1. Executive Summary
OptionBlitz emerged as a decentralized finance (DeFi) trading platform built on the Arbitrum network, promoting a wide array of derivative products, including high-risk binary options, perpetual contracts, and unique offerings like “Turbos,” alongside integrated social trading features.1 It aimed to attract traders by promising a sophisticated yet user-friendly experience with features like gasless transactions and short-term expiry options.3 However, a comprehensive analysis reveals that OptionBlitz is no longer operational. Key indicators confirm its defunct status: the platform has been marked as inactive by monitoring services like DappRadar since April 16, 2025, citing a lack of on-chain activity and an inaccessible official website.3 Furthermore, data from DefiLlama shows a Total Value Locked (TVL) of $0, indicating a complete absence of capital on the platform, including within its staking programs.1 Development activity, tracked via public code repositories, ceased months before the platform was officially marked inactive.1
Even during its operational phase, OptionBlitz presented significant risks. Its core offering included binary options, a financial product frequently associated with fraud and manipulation, drawing numerous warnings from global financial regulators.5 Operating as an unlicensed entity, OptionBlitz offered none of the investor protections typically associated with regulated financial services providers.7 The platform’s ambitious scope, combining complex derivatives, social features, and staking mechanisms, ultimately proved unsustainable. The combination of these factors—high-risk products, lack of regulation, cessation of development, and eventual inactivity—positions OptionBlitz as a failed venture that exemplified many potential pitfalls within the DeFi space.
related posts : Best Binary Options Brokers (in 2025)
2. Introduction to OptionBlitz: A Decentralized Options Trading Concept
OptionBlitz entered the decentralized finance (DeFi) arena with the stated ambition of “revolutionizing the options trading landscape”.2 Positioned as a decentralized hub built on Arbitrum, an Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solution, it aimed to leverage the network’s capabilities for enhanced performance and a more responsive user experience.3 The platform intended to offer a comprehensive suite of trading products, moving beyond standard options to include binary options, perpetual contracts, and social trading functionalities, targeting a perceived gap in the market.3
Its emergence coincided with a broader trend in DeFi seeking to replicate and potentially improve upon traditional financial instruments and platforms by utilizing blockchain technology. The core value proposition appeared centered on decentralization, accessibility (highlighted by claims of gasless trading), and a wide product range catering potentially to retail traders, particularly those interested in short-term derivatives and leverage.1 The platform’s architecture on Arbitrum was a critical technological choice. Ethereum Layer 1’s historical struggles with high transaction fees (gas) and network congestion made certain trading strategies, especially those involving frequent, small-value trades typical of short-term options (like the 2-minute expiries OptionBlitz offered 1), economically impractical. By building on Arbitrum 2, OptionBlitz aimed to overcome these limitations, offering faster execution and significantly lower costs, thereby making its core product viable and attractive compared to Layer 1 alternatives. However, this reliance also intrinsically linked its operational success and user experience to the performance, stability, and adoption of the Arbitrum ecosystem itself. While solving the cost barrier was essential for its product mix, this technological choice did not inherently address fundamental challenges related to liquidity acquisition, regulatory compliance, or building platform trust – factors that ultimately proved insurmountable.
3. Core Product Offerings: Beyond Binary Options
OptionBlitz marketed a diverse portfolio of financial instruments, extending significantly beyond typical decentralized exchange offerings:
- Binary Options: These formed a core part of the offering, presenting users with simple yes/no propositions on whether an asset’s price would be above or below a certain point at a specific, often very near-term, expiry time.1 Financial regulators like the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have issued explicit warnings regarding the high risks associated with binary options, including potential for fraud and platforms structured such that user losses significantly outweigh potential gains.5
- Barrier/Touch Options: The platform also claimed to offer barrier or touch options, where payouts depend on whether an asset’s price reaches (touches) or fails to reach a predetermined barrier level during the option’s lifetime.1
- Vanilla Options: Standard European-style call and put options were also listed as part of the product suite, providing more conventional options trading capabilities.1
- Perpetual Contracts (Perps): OptionBlitz included perpetual contracts, which function similarly to futures contracts but without an expiration date, allowing traders to speculate on the price movements of assets like Forex, cryptocurrencies, and metals.1 Public code repositories suggest specific smart contracts were developed for managing perpetual positions.9
- Turbos: Described as a “flagship trading product,” Turbos were presented as the “world’s first decentralised Turbos,” purportedly combining features of leveraged certificates and perpetual swaps.4 While details were scarce, this product likely involved significant leverage, aligning with mentions of 1:100 leverage found on less reliable sources like Pinterest 12, further amplifying the platform’s high-risk profile.
- Asset Coverage: The platform claimed to support trading across more than 40 assets, encompassing cryptocurrencies, metals, foreign exchange (FX), and stocks.1
- Expiration Times: A defining feature was the wide range of expiration times, stretching from as long as 24 hours down to extremely short durations like 2 minutes or even 10 seconds.1
The emphasis on extremely short expiry times, particularly when combined with binary options, strongly positioned OptionBlitz towards the highly speculative, almost gambling-like end of the trading spectrum. Binary options already carry an inherent risk due to their fixed and often asymmetric payout structures.5 Adding expiries measured in seconds or minutes 4 largely eliminates the possibility for traders to apply meaningful analysis or strategy, reducing trading to rapid bets on momentary price fluctuations. This structure not only increases the potential for rapid user losses driven by market noise and platform fees/spreads but also heightens concerns about platform integrity, as regulators warn that such platforms can manipulate software or price feeds to ensure user losses.5 This focus likely attracted users seeking quick profits or thrills rather than sophisticated traders, potentially hindering the development of a stable, long-term user base and increasing the platform’s vulnerability to regulatory action and accusations of unfair practices. The “Turbos” product, with its implied high leverage 4, further cemented this high-risk, high-speculation identity.
4. Platform Features and User Experience Analysis
OptionBlitz promoted several features designed to create an appealing and seamless trading environment:
- Trading Interface: Descriptions highlighted a “rich, graphical interface” 8 equipped with “advanced charting and visualisation tools” and graphical position management to aid traders in analysis and decision-making.2 Landing page designs aimed for a captivating look.13
- Order Execution: The platform claimed “near instant order execution and settlement,” leveraging the speed advantages of the Arbitrum network.3
- Gasless and Signless Trading: A key user experience enhancement was the promotion of “1-click gasless trading” and “signless support”.1 This was likely achieved through integration with Biconomy 2, employing meta-transactions to abstract away blockchain complexities and gas fees from the end-user, aiming for a smoother experience akin to centralized platforms.
- Social Trading Features: OptionBlitz heavily emphasized its social components, offering “free in-app trading signals,” customizable newsfeeds, in-app chat functionalities, and sentiment analytics.2 The goal was to create a community-oriented platform where users could interact and potentially follow strategies, as suggested by an Upwork agency profile describing it as a “social trading platform”.14
- Other Features: The platform also supported multiple languages and allowed the use of various assets as collateral.1 An “aggressive affiliate program” was also mentioned, likely aimed at rapid user acquisition.1
While features like gasless trading and advanced charting aimed to improve usability, the prominent inclusion of “free trading signals” and social trading elements within an unregulated platform offering high-risk products like binary options raises significant concerns. In environments where the platform operator may act as the counterparty to user trades (a common model in binary options, where the platform profits if the user loses), providing “free signals” creates a direct conflict of interest. Such signals could potentially be used manipulatively to encourage users to take specific positions or increase their trading frequency, ultimately benefiting the platform at the user’s expense. This aligns with warnings from regulators about fraudulent promotion schemes and pressure tactics employed by unscrupulous platforms.5 While social features can foster community, on a platform centered around high-risk speculation, they could also serve as a vector for herding behavior, amplifying risky trends, particularly among less experienced users attracted by the platform’s accessibility claims.
5. Technological Foundation: Arbitrum, Smart Contracts, and Integrations
OptionBlitz’s technical infrastructure was presented as being rooted in DeFi principles, leveraging several key technologies:
- Blockchain Network: The platform was fundamentally built on Arbitrum, utilizing this Ethereum Layer 2 solution to achieve faster transaction speeds and lower costs compared to Ethereum mainnet.2 This choice was crucial for supporting its short-term options products.1
- Smart Contracts: OptionBlitz maintained public GitHub repositories containing smart contract code, including optionblitz/Perps for perpetual contracts, optionblitz/OB-tokensale-smart-contracts presumably for a token sale, and optionblitz/defi-options-adapters for interacting with options protocols.16 Specific contracts like RoleStore.sol (governance roles), Positions.sol (perpetual position logic), and PositionStore.sol (perpetual position data) were visible.9 However, these repositories exhibited very low community engagement, indicated by minimal stars and forks.9 Critically, the main Perps repository lacked a SECURITY.md file, indicating an absence of a formal security policy or process for reporting vulnerabilities.19
- Price Feeds: To obtain real-time asset prices crucial for settling options and perpetuals, OptionBlitz integrated with the Pyth Network, aiming for “low latency decentralised price feeds”.3 Reliable oracle data is paramount in derivatives trading to prevent price manipulation.
- Gasless Transactions: The advertised gasless trading experience was facilitated through integration with Biconomy 2, which provides infrastructure for meta-transactions, allowing the platform or another entity to sponsor gas fees on behalf of users.
- Development Workflow: The project utilized GitHub Actions for automating software workflows like continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD).16
Despite positioning itself within the DeFi ecosystem and making its smart contract code public 18, several factors challenge the notion that OptionBlitz operated as a truly robust or decentralized platform. The minimal engagement with its public code repositories 16 suggests limited external review or community vetting. The absence of a documented security policy 19 is another red flag regarding its commitment to security best practices. Most importantly, the platform’s eventual complete shutdown 3 demonstrates that its operational resilience was compromised. This implies that despite using smart contracts, critical components likely remained centralized – such as website hosting, potentially off-chain order matching or settlement layers, price feed relay mechanisms, or the core team’s operational infrastructure. The failure underscores that merely deploying contracts on a blockchain does not guarantee decentralization or censorship resistance. Platforms can still possess single points of failure that lead to total service interruption, making the “DeFi” label sometimes more of a marketing descriptor than a reflection of true architectural resilience.
6. Staking, Liquidity Provision, and the BLX Token Ecosystem
OptionBlitz incorporated mechanisms intended to foster an ecosystem beyond direct trading, primarily through staking and a native token:
- Staking Program: The platform featured a staking program where users could deposit USDC stablecoins to act as liquidity providers (LPs).1 In return, these LPs were promised a share of the platform’s revenue.4 Promotional materials emphasized “flexible conditions” and, notably, “zero impermanent loss”.4
- BLX Token: The existence of a native token, likely named BLX, was indicated by mentions of “exclusive features accessible only to BLX holders”.4 A dedicated GitHub repository for token sale smart contracts (OB-tokensale-smart-contracts 18) further suggests a plan for token distribution and utility within the ecosystem.
- Ecosystem Goal: These components were framed as contributing to a “healthy ecosystem and profitable business model”.4
The claim of “zero impermanent loss” (IL) for USDC stakers warrants significant scrutiny.4 Impermanent loss is a specific risk associated with providing liquidity to typical Automated Market Maker (AMM) pools containing pairs of volatile assets whose relative prices diverge. While staking a single stablecoin like USDC avoids this specific type of IL, it does not eliminate risk. The staked USDC likely served as the collateral pool or counterparty liquidity for the platform’s high-risk trading activities (binary options, leveraged Turbos, perpetuals). Platform revenue, from which LPs were paid, would depend heavily on trading volume and potentially on net user losses if the platform acted as the house. A downturn in trading activity or significant net payouts from the platform to winning traders could deplete the pool or halt revenue sharing, leading to losses for stakers. Therefore, while technically accurate that traditional IL wasn’t present, the “zero IL” claim could be highly misleading by obscuring the substantial counterparty and operational risks inherent in backing a derivatives platform. The fact that staking TVL ultimately dropped to zero 1 indicates this model either failed to attract or retain capital, or collapsed entirely, potentially validating these underlying risks.
7. Development Activity and Team Background Insights
Assessing the development trajectory and team structure provides further context on OptionBlitz’s lifecycle:
- GitHub Activity: While OptionBlitz maintained public GitHub repositories 16, analysis of development activity reveals a significant slowdown and eventual halt. DefiLlama recorded the last commit to the Perps repository on August 15, 2024.1 This cessation of public development occurred approximately eight months before DappRadar officially marked the platform as inactive in April 2025.3 Prior to this halt, commit frequency was already low.1
- Team and Entity: Limited information is available about the team. An ICO listing named “Artemis” as the Founder.4 The GitHub organization profile lists “Optionblitz LLC” as the associated entity.18
- Development Outsourcing: A profile for an agency on Upwork, “ExpertsVettedUpworkAgency,” listed OptionBlitz as one of its launched projects, describing it as a “Decentralised options(exchange) and social trading platform powered by ethereum layer 2 protocol arbitrum”.14 This suggests that at least part of the platform’s development may have been outsourced.
The considerable time lag between the last known code commit 1 and the platform’s confirmed inactivity 3 points towards a gradual decline rather than an abrupt failure. Continuous development, bug fixing, and security patching are vital for complex DeFi platforms. An eight-month period without public code updates strongly suggests that active development had ceased long before the platform became unusable. This could indicate various underlying issues, such as exhaustion of funding, loss of key developers, failure to achieve product-market fit leading to deprioritization, or potentially a deliberate winding down or abandonment of the project after an initial launch phase. The reliance on an external agency for development 14 could also imply that core development might have stalled or ceased if the contract concluded or funding for it dried up, potentially leaving the project without the necessary in-house expertise for long-term maintenance and evolution. This timeline contradicts the image of a “dynamic platform” 2 and hints at internal problems emerging well before the final shutdown.
8. Operational Status: The Inactivity of OptionBlitz
Multiple independent sources and data points confirm conclusively that OptionBlitz is no longer an operational platform:
- DappRadar Inactivity Notice: DappRadar, a service tracking decentralized application activity, officially marked OptionBlitz as “inactive” on April 16, 2025. This designation was based on two key criteria: the absence of any detectable on-chain activity (transactions or smart contract interactions) for at least 30 days prior, and the unavailability of the project’s official resources, specifically noting that the website https://www.optionblitz.co was no longer accessible.3
- DefiLlama Zero TVL: DefiLlama, a prominent DeFi data aggregator, reports that OptionBlitz currently holds $0 in Total Value Locked (TVL). This applies across all tracked categories, including its USDC staking pool, indicating a complete withdrawal or loss of user funds from the platform’s smart contracts.1
- Stalled Communication and Development: DefiLlama also noted that the last public communication via Twitter was on December 27, 2024, and the last code commit was months earlier in August 2024.1 This lack of recent development or communication aligns with the platform being abandoned.
- Resource Unavailability: Beyond the official website being down 3, other sources show signs of neglect or missing information. For instance, the Biconomy ecosystem page for OptionBlitz lacks any media assets 2, and attempts to access specific GitHub repository URLs have failed 20, further suggesting resource decay. Pages listing alternatives to OptionBlitz on platforms like Alchemy also implicitly confirm its non-operational status.21
The convergence of evidence from multiple reputable data sources – tracking on-chain activity, value locked, development progress, communication channels, and website availability – paints a clear picture. OptionBlitz is not experiencing a temporary outage; it has ceased operations entirely. This confirmation shifts the focus from evaluating its potential as a trading platform to understanding the reasons for its failure and the risks it posed to users. For anyone considering using OptionBlitz, the platform is definitively defunct.
9. Regulatory Scrutiny and Risk Assessment: Binary Options and DeFi Platforms
OptionBlitz operated in a high-risk segment of the market, compounding inherent DeFi risks with those specific to its product offerings and lack of regulatory oversight:
- Binary Options Risks: The platform’s focus on binary options placed it squarely in territory flagged by numerous financial regulators. The SEC and CFTC have issued joint alerts warning investors about fraudulent schemes involving binary options platforms, including refusal to credit customer accounts, identity theft, and software manipulation to generate losing trades.5 They also highlight the often unfavorable risk-reward structure, where potential losses can significantly exceed potential gains.5 Similar warnings about unauthorized trading platforms and common scam tactics (like manipulation, pressure selling, and fake recovery services) have been echoed by international bodies such as Belgium’s FSMA 6 and the UK’s FCA.7 The FCA explicitly warns against dealing with unauthorized firms, noting the lack of recourse through investor compensation schemes.7 Deepfake scams promoting unregulated trading platforms are also a noted concern.23
- Unregulated Operation: There is no evidence that OptionBlitz or Optionblitz LLC 18 ever obtained licenses from recognized financial authorities. Unlike regulated brokers subject to oversight by bodies like the DFSA, CySEC, ASIC, or FCA 24, OptionBlitz operated outside these frameworks. This lack of regulation meant users had no access to investor protection mechanisms like the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) 7 and very limited legal recourse in case of platform failure, fund misappropriation, or disputes.
- DeFi-Specific Risks: Beyond the product and regulatory issues, users also faced general DeFi risks. These include potential vulnerabilities in smart contracts (despite code being public 9, there’s no public record of comprehensive audits), risks related to the reliability and security of the oracle providing price feeds (despite using Pyth Network 3), and the risks associated with the staking model, where staked assets could be lost due to platform failure or exploits, irrespective of the “zero IL” marketing claim.4
- Scam Indicators: Several characteristics of OptionBlitz align with patterns often seen in fraudulent or high-risk operations identified by regulators.5 These include the offering of binary options itself, the promotion of “free trading signals” 2 (potential conflict of interest), an “aggressive affiliate program” 1 (can incentivize recruitment over genuine use), and its eventual abrupt failure.3 A user review mentioning referral links and a Discord channel for “how to make money” 28 could also potentially indicate characteristics sometimes associated with unsustainable schemes.
The decision by OptionBlitz to center its platform around binary options, a product widely associated with scams and subject to regulatory crackdowns globally 5, was a fundamental strategic choice carrying immense risk. It suggests either a deliberate operation within a regulatory grey area or profound naivety regarding the challenges of building a legitimate financial platform around such controversial instruments. This choice inherently limited its appeal to cautious investors, attracted speculative capital, increased regulatory scrutiny likelihood, and ultimately contributed to its failure to achieve sustainability or mainstream acceptance.
Table 1: OptionBlitz Risk Assessment Summary
| Risk Category | Specific Risk Factor | Description/Evidence (Selected IDs) | Assessed Severity |
| Product Risk | Binary Options | High potential for fraud, manipulation, unfavorable odds inherent in product structure.5 | High |
| Regulatory Risk | Unlicensed Operation | Lack of regulatory oversight, no investor protection schemes, limited user recourse.7 | High |
| Operational Risk | Platform Inactivity | Services defunct, website inaccessible, development ceased, funds likely inaccessible or lost.1 | High (Realized) |
| Counterparty Risk | DeFi Staking Model | Potential loss of staked USDC due to platform failure/revenue loss, despite “zero IL” claim.1 | High |
| Technology Risk | Smart Contract Security | Public code but limited external review/audit info, no formal security policy documented.9 | Medium-High |
| Scam Potential | Red Flag Indicators Present | Binary options focus, “free signals,” affiliate program, rapid failure align with scam warnings.1 | High |
10. Comparative Landscape: OptionBlitz vs. DeFi Alternatives
While OptionBlitz is no longer a viable platform, understanding its advertised positioning relative to other decentralized options protocols provides context. OptionBlitz aimed for a broad offering, combining binary options, vanilla options, perpetuals, and unique products like Turbos, layered with social trading features and gasless transactions.1
Several active decentralized options platforms exist, often specializing in particular niches or technologies, presenting alternatives for users interested in this space 8:
- Dopex: Focuses on maximizing liquidity and minimizing exposure for options traders, primarily on Arbitrum.8
- Lyra: Provides AMM-based options trading on Optimism and Arbitrum.29
- Hegic: An on-chain peer-to-pool options trading protocol on Arbitrum.29
- Panoptic: Offers perpetual, oracle-free options trading on Ethereum and Layer 2s.8
- Syndr: Positions itself as a cross-margined options and futures exchange on Arbitrum.8
- Other Platforms: Numerous others like Opyn, Thetanuts Finance, Jones DAO, Polynomial Protocol, etc., offer various strategies and options types.29
Compared to these active protocols, OptionBlitz’s attempt to bundle numerous disparate features (binary options, social trading, Turbos) might have diluted its focus. The surviving platforms often emphasize specific innovations (e.g., oracle-free design 29, liquidity mechanisms 8, specific option strategies 29). This suggests that a more specialized approach might be more sustainable in the complex DeFi options market than trying to be a “do-it-all” platform, especially when including highly controversial products like binary options.
Furthermore, contrasting OptionBlitz with established, regulated traditional options brokers like Interactive Brokers (IBKR), tastytrade, or Schwab’s thinkorswim 30 highlights stark differences. Traditional brokers offer robust platforms (often with steeper learning curves), extensive educational resources, regulatory protection, and customer support, but typically lack the DeFi-native features (like direct wallet integration or staking) and operate within strict compliance frameworks that preclude offerings like unregulated binary options. OptionBlitz aimed for the accessibility and crypto-native feel of DeFi but failed to provide the stability, security, or legitimacy of regulated alternatives.
Table 2: Feature Comparison: OptionBlitz (Advertised) vs. Select Active DeFi Options Protocols
| Feature/Aspect | OptionBlitz (Advertised) | Dopex | Lyra | Panoptic |
| Status | Inactive ($0 TVL) | Active | Active | Active |
| Primary Chain(s) | Arbitrum | Arbitrum, Polygon | Optimism, Arbitrum | Ethereum, Optimism, Arbitrum |
| Options Types | Binary, Vanilla, Barrier, Turbos, Perps | Vanilla, Straddles, Interest Rate | Vanilla | Perpetual Options |
| Key Feature Claim | Social Trading, Gasless TX, Turbos 3 | Liquidity/Minimal Exposure Focus 8 | AMM-based Options 29 | Oracle-free Design 8 |
| Regulation | None (Unlicensed) | None (Typical DeFi) | None (Typical DeFi) | None (Typical DeFi) |
11. Conclusion and Final Assessment
OptionBlitz represented an ambitious attempt to carve out a niche in the DeFi derivatives market by offering a wide spectrum of products, from standard perpetuals to high-risk binary options and novel “Turbos,” all packaged with social trading features and user experience enhancements like gasless transactions on the Arbitrum network.1 However, the platform ultimately failed to sustain operations. Overwhelming evidence confirms that OptionBlitz is defunct: development activity ceased months ago, its website is offline, communication channels are silent, and its Total Value Locked has fallen to zero.1
The platform’s trajectory was fraught with significant risks from the outset. Its core offering of binary options immediately placed it in a category heavily scrutinized and warned against by financial regulators globally due to the high potential for fraud and investor harm.5 Operating without any apparent regulatory licenses or oversight further compounded these risks, leaving users without standard investor protections. While leveraging DeFi technologies like smart contracts and Layer 2 scaling 2, the project exhibited red flags such as low community engagement with its code 16, lack of a formal security policy 19, and potentially misleading marketing claims regarding staking risks.4
The failure of OptionBlitz serves as a cautionary tale within the DeFi space. It underscores that the “DeFi” label is not a guarantee of legitimacy, decentralization, security, or longevity. Platforms combining complex and high-risk financial products with a lack of regulation and transparency warrant extreme caution. Users seeking exposure to decentralized options trading should look towards established, currently operational platforms with demonstrable track records, transparent mechanisms, and ideally, evidence of security audits. Thorough due diligence, critical evaluation of product risks (especially concerning binary options or high leverage), understanding the economic sustainability of staking rewards, and verifying operational status remain paramount when navigating the innovative but often perilous landscape of decentralized finance. OptionBlitz, in its current state, is not a viable platform and should be avoided.
Works cited
- OptionBlitz – DefiLlama, accessed April 24, 2025, https://defillama.com/protocol/optionblitz
- OptionBlitz – Biconomy, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.biconomy.io/ecosystem/optionblitz
- OptionBlitz – DeFi Overview, TVL Analysis – DappRadar, accessed April 24, 2025, https://dappradar.com/dapp/optionblitz
- OptionBlitz | ICO Hot List, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.icohotlist.com/ico/optionblitz/
- Investor Alert: Binary options and Fraud – SEC.gov, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/ia_binary.pdf
- Look out for traps: beware of these fraudulent trading platforms – FSMA, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.fsma.be/en/warnings/look-out-traps-beware-these-fraudulent-trading-platforms
- OPT Finance | FCA, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/warnings/opt-finance
- OptionBlitz – DeFi Dapps – Alchemy, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.alchemy.com/dapps/optionblitz
- Perps/RoleStore.sol at main · optionblitz/Perps – GitHub, accessed April 24, 2025, https://github.com/optionblitz/Perps/blob/main/RoleStore.sol
- Perps/Positions.sol at main · optionblitz/Perps – GitHub, accessed April 24, 2025, https://github.com/optionblitz/Perps/blob/main/Positions.sol
- Perps/PositionStore.sol at main · optionblitz/Perps – GitHub, accessed April 24, 2025, https://github.com/optionblitz/Perps/blob/main/PositionStore.sol
- Pocket Option Social Trading Review: Unlocking The Power Of Copy Trading With Binary Options – Pinterest – India, accessed April 24, 2025, https://in.pinterest.com/pin/578923727128289181/
- Trading platform OPTION BLITZ – Landing Page – Responsive by Anna Volkova for ONIX Design Team on Dribbble, accessed April 24, 2025, https://dribbble.com/shots/21566880-Trading-platform-OPTION-BLITZ-Landing-Page-Responsive
- FISTA Solutions | Upwork Company Profile – Hire Today, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.upwork.com/agencies/expertsvettedupworkagency/
- Top 50+ React Native Development Companies March 2025 – Upwork, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.upwork.com/agencies/react-native-companies/?page=51
- Actions · optionblitz/Perps – GitHub, accessed April 24, 2025, https://github.com/optionblitz/Perps/actions
- Activity · optionblitz/Perps – GitHub, accessed April 24, 2025, https://github.com/optionblitz/Perps/activity
- optionblitz – GitHub, accessed April 24, 2025, https://github.com/optionblitz
- Security Overview · optionblitz/Perps – GitHub, accessed April 24, 2025, https://github.com/optionblitz/Perps/security
- accessed December 31, 1969, https://github.com/optionblitz/Perps
- Find 9 OptionBlitz Alternatives (2025) – Alchemy, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.alchemy.com/dapps/alternatives/optionblitz
- Find 9 OptionBlitz Alternatives (2024) – Alchemy, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.alchemy.com/alternatives/optionblitz
- Deepfake video scam warning: fake news stories, political endorsements – multiple trading platforms | Financial Markets Authority, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.fma.govt.nz/library/warnings-and-alerts/deepfake-video-scam-warning/
- CFI Financial Review – Forex Trading Education, accessed April 24, 2025, https://traders.mba/brokers/cfi-financial-review/
- Advanced Markets Review – Forex Trading Education, accessed April 24, 2025, https://traders.mba/brokers/advanced-markets-review/
- SNB Capital (DIFC) Limited Impersonated in Scam – DFSA, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.dfsa.ae/alerts/snb-capital-difc-limited-impersonated-scam
- Warning on Frauds and Scams | Interactive Brokers India Pvt. Ltd., accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.interactivebrokers.co.in/en/general/warnings-on-frauds-and-scams.php
- No KYC/No VPN Options Trading! #Optionblitz – YouTube, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxCAbzfj6po
- List of 22 Decentralized Options (2024) – Alchemy, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.alchemy.com/best/decentralized-options
- Best Options Trading Platforms: Our Top 5 Picks of 2025 | The Motley Fool, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.fool.com/money/buying-stocks/best-options-trading-platforms/
- Which Is the Best Broker for Options Trading in 2024, accessed April 24, 2025, https://www.timothysykes.com/blog/which-is-best-broker-for-option-trading/