership and oversight. Notably, the main website for Grand Capital (grandcapital.net) details various CFD trading options but does not appear to feature binary options or explicitly mention “GC Option”.9

The use of a similar name (“GC Option” or “Grand Capital Option” as listed by the AFM 3) by an entity operating from a different jurisdiction (St. Vincent and the Grenadines 2) compared to the Financial Commission member (Seychelles 2) raises concerns. This naming convention could potentially mislead users into associating gcoption.com with the reputation or regulatory standing (however limited) of grandcapital.net. Operating under a familiar banner while lacking the same oversight framework represents a significant risk, as users might make assumptions about safety and legitimacy that do not apply to gcoption.com.

B. Disambiguation of “GC”

The acronym “GC” appears frequently across various domains unrelated to the binary options broker GC Option. To prevent confusion, it is essential to identify and exclude these irrelevant references found in the research materials:

  • Dental/Medical: GC Europe N.V. (dental products) 10, GC Aesthetics (breast implants).11
  • Sports/Technology: GameChanger (youth sports app) 12, Eisenhower Golf Club.13
  • Retail: Good Choice Shoes (GC Shoes).14
  • Finance (Unrelated):
  • GC Exchange (institutional digital assets).15
  • CME Group Gold Futures (ticker symbol GC).16
  • Eurex Repo GC Pooling (General Collateral Pooling).23
  • General Collateral (GC) in repo markets.24
  • GC Securities (division of MMC Securities LLC/Ltd./Ireland Ltd., investment banking/ILS).26
  • Golub Capital (investment management).28
  • GC Timmis & Company (former broker-dealer).29
  • FICC Government Securities Division (GSD) rules.30
  • Gram-Charlier (GC) option pricing model.31
  • Government/Education/Construction: Galveston College 32, Construction Management/General Contractor (CM/GC) contracts 33, Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) CARM/GCKey systems 38, Capital University course codes.39
  • Computing/Technical: Grid Configuration File (GCF) 40, Garbage Collection (GC) in Java Virtual Machines and software 41, Gas Chromatography (GC) analysis.44
  • Other: Garden Community (GC) Option in planning.47

These diverse uses of “GC” are distinct from the binary options broker GC Option operating at gcoption.com and will not be discussed further in this analysis.

III. Regulatory Scrutiny and Investor Protection

A. Lack of Verifiable Regulation

A critical finding of this review is the absence of any evidence indicating that GC Option, operating via gcoption.com, is authorized or regulated by a recognized, reputable financial authority.1 In the global financial services landscape, regulation serves as a cornerstone of investor protection. Major jurisdictions, such as the United States, have established robust frameworks involving bodies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for securities and options on securities, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for commodities, futures, and options on futures.48 Self-regulatory organizations like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the National Futures Association (NFA) enforce rules on broker-dealers, mandate licensing, ensure capital adequacy, require meticulous record-keeping, and oversee market conduct to prevent fraud and manipulation.48 The primary objective of such regulation is to maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets while safeguarding the interests of investors through transparency, standardized rules, and mechanisms for recourse.48 The lack of such oversight for GC Option is a significant deficiency.

B. Specific Warnings and Clarifications

The regulatory concerns surrounding GC Option are not merely theoretical; they are substantiated by explicit statements from relevant organizations. The Financial Commission, which offers dispute resolution services and a compensation fund for clients of its member firms, has clearly stated that it cannot process complaints against the entity operating gcoption.com (Grand Capital Ltd., St. Vincent and the Grenadines). This is because this entity is not an approved member firm.2 This contrasts directly with the status of Grand Capital Ltd. (Seychelles) operating grandcapital.net, which is a member and whose clients can access the Commission’s services, including a compensation fund of up to €20,000 per complaint.2

Furthermore, the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM), a major European financial regulator, has included “Grand Capital Option & GC Option” in its public list of warnings.3 Such warnings are typically issued when entities solicit clients without the necessary authorization or raise other serious investor protection concerns.

The combination of operating from St. Vincent and the Grenadines 2—an offshore jurisdiction often associated with less stringent financial oversight compared to major onshore centers—the explicit non-membership in the Financial Commission 2, and a warning from a European regulator 3 points towards a potential strategy of regulatory arbitrage. By choosing a domicile with minimal regulatory requirements, the broker may avoid the compliance costs, capital adequacy rules, and operational constraints imposed by stricter regimes. However, this choice effectively transfers the bulk of the risk to the client, who operates outside the safety net provided by robust financial regulation.

