Can Binary Options Make You Rich?

Executive Summary

This report provides an expert evaluation of the potential for binary options trading to generate significant wealth. Based on an analysis of their mechanics, mathematical probabilities, inherent risks, regulatory status, prevalence of fraud, expert opinions, and comparative risk profiles, the conclusion is definitive: binary options trading is highly unlikely to make an individual rich and represents an unsuitable strategy for wealth building. Key findings indicate an unfavorable mathematical expectation for traders due to payout structures typically offering less than 100% on wins while risking 100% on losses. This necessitates unrealistically high win rates for sustained profitability, particularly given the short-term, often unpredictable nature of the price movements involved. The “all-or-nothing” payoff structure mirrors gambling, a comparison reinforced by widespread regulatory actions, including outright bans in major jurisdictions like the European Union, the United Kingdom, and Australia, driven by evidence of significant consumer harm. While a small, regulated market exists in the United States, the vast majority of binary options trading occurs through unregulated offshore platforms, which are overwhelmingly associated with fraudulent activities such as refusal of withdrawals, identity theft, and trade manipulation. Financial experts widely regard binary options as a form of high-risk speculation or gambling, fundamentally misaligned with prudent investment principles. Claims of easy riches are largely unsubstantiated and often serve as marketing lures for fraudulent schemes. Consequently, binary options present an exceptionally poor choice for individuals seeking financial growth, exposing them not only to significant market risk but also pervasive counterparty and fraud risks.

related posts : Best Binary Options Brokers (in 2025)

I. Binary Options Explained: The Mechanics of the Bet

• The Yes/No Proposition: Defining the Core Concept
  Binary options are a type of financial derivative contract whose payoff depends entirely on the outcome of a simple “yes or no” proposition.¹ This proposition typically relates to whether the price of an underlying asset will be above or below a specific price level (the strike price) at a predetermined expiration time.² The range of possible underlying assets is broad, encompassing market indices (like the S&P 500), foreign currency (forex) pairs (like EUR/USD), commodities (such as gold or oil), individual stocks, or even specific economic events (like interest rate decisions or employment data releases).⁷
  A critical distinction from traditional options (often called “vanilla” options) is that binary options do not confer upon the holder the right, potential, or obligation to buy or sell the underlying asset itself.² They are purely speculative instruments; the trader is merely betting on the direction of a price movement over a defined, often very short, period.² The trader never takes ownership or establishes a position in the actual stock, currency, or commodity.²
  This straightforward “yes/no” structure is frequently highlighted in marketing materials, appealing particularly to novice traders due to its apparent simplicity.⁷ However, this surface-level ease of understanding masks significant underlying complexities. While the question seems simple (Will the price be higher or lower?), accurately and consistently predicting short-term price movements is notoriously difficult, even for seasoned professionals.⁹ Furthermore, factors such as market volatility, the rapid decay of value as expiration approaches (time decay), and the specific payout percentages set by brokers introduce complexities in fairly valuing these instruments and assessing the true probability of success.⁴ The inherent difficulty and risk are often underestimated by those drawn in by the simple binary premise.²⁰
• Trading Process: Assets, Strikes, Expiry, and Execution
  The process of trading a binary option involves several steps. First, the trader selects an underlying asset or market to trade.¹⁰ Second, they choose an expiration time. These timeframes can vary significantly, ranging from extremely short durations like 60 seconds or five minutes, to hourly, daily, or sometimes even weekly expirations.² Third, a strike price is determined; this is the critical price level against which the outcome is measured. Often, the trading platform sets the strike price based on the current market price of the underlying asset.¹⁰ Finally, the trader places their bet by choosing either a “call” option (predicting the price will finish above the strike price at expiration) or a “put” option (predicting the price will finish at or below the strike price at expiration).⁷
  On regulated exchanges in the U.S., such as the North American Derivatives Exchange (Nadex), the price of a binary option contract fluctuates between $0 and $100.² This price, determined by bid and ask quotes reflecting supply and demand, represents the market’s perceived probability of the specific outcome occurring.¹ If the market believes the “yes” proposition (e.g., price above strike) is highly likely, the price of that option will trade closer to $100. Conversely, if the outcome is seen as unlikely, the price will trade closer to $0. Uncertainty often results in prices around $50.¹¹ The price paid by the buyer (the offer price) or received by the seller (the bid price) determines both the maximum potential profit and the maximum possible loss for that trade.² For instance, buying an option contract at $40 means the maximum risk is $40, and the maximum potential profit is $60 ($100 final value – $40 cost).²
  Some regulated platforms, like Nadex, offer flexibility by allowing traders to close their positions before the scheduled expiration time.² This can be used to lock in a smaller profit if the option’s price has moved favorably or to cut losses if the price has moved unfavorably. However, other exchanges, like the Cboe and CME (for its event futures), typically require positions to be held until expiration.¹¹ Many unregulated offshore platforms may claim to offer early closure but might manipulate this feature or make it practically impossible to use effectively.
• Payoff Structure: The Fixed “All-or-Nothing” Outcome
  The defining characteristic of a binary option is its payoff structure: it is strictly binary, meaning there are only two possible outcomes at expiration.¹
  If the trader’s prediction is correct at the moment of expiration – meaning the underlying asset’s price is on the predicted side of the strike price (above for a call, at or below for a put) – the option expires “in the money.” In this case, the trader receives a fixed, predetermined cash payout.¹ This payout is typically expressed as a percentage of the amount invested.⁷
  Conversely, if the trader’s prediction is incorrect at expiration – the price is not on the predicted side of the strike price – the option expires “out of the money.” In this scenario, the trader receives nothing and loses the entire amount they invested (the premium paid) for that specific trade.² There is no partial payout or loss based on how close the price was to the strike price or how far it moved in the unfavorable direction; it is truly an “all-or-nothing” event.²
  For example, consider a trader who believes the price of Asset X will be above $100 at the 3:00 PM expiration. They purchase a call option for $40. The broker offers an 80% payout on winning trades. If, at 3:00 PM, the price of Asset X is $100.01 or higher, the option expires in the money. The trader receives their initial $40 investment back, plus a profit of $32 (80% of $40). If, however, the price of Asset X is $100 or lower at 3:00 PM, the option expires out of the money, and the trader loses their entire $40 investment.²
• Trading Timeframes: Emphasis on Short-Term Expirations
  A prominent feature of binary options trading is the typically very short duration of the contracts.² While options with daily or weekly expirations exist, a significant portion of the market, particularly on unregulated online platforms, focuses on expirations measured in minutes or even seconds (e.g., 60-second options).⁸
  The prevalence of these extremely short timeframes has profound implications. Financial markets exhibit inherent short-term volatility or “noise” – small, rapid price fluctuations that are often random and extremely difficult to predict with any consistency.⁹ Over periods as short as a few minutes, this random noise can easily dominate any underlying trend or signal that might be derived from fundamental analysis (economic news, company performance) or standard technical analysis (chart patterns, indicators).⁷ Consequently, attempting to predict the precise direction of the price over the next 60 seconds or 5 minutes becomes less an exercise in informed analysis and more akin to guessing the outcome of random price ticks. This heavy reliance on chance, amplified by the short expiry times, pushes the activity away from strategic trading and firmly towards the realm of gambling.⁹

