Pocket Option Binary Option Broker Review (Updated 2025)

Table of Contents

I. Introduction

Pocket Option emerged in the online trading landscape in 2017, quickly establishing itself as a prominent, albeit highly controversial, broker specializing in binary options.¹ The platform promotes a global presence, claiming active users across more than 95 countries and significant trading volumes.² It operates within the high-risk segment of the financial markets dealing with binary options, a financial product known for its speculative nature and potential for rapid losses.⁷

The core controversy surrounding Pocket Option stems from a stark contrast between its marketed features and its operational realities. On one hand, the platform is frequently praised for its user-friendly interface, accessibility features like a demo account, social trading capabilities, and a wide array of assets.¹² These elements appear designed to attract a broad user base, including those new to trading. On the other hand, Pocket Option faces severe scrutiny due to numerous warnings from reputable international financial regulators, questions surrounding its claimed regulatory status, and a significant volume of user complaints, particularly concerning the inability to withdraw funds and questionable operational practices.¹⁷

This report aims to provide an expert, evidence-based analysis of Pocket Option. It will dissect the broker’s corporate structure, critically evaluate its regulatory standing against verifiable facts, examine its platform features and trading conditions, analyze user sentiment from various sources, and assess the specific risks involved. The objective is to offer a comprehensive and objective evaluation, enabling market participants and potential users to make informed decisions based on a clear understanding of the broker’s operations and associated risks. The scope encompasses the company’s background, regulatory compliance (or lack thereof), platform technology, financial terms, market reputation, and the inherent dangers of binary options trading amplified by Pocket Option’s specific circumstances.

related posts : Best Binary Options Brokers (in 2025)

II. Pocket Option: Company Profile and Operational Structure

Understanding the entity or entities operating Pocket Option is complicated by a history of shifting names and registrations across various jurisdictions, predominantly offshore locations known for minimal financial oversight. This complex structure raises immediate questions about transparency and accountability.

A. Identifying the Operator(s): A Web of Entities

The operational control of Pocket Option appears to have transitioned between several entities, making it difficult to pinpoint a single, consistently responsible party:

Gembell Limited (Marshall Islands): This entity is frequently cited in earlier sources as the owner and operator of Pocket Option.³ The Republic of the Marshall Islands is a popular jurisdiction for offshore company registration, often chosen for its lenient regulatory environment and corporate secrecy laws. Gembell Limited was also noted as having been registered with the Marshall Islands Registry (IRI), which is important to distinguish as a corporate registry, not a financial services regulator. This registration was subsequently cancelled.²¹
Infinite Trade LLC (Costa Rica / Mwali): Later reports identify Infinite Trade LLC as the owner and operator.⁶ This entity is registered in the Republic of Costa Rica.⁶ Significantly, Infinite Trade LLC reportedly held a license from the Mwali International Services Authority (MISA), an entity based in the Comoros Union (Mwali/Mohéli island). However, this license (associated with Pocket Option) was suspended by MISA itself in July 2023.²¹ Despite this suspension, there are indications that Pocket Option’s website may have continued to display the outdated MISA license.²¹
PO TRADE LTD (Mwali): This entity, registered in Mwali (Mohéli), Comoros Union, currently appears on MISA’s list of authorized brokerage companies with license number T2022086, issued on April 12, 2022, and marked as ‘Active’.²⁸ PO TRADE LTD operates the website po.trade/en and is explicitly stated to provide the brokerage activity on that site.²⁹ The close naming similarity to Pocket Option and its active status under the same questionable regulator (MISA) while Infinite Trade LLC is suspended strongly suggests this may be the current operational vehicle for the business.
Pocket Option Ltd (UK): Records indicate a private limited company named POCKET OPTION LTD (Company number 15474264) was incorporated in the United Kingdom on February 8, 2024. However, this entity was dissolved less than a year later, on February 4, 2025.³⁰ The purpose of this short-lived UK entity is unclear but could represent an attempt to gain a veneer of legitimacy associated with a major financial center or to facilitate specific operational aspects before its dissolution.
Pocket Investments LLC (App Developer): This name appears as the developer of various Pocket Option-related mobile applications available on the Google Play Store, such as “Pocket Broker” and “Pocket Options Signals”.¹⁵ The precise legal relationship between Pocket Investments LLC and the operating entities (Gembell, Infinite Trade, PO TRADE) is not clarified in the available information.

B. History and Growth Trajectory

Pocket Option was established in 2017.¹ The platform claims rapid growth, citing figures such as over 10 million registered customers, more than 100,000 active users, operations in over 95 countries, and a trading turnover exceeding $500 million.² It is crucial to note that these impressive metrics are self-reported or promoted through affiliated channels. Given the significant regulatory issues and user complaints detailed later in this report, these figures should be treated with considerable skepticism, as they may be inflated for marketing purposes or may not reflect sustainable, legitimate trading activity.

C. Operational Transparency Assessment

The operational structure of Pocket Option demonstrates a marked lack of transparency. The utilization of multiple corporate identities across disparate, often offshore, jurisdictions known for weak regulatory oversight (Marshall Islands, Mwali, Costa Rica) is a significant red flag. The shifting identities, from Gembell Limited to Infinite Trade LLC, and the concurrent activity of PO TRADE LTD, further obscure lines of accountability. Compounding this issue is the apparent absence of publicly available information regarding the ultimate beneficial owners or key management personnel of these entities, a point highlighted by external analyses.³⁴ Such opacity makes it extremely difficult for users, regulators, and analysts to ascertain who is truly responsible for the platform’s operations and financial conduct.

The intricate and frequently changing corporate structure involving offshore registrations points strongly towards a deliberate strategy of regulatory arbitrage. This approach allows the business to operate in jurisdictions with minimal financial oversight and leverage questionable regulatory bodies, such as MISA, to create a superficial appearance of legitimacy. This strategy effectively sidesteps the stringent requirements, costs, and investor protection mandates enforced by regulators in established financial centers. The complexity makes it challenging for users who encounter problems, or for authorities attempting investigation, to identify and hold the responsible parties accountable.

Furthermore, the stark contrast between the platform’s claims of a massive user base and substantial turnover ² and the numerous official warnings from regulators coupled with severe user complaints about fund access ¹⁷ suggests a significant disconnect. This could indicate either grossly inflated marketing figures or a business model that successfully attracts numerous users (perhaps through aggressive marketing and low entry barriers) but fails to provide reliable service or honor withdrawal requests, particularly when users become profitable or attempt to withdraw larger sums.

The active MISA license held by PO TRADE LTD ²⁸, concurrent with the suspension of Infinite Trade LLC’s license ²¹, could represent a tactical maneuver. This allows the business to continue operating and claiming affiliation with some regulatory body (however dubious MISA may be), thereby maintaining a semblance of oversight despite the action taken against Infinite Trade LLC. PO TRADE LTD, operating po.trade/en and directly providing brokerage services ²⁹, may function as the primary operational entity under this arrangement.

III. Regulatory Standing and Compliance Analysis

The regulatory status of Pocket Option is one of the most critical and concerning aspects of its operation. While the platform makes claims of being regulated, these claims rely on entities whose legitimacy is highly questionable, while numerous reputable international financial authorities have issued explicit warnings against the broker.

A. Claimed Regulation: MISA and IFMRRC

Pocket Option has historically claimed regulation through two main bodies:

Mwali International Services Authority (MISA): The platform, through its associated entities Infinite Trade LLC and potentially now PO TRADE LTD, has claimed regulation by MISA, located on the island of Mwali (Mohéli) in the Comoros Union.¹ As noted previously, Infinite Trade LLC’s MISA license was suspended in July 2023.²¹ However, PO TRADE LTD (License T2022086) is currently listed as ‘Active’ on MISA’s own website registry, with an issue date of April 12, 2022.²⁸ The fundamental problem with this claim is the disputed status of MISA itself. The Central Bank of Comoros, which is the legitimate financial regulator for the entire Union of Comoros including Mwali, has publicly and unequivocally declared MISA to be a “fictitious entity” lacking any legal basis or authority to issue licenses for banking or financial services.²¹ Multiple independent analyses concur, describing MISA as a fake regulator or even a scam operation potentially selling worthless licenses to entities seeking a cheap and easy way to appear regulated.²¹ Consequently, any license or authorization purportedly issued by MISA carries no genuine regulatory weight and offers no meaningful investor protection. Some sources promoting MISA present it as a legitimate body formed in 1998, responsible for AML/CFT compliance and licensing various financial activities, claiming it has never been blacklisted by the EU or OECD.³⁸ However, these claims are directly contradicted by the statements from the Central Bank of Comoros and other critical analyses.²¹ Brokers regulated solely by MISA are often viewed with extreme skepticism in the industry.⁴¹
International Financial Market Relations Regulation Center (IFMRRC): Pocket Option also frequently cites regulation or certification by the IFMRRC.¹ Some promotional materials or reviews present the IFMRRC as an entity ensuring compliance, transparency, and trustworthiness, sometimes claiming it offers compensation funds.¹ However, the IFMRRC is not a government-backed financial regulatory authority. It is a private, independent, non-governmental organization reportedly based in Russia.⁵⁰ Its standards, enforcement mechanisms, dispute resolution processes, and overall legitimacy are not comparable to those of established national regulators like the FCA or CFTC. Some sources explicitly raise concerns about its regulatory status.⁵¹ Relying on an IFMRRC certificate provides minimal assurance of genuine regulatory oversight or protection for client funds.

B. Warnings from Recognized International Regulators

In stark contrast to its reliance on questionable entities, Pocket Option has been the subject of numerous warnings from well-respected financial regulators worldwide. These warnings consistently state that the broker is operating within their jurisdictions without the necessary authorization, thereby violating local financial laws and regulations. This pattern indicates a systemic disregard for established regulatory frameworks.

Specific warnings include:

Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), UK: The FCA has issued warnings concerning Pocket Option and potentially related entities like “Pocket Option FX” for targeting UK residents without authorization.²² Operating without FCA authorization means UK clients lack access to the Financial Ombudsman Service for complaints and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) for protection if the firm fails.²²
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), USA: The CFTC placed Pocket Option (pocketoption.com) on its Registration Deficient (RED) List on July 6, 2022.¹⁹ The RED List identifies firms operating outside the US but soliciting or accepting funds from US customers for products under CFTC jurisdiction (like certain binary options) without being registered with the CFTC. The CFTC explicitly warns that US customers may have little or no protection when dealing with such unregistered foreign firms.¹⁹
Alberta Securities Commission (ASC), Canada: On May 5, 2023, the ASC added Pocket Option (pocketoption.com) to its Investment Caution List, stating the firm is not registered to trade in or advise on securities or derivatives in Alberta.¹⁷ The ASC advises investors against dealing with unregistered firms due to the lack of investor protections.¹⁷
Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA): The CSA, an umbrella organization for Canada’s provincial and territorial securities regulators, echoes the ASC’s alert regarding Pocket Option.¹⁸ Canadian authorities have also highlighted the general risks and prevalence of fraud associated with binary options trading.⁵³
Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA), Belgium: The FSMA has issued a warning regarding Pocket Option.⁵¹
Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV), Spain: Spain’s regulator lists the warning issued by Belgium’s FSMA concerning Pocket Option.⁵⁴
Authority for Financial Markets (AFM), Netherlands: The AFM’s warning list includes Pocket Option and associated entities like PO TRADE.²³
Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), Poland: The KNF includes Pocket Option on its public warning list.²⁴
Securities Commission Malaysia (SC): The SC added Pocket Option to its Investor Alert List back in 2020, indicating early regulatory concerns in that jurisdiction.²⁴
Other Regulatory Context: Binary options themselves are banned or severely restricted for retail clients in many major jurisdictions, including the European Union (by ESMA) ⁹, the United Kingdom ²², Australia (by ASIC) ⁵⁵, and Canada.⁵³ India also maintains restrictions via the RBI and SEBI.¹⁰ This regulatory environment makes Pocket Option’s core product offering illegal for retail clients in these significant markets, irrespective of its registration status. Pocket Option has also been identified as one of the most searched-for potential scam entities within the EU ⁵² and appears on the IOSCO Investor Alerts Portal.⁵⁷

C. Jurisdictional Availability and Restrictions

Pocket Option claims to operate in over 95 countries.² However, some sources indicate it is explicitly banned or restricted in key regions such as European Economic Area (EEA) countries, the United States, Israel, the United Kingdom, and Japan.¹ This information directly contradicts other claims found in promotional material suggesting legality in the US and UK ², highlighting the unreliability of information provided by the platform or its affiliates. The widespread regulatory bans on binary options for retail clients further restrict its legitimate operational scope.

D. Implications for Investor Protection

The lack of authorization from credible regulators has severe consequences for investor protection:

No Oversight: Pocket Option operates outside the supervisory framework of recognized authorities, meaning its business practices, financial stability, and treatment of clients are not monitored according to established standards.
No Compensation Schemes: Clients have no recourse to investor compensation funds (like the UK’s FSCS or similar schemes elsewhere) if Pocket Option becomes insolvent or engages in fraud.²²
No Dispute Resolution: Access to independent dispute resolution services, such as financial ombudsmen, is unavailable.²² Clients must rely solely on the company’s internal processes, which user reports suggest are often inadequate or unresponsive.²⁰
Fund Safety Concerns: While claims of segregated accounts might be made under the banner of IFMRRC ⁴⁹, the absence of genuine regulation means there is no legal guarantee that client funds are kept separate from company operational funds, increasing the risk of loss through mismanagement or misappropriation.⁷

E. Table: Summary of Regulatory Warnings and Actions

Regulator	Jurisdiction	Date of Warning/Action	Specific Entity Named	Nature of Warning/Action	Source Snippet ID
CFTC	USA	2022-07-06	Pocket Option (pocketoption.com)	RED List (Registration Deficient)	¹⁹
FCA	UK	2023-09-12	Pocket Option FX	Unauthorized Firm Targeting UK Consumers	²²
FCA	UK	Mentioned	Pocket Option	General Warning / Lack of Authorization	²³
ASC	Canada (AB)	2023-05-05	Pocket Option (pocketoption.com)	Investment Caution List (Not Registered)	¹⁷
CSA	Canada	2023-05-05	Pocket Option (pocketoption.com)	Investor Alert (Echoes ASC)	¹⁸
FSMA	Belgium	Mentioned	Pocket Option	Warning Issued	⁵¹
CNMV	Spain	2023-06-07	Pocket Option	Lists FSMA Warning	⁵⁴
AFM	Netherlands	Mentioned	Pocket Option, PO TRADE	Warning List	²³
KNF	Poland	Mentioned	Pocket Option	Public Warning List	²⁴
SC	Malaysia	2020	Pocket Option	Investor Alert List	²⁴
IOSCO	Global	Mentioned	Pocket Option	Investor Alerts Portal	⁵⁷
Better Finance	EU	2024 (Report)	Pocket Option	Identified as Top Searched Potential Scam in EU	⁵²

Note: Dates may reflect publication date of the warning or the date it was noted in the source material.

The extensive list of warnings from diverse, reputable regulators across major global markets strongly suggests a consistent pattern of operating outside established legal frameworks for financial services, rather than isolated administrative oversights. This appears to be a deliberate strategy of non-compliance.

Furthermore, the persistent promotion of regulation by MISA and IFMRRC, despite clear evidence challenging their legitimacy (especially MISA’s fictitious status and the suspension of Infinite Trade LLC’s license), indicates that projecting a false image of oversight is a core element of Pocket Option’s client acquisition strategy. This tactic likely preys on users unfamiliar with the nuances of financial regulation, misleading them into a false sense of security.

There is a direct correlation between the issues regulators warn about – lack of authorization leading to no investor protection mechanisms like compensation schemes or dispute resolution – and the most frequent user complaints, namely withdrawal difficulties and lack of recourse.²⁰ This convergence strongly implies that the absence of regulatory oversight enables or emboldens the platform to engage in practices detrimental to users, who then lack effective avenues for redress.

IV. Trading Platform: Features and Functionality

Despite the severe regulatory concerns, Pocket Option’s trading platform itself is often cited for its accessibility and range of features, which likely contribute to its ability to attract users.

A. Platform Accessibility

Pocket Option offers access through multiple channels:

Web Platform: This is the primary interface, accessible directly through web browsers without needing downloads.⁶ It is widely regarded as the most comprehensive version of the platform.
Mobile Applications: Dedicated apps are available for Android devices via the Google Play Store ¹² and likely for iOS as well (though not explicitly confirmed in snippets). These apps aim to provide core trading functionality for on-the-go access ¹ but may sometimes lack the full range of tools, such as certain technical indicators, available on the web version.¹² The listed developer for these apps is Pocket Investments LLC.¹⁵
Desktop Application: A downloadable version of the platform is mentioned for Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems.¹ This might offer enhanced performance or customization options compared to the web version.¹
Telegram Bot: The availability of a Telegram bot is also mentioned, potentially for receiving signals or account updates.²⁷

B. User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX)

A consistent theme across many reviews, even critical ones, is the platform’s user-friendly design. It is frequently described as intuitive, sleek, modern, clean, and easy to navigate, making it accessible for beginners while still offering features appreciated by more experienced traders.¹² The platform incorporates customizable charts allowing traders to tailor their analysis environment.¹⁴

C. Account Structure

Pocket Option primarily offers two types of accounts:

Demo Account: This is a highly promoted and widely praised feature.¹² It allows users to practice trading with virtual funds – typically $10,000, sometimes described as unlimited or rechargeable ¹² – in a simulated market environment without risking real capital. Access is often granted without full registration, lowering the barrier to trying the platform.¹⁴
Live Account(s): To trade with real money, users must register and typically complete identity verification (KYC) procedures.¹⁴ While some sources mention a “Standard Live Account” ¹, details on potentially tiered live accounts offering different benefits based on deposit size or activity level are sparse in the provided materials, although hinted at by the gamification features involving gems.² The minimum deposit required to open a live account varies (detailed in Section V).

D. Key Platform Features

Pocket Option integrates several features aimed at enhancing the trading experience and user engagement:

Social Trading: A prominent feature allowing users to observe the trading activities of other investors on the platform and automatically copy the trades of those deemed successful.¹⁴ This is often highlighted as particularly useful for beginners seeking guidance.¹⁴
Analytical Tools & Indicators: The platform provides real-time charts and market analysis tools.¹³ It includes a selection of popular technical indicators such as Moving Averages, RSI (Relative Strength Index), Bollinger Bands, ADX (Average Directional Index), and potentially others like Zigzag and Keltner Channels (though availability might differ between web and mobile platforms).²
Trading Signals: Pocket Option offers trading signals, presented as market movement tips from their “professionals”.³² These are provided free, often through a separate mobile app (“Pocket Options Signals”) or integrated platform features, covering various currency pairs and instruments.²⁷ However, user reviews have questioned the reliability and real-time accuracy of these signals.³²
Educational Resources: A Help Center containing tutorials, guides, articles on trading strategies, and potentially webinars is available.² While present, the comprehensiveness of these resources has been noted by some reviewers as potentially less extensive than those offered by competitor platforms.⁵⁹
Achievements/Gamification: Pocket Option employs a unique system where traders can unlock “achievements” by completing tasks, gaining experience points, and earning virtual “gems” of varying rarity.² These gems can sometimes be purchased and used to acquire bonuses, risk-free trades, cashback enhancements, or access other platform perks, adding a game-like layer to the trading activity.²
Tournaments: Regular trading competitions are offered, some free to enter using demo accounts and others requiring a buy-in with real money.¹ These tournaments feature prize pools ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars, paid into winners’ real trading accounts.²
Customer Support: The platform claims to offer customer support, with conflicting reports of 24/7 availability ¹² versus 24/5.¹ Available channels reportedly include live chat, email (e.g., [email protected] ¹⁵, [email protected] ³²), phone, and possibly Skype.² As detailed in Section VI, user experiences with support effectiveness vary dramatically.

E. Trading Bots

The existence of third-party trading robots, such as a Chrome browser extension named “PocketOption BOT,” indicates that automated trading strategies can be employed on the platform.⁶⁶ It is important to note that these bots are typically developed externally, are not endorsed or supported by Pocket Option, may carry significant risks of malfunction or loss, and their use could potentially violate the platform’s terms of service.

The platform’s design choices reveal a strategic focus. The heavy emphasis on a user-friendly interface, a prominent and easily accessible demo account, social copy-trading features, and gamification elements like achievements and tournaments strongly indicates a strategy geared towards attracting and retaining new or inexperienced traders. These features effectively lower the perceived barriers to entry and create engaging user loops, similar to those found in video games. However, this focus on accessibility and engagement might inadvertently mask or distract from the inherently high financial risks associated with binary options trading, especially for novice users unfamiliar with market dynamics and risk management.

Furthermore, reports of inconsistencies between platform versions, such as missing indicators on mobile apps ¹² or unreliable signal updates ³², suggest potential shortcomings in development resources or quality control for non-core features or platforms. While the main web interface might be robust, users relying on mobile apps or auxiliary tools like signals could encounter a fragmented or less dependable experience.

The social trading feature, while potentially educational, presents a double-edged sword within an environment lacking credible regulation. The risk exists that users might be copying strategies based on manipulated data, non-representative demo account performance (as demo accounts are used in rankings/tournaments ⁵⁹), or from traders who are not genuinely profitable under fair market conditions. This exposes users relying on the copy-trading feature to risks beyond typical market volatility, potentially leading them to mirror unsustainable or misleading trading patterns.⁸

V. Trading Conditions and Financial Details

The specific trading conditions and financial parameters offered by Pocket Option are crucial factors for potential users, encompassing the available assets, payout structures, minimum financial requirements, fees, and payment logistics.

A. Asset Portfolio

Pocket Option provides access to a diverse range of tradable assets, with claims varying between over 100 ², over 130 ⁵, or even over 150 ³ different instruments. The portfolio spans multiple asset classes:

Forex: Includes major currency pairs (e.g., EUR/USD, GBP/USD), minor pairs, and exotic pairs.¹
Stocks: Offers trading on shares of major global companies, such as Apple (AAPL), Meta (META), Amazon, and Microsoft.¹
Indices: Provides access to major stock market indices like the S&P 500, Dow Jones, FTSE 100, AUS 200, and E50EUR.¹
Commodities: Includes popular commodities such as Gold, Silver, Platinum, Crude Oil (WTI/Brent), and Natural Gas.¹
Cryptocurrencies: Offers trading on various digital currencies, including Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC), Ripple (XRP), Dash, Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Stellar (XLM), and others.¹
Other: Over-the-Counter (OTC) assets are also mentioned, typically available during weekends when traditional markets are closed.⁵⁹ Specialized indices like Crypto IDX (representing a basket of cryptocurrencies) and Commodity Index are also listed.⁵⁹

B. Binary Options Mechanics

Pocket Option primarily focuses on a specific type of binary option:

High/Low Options: This is the main trading type offered.⁵ Traders simply predict whether the asset’s price will finish higher or lower than the price at the time of entry, upon the option’s expiration.
Expiration Times: A wide range of expiry times is available, catering to different trading styles. Very short-term options are prominent, with expiries as low as 5 seconds ² or 60 seconds being common (“quick trading”).²⁷ Longer expiries up to four hours are also possible.²
Other Variants: Terms like “digital trading,” “express trades,” and “pending orders” are mentioned ²⁷, likely referring to specific platform features or variations within the high/low framework. The mention of “Forex MT5” ²⁷ is ambiguous; it could refer to standard Forex trading offered via the MetaTrader 5 platform (which some brokers offer alongside binary options) or potentially a binary option product related to Forex pairs accessed through an MT5 interface. However, the core business clearly revolves around binary options.

C. Payout Structure

Payouts on successful binary option trades determine profitability. Pocket Option’s payout structure is characterized by:

Advertised Maximum Payout: The platform frequently promotes potential payouts “up to 218%”.⁵ This exceptionally high figure is significantly above industry norms and appears prominently in marketing materials. However, the specific conditions under which such a payout could be achieved are not detailed ²⁷, raising questions about its attainability and representativeness.
Typical Payout Range: More realistic payout percentages for successful trades are generally cited as being between 80% and 100%.⁵ Other sources mention maximums around 95-97% ⁵ or up to 128%.⁶⁰ These figures are more aligned with standard binary options offerings.
Minimum Payout: The lowest payout on a winning trade can be 50% ²⁶, and some sources suggest payouts on certain assets could be as low as 15%.² Users are advised to focus on instruments offering higher payout rates (e.g., 80%+) to improve potential profitability.²
Influencing Factors: The payout percentage for a specific trade is dynamic and depends on the chosen asset, current market volatility, and the selected expiration time.² Shorter expiry times may sometimes offer higher percentage payouts but also carry higher risk.⁵⁹ The platform’s trading schedule displays the current payout percentages for available assets.⁶²
Losing Trades: In standard binary options, a losing trade results in the loss of the entire amount invested. While some brokers offer a small percentage return on out-of-the-money trades ⁷, this is not explicitly confirmed for Pocket Option, although cashback features on net losses are available.²⁶

The consistent and prominent marketing of “up to 218%” payouts, while lacking clear substantiation or conditions ²⁷, seems more like an aggressive advertising tactic than a reflection of typical trading outcomes. Standard binary options payouts usually cap around 80-100% ¹⁶, as the broker needs to maintain a statistical edge.⁷ The exceptionally high claim likely serves to attract attention but risks setting unrealistic profit expectations for users.

D. Financial Requirements

Entry barriers in terms of capital are relatively low, but figures vary:

Minimum Deposit: This figure is inconsistent across sources, likely varying by user region and chosen payment method. Cited minimums include $5 ², $10 [³ (withdrawal min)], $20 (for specific crypto methods like ERC-20 tokens) ⁵⁹, and $50.¹ The official website ambiguously states “$0*” with a note about variance.²⁷ A $50 minimum seems common for standard live account activation in many contexts.
Minimum Withdrawal: Generally reported as $10.² Withdrawals are subject to account verification and processing review.¹
Minimum Trade Amount: Consistently stated as $1 per trade.¹

The combination of a very low minimum trade amount ($1) and potentially low minimum deposits ($5-$50 range) makes Pocket Option highly accessible financially. However, this ease of entry into a high-risk product offered by an under-regulated platform significantly increases the danger for inexperienced traders, who can lose capital rapidly through numerous small, unsuccessful trades.

E. Fee Structure

Pocket Option promotes a low-fee structure, but potential costs exist:

Trading Commissions: The platform claims not to charge commissions per trade.¹ The broker’s potential profit comes from the difference between the total amount paid out on winning trades and the total amount collected from losing trades (the inherent house edge).
Deposit/Withdrawal Fees: Pocket Option asserts that it does not charge fees for deposits or withdrawals.¹ However, users may incur fees levied by third-party payment processors, such as banks (for wire transfers), e-wallet providers, or cryptocurrency networks.¹
Currency Conversion Fees: If a user deposits or withdraws funds in a currency different from their account’s base currency (which is typically USD), Pocket Option may apply a currency conversion fee.¹ Users are advised to consult the platform’s tariff information for details.¹
Inactivity Fees: No information in the reviewed sources suggests that Pocket Option charges inactivity or dormant account fees.¹ This contrasts with some other brokers who penalize inactive accounts.⁷⁰

While the claim of “no platform fees” for deposits and withdrawals is technically accurate regarding Pocket Option’s own charges, it can be misleading. Users must remain aware of potential external costs from payment intermediaries and currency conversions, which can impact the net amount transferred.¹

F. Payment Methods

A wide variety of payment methods is supported, claimed to be over 50 options ¹²:

Credit/Debit Cards: Visa, Mastercard, Maestro are commonly accepted.¹
Bank Wire Transfer: Available, though potentially slower processing times.¹
E-wallets: Popular options like Skrill, Neteller, Perfect Money, Jeton are supported.¹
Cryptocurrencies: A range of cryptocurrencies can be used for deposits and withdrawals, including Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Stellar (XLM), Ripple (XRP), ZCash, Tether (USDT – TRC20 and ERC20), USD Coin (USDC – ERC20), etc..¹
Processing Times: Deposits are often near-instantaneous, especially with e-wallets and crypto, while bank wires can take several days.¹ Withdrawals are generally required to be made using the same method as the deposit.⁶⁹ Pocket Option typically processes withdrawal requests within 24 hours ², but significant delays and issues are frequently reported by users (see Section VI).

G. Promotional Offers

Pocket Option utilizes various bonuses and promotions to attract and retain clients:

Deposit Bonuses: A common offer is a 50% bonus on the first deposit, applicable to deposits over a certain threshold ($5 or $50, depending on the source).¹ These bonuses usually come with trading volume requirements that must be met before the bonus funds (and potentially associated profits) can be withdrawn.⁵¹
Cashback: A cashback feature allows traders to receive back a percentage (up to 10%) of their net losses over a certain period.²⁶
Other Promotions: Regular contests, gifts, promo codes, and risk-free trades (where a losing trade can be cancelled) are also offered.²

H. Table: Summary of Fees and Minimum Financial Thresholds

Feature	Detail	Source Snippet IDs
Minimum Deposit	Varies ($5 – $50+ range cited, depends on region/method)	¹
Minimum Withdrawal	$10	²
Minimum Trade Amount	$1	¹
Trading Commission	$0 (Profit/loss based on payout %)	¹
Platform Deposit Fees	$0 (Claimed by Pocket Option)	¹
Platform Withdrawal Fees	$0 (Claimed by Pocket Option)	¹
Potential 3rd Party Fees	Yes (Bank fees, e-wallet fees, crypto network fees may apply)	¹
Currency Conversion Fees	Potential (If transaction currency differs from account base currency)	¹
Inactivity Fee	Likely No (Not mentioned in relevant sources)	¹

VI. User Sentiment and Market Reputation

The market reputation of Pocket Option is sharply divided, presenting a polarized landscape of user experiences. While the platform garners praise for certain aspects, it is also subject to numerous severe complaints, particularly regarding financial transactions and account management.

A. Synthesis of User Reviews: A Polarized Landscape

Positive Feedback: Users often commend Pocket Option for its intuitive and user-friendly interface, which simplifies the trading process, especially for newcomers.¹² The availability and functionality of the demo account are frequently highlighted as valuable tools for practice and strategy testing without financial risk.⁴ The wide selection of assets and the platform’s relatively fast trade execution speeds are also noted positively.⁵¹ Some users specifically report positive experiences with fast withdrawals and overall platform reliability.¹⁵ High ratings on platforms like Trustpilot are often cited as evidence of user satisfaction.²
Negative Feedback: Conversely, a substantial volume of negative feedback exists, centering on critical operational issues:

Withdrawal Problems: This is arguably the most frequent and damaging category of complaints. Users report significant delays in withdrawal processing, outright cancellation of withdrawal requests without clear explanations, demands for excessive or repetitive identity verification documents specifically when trying to withdraw, and, in the most severe cases, a complete inability to withdraw either profits or their initial deposits.¹
Account Blocking/Bans: Numerous users allege that their accounts were unfairly banned or frozen, often coinciding with periods of profitability or attempts to withdraw funds.²⁰ This leaves them unable to access their capital held within the platform.
Poor Customer Support: Complaints describe customer support as unresponsive, unhelpful, providing generic or delaying responses, or being unreachable when critical issues like withdrawal problems arise.⁴
Platform Manipulation Allegations: Serious accusations include the manipulation of trading outcomes. Some users claim discrepancies between results on the demo account versus the live account for identical trades.²¹ Others allege that the platform manipulates price feeds or arbitrarily extends trade expiration times on potentially winning trades until they result in a loss.⁸
Deposit Issues: Some users have reported depositing funds that were never credited to their trading accounts, despite providing proof of transaction.²⁰
Verification Delays: Unreasonably long delays in the Know Your Customer (KYC) verification process are also mentioned, sometimes hindering trading or withdrawal capabilities.²⁰

B. Analysis Across Review Platforms

The perception of Pocket Option varies depending on the platform where reviews are sought:

Trustpilot & TrustFinance: These platforms show remarkably high scores, with reports of nearly 2,000 five-star reviews on Trustpilot ² and a 92% five-star rating on TrustFinance.⁵¹ However, the credibility of these high ratings is questionable. Skeptics point out that many positive reviews may originate from accounts with no other review history.³⁴ More critically, there are allegations that Pocket Option incentivizes positive reviews by offering rewards like risk-free trade codes.²¹
Google Play Store: Reviews for the “Pocket Broker” and “Pocket Options Signals” apps are mixed. While some users praise the UI and basic functionality ¹⁵, others criticize the mobile apps for lacking features available on the web version (e.g., certain indicators) ¹², report reliability issues with the signals app (e.g., lagging updates) ³², or express general warnings about the risks and potential scam nature of binary options trading.³² App ratings typically fall in the 3.6 to 4.3-star range.¹⁵
Sikayetvar.com: This Turkish consumer complaint website hosts numerous detailed and specific grievances against Pocket Option, corroborating the patterns of withdrawal difficulties, account bans, unresponsive support, and deposit problems reported elsewhere.²⁰
Other Sources: Discussions on forums ⁴⁸, comments on YouTube videos ⁶⁹, and reviews of related materials like trading guides ⁶³ generally reflect the same polarized sentiment seen elsewhere.

C. Addressing Allegations

Withdrawal Issues: The sheer volume and consistency of withdrawal complaints across diverse platforms ⁴ strongly suggest these are not isolated incidents but indicative of a potential systemic problem or deliberate practice. This aligns perfectly with the risks inherent in dealing with unregulated offshore brokers who lack accountability.
Manipulation Claims: Allegations of manipulated trades or discrepancies between demo and live accounts ⁸ are extremely serious. While difficult to verify externally without forensic data access, such practices are hallmarks of fraudulent binary options operations warned about by regulators and consumer groups.⁸ The reported difference in outcomes between demo and real trading ²¹ is a particularly significant red flag suggesting the demo environment may not accurately represent real trading conditions or outcomes.
Incentivized Reviews: The evidence suggesting Pocket Option may offer rewards for positive reviews ²¹ severely undermines the validity of overwhelmingly positive ratings found on platforms like Trustpilot or TrustFinance. This practice artificially inflates the perceived reputation of the broker.

The stark dichotomy in user reviews may well be linked to the user’s trading success and interaction with the withdrawal process. It is plausible that users who are new, primarily using the demo account, or have only made small withdrawals might focus on the platform’s usability and features, leading to positive reviews. Conversely, users who achieve significant profits and attempt to withdraw larger sums appear far more likely to encounter obstacles such as unexplained delays, excessive verification demands, or outright account blocking, resulting in strongly negative feedback. This pattern suggests potential operational practices designed to hinder or prevent successful traders from realizing substantial gains, a behavior consistent with the conflict of interest inherent in the binary options model (where the broker often profits from client losses) when operating without regulatory constraints.

Consequently, the high aggregate review scores seen on certain platforms ², potentially skewed by incentivized or filtered reviews ²¹, likely create a misleadingly positive perception of Pocket Option’s trustworthiness. Potential users relying solely on these surface-level scores may significantly underestimate the substantial operational and financial risks involved, overlooking the numerous regulatory warnings and specific, severe complaints documented elsewhere.

Furthermore, the reported inadequacy and unresponsiveness of customer support ⁴ become critically detrimental when users face major issues like withdrawal blocks or account freezes. In a regulated environment, clients typically have escalation paths and access to independent dispute resolution. With Pocket Option’s lack of credible regulation and allegedly poor support, users encountering critical problems are often left without recourse, explanation, or assistance, amplifying their frustration and financial losses. This lack of effective support compounds the risks associated with the platform’s operational issues.

VII. Risk Assessment: Binary Options and Pocket Option Specifics

A comprehensive risk assessment of Pocket Option must consider both the inherent risks associated with binary options trading as a financial product and the specific risks stemming from the platform’s operational and regulatory profile.

A. The High-Risk Nature of Binary Options Trading

Binary options are widely recognized as one of the riskiest financial products available to retail clients:

Speculative Gambling, Not Investing: Due to their fixed, all-or-nothing payout structure and often very short expiration times, binary options are frequently characterized as a form of financial gambling rather than traditional investment.⁷ Consistently predicting short-term price movements with the accuracy required for sustained profitability is exceptionally difficult, even for experienced traders.⁷
Inherent House Edge: The payout structure (e.g., winning 80-90% on a successful trade vs. losing 100% on an unsuccessful one) typically creates a statistical advantage for the broker over the long term. This means that, cumulatively, the platform is designed to profit from overall client losses.⁷
Complexity Masked as Simplicity: While marketed as simple (“predict up or down”), understanding the true odds, the impact of volatility on pricing, and the platform’s mechanics can be complex and opaque.⁸
Potential for Addiction: The fast-paced nature of short-term binary options (e.g., 60-second trades) can foster addictive trading behavior.⁷
Fraud and Manipulation: The binary options industry has been plagued by fraudulent operators engaging in practices like refusing withdrawals, manipulating software to ensure client losses, identity theft, and using high-pressure sales tactics.⁸
Global Regulatory Condemnation: Recognizing these risks, numerous leading financial regulators across the globe have either completely banned the sale of binary options to retail clients or imposed severe restrictions. This includes authorities in the European Union (ESMA), the UK (FCA), Australia (ASIC), Canada (CSA), Israel, and others.⁸ These actions were taken specifically to protect retail investors from significant financial harm.⁸

B. Platform-Specific Risks Associated with Pocket Option

Beyond the general risks of binary options, Pocket Option presents several specific, significant risks due to its operational characteristics:

Severe Regulatory Deficit: This is the paramount risk. Pocket Option lacks authorization from any credible, internationally recognized financial regulatory body.¹⁷ Its reliance on the discredited MISA ²¹ and the non-governmental IFMRRC ⁵⁰ provides no genuine regulatory oversight or protection. This absence of regulation permeates all other aspects of risk.
Substantial Withdrawal Risk: The high frequency of user complaints regarding difficulties or inability to withdraw funds ⁴ indicates a significant counterparty risk – the risk that the broker itself will prevent users from accessing their capital or profits.
Operational Opacity: The convoluted corporate structure involving multiple entities in offshore jurisdictions and a lack of transparency regarding ownership and management create an opaque operating environment that hinders accountability and due diligence.³⁴
Potential for Platform Manipulation: Allegations from users regarding manipulated trade outcomes or discrepancies between demo and live accounts ⁸ introduce a risk factor beyond normal market movements, suggesting the platform might actively work against successful traders.
Misleading Information: The dissemination of potentially misleading information regarding regulatory status, the legitimacy of user reviews, and possibly unrealistic payout potentials creates an environment where users may make decisions based on flawed premises.
Data Security Concerns: While Pocket Option claims to employ security measures like SSL encryption and 2FA ¹², dealing with an unregulated entity inherently carries higher risks related to the security and privacy of personal and financial data provided during registration and verification.⁸

C. Absence of Standard Investor Protections

The lack of credible regulation directly translates to an absence of standard investor safety nets:

Users have no access to independent dispute resolution bodies like financial ombudsman services if they have a complaint against Pocket Option.²²
Clients are not covered by investor compensation schemes (such as FSCS in the UK or SIPC in the US) that protect funds in case of broker insolvency or fraud.²²
Any disputes must be resolved directly with the company, whose willingness and fairness in handling complaints are highly questionable based on user reports of unresponsive support.²⁰

The specific operational and regulatory failings of Pocket Option act to significantly amplify the already substantial risks inherent in binary options trading. Users are exposed not only to the high probability of market losses associated with the product itself but also to considerable counterparty risk originating from the broker’s practices. The lack of regulation, coupled with frequent complaints about withdrawal refusals and potential manipulation, means traders face the danger that even if they are successful in their market predictions, the platform itself may prevent them from realizing or accessing their gains.

The platform’s strategy, combining easy financial access (low minimum deposits and trades) with a user-friendly interface and gamified elements, while operating in regulatory grey areas, may disproportionately attract individuals who are financially inexperienced or vulnerable. These users may be less equipped to understand the true risks involved, verify the broker’s dubious regulatory claims, or withstand rapid financial losses. The business model, therefore, carries a heightened risk of causing significant harm to less sophisticated market participants drawn in by the accessible interface and promises of high returns.

Ultimately, the consistent warnings issued by numerous global regulators over several years serve as strong leading indicators of potential user harm. These official alerts, highlighting the lack of authorization and investor protection, have been subsequently validated by the widespread user complaints detailing precisely the types of negative outcomes – primarily inaccessible funds and significant financial losses – that the regulators sought to prevent. This underscores the critical importance for potential users to heed such regulatory warnings and conduct thorough due diligence beyond the broker’s own marketing claims.

VIII. Conclusion and Expert Recommendations

Consolidated Findings:

The analysis of Pocket Option reveals a stark dichotomy. The platform offers a technologically accessible interface for trading binary options, featuring a user-friendly design, a popular demo account, social trading capabilities, and a wide range of assets, making it superficially attractive, particularly to novice traders.¹³

However, these features are overshadowed by fundamental and severe issues:

Opaque and Questionable Operations: Pocket Option operates through a complex and shifting web of corporate entities registered primarily in offshore jurisdictions known for lax oversight (Marshall Islands, Mwali, Costa Rica), demonstrating a significant lack of operational transparency and accountability.⁶
Misleading Regulatory Claims: Claims of regulation by the Mwali International Services Authority (MISA) and the International Financial Market Relations Regulation Center (IFMRRC) are highly misleading. MISA has been declared fictitious by the legitimate Central Bank of Comoros ²¹, and the IFMRRC is a non-governmental body lacking recognized authority.⁵⁰
Widespread Regulatory Warnings: Pocket Option has been explicitly warned against by numerous reputable financial regulators globally (including the CFTC, FCA, ASC, CSA, FSMA, AFM, KNF, SC) for operating without authorization in their jurisdictions.¹⁷
Severe User Complaints: User feedback, while polarized, includes a high volume of serious complaints regarding withdrawal failures, account blocking (especially after profits), unresponsive customer support, and allegations of platform manipulation.⁴ The credibility of overwhelmingly positive reviews is undermined by evidence of potential incentivization.²¹
Amplified High-Risk Product: The platform deals exclusively in binary options, an inherently high-risk, speculative product banned for retail clients in many jurisdictions.⁷ Pocket Option’s lack of regulation and questionable practices significantly amplify these inherent risks.
Lack of Investor Protection: Due to its unauthorized status in regulated markets, clients have no access to standard investor protections like compensation schemes or independent dispute resolution mechanisms.⁷

Overall Assessment:

Based on the comprehensive analysis of its operational structure, regulatory standing, user feedback, and the nature of its product offering, Pocket Option cannot be considered a legitimate or trustworthy broker according to established industry standards. The severe lack of credible regulation, the multitude of warnings from official bodies, the operational opacity, and the consistent pattern of serious user complaints regarding fund accessibility represent an unacceptably high level of risk for investors. The platform’s appealing features and user interface do not mitigate these fundamental flaws. The risks to user capital, stemming from both market volatility and potential platform malfeasance, are substantial, and the absence of regulatory recourse leaves users vulnerable.

Expert Recommendations:

Strongly Advise Against Use: Potential users, particularly retail traders, are strongly advised to avoid depositing funds or engaging in trading activities with Pocket Option. The documented regulatory issues and operational risks outweigh any perceived benefits of the platform.
Prioritize Credible Regulation: Investors seeking to trade online should prioritize brokers that are authorized and regulated by reputable financial authorities within well-established jurisdictions (e.g., FCA in the UK, ASIC in Australia, CySEC in Cyprus, BaFin in Germany, CFTC/NFA/SEC in the US, IIROC in Canada). Always verify a broker’s registration status directly on the official website of the claimed regulator before opening an account.¹⁷
Understand Binary Options Risks: Exercise extreme caution with binary options as a product class. Recognize their speculative, gambling-like nature and the high probability of loss.⁷ Consider alternative, regulated financial instruments like traditional stocks, ETFs, futures, or Forex offered through reputable brokers, which generally provide greater transparency and investor protection.
Conduct Thorough Due Diligence: Do not rely solely on broker marketing materials or potentially skewed online reviews. Seek independent analysis, check for regulatory warnings from official sources ¹⁷, and understand the terms and conditions thoroughly before committing funds to any online trading platform.
Guidance for Existing Users: Existing users of Pocket Option should proceed with extreme caution. Attempting to withdraw funds may prove challenging, based on widespread reports.²⁰ It is advisable to document all communications and transaction attempts with the platform meticulously. While recovery prospects are low due to the lack of regulation, users experiencing issues may consider reporting their experiences to relevant consumer protection agencies or financial crime authorities in their jurisdiction, although effective intervention is unlikely.

Works cited

Pocket Option Review ☑️ Safe or Scam Revealed (Updated 2024) – FXLeaders, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.fxleaders.com/forex-brokers/forex-brokers-review/pocket-option-review/
Pocket Option Review: Legit and Regulated or Scam? – WallStreetZen, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.wallstreetzen.com/blog/pocket-option-review/
Pocket Option Reviews A Comprehensive Look at This Popular Trading Platform, accessed April 23, 2025, https://wingstore.ma/pocket-option-reviews-a-comprehensive-look-at-this/
Pocket Option Review Trustpilot A Comprehensive Analysis – Netsurance Canada, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.netsurance.ca/blog/pocket-option-review-trustpilot-a-comprehensive-2/
Exploring Low or No-Deposit Binary Options Brokers: Top 5 Picks for Budget-Friendly Trading | SDNews.com, accessed April 23, 2025, https://sdnews.com/exploring-low-or-no-deposit-binary-options-brokers-top-5-picks-for-budget-friendly-trading/
Pocket Option Demo Account Report: Statistics and Facts – Elevate Interior, accessed April 23, 2025, https://elevateinterior.in/uncategorized/pocket-option-demo-account-report-statistics-and-facts/
Binary option – Wikipedia, accessed April 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_option
(PDF) Binary options trading: A deep dive into user perspective and satisfaction – ResearchGate, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377180474_Binary_options_trading_A_deep_dive_into_user_perspective_and_satisfaction
Research Article Binary options trading: A deep dive into user perspective and satisfaction – Semantic Scholar, accessed April 23, 2025, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5a25/be81673bab4d8469ab53acae452c1446c170.pdf
Binary Option trading strategies in India – Fisdom, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.fisdom.com/binary-option-trading-strategies-in-india/
Binary Options Firm Blamed Hackers For Lost Cash – iExpats, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.iexpats.com/binary-options-firm-blamed-hackers-for-lost-cash/
Pocket Option – Apps on Google Play, accessed April 23, 2025, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pocketoption.broker
Pocket Option – The Ultimate Online Trading and Investment Platform – Roterin, accessed April 23, 2025, https://roterin.com/blog/pocket-option-the-ultimate-online-trading-and-investment-platform/
Pocket Option Trading Platform A Comprehensive Guide to Success – กรมวิชาการเกษตร, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.doa.go.th/procure/?p=12923
Pocket Broker – trading – Apps on Google Play, accessed April 23, 2025, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.potradeweb
Pocket Option Reviews An In-depth Look at the Trading Platform – BLANCO Sverige, accessed April 23, 2025, https://sverigeblanco.se/pocket-option-reviews-an-in-depth-look-at-the/
Pocket Option | ASC – Alberta Securities Commission, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.asc.ca/en/Enforcement/Investment-Caution-List/p/Pocket-Option
Pocket Option – Canadian Securities Administrators, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.securities-administrators.ca/investor-alerts/pocket-option/
RED List: Pocketoption | CFTC, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/node/241216
Pocket Option Read Customer Complaints and Reviews – Xolvie, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.sikayetvar.com/en/pocket-option-us
Pocket Option’s Regulatory Claims: Fact or Fiction? – BrokersView, accessed April 23, 2025, https://m.brokersview.com/news/pocket-options-regulatory-claims-fact-or-fiction-238588
Pocket Option FX | FCA, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/warnings/pocket-option-fx
p – AFM, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.afm.nl/en/consumenten/waarschuwingen/bekijk-de-waarschuwingen/p
lop.knf.gov.pl, accessed April 23, 2025, https://lop.knf.gov.pl/images/Tabela/EN/csv.csv
A present by Pocket Option for the New Year – پاکت آپشن, accessed April 23, 2025, https://pocketoption.ir/a-present-by-pocket-option-for-the-new-year/
Pocket Option Review for 2025: Binary Options Trading Done Right – Fortunly, accessed April 23, 2025, https://fortunly.com/reviews/pocket-option-review/
The Most Innovative Trading Platform, accessed April 23, 2025, https://pocketoption.com/
Brokerage Companies – MWALI INTERNATIONAL SERVICES …, accessed April 23, 2025, https://mwaliregistrar.com/list_of_entities/authorised_brokerage_companies
The Most Innovative Trading Platform, accessed April 23, 2025, https://po.trade/en
POCKET OPTION LTD overview – Find and update company information – GOV.UK, accessed April 23, 2025, https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15474264
POCKET OPTION LTD more information – Find and update company information – GOV.UK, accessed April 23, 2025, https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15474264/more
Pocket Options Signals – Apps on Google Play, accessed April 23, 2025, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pocketoption.signalsplatform
Pocket Options Signals – Apps on Google Play, accessed April 23, 2025, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pocketoption.signalsplatform&hl=en_US
Pocket Option review: is it safe & legit? ⚠️ Warning flags in 2025 – YouTube, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W70ltyjDLuQ&pp=0gcJCdgAo7VqN5tD
www.earnforex.com, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.earnforex.com/guides/misa-mwali-international-services-authority/#:~:text=Mwali%20International%20Services%20Authority%20Register,the%20banking%20sector%20and%20financial.
MISA (Mwali International Services Authority) – EarnForex, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.earnforex.com/guides/misa-mwali-international-services-authority/
Why you should not get a Comoros forex broker license – TradeInformer, accessed April 23, 2025, https://tradeinformer.com/fx-cfd-licensing/why-you-should-not-get-a-comoros-forex-broker-license/
The Moheli (Mwali) Forex License in 2025 | Gofaizen & Sherle, accessed April 23, 2025, https://gofaizen-sherle.com/forex-license/moheli-mwali
Comoros Islands Forex License 2025 – Regulated United Europe, accessed April 23, 2025, https://rue.ee/forex-license/comoros-islands/
MWALI INTERNATIONAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, accessed April 23, 2025, https://mwaliregistrar.com/
Trade24Seven.com Review – A Reliable Trading Platform for LATAM and Brazilian Investors, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.streetinsider.com/Globe+PR+Wire/Trade24Seven.com+Review+-+A+Reliable+Trading+Platform+for+LATAM+and+Brazilian+Investors/24634900.html
AMarkets Review 2025 – Investing.com, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.investing.com/brokers/reviews/amarkets/
Invidia Trade Review – Forex Brokers – ForexChurch.com, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.forexchurch.com/forex-brokers/invidia-trade
BondFinance Review 2025 | Information about BondFinance Forex Broker – BrokersView, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.brokersview.com/brokers/bondfinance
Pocket Option Broker Review 2024 – Uncovering the Truth Behind the Trading Platform, accessed April 23, 2025, https://hei-prometheus.eu/entrepreneurship-acceleration-platform/pocket-option-broker-review-2024-uncovering-the-truth-behind-the-trading-platform/
Pocket Option Broker Review 2024 Scam or Legit | Advans Pharma, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.advanspharma.com/pocket-option-broker-review-2024-scam-or-legit/
Pocket Option Broker Review 2024 – Scam or Legit? – int-elearning, accessed April 23, 2025, https://int-elearning.com/pocket-option-broker-review-2024-scam-or-legit/
Forex binary option – LeiOut, accessed April 23, 2025, https://leioutultimate.com/forums/topic/forex-binary-option/
FinmaxFX Review – Find Top #1 Forex & Binary Trading Platform in Africa, accessed April 23, 2025, https://africa-platform.org/finmaxfx/
Regulations & Licenses | TrustFinance’s Comprehensive Guide, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.trustfinance.com/regulation
Pocket Option Review – 4.22 TrustScore from 435 User Reviews – TrustFinance, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.trustfinance.com/companies/pocket-option
BC Investment Fraud Presentation_final (28 November 2024) – BETTER FINANCE, accessed April 23, 2025, https://betterfinance.eu/wp-content/uploads/BC-Investment-Fraud-Presentation_final-28-November-2024.pdf
Province warns of online investment scam – CTV News, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.ctvnews.ca/winnipeg/article/province-warns-of-online-investment-scam/
Alerts from foreign regulators. unauthorised entities – CNMV, accessed April 23, 2025, https://cnmv.es/portal/advertenciaslistado?tipoAdv=4&inicial=P&page=12&sortExpression=Regulador&sortDirection=1&lang=en
Report REP 736 Response to submissions on CP 362 Extension of the binary options product intervention order – ASIC, accessed April 23, 2025, https://download.asic.gov.au/media/pcilau51/rep736-published-5-september-2022.pdf
20 June 2022 Retail Complex Products and Investor Protection Market Supervision Australian Securities and Investments Commission – Law Council of Australia, accessed April 23, 2025, https://lawcouncil.au/publicassets/68f0777d-9001-ed11-945c-005056be13b5/2022%2006%2020%20-%20CP362%20Extension%20of%20the%20binary%20options%20product%20intervention%20order.pdf
Investor Protection – IOSCO, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.iosco.org/v2/investor_protection/?subsection=investor_alerts_portal&RegulatorID=0&JurisdictionID=0&SubjectID=0&Keywords=pocket
International Securities & Commodities Alerts Network (I-SCAN, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.iosco.org/i-scan/?SUBSECTION=main&NCA_ID=&VALIDATIONDATESTART=&CATEGORYID=&VALIDATIONDATEEND=&ID=&PRODUCTID=&KEYWORDS=&page=70
Pocket Option Review 2025 – Is It the Best Platform for Trading? – OptionsTrading.org, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.optionstrading.org/reviews/pocket-option/
Pocket Option Review – Benzinga, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.benzinga.com/money/pocket-option-review
Pocket Option – Trading Platform | Windows, iOS, Android, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.pocketoption.app/
Forex binary option Pocket Option Review – CEES | Makerere Univsity, accessed April 23, 2025, https://cees.mak.ac.ug/forex-binary-option-pocket-option-review/
Pocket Option to Pocket Profits: Mastering Binary Options Trading with Precision – Amazon.com, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.amazon.com/Pocket-Option-Profits-Mastering-Precision/dp/B0CYXLH7T5
Understanding Pocket Option’s Assets: A Guide by Binaryoptions.com – The Zebra Press, accessed April 23, 2025, https://thezebra.org/2024/01/31/understanding-pocket-options-assets-a-guide-by-binaryoptions-com/
You Can Thank Us Later – 3 Reasons To Stop Thinking About Pocket Option, accessed April 23, 2025, https://johnnyriccos.com/you-can-thank-us-later-3-reasons-to-stop-thinking-about-pocket-option/
PocketOption BOT – Chrome Web Store, accessed April 23, 2025, https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/pocketoption-bot/imecccjjaeolikdablecfbnnapokliih
60-Second Binary Options: Trading Strategies & Brokers | Fortunly, accessed April 23, 2025, https://fortunly.com/articles/60-second-binary-options-trading/
10 Solid Reasons To Avoid Pocket Option Partnership Details, accessed April 23, 2025, http://seikensha.net/wordpress/2025/01/12/10-solid-reasons-to-avoid-pocket-option-partnership-details/
How to start TRADE. Trading for Beginners on Pocket Option – YouTube, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8aVfF_Dd3I&pp=0gcJCdgAo7VqN5tD
Two in five millennials now investing in property and shares to grow, accessed April 23, 2025, https://mozo.com.au/share-trading/articles/two-in-five-millennials-now-investing-in-property-and-shares-to-grow-their-wealth-commbank
Quebec’s AMF Adds 13 Unauthorized Binary Options Websites to its Watch List, accessed April 23, 2025, https://www.financemagnates.com/binary-options/regulation/quebecs-amf-adds-13-unauthorized-binary-options-websites-to-its-watch-list/