C. Implications for Traders

Trading with an unregulated broker like GC Option exposes clients to substantial risks. Without regulatory oversight, there is no assurance that client funds are segregated from the company’s operational capital, increasing the risk of loss if the broker faces financial difficulties or insolvency. There are no guarantees regarding the fairness of trading conditions, the accuracy of price feeds, or the integrity of trade execution. Perhaps most critically, clients have limited or no access to impartial dispute resolution mechanisms or official channels for recourse if they encounter problems such as withdrawal difficulties, platform manipulation, or unfair treatment. They are also excluded from investor compensation schemes, like the one offered by the Financial Commission to clients of its member firms 2, which are designed to protect client assets up to a certain limit in the event of broker failure.

These risks are amplified by the nature of the product offered. Binary options are widely considered highly speculative and carry a significant risk of loss. Many reputable regulatory bodies in jurisdictions like the European Union and the United Kingdom have banned or severely restricted the sale of binary options to retail clients due to investor protection concerns. The combination of an unregulated operational environment and a high-risk financial product creates an exceptionally precarious situation for potential investors considering GC Option.

IV. Trading Platform and Instruments

A. Platform Offerings

GC Option provides clients with access to three distinct trading platforms, catering to different perceived levels of experience and needs.1

  1. WebTrader Classic: Described as the “best way to start trading,” this platform is available to all account holders, including the entry-level Silver tier.1 This suggests a basic, user-friendly interface suitable for beginners.
  2. WebTrader Pro: Positioned as an “advanced version of the web terminal,” this platform boasts “extensive technical analysis capabilities”.1 Access is granted to Gold and VIP account holders 1, implying more sophisticated charting tools and indicators compared to the Classic version.
  3. Trading Platform 4: Presented as a “professional platform for market analysis and algorithmic trading,” this option is also available to Gold and VIP users.1 The mention of algorithmic trading capabilities suggests compatibility with automated trading systems, specifically Expert Advisors (EAs), although the ability to use EAs is explicitly restricted to VIP account holders.1

The tiered access to these platforms, progressing from “start trading” to “advanced” and “professional,” reflects a common industry model. However, it also serves as an incentive structure, potentially encouraging users to deposit more funds to unlock platforms perceived as more capable. The actual functionality and performance of these platforms, particularly from an unregulated provider, cannot be independently verified from the available data.

B. Tradable Assets and Option Types

GC Option offers trading on a selection of 30 underlying assets. The categories explicitly mentioned include currency pairs, futures, and metals.1 Notably absent from this primary description are common asset classes like individual stocks or cryptocurrencies, suggesting a relatively focused, if limited, range of markets compared to broader multi-asset brokers.

The core trading instrument is the binary option, described as a method to profit by predicting an asset’s price direction.1 Two basic types are offered:

  • CALL options: Purchased with the expectation that the asset’s price will be higher than the entry price at the option’s expiration time. A correct prediction results in a fixed profit, while an incorrect prediction (price is the same or lower) results in the loss of the invested amount.1
  • PUT options: Purchased with the expectation that the asset’s price will be lower than the entry price at expiration. Profit is made if the price is indeed lower; the investment is lost if the price is the same or higher.1

The platform advertises potential profits of “up to 86%” on successful trades.1 Such high payout claims are characteristic of the binary options industry but warrant skepticism. Binary options are typically a zero-sum game between the broker and the trader (or traders amongst themselves if brokered). The advertised payout rate represents the maximum potential return, and the actual achievable rate may vary depending on the asset, time frame, market conditions, and potentially the broker’s discretion, especially in an unregulated environment. The sustainability and consistency of such high payouts are questionable, as the broker’s business model often relies on a statistical edge over retail traders.

An “Early Closure” feature is also mentioned, allowing traders to exit a position before the scheduled expiry. This feature is associated with claims of “up to 40% payouts” or “up to 10% refund for losses” 1, though the specific conditions determining these outcomes are not detailed.

C. Trading Parameters

GC Option facilitates entry into trading with remarkably low financial thresholds. The minimum deposit required to open an account is just $10, which grants access to the Silver account tier.1 Correspondingly, the minimum amount required to place a single trade is $1.1

This extremely low barrier to entry is a significant characteristic. While potentially attractive to individuals with limited capital or those wishing to experiment with small amounts, it must be viewed in the context of the high-risk nature of binary options and the broker’s unregulated status. Such low minimums can effectively lure inexperienced traders into a high-risk environment without adequate understanding of the potential for rapid losses or the lack of investor protection mechanisms. It appears to be a strategy focused on attracting a high volume of small-scale traders, potentially overlooking suitability assessments or robust risk warnings that would be standard practice for regulated brokers.

V. Account Tiers and Features

A. Account Structure

GC Option employs a tiered account system, segmenting clients based on their investment level. Three distinct account types are offered 1:

  • Silver: Requires a minimum investment starting from $10.
  • Gold: Requires a minimum investment starting from $100.
  • VIP: Requires a minimum investment starting from $300.

B. Feature Comparison

The features and services provided vary significantly across these tiers, creating a clear progression designed to incentivize larger deposits 1:

  • Common Features (All Tiers): All account holders (Silver, Gold, VIP) receive access to the basic WebTrader Classic platform, “free education,” and “free analysis” materials.1
  • Gold Tier Additions: Moving up to the Gold tier unlocks access to the more advanced WebTrader Pro and Trading Platform 4 interfaces. Additionally, Gold users gain access to “trading signals” and “analysis tools right in the terminal”.1
  • VIP Tier Exclusives: The highest tier, VIP, includes all Gold features plus several exclusive benefits: the assignment of a “personal analyst,” the capability to utilize Expert Advisors (EAs) for automated trading on Platform 4, access to “risk-free trading” opportunities (the specifics of which are undefined), and a “10% refund for unsuccessful trades” (again, conditions are unspecified).1

This structure clearly gates potentially valuable features behind higher deposit requirements. While tiered accounts are common, the nature of the gated features offered by an unregulated broker raises questions. The tangible value and objectivity of services like “trading signals,” “personal analyst,” or vaguely defined “risk-free trading” provided by GC Option cannot be ascertained from the available information and could primarily serve as marketing inducements rather than genuine aids to profitable trading. The 10% loss refund for VIPs, while seemingly beneficial, might also subtly encourage traders to take larger risks, knowing a small fraction of losses might be recouped. The effectiveness and reliability of these premium features remain unverified.

C. Table: GC Option Account Comparison

The table below summarizes the key differences between the account tiers based on the available information.1

FeatureSilverGoldVIP
Min. Deposit$10+$100+$300+
WebTrader ClassicYesYesYes
WebTrader ProNoYesYes
Trading Platform 4NoYesYes
Free EducationYesYesYes
Free AnalysisYesYesYes
Trading SignalsNoYesYes
In-Terminal ToolsNoYesYes
Personal AnalystNoNoYes
EA UsageNoNoYes
Risk-Free TradingNoNoYes
10% Loss RefundNoNoYes

VI. Deposit and Withdrawal Procedures

A. Available Methods

Information regarding deposit and withdrawal methods was specifically sought from the broker’s “operations_with_money” page.50 The methods detailed in that specific source are limited:

  • Deposits:
  • Bank transfer via ThunderXpay (Accepting LAK, MMK, KHR currencies).50
  • Local transfer agents via Indian Exchanger (Primarily for INR, involving currency conversion by the exchanger).50
  • Withdrawals:
  • Bank transfer via ThunderXpay (Paying out in LAK, MMK, KHR).50
  • Local transfer agents via Indian Exchanger (Paying out in INR).50

It is important to note that while the main website mentions a dedicated section for deposits/withdrawals 1, the specific scrape 50 only yielded these two methods. The absence of widely used international payment options such as major credit/debit cards (Visa, Mastercard), prominent e-wallets (like Skrill, Neteller, PayPal), or standard international bank wire transfers in this data is conspicuous. This suggests either the data capture was incomplete or GC Option relies heavily on region-specific payment solutions and potentially less conventional third-party intermediaries.

Reliance on specific regional providers like ThunderXpay (targeting Laos, Myanmar, Cambodia) and an Indian Exchanger system points towards a payment infrastructure that may not be globally oriented or robust. Using such intermediaries can introduce additional layers of counterparty risk, potential delays, and less transparency regarding fees, particularly concerning currency exchange rates applied by agents.50 The lack of mainstream, globally recognized payment channels is unusual for brokers seeking international clientele and could indicate challenges in establishing relationships with traditional financial institutions, often a consequence of operating in an unregulated or high-risk sector.

B. Fees and Processing Times

Based on the information from the dedicated payments page 50:

  • Deposits:
  • ThunderXpay: Carries a 2% commission. Processing time is not specified.50
  • Indian Exchanger: Commission is stated as 0% (compensated by Grand Capital, though the relation to GC Option is ambiguous here). Processing time is listed as 1 day.50
  • Withdrawals:
  • ThunderXpay: Commission is 0%. Processing time is up to 3 business days.50
  • Indian Exchanger: Commission “Depends on the Bank.” Processing time ranges from 1 to 3 business days.50

The fee structure appears mixed, with commissions applied to some deposit methods but not others, and withdrawal fees potentially varying depending on the intermediary bank used by the Indian Exchanger. The processing times of 1-3 days are within typical ranges, although the lack of specified time for ThunderXpay deposits is an omission.

C. Table: GC Option Deposit & Withdrawal Summary 50

This table summarizes the details found for the specific payment methods listed in source.50

MethodTypeCurrenciesCommissionProcessing Time
ThunderXpayDepositLAK, MMK, KHR2%Not Specified
ThunderXpayWithdrawalLAK, MMK, KHR0%Up to 3 days
Indian ExchangerDepositINR*0% (compensated)1 day
Indian ExchangerWithdrawalINRDepends on the Bank1 day – 3 days

*Deposited via exchanger, involving currency conversion.

VII. Customer Support and Educational Resources

A. Customer Support Channels

Accessing reliable customer support is crucial when dealing with financial services providers, particularly unregulated ones. However, identifying clear and consistent support channels for GC Option proves challenging based on the available data. A direct examination of the main website, gcoption.com, did not reveal standard contact options like a dedicated email address, phone number, or live chat functionality readily available on the page; it primarily showed an “offline” status and login prompts.1

Contact information does appear in relation to associated entities or regional operations. For instance, details for an office in Abidjan, including a phone number and Gmail address (info.grandcapital.ci@gmail.com), are listed under the Grand Capital banner but potentially linked to local representation.51 Similarly, contact points (Email, Skype, Phone, WhatsApp, Telegram) associated with an individual (g.das@grandcapital.net / g.das@grandcapital.co.za) were provided in an announcement about a Nigerian payment service on a gcoption.in domain.52

This fragmented picture suggests a potentially decentralized support structure, possibly relying on regional partners or specific service contacts rather than a unified, easily accessible global support desk operating directly under the GC Option brand. For traders encountering issues, particularly urgent ones related to funds or trading, navigating such a disparate system could be problematic. The lack of clear, official support channels on the main website raises concerns about the accessibility, reliability, and consistency of assistance available to clients worldwide.

B. Educational and Analytical Resources

GC Option promotes the availability of learning and analysis tools as part of its service offering.1 “Free education” and “free analysis” are listed as benefits for all account tiers (Silver, Gold, VIP).1 For users with Gold and VIP accounts, the platform provides “analysis tools right in the terminal” and “trading signals”.1 VIP clients are additionally offered a “personal analyst”.1 The existence of video tutorials is also indicated.1

While the provision of such resources is common among brokers, their actual quality and utility, especially when offered by an unregulated entity, must be critically evaluated. Educational materials from unregulated brokers may lack depth, objectivity, or pedagogical soundness. Trading signals and analysis tools provided directly by the broker (who often acts as the counterparty in binary options trades) carry an inherent potential for conflict of interest. The advice from a “personal analyst” under such circumstances may not be unbiased or genuinely aimed at the client’s profitability. Without independent verification or evidence of the quality and objectivity of these resources, they should be viewed with caution and not relied upon as primary tools for making trading decisions.

VIII. Market Reputation and User Feedback

A. Independent Review Platform Data

Assessing the market reputation of GC Option through independent sources reveals significant concerns. Data from FxVerify, a platform aggregating broker information and user reviews, paints a negative picture.53 GC Option holds an extremely low overall rating of 1.4 out of 5. This score is derived from various factors, including popularity (rated 2.3) and other categories like regulation, pricing, features, and customer support, which were notably “not rated” by FxVerify itself, likely due to insufficient data or lack of verifiable information.53

Most strikingly, despite having an online presence, GC Option had accumulated zero user reviews on FxVerify at the time the data was captured.53 This complete absence of user feedback on an independent review site is highly unusual for a broker actively soliciting clients and suggests a lack of significant market traction, widespread user dissatisfaction that doesn’t translate into reviews on this platform, or potentially other issues hindering the accumulation of genuine feedback.

Web traffic data sourced by FxVerify from SimilarWeb provides some context on the broker’s online footprint.53 Total monthly visits to gcoption.com were relatively low, estimated at around 3,708, with the vast majority (99%) being organic (non-paid) traffic. Engagement metrics, such as a 45% bounce rate, 4.52 pages per visit, and an average visit duration of approximately 6 minutes, appear moderate. The organic traffic rank (380 out of 943 Forex brokers analyzed by FxVerify) indicates some visibility but not a dominant market position.53

The stark contrast between GC Option’s marketed offerings (multiple platforms, tiered accounts, analytical features 1) and the lack of positive independent validation (extremely low rating, zero user reviews on FxVerify 53) is a major red flag. A functioning, reputable broker would typically generate some level of user feedback, whether positive or negative. The absence of this validation strongly undermines any claims of reliability or customer satisfaction and aligns with the concerns raised by the lack of regulation and specific warnings.2

B. General Market Context

It is also pertinent to consider the general risks inherent in the products offered. The FxVerify platform itself includes a disclaimer highlighting the considerable risks associated with trading complex financial instruments.53 It notes that a high percentage (74-89%) of retail accounts lose money when trading CFDs (Contracts for Difference), emphasizes the extreme volatility of options and cryptocurrencies, and warns that even seemingly safer assets like stocks and bonds can depreciate rapidly. The stability and regulatory status of the broker, including the existence of effective investor compensation schemes, are crucial for asset protection.53 GC Option operates within this high-risk segment, offering binary options, but does so without the regulatory safeguards and potential compensation mechanisms available through supervised brokers.

IX. Conclusion and Analyst Recommendation

A. Summary of Findings

The analysis of GC Option reveals a broker operating in the high-risk binary options market via the website gcoption.com. It attracts users with low entry barriers ($10 minimum deposit, $1 minimum trade) and offers tiered accounts ($10 Silver, $100 Gold, $300 VIP) with progressively more features, including multiple trading platforms (WebTrader Classic, WebTrader Pro, Platform 4) and analytical tools.1 The platform facilitates trading on a limited range of assets (primarily currency pairs, futures, metals) with advertised payouts up to 86%.1

However, the most critical finding is the definitive lack of regulation by any recognized major financial authority.1 This is corroborated by explicit statements from the Financial Commission confirming GC Option (operated by Grand Capital Ltd., St. Vincent and the Grenadines) is not a member and complaints against it cannot be handled 2, unlike the similarly named but separate entity grandcapital.net. Furthermore, a warning has been issued by the Dutch AFM regarding “Grand Capital Option & GC Option”.3 This lack of oversight appears potentially linked to a strategy involving brand ambiguity.

Additional concerns identified include a limited and geographically specific payment infrastructure documented 50, an unclear and fragmented customer support system 1, and a concerning lack of positive market validation, evidenced by an extremely low rating and zero user reviews on the independent platform FxVerify.53

B. Overall Risk Assessment

GC Option must be classified as an extremely high-risk platform for investors. This assessment is based on the convergence of several critical factors:

  1. Unregulated Status: Operating without oversight from reputable financial bodies removes fundamental investor protections.
  2. Offshore Jurisdiction: Registration in St. Vincent and the Grenadines 2 places it outside stringent regulatory environments.
  3. Regulatory Warnings: Explicit non-membership confirmation by the Financial Commission 2 and a warning from the AFM 3 signal significant concerns from oversight bodies.
  4. High-Risk Product: Binary options are inherently speculative and banned/restricted for retail clients in many regulated markets.
  5. Lack of Transparency: Ambiguity surrounding its relationship with Grand Capital, unclear support structures, and unverified platform/feature quality contribute to opacity.
  6. Absence of Recourse: Clients lack access to regulatory dispute resolution and investor compensation funds.

The combination of these factors creates an environment where client funds are potentially insecure, trading practices may not be fair, and resolving issues could prove exceptionally difficult.

C. Analyst Recommendation

Based on the comprehensive analysis of the available information and the significant red flags identified, particularly the lack of regulation and explicit warnings, potential users are strongly advised to exercise extreme caution and avoid depositing funds with GC Option (gcoption.com).

The perceived advantages of low minimum deposits and accessible platforms are overwhelmingly outweighed by the substantial risks associated with the broker’s unregulated status, operational ambiguities, and the inherent dangers of binary options trading. Investors seeking exposure to binary options (where legally permissible) or any other financial instruments should prioritize safety and security by exclusively engaging with brokers that are authorized and regulated by reputable financial authorities within established jurisdictions (e.g., SEC, CFTC in the US; FCA in the UK; ASIC in Australia; CySEC in Cyprus/EU, etc.). Choosing a regulated broker provides critical safeguards, including requirements for fund segregation, fair dealing practices, access to dispute resolution, and potential eligibility for compensation schemes, none of which appear to be available to clients of GC Option.

Works cited

  1. GC Option — up to 86% of profit with deposit from $10, accessed April 23, 2025, https://gcoption.com/
  2. Grand Capital – Financial Commission, accessed April 23, 2025, https://financialcommission.org/grand-capital/
  3. g, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.afm.nl/en/consumenten/waarschuwingen/bekijk-de-waarschuwingen/g
  4. Binary Options Broker Market Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Pri, accessed April 23, 2025, https://central.newschannelnebraska.com/story/51561527/binary-options-broker-market-size-share-growth-trends-and-price-forecast-2032
  5. Binary Options Broker Market 2024: Emerging Trends, Major Driving, accessed April 23, 2025, https://southeast.newschannelnebraska.com/story/51963325/Binary-Options-Broker-Market-2024-Emerging-Trends-Major-Driving-Factors-Business-Growth-Opportunities
  6. Grand Capital – Финансовая комиссия – Financial Commission, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.financialcommission.org/ru/%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F-%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0/
  7. CONTENT 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 2 GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF, accessed April 23, 2025, https://grandcapital.net/static/agreements/en/Regulation%20RTO%20Options%20Grand%20Capital.pdf
  8. GC Manual – Part 1: Registration and Verification – Grand Capital, accessed April 23, 2025, https://grandcapital.net/blog/blog/gc-manual-part-one-2/
  9. Trade and invest in most popular assets with Grand Capital broker, accessed April 23, 2025, https://grandcapital.net/
  10. Homepage | GC Europe N.V., accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.gc.dental/europe/en
  11. GC Aesthetics® – The results you want in your plastic surgery, accessed April 23, 2025, https://gcaesthetics.com/
  12. GameChanger, accessed April 23, 2025, https://gc.com/
  13. Eisenhower Golf Club | USAFA 10 FSS, accessed April 23, 2025, https://usafasupport.com/eisenhower-golf-club/
  14. GC Shoes: Good Choice Shoes, accessed April 23, 2025, https://goodchoiceshoes.com/
  15. GCEX, accessed April 23, 2025, https://gc.exchange/
  16. Gold Futures Overview – CME Group, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/metals/precious/gold.html
  17. Gold Futures Contract Specs – CME Group, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/metals/precious/gold.contractSpecs.html
  18. Gold Option Contract Specs – CME Group, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/metals/precious/gold.contractSpecs.options.html
  19. Gold Futures Contract Specs – CME Group, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/metals/precious/gold.contractSpecs.html?videoId=6360522206112
  20. GC – QuantConnect.com, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.quantconnect.com/docs/v2/writing-algorithms/securities/asset-classes/futures/market-hours/comex/gc
  21. Micro Gold Overview – CME Group, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/metals/precious/e-micro-gold.html
  22. COMEX Precious Metals Futures – IBKR Guides, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.ibkrguides.com/clientportal/comexpreciousmetals.htm
  23. GC Pooling Baskets – Eurex, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.eurex.com/ex-en/markets/eurex-repo/gcpooling
  24. Special and GC Repo – Eurex, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.eurex.com/ex-en/markets/eurex-repo/special-and-gc-repo
  25. 8. What is general collateral (GC)? – ICMA, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.icmagroup.org/market-practice-and-regulatory-policy/repo-and-collateral-markets/icma-ercc-publications/frequently-asked-questions-on-repo/8-what-is-general-collateral-gc/
  26. GC Securities – GuyCarpenter, accessed April 23, 2025, https://gcqa65.www.guycarp.net/solutions/capabilities/gc-securities.html
  27. Global Capital Solutions – Guy Carpenter, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.guycarp.com/solutions/capabilities/global-capital-solutions.html
  28. Important Investor Information – Golub Capital, accessed April 23, 2025, https://golubcapital.com/important-investor-information/
  29. GC TIMMIS & COMPANY – finra, accessed April 23, 2025, https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_37240.pdf
  30. FIXED INCOME CLEARING CORPORATION GOVERNMENT SECURITIES DIVISION RULEBOOK – DTCC, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.dtcc.com/~/media/files/downloads/legal/rules/ficc_gov_rules.pdf
  31. Elements of Financial Risk Management, accessed April 23, 2025, https://sar.ac.id/stmik_ebook/prog_file_file/dyI089iWD7.pdf
  32. Steps to Enroll – Galveston College, accessed April 23, 2025, https://gc.edu/admissions/steps-to-enroll.php
  33. 23 CFR 635.504 — CM/GC Requirements. – eCFR, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-23/chapter-I/subchapter-G/part-635/subpart-E/section-635.504
  34. 23 CFR § 635.504 – CM/GC Requirements. – Cornell Law School, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/23/635.504
  35. BDO 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT/GENERAL CONTRACTOR (CM/GC) Pre-Construction Services PROJECT TITLE: – Ogden City, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.ogdencity.gov/DocumentCenter/View/26467/BDO-2nd-Street-Improvements-CMGC-PreConstruction-Agreement–FINAL
  36. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS CONTENTS – University System of Georgia, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.usg.edu/assets/facilities/documents/CM_-_General_Conditions.pdf
  37. Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission – SCCRTC, accessed April 23, 2025, https://sccrtc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/RFP-2153-SCCRTC-Rail-Transit-PrelimEng-EIR-RFP-1.pdf
  38. Get started with CARM – Agence des services frontaliers du Canada, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/services/carm-gcra/start-passer-eng.html
  39. Course Descriptions – Capital University – Modern Campus Catalog™, accessed April 23, 2025, https://capital.catalog.acalog.com/content.php?catoid=13&catoid=13&navoid=451&filter%5Bitem_type%5D=3&filter%5Bonly_active%5D=1&filter%5B3%5D=1&filter%5Bcpage%5D=2&expand=1&print
  40. THE CADP NEWSLETTER – Nr. 6 – April 19, 2007 – Inria, accessed April 23, 2025, https://cadp.inria.fr/news/06.html
  41. Jamaicavm Manual | PDF | Java (Programming Language) | Eclipse (Software) – Scribd, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/97093474/Jamaicavm-Manual
  42. ATG Installation and Configuration Guide – product version – Oracle Help Center, accessed April 23, 2025, https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24152_01/Platform.10-1/ATGInstallGuide/ATGInstallGuide.pdf
  43. Sequence-level instructions direct transcription at polyT short, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/634261v1.full.pdf
  44. FR-2002-05-08.xml – GovInfo, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2002-05-08/xml/FR-2002-05-08.xml
  45. Personnel Protection and Safety – epa nepis, accessed April 23, 2025, https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=94001BZR.TXT
  46. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Semiconductor Manufacturing, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2003/05/22/03-5519/national-emission-standards-for-hazardous-air-pollutants-for-semiconductor-manufacturing
  47. North Essex Authorities Strategic Section One for Local Plans – Tendring District Council, accessed April 23, 2025, https://legacy.tendringdc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/planning/Planning_Policy/Section_1/SD001_NEASS_Sustainability_Appraisal_Non_Tech_Summary_June_17.pdf
  48. U.S. Options Market Regulations – Investopedia, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/030215/us-options-market-regulations.asp
  49. Position Limits for Derivatives | CFTC, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/IndustryOversight/MarketSurveillance/SpeculativeLimits/index.htm
  50. Funds Transfer – Grand Capital – GC Option, accessed April 23, 2025, https://gcoption.com/trading/operations_with_money/
  51. Introducing Broker in Abidjan – Grand Capital, accessed April 23, 2025, https://grandcapital.net/about/partners/abidjan
  52. New payment service for Nigerian clients – Grand Capital, accessed April 23, 2025, https://gcoption.in/about/company_news/new-payment-service-nigerian-clients/
  53. GC Option – Customer Reviews – FxVerify, accessed April 23, 2025, https://fxverify.com/brokers/2277/gcoption?tab=user-reviews

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version