II. The Numbers Game: Probability, Payouts, and Profitability

• Understanding Payout Percentages vs. Loss Potential
  A crucial aspect of binary options is the asymmetry between potential gains and losses, dictated by the payout percentages offered by brokers. For a winning trade (expiring in the money), brokers typically offer a fixed payout that is a percentage of the amount invested. This percentage commonly ranges from 60% to 90%, although figures up to 95% are sometimes advertised.⁵ However, for a losing trade (expiring out of the money), the loss is almost always 100% of the capital risked on that trade.²
  This means that the potential profit on a winning trade is inherently less than the potential loss on a losing trade. For instance, if a trader wagers $100 on an option with an 80% payout:

• A win results in getting the $100 back plus $80 profit (total return $180).
• A loss results in losing the entire $100 (total return $0). The potential gain ($80) is smaller than the potential loss ($100).²

It is also worth noting that payout percentages are not always static. Brokers may adjust payouts based on the perceived likelihood of an event occurring, offering lower percentages for outcomes deemed more probable, further skewing the risk/reward balance.¹⁶

• Mathematical Expectation: Why the Odds Favor the Broker
  The concept of mathematical expectation, or expected value (EV), provides a clear lens through which to analyze the inherent profitability (or lack thereof) of binary options trading over the long run. Expected value calculates the average outcome of an event if it were repeated many times. It is determined by multiplying the value of each possible outcome by its probability and summing the results.
  In the context of binary options, because the potential loss (100% of stake) is greater than the potential gain (payout percentage, typically < 100% of stake), the expected value of a single trade is generally negative for the trader, assuming a random or 50/50 chance of predicting the direction correctly.⁴
  Let’s calculate the EV using the previous example of an 80% payout and assuming, for simplicity, a 50% probability of winning (Pwin​=0.5) and a 50% probability of losing (Ploss​=0.5). Let the amount staked be Stake.
  The value of a win is 0.80×Stake.
  The value of a loss is −1.00×Stake.
  The Expected Value (EV) is calculated as:
  EV=(Pwin​×Value of Win)+(Ploss​×Value of Loss)
  EV=(0.5×0.80×Stake)+(0.5×−1.00×Stake)
  EV=(0.40×Stake)−(0.50×Stake)
  EV=−0.10×Stake
  This calculation shows a negative expected value of -10% of the amount staked per trade. This means that, on average, for every $100 wagered under these conditions, the trader can expect to lose $10 over the long term.
  This inherent negative expected value constitutes the broker’s statistical edge, much like the house edge in casino games such as roulette or blackjack.⁵ Even if some traders win individual bets, the structure ensures that, across a large volume of trades from many participants, the platform operator is statistically positioned to profit from the aggregate losses of its clients.¹⁹ This fundamental mathematical disadvantage is a primary reason why consistently profiting from binary options is so challenging.
• The Win Rate Hurdle: Calculating Break-Even and Profitability Points
  The direct consequence of the negative expected value and the asymmetric payout structure is that a trader must achieve a win rate significantly greater than 50% simply to break even over time.⁹ A 50% win rate, which might seem adequate at first glance, will lead to net losses due to the larger size of losses compared to wins.
  The break-even win rate (WR) can be calculated by determining the point at which total profits equal total losses. Using the 80% payout example:
  Let W be the number of winning trades and L be the number of losing trades.
  Let Stake be the amount risked per trade.
  Profit from wins = W×(0.80×Stake)
  Loss from losses = L×(1.00×Stake)
  For break-even, Profit = Loss:
  W×0.80×Stake=L×1.00×Stake
  0.80W=1.00L
  The total number of trades is T=W+L. The win rate is WR=W/T. The loss rate is (1−WR)=L/T.
  Substituting L=T(1−WR) and W=T×WR:
  0.80×(T×WR)=1.00×(T×(1−WR))
  0.80×WR=1.00×(1−WR)
  0.80×WR=1−WR
  1.80×WR=1
  WR=1/1.80≈0.5556 or 55.6%
  Therefore, with an 80% payout, a trader needs to win more than 55.6% of their trades just to avoid losing money.¹⁹ To achieve any meaningful profit, the win rate must climb even higher. As noted in one analysis, a win rate of at least 60% is needed to make money with an 80% payout.¹⁹
  Consistently achieving such high win rates, especially given the short-term nature of most binary options and the inherent randomness or “noise” in market price movements, is exceptionally difficult.⁹ Professional traders in more conventional markets often struggle to maintain win rates significantly above 50-55% over the long term. For retail traders, often lacking sophisticated analytical tools, deep market knowledge, and disciplined risk management strategies, reaching and sustaining the necessary win rate (e.g., >55.6% for 80% payout) is a formidable challenge.⁹ This high mathematical hurdle, stemming directly from the payout structure, is a fundamental reason why regulatory bodies and financial experts report that the majority of retail participants ultimately lose money trading binary options.¹⁵

III. A High-Stakes Gamble: Unpacking the Risks

• The Imminent Risk of Losing 100% of Capital Per Trade
  The most immediate and defining risk of binary options trading stems directly from its “all-or-nothing” payoff structure. For every single trade placed, the entire amount of capital allocated to that trade (the premium paid) is at risk of complete loss.² If the trader’s prediction about the price direction relative to the strike price at expiration proves incorrect, the investment for that trade vanishes entirely.
  This contrasts sharply with traditional forms of investment. For instance, when investing in stocks, a total loss typically only occurs if the company goes bankrupt and its shares become worthless. Market downturns can decrease the value of a stock portfolio, but the capital is not usually wiped out on a trade-by-trade, binary basis. Even with traditional options, while the premium paid can be lost if the option expires worthless, the value can fluctuate, and strategies exist to manage partial losses. The binary option structure offers no such mitigation within a single trade – the outcome is absolute loss or a fixed gain.
  Compounding this risk is the prevalence of very short expiration times.⁹ The ability to place numerous trades in rapid succession (e.g., every few minutes) means that a streak of incorrect predictions can lead to the rapid depletion of a trader’s capital. A few consecutive losses can significantly impact or even wipe out an account balance far quicker than might occur in longer-term investment strategies.
• Beyond Market Moves: Platform Integrity and Counterparty Dangers
  While predicting market direction is challenging, the risks in binary options trading extend far beyond unfavorable price movements. A significant layer of danger arises from the platforms and brokers facilitating these trades, particularly those operating offshore and outside of robust regulatory oversight.² This introduces substantial counterparty risk – the risk that the other party in the transaction (the broker/platform) will fail to meet its obligations.
  Regulatory bodies like the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as well as international counterparts, have received numerous complaints detailing fraudulent practices by unregulated binary options platforms.⁴ Common allegations include platforms outright refusing to credit customer accounts with winnings, denying or ignoring withdrawal requests, manipulating the trading software to generate losing trades (e.g., altering expiration times or price feeds), or even disappearing entirely with deposited funds.⁴
  Furthermore, in the common over-the-counter (OTC) model used by many unregulated brokers, the platform itself acts as the direct counterparty to the client’s trade. This creates a fundamental conflict of interest: the broker profits directly from the client’s losses.¹⁵ This inherent conflict provides a strong incentive for platforms to engage in unfair practices, as client success directly negatively impacts the broker’s bottom line.
  The implication is stark: even a trader who manages to overcome the unfavorable mathematical odds and make consistently accurate market predictions can still lose their entire investment due to the unreliability or outright fraud of the platform they are using. The operational and counterparty risks associated with the largely unregulated segment of the binary options market can dwarf the actual market risk, making it an exceptionally hazardous environment for investors’ capital.
• Behavioral Risks: Comparison to Gambling and Addiction Potential
  Beyond the financial and operational risks, binary options trading presents significant behavioral risks due to its structural characteristics. The combination of a simple, easily understood premise (yes/no), the potential for rapid outcomes (short expirations), fixed odds (predetermined payout/loss), and the ability to place frequent trades creates an environment that shares many features with traditional gambling products.⁵
  Regulators, including the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), have explicitly noted these similarities and expressed concerns about the potential for binary options trading to encourage compulsive or addictive behaviors.⁹ The FCA highlighted that prior to regulatory changes in 2018, binary options in the UK were indeed regulated as gambling products under the UK Gambling Commission, suggesting a historical and structural link.²³
  The psychological appeal of quick potential wins and the immediate feedback loop can trigger reward pathways in the brain similar to those activated by gambling. This can lead traders, particularly inexperienced ones, to make impulsive decisions, over-trade, ignore risk management principles (like limiting risk per trade or daily loss limits ¹⁸), or engage in “chasing losses” – making increasingly larger or riskier bets in an attempt to recoup previous losses. Such behaviors dramatically amplify the already significant financial risks. The design of the product itself, therefore, carries inherent behavioral pitfalls that compound the mathematical and operational dangers.

IV. Regulatory Landscape: Legality, Bans, and Warnings

• Global Stance: Widespread Prohibitions (EU, UK, Australia, etc.)
  The regulatory response to binary options across major developed economies has been overwhelmingly negative, driven by concerns over investor protection and documented harm. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the pan-EU financial markets regulator, implemented a temporary prohibition on the marketing, distribution, and sale of binary options to retail clients across all European Union member states, effective from July 2, 2018.⁴⁵ This temporary measure was subsequently renewed before individual member states or national regulators took permanent action.
  In the United Kingdom, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) went further, instituting a permanent ban on the sale, marketing, and distribution of all binary options, including securitised binary options (which were initially exempt from ESMA’s temporary ban), to retail consumers starting April 2, 2019.²¹ The FCA justified this stringent measure by citing evidence of significant consumer harm, the inherent risks of the products (complexity, similarity to gambling), misleading marketing practices exaggerating profit potential, poor conduct by selling firms, and inherent conflicts of interest.¹⁵
  Similarly, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) banned the sale of binary options to retail clients from May 2021, classifying them as high-risk and unpredictable investments where losses significantly outweighed gains for most consumers.² Canadian provincial securities regulators have also issued strong warnings and effectively restrict the offering of binary options from unregistered platforms.² Israel took the decisive step of banning the entire binary options industry operating from its shores due to widespread fraud originating there.⁵ Furthermore, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), a global body of securities regulators, issued a statement warning investors worldwide about the risks associated with illegal and fraudulent binary options platforms.³⁸
• The U.S. Exception: Regulated Exchanges (Nadex, CBOE) and CFTC/SEC Oversight
  The regulatory situation in the United States presents a notable contrast, though with crucial caveats. Binary options trading is legally permitted in the U.S., but only under strict conditions: the options must be listed and traded on an exchange registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or designated as a contract market (DCM) by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).⁶
  Historically, the main regulated venues included the North American Derivatives Exchange (Nadex) and the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), although CBOE later ceased listing binary options. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) also introduced “event futures,” which function very similarly to binary options, settling at $100 or $0 based on a yes/no outcome.⁸
  Trading on these regulated U.S. exchanges offers certain investor protections not found on unregulated platforms. These include standardized contract specifications, transparent pricing mechanisms, and the mitigation of counterparty risk through a central clearinghouse that guarantees trades.⁸ Additionally, exchanges like Nadex impose position limits to cap the amount a trader can risk.² However, it is crucial to understand that this regulated segment represents only a small fraction of the global binary options market activity.²⁷
• Navigating the Offshore Minefield: The Perils of Unregulated Platforms
  The overwhelming majority of binary options trading accessible online, particularly to a global audience including U.S. residents, occurs through platforms that are not registered with the SEC or CFTC and operate outside the U.S. regulatory framework, often based in offshore jurisdictions with lax oversight.²
  These unregulated, offshore platforms are the primary source of the widespread fraud and investor complaints documented by U.S. and international regulators.⁴ The CFTC maintains a Registration Deficient (RED) List specifically to warn the public about foreign entities soliciting U.S. residents without the required registration, many of which offer binary options.²⁷
  The stark difference between the restrictive or prohibitive stance in most regulated markets (EU, UK, Australia, Canada) and the continued proliferation of easily accessible, unregulated online platforms creates a significant regulatory arbitrage situation and a dangerous environment for consumers. Investors, often attracted by aggressive online marketing promising easy profits ¹⁴, can easily be directed towards these fraudulent operators. The existence of a small, legitimate, regulated market in the U.S. does little to protect investors who inadvertently or unknowingly engage with the dominant, high-risk unregulated sector. The practical reality for many individuals encountering binary options online is an encounter with an unregulated, potentially fraudulent entity, regardless of the specific regulations in their home country.

V. The Shadow Market: Fraud, Scams, and Investor Protection

• The Scale of the Problem: Documented Fraud and Financial Losses
  The association between binary options and fraud is not merely anecdotal; it is a well-documented, large-scale international problem. The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has estimated that binary options scams steal approximately US$10 billion annually from victims worldwide.⁵ Investigations and enforcement actions by regulators reveal the significant financial devastation caused by fraudulent operations. For example, a CFTC action against entities related to the Yukom Communications binary options scheme resulted in a default judgment ordering defendants to pay over $451 million in restitution and penalties for a fraud that victimized thousands, with reports indicating 95% of customers lost their money, many losing their life savings.³² The “mastermind” behind this scheme, Lee Elbaz, was sentenced to 20 years in prison.³² Another major operator, Banc de Binary, faced charges from the CFTC for illegally soliciting U.S. customers and operating without registration.⁵⁰
  Regulatory filings also shed light on the poor outcomes even on platforms subject to enforcement. In one SEC settlement case, it was revealed that less than 3% of the platform’s U.S. customers actually earned a profit trading binary options offered by the respondent.³⁵ UK police investigations reported that binary options fraud had become the country’s largest single fraud type for a period, with the average victim losing around £16,000.³⁹ Authorities consistently warn that recovering funds lost to these fraudulent offshore schemes is highly improbable.³⁸
• Recognizing Common Scams: Tactics Used by Fraudulent Operators
  Fraudulent binary options operators employ a consistent set of tactics to lure victims and extract funds. Awareness of these red flags is crucial for investor protection. Based on warnings from the FBI, CFTC, SEC, FCA, Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), and other sources, common scam tactics include:

1. Refusal to Credit Accounts or Process Withdrawals: A hallmark of fraud is the platform preventing customers from accessing their funds. This manifests as ignoring or denying withdrawal requests, cancelling requests without reason, freezing accounts, or demanding excessive, previously undisclosed fees to release money.⁴
2. Identity Theft: Operators may falsely claim regulatory requirements necessitate extensive personal documentation, such as copies of credit cards, passports, driver’s licenses, and utility bills. This information is then potentially used for identity theft or other illicit purposes.⁴
3. Manipulation of Trading Software: Platforms may rig the trading process itself. This can involve manipulating the price feeds shown to the customer, altering the expiration times of trades (e.g., extending a winning trade until it becomes a loss), or configuring algorithms to ensure customer losses.⁴ In some cases, no actual trading may occur at all; the platform is merely a facade to collect deposits.¹⁴
4. Misleading Marketing and False Promises: Aggressive marketing is key. Platforms advertise heavily online (social media, search engines, spam email) promising unrealistically high returns, guaranteed profits, or low-risk trading opportunities.⁴
5. Fake Credibility Signals: To appear legitimate, operators use professional-looking websites and mobile apps, fake testimonials, fabricated news articles, and sometimes fraudulent endorsements from celebrities or well-known financial figures.⁵
6. High-Pressure Sales Tactics: Victims are often contacted by “brokers,” “analysts,” or “account managers” (who are typically just high-pressure salespeople) using aggressive tactics to persuade them to deposit more funds, often starting with small initial deposits and escalating.⁴
7. Predatory Bonuses and “Insurance”: Platforms may offer deposit bonuses or “risk-free” trades/insurance, but these come with hidden terms and conditions (e.g., extremely high trading volume requirements) that effectively prevent the withdrawal of any funds.²
8. Reload Scams: After initial losses, victims may be contacted again, sometimes by individuals claiming affiliation with government agencies, offering to help recover the lost funds for an upfront fee.⁶

• Due Diligence: Verifying Registration and Avoiding Red Flags
  Given the pervasive nature of fraud, rigorous due diligence is essential before engaging with any binary options platform. Regulators strongly advise potential traders to always verify the registration status of the platform, the products offered, and any individuals they deal with before depositing money or providing personal information.⁴
  Specific resources available for U.S. residents include:

• Checking if the platform is a CFTC-Designated Contract Market (DCM).⁶
• Checking if the platform is registered as an exchange with the SEC via its website.⁶
• Using the National Futures Association (NFA) BASIC database to check the registration status and disciplinary history of firms and individuals.³⁴
• Using the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) BrokerCheck website for similar checks.³⁴
• Consulting the CFTC’s RED List for known unregistered foreign entities.²⁷

Key red flags to avoid include: unsolicited investment offers (cold calls, emails), high-pressure sales tactics, promises of guaranteed or unrealistically high returns, requests for sensitive personal data beyond standard account opening needs, vague information about the company’s management or location, and any platform operating offshore without clear registration in a major jurisdiction.⁶ If registration cannot be verified, the safest course of action is to avoid the platform entirely.⁴The sheer volume and consistency of warnings about fraud emanating from numerous independent regulatory bodies globally (CFTC, SEC, FCA, ESMA, ASIC, IOSCO, FBI, state/provincial regulators) ⁴ paint a clear picture. The fraudulent tactics described are remarkably similar across jurisdictions ⁴, and the reported financial losses are substantial.⁵ This widespread, consistent pattern strongly suggests that fraud is not an isolated issue but rather a systemic problem deeply embedded within the unregulated binary options market, making it an exceptionally dangerous arena for investors.

VI. Expert Perspectives: Investment, Speculation, or Gambling?

• Consensus Among Financial Professionals and Educators
  There is a strong consensus among financial experts, investment professionals, reputable financial education sources, and regulators that binary options trading falls outside the realm of legitimate investing and aligns more closely with high-risk speculation or outright gambling.⁵
  Gordon Pape, writing for Forbes.com as early as 2010, unequivocally labeled binary options websites as “gambling sites, pure and simple”.⁵ His reasoning centered on the negative payout structure (house edge) and the inherent difficulty, even impossibility, of consistently predicting short-term market movements.⁵ This view is echoed in numerous sources that highlight the gambling-like characteristics: the all-or-nothing payout, the fixed odds determined by the broker, the short time horizons relying heavily on chance, and the potential for addictive behavior.⁹ The fact that UK regulators initially placed binary options under the purview of the Gambling Commission further underscores this perception.²³
  The distinction between investing and gambling is crucial. Investing typically involves allocating capital with the expectation of generating a positive return over time, based on the underlying value, productivity, or growth prospects of an asset, while managing associated risks.⁵¹ Gambling, conversely, involves wagering on an uncertain outcome where the probability of loss often exceeds the probability of gain, driven by chance, with a known statistical advantage favoring the house or organizer.⁵¹ Binary options, particularly those offered by unregulated brokers, fit the gambling paradigm far more closely due to their negative expected value for the trader, reliance on short-term chance, lack of connection to underlying asset ownership or value creation, and the broker often taking the opposing side of the bet.⁵
  Even financial platforms like NerdWallet, while explaining the mechanics of binary options ¹² or similar event contracts/prediction markets ⁵², advise treating such activities as entertainment expenses rather than investments and strongly warn against betting money one cannot afford to lose.⁵² Their focus on credible financial advice and avoiding scams aligns with the broader expert caution surrounding binary options.¹²
• Why Binary Options Fail as a Wealth-Building Tool
  Synthesizing the analysis presented throughout this report, binary options fail as a viable strategy for long-term wealth building for several fundamental reasons:

1. Negative Mathematical Expectancy: The typical payout structure, where potential wins are smaller than potential losses, creates a built-in statistical disadvantage for the trader, making long-term profitability mathematically improbable without an exceptionally high and consistent win rate.⁴
2. Unrealistic Win Rate Requirements: To overcome the negative EV, traders need to correctly predict short-term market direction significantly more often than they are wrong (e.g., >55-60% win rate depending on payout) – a feat extremely difficult to achieve consistently.⁹
3. Inherent Conflict of Interest: With many OTC brokers acting as the counterparty, their profits come from client losses, creating incentives misaligned with the trader’s success.¹⁵
4. Difficulty of Short-Term Prediction: Very short timeframes amplify the impact of random market noise, making accurate prediction based on analysis extremely challenging.⁹
5. Pervasive Fraud Risk: The unregulated nature of much of the market exposes traders to significant risks of platform manipulation, withdrawal refusals, and outright theft.

These characteristics stand in stark contrast to established principles of sound investing and wealth accumulation, which typically emphasize:

• Investing in assets with positive long-term expected returns (e.g., equities benefiting from economic growth).
• Diversification to manage risk.
• A long-term perspective allowing for compounding.
• Investing in productive assets or enterprises.
• Utilizing regulated markets and intermediaries.

Binary options trading inherently lacks these qualities. The structure is geared towards frequent, short-term bets with unfavorable odds, amplified by significant operational and behavioral risks. The overwhelming consensus among financial professionals and the actions taken by regulators globally reflect a clear judgment: binary options are fundamentally unsuitable for individuals seeking to build wealth reliably and safely.

VII. Comparative Risk Profiles: Binary Options vs. Alternatives

To fully appreciate the unique position of binary options, it is helpful to compare their risk and reward characteristics against other forms of financial activity, including traditional investments and gambling.

• vs. Stock Market Investing (Ownership, Long-Term Growth, Risk/Reward)

• Ownership: Stock investing involves purchasing shares, representing actual ownership in a company.⁵⁴ Binary options offer no ownership stake in the underlying asset.²
• Reward: Stock investing offers potential for long-term capital appreciation driven by company growth, profitability, and broader economic factors, as well as potential dividend income. Returns are variable and potentially substantial over time. Binary options offer a fixed, capped percentage return per trade, independent of the magnitude of the price move beyond the strike.¹
• Risk: Stock investing carries market risk (share prices can fall), potentially leading to significant losses, but a 100% loss typically requires company bankruptcy. Risk is managed through diversification across multiple stocks/sectors and a long-term investment horizon. Binary options carry the risk of 100% loss of the staked capital on each individual trade if the prediction is wrong.² Diversification across multiple binary option trades does little to mitigate the inherent negative expected value or the risk of platform fraud.
• Expectation: Historically, diversified stock market investing has offered positive long-term expected returns. Binary options generally have a negative expected return for the trader.⁴
• vs. Forex Trading (Leverage, Complexity, Variable Outcomes, Regulation)

• Mechanism: Both can involve trading currency pairs.⁸ However, traditional spot forex trading involves buying one currency while selling another, often using leverage (borrowed funds) to amplify position size.⁸ Binary options on forex are simply bets on the direction of the exchange rate.⁸
• Risk/Reward: Forex trading offers variable profit and loss potential, determined by the magnitude of the exchange rate movement and the leverage used. Leverage can magnify both gains and losses, potentially exceeding the initial margin deposit.⁸ Binary options have fixed, predefined risk (the premium paid) and fixed, predefined reward (the payout percentage).²
• Complexity & Regulation: Traditional forex trading is complex, involving understanding margin, leverage, spreads, and macroeconomic factors. It operates within established (though globally varied) regulatory frameworks. Binary options are often marketed as simpler ⁸, but this masks the difficulty of prediction and the significant risks, especially within the largely unregulated offshore market.
• vs. Traditional Options (Vanilla Options) (Flexibility, Hedging, Ownership Potential)

• Rights & Ownership: Traditional options (calls and puts) grant the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell the underlying asset at the strike price before expiration, offering potential ownership.² Binary options offer no such right or potential ownership.²
• Profit Potential: Traditional option profits (for buyers) depend on how far the underlying asset’s price moves beyond the strike price (intrinsic value) plus time value; potential gains can be substantial or even theoretically unlimited for calls.² Binary options have a fixed payout regardless of the extent of the price movement.²
• Risk: For buyers of traditional options, the maximum risk is limited to the premium paid.⁵⁴ For sellers, risk can be substantial (potentially unlimited for naked calls). Binary option risk is fixed at the premium paid per trade.²
• Uses & Regulation: Traditional options are widely used for hedging existing positions and complex strategies.²⁵ Binary options are generally considered unsuitable for hedging.²⁹ Traditional options are traded on highly regulated exchanges globally.²
• vs. Gambling (Acknowledged Odds, Entertainment vs. Investment)

• Similarities: Both often involve fixed odds (payout vs. stake), short-term outcomes, negative expected value for the participant (house/broker edge), and potential for addictive behavior.⁵
• Differences: Regulated gambling typically operates with clearly stated odds and rules, and is generally understood by participants as a form of entertainment with an expected cost. Binary options, especially unregulated ones, are frequently marketed deceptively as legitimate investment opportunities or easy ways to make money.⁴ The level of fraud and lack of transparency in the unregulated binary options sphere far exceeds that found in regulated gambling industries.
• Comparative Table:
  The following table summarizes the key characteristics of binary options compared to other financial activities and gambling:

Feature	Binary Options (Unregulated OTC)	Stock Investing	Forex Trading (Leveraged Spot)	Traditional Options (Vanilla)	Casino Gambling (e.g., Roulette)
Primary Goal	Speculation / Gambling	Investment / Growth	Speculation / Hedging	Speculation / Hedging	Entertainment
Risk per Trade/Bet	Fixed 100% Loss of Stake	Variable / Partial	Variable / Potentially > Stake	Fixed Premium (Buyer)	Fixed Bet Amount
Reward Potential	Fixed % < 100%	Variable / High	Variable / High (Leveraged)	Variable / High (Buyer)	Fixed Odds
Mathematical Expectation	Negative	Positive (Long-Term)	Near Zero (Before Costs)	Depends / Negative (Decay)	Negative (House Edge)
Regulation	Often Unregulated / Banned	Highly Regulated	Regulated	Highly Regulated	Regulated (Gaming)
Complexity	Deceptively Simple	Moderate / High	High	High	Simple Rules / Complex Odds
Typical Timeframe	Very Short	Medium / Long-Term	Short / Medium-Term	Short / Medium-Term	Very Short
Ownership Involved	No	Yes	No (Spot) / Yes (Futures)	Potential Yes	No
Fraud Risk	Extremely High	Low (Regulated Markets)	Moderate (Broker Dependent)	Low (Regulated Exchanges)	Low (Regulated Casinos)

This comparison highlights the unique and often unfavorable positioning of unregulated binary options. They combine the negative expected value and short-term nature of gambling with the marketing guise of investing, while carrying exceptionally high fraud risks not typically associated with either regulated investing or regulated gambling.

VIII. Deconstructing Success Claims: Anecdotes vs. Data

• Evaluating Testimonials: The Lack of Credible Evidence
  The internet and social media are replete with testimonials, videos, and advertisements claiming substantial financial success and wealth generation through binary options trading.⁵ These narratives often depict individuals achieving luxurious lifestyles through seemingly simple trading strategies. However, the credibility of such claims is highly questionable.
  These testimonials are frequently anonymous, lack verifiable details, and are often integral parts of the marketing campaigns run by the binary options platforms themselves, particularly unregulated ones.¹⁴ There is a significant risk that results shown are fabricated, manipulated, or selectively presented to create a false impression of profitability.⁴ The use of fake celebrity endorsements is another common deceptive tactic employed to lend false legitimacy to these schemes.⁵
  While some videos or screenshots might appear to show large withdrawals ⁵⁶, these isolated instances provide no context regarding the total amount deposited, overall losses incurred, the number of failed attempts, or the typical experience of other users on the platform. Such displays could easily be staged for marketing purposes, potentially with the cooperation of the platform, and do not constitute reliable evidence of widespread or achievable success. These anecdotal claims stand in stark contrast to the numerous documented accounts from real victims detailing significant financial losses and struggles with fraudulent platforms.¹⁵
• The Weight of Evidence: High Loss Ratios and Regulatory Actions
  When anecdotal success stories are weighed against official data and regulatory findings, the evidence overwhelmingly points towards widespread losses for retail clients engaging in binary options trading. Regulatory bodies like the UK’s FCA explicitly stated that their data suggested a majority of consumers lose money.¹⁵ Investigations linked to enforcement actions provide more concrete figures: one SEC case involved a platform where fewer than 3% of U.S. customers turned a profit ³⁵, while another major fraudulent operation saw 95% of its clients lose their invested capital.³² Reports from UK fraud investigators indicated average losses per investor reaching £16,000 during the peak of the scams.³⁹
  Crucially, the stringent regulatory actions taken globally – including outright bans in the EU, UK, Australia, and elsewhere – were not preemptive measures based on theoretical risks alone. They were direct responses to the documented reality of significant, widespread consumer harm and financial losses resulting from the nature of the product and the conduct of the firms offering it.⁵ The regulatory consensus itself serves as powerful evidence against the notion that binary options are a reliable path to profit for the average person.
• Conflicts of Interest: When the Broker Wins if the Client Loses
  Reinforcing the skepticism surrounding success claims is the inherent conflict of interest present in the business model of many over-the-counter (OTC) binary options brokers.¹⁵ When the broker acts as the direct counterparty to the trade, taking the opposite side of the client’s bet, the broker’s revenue is directly derived from the client’s net losses.
  This structure means that consistently profitable clients are detrimental to the broker’s business. This conflict creates strong incentives for brokers, even those not engaging in outright fraud like price manipulation, to implement practices that disadvantage successful traders. This could include imposing unexpected restrictions, delaying or refusing withdrawals, closing profitable accounts, or offering less favorable trading conditions.⁴² Therefore, even if a trader could theoretically achieve the high win rates needed to be profitable against the mathematical odds, the platform itself may actively work against their continued success.
  Considering the combination of factors – the negative mathematical expectation requiring high win rates, the inherent difficulty of achieving such rates in short-term trading, the pervasive risk of fraud within the unregulated market, and the fundamental conflict of interest often existing between broker and client – the conclusion is unavoidable. Sustained, significant wealth generation through binary options trading is exceptionally improbable for retail participants. The ubiquitous success stories should be viewed with extreme skepticism, as they are far more likely to be fabricated marketing ploys, unrepresentative outliers, or simply misleading narratives that ignore the overwhelming evidence of losses and risks.

IX. Final Verdict and Investor Guidance

• Conclusion: Binary Options Are Not a Reliable Path to Wealth
  Based on a comprehensive analysis of their structure, mathematical underpinnings, associated risks, regulatory treatment, and expert consensus, the final verdict is unequivocal: Binary options trading is not a viable or recommended strategy for building wealth. The allure of simplicity and rapid potential gains is overwhelmingly overshadowed by a combination of factors that make sustained profitability highly unlikely and the risk of substantial loss exceptionally high. It is far more akin to gambling on short-term market fluctuations within a system often designed to the trader’s disadvantage, frequently compounded by the danger of outright fraud.
• Recap of Critical Risks and Structural Disadvantages
  Individuals considering binary options should be acutely aware of the following critical points:

• Negative Expected Value: The typical payout structure (win < 100%, loss = 100%) creates a mathematical edge for the broker, meaning traders are statistically expected to lose money over time without exceptional skill or luck.
• High Win-Rate Hurdle: Profitability requires consistently winning a high percentage of trades (often >55-60%), which is extremely difficult, especially in short timeframes dominated by market noise.
• All-or-Nothing Risk: Each trade carries the risk of losing 100% of the invested capital.
• Short-Term Unpredictability: Extremely short expiration times make reliable analysis challenging and increase the role of random chance.
• Pervasive Fraud: The market, particularly the segment involving unregulated offshore platforms, is rife with fraud, including withdrawal issues, identity theft, and manipulated trading outcomes.
• Regulatory Condemnation: Widespread bans and warnings from major global regulators underscore the perceived dangers to retail consumers.
• Expert Classification: Financial professionals overwhelmingly classify binary options as high-risk speculation or gambling, not sound investment.
• Conflict of Interest: Many brokers profit directly from client losses, creating misaligned incentives.
• Recommendations for Individuals Seeking Financial Growth
  For individuals genuinely seeking to build wealth over the long term, the focus should be on established, regulated, and fundamentally sound investment strategies. This includes:

• Prioritizing Regulated Investments: Engage with financial markets through reputable, regulated brokers and exchanges offering traditional investment products like stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
• Adopting a Long-Term Perspective: Focus on strategies aligned with long-term growth, utilizing diversification to manage risk and allowing the power of compounding to work over time.
• Conducting Thorough Research: Understand any investment before committing capital. If an investment seems too complex or its risks are unclear, avoid it.³⁴
• Being Wary of “Get-Rich-Quick” Schemes: Approach any investment promising unusually high or easy returns with extreme skepticism, especially those promoted aggressively online or through unsolicited contact.⁴ If it sounds too good to be true, it almost certainly is.¹⁴
• Avoiding Unregulated Platforms: Under no circumstances should individuals deposit funds or provide personal information to unregulated offshore binary options platforms due to the overwhelming risk of fraud and total capital loss.⁴ Always verify registration with relevant authorities (CFTC, SEC, NFA, FINRA, or respective national regulators) before proceeding.⁶
• Seeking Qualified Advice: Consider consulting with a qualified, independent financial advisor to develop an investment strategy appropriate for individual financial goals and risk tolerance.¹⁴

In summary, while the question asks if binary options can make one rich, the overwhelming evidence indicates that the probability is exceedingly low, and the attempt is fraught with disproportionate risks, including the near certainty of encountering fraudulent actors in the unregulated space. Binary options should be avoided by anyone seeking a reliable path to financial security or wealth accumulation.

Download PDF

Works cited

1. www.investopedia.com, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/061114/guide-trading-binary-options-us.asp#:~:text=Binary%20options%20are%20based%20on,which%20option%20is%20more%20likely.
2. Binary Option: Definition, How They Trade, and Example – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/binary-option.asp
3. www.investopedia.com, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/061114/guide-trading-binary-options-us.asp#:~:text=Key%20Takeaways,capped%20risk%20or%20capped%20potential.
4. Binary Options Fraud | Investor.gov, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investor.gov/protect-your-investments/fraud/types-fraud/binary-options-fraud
5. Binary option – Wikipedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_option
6. Beware of Online Binary Options Schemes – Missouri Secretary of State, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.sos.mo.gov/bewareofonlinebinaryoptionsschemes
7. The Most Important Technical Indicators for Binary Options – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/022615/most-important-technical-indicators-binary-options.asp
8. Trading Forex With Binary Options – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/022415/trading-forex-binary-options.asp
9. Currency Binary: What It is, How it Works, Examples – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currency-binary.asp
10. Binary Options Strategies You Should Know – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/052014/binary-options-strategies.asp
11. A Guide to Trading Binary Options in the US – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/061114/guide-trading-binary-options-us.asp
12. Introduction to Binary Options Trading – NerdWallet, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/investing/binary-options-trading
13. The use of Contracts for difference (‘CFD’) Spread Bets and Binary Options (‘forbin’) to Trade Foreign Exchange (‘forex’) Commodities and Stocks and Shares in Volatile Financial Markets – Herald Scholarly Open Access, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.heraldopenaccess.us/openaccess/the-use-of-contracts-for-difference-cfd-spread-bets-and-binary-options-forbin-to-trade-foreign-exchange-forex-commodities-and-stocks-and-shares-in-volatile-financial-markets
14. A Losing Bet: Binary Options – Canadian Securities Administrators, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.securities-administrators.ca/uploadedFiles/General/pdfs/CSA_BinaryOptionsFraud_EN_2017.pdf
15. Consumer warning about the risks of investing in binary options | FCA, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/news-stories/consumer-warning-about-risks-investing-binary-options
16. Double No-Touch Option: What It Is, How It Works – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/doublenotouch.asp
17. CFTC/SEC Investor Alert: Binary Options and Fraud | CFTC, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/fraudadv_binaryoptions.html
18. What Are Binary Options: Definition, How Do They Work, and Example | LiteFinance, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.litefinance.org/blog/for-beginners/what-are-binary-options/
19. Trading Guide: The Importance of Basic Mathematics in Trading …, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.financemagnates.com/binary-options/analysis/trading-guide-importance-basic-mathematics-trading-binary-options/
20. Binary Options for the Commodities Markets – FICC Markets Standards Board, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://fmsb.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/2016-002-FMSB-Std_BinaryOptions_CommoditiesMarkets_Final-Updated.pdf
21. www.fca.org.uk, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/impact-assessments/product-intervention-retail-binary-options.pdf
22. All bets are off for binary options – RPC, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.rpclegal.com/thinking/financial-services-regulatory-and-risk/all-bets-are-off-for-binary-options/
23. 1 Having regard to Article 43(2) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma-35-43-1811-esma_opinion_under_article_432_mifir_fca_bo.pdf
24. Arbitrage Strategies With Binary Options – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/040115/arbitrage-strategies-binary-options.asp
25. How to Hedge Stock Positions Using Binary Options – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/073015/how-hedge-stock-positions-using-binary-options.asp
26. Taking a directional view on BTC price movements with binary or one-touch options, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://wintermute.com/taking-a-directional-view-on-btc-price-movements-with-binary-or-one-touch-options
27. Beware of Off-Exchange Binary Options Trades | CFTC, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/beware_of_off_exchange_binary_options.htm
28. Beyond the Hype: Risks and Regulations in Binary Options Trading – IndiaCorpLaw, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://indiacorplaw.in/2024/02/beyond-the-hype-risks-and-regulations-in-binary-options-trading.html
29. Analytical Modeling and Empirical Analysis of Binary Options Strategies – MDPI, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/7/208
30. Differences Between Forex & Binary Options Trading – TradingPedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.tradingpedia.com/binary-options-academy/differences-between-forex-and-options/
31. Forex Options Trading: Primary Types and Examples – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/forex/f/foreign-currency-option-trading.asp
32. Fraudulent binary options scheme participants ordered to pay CFTC $451m, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.grip.globalrelay.com/defendants-who-operated-fraudulent-binary-options-scheme-ordered-to-pay-cftc-451m/
33. Binary Options websites are NOT a way to get rich quick. These are scams – ThatsNonsense.com, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.thatsnonsense.com/binary-options-website-are-not-a-way-to-get-rich-quick-these-are-scams/
34. Binary Options Fraud – FBI, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/binary-options-fraud
35. Regulators Warn Investors of Binary Options Risks – Nasdaq, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/regulators-warn-investors-binary-options-risks-2016-11-14
36. Avoid Unregistered Binary Options Trading Platforms | CFTC, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/LearnAndProtect/AdvisoriesAndArticles/avoid_unregistered_binary_options_platforms.htm
37. Binary Options Fraud | CFTC, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/BinaryOptionsFraud/index.htm
38. Statement on Concerns Related to Binary Options, accessed on April 19, 2025, http://www.csrc.gov.cn/csrc/c100220/c1003110/1003110/files/1631593297339_49319.pdf
39. Binary Options | TBIJ, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/projects/binary-options/
40. The Truth Behind Binary Options Fraud, Episode 1 Introduction The following is the transcript of a CFTC vide, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/sites/smartcheck/files/2018-04/BinaryTranscript_Episode1.pdf
41. The Truth Behind Binary Options Fraud, Episode 2 Introduction The following is the transcript of a CFTC vide, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/sites/smartcheck/files/2018-04/BinaryTranscript_Episode2.pdf
42. Binary Options – Has anyone had any experience or success? What are my other options? : r/investing – Reddit, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/investing/comments/391z63/binary_options_has_anyone_had_any_experience_or/
43. Legal difference between Binary Options regulated by CFTC and gambling regulated by U. S. member states – Law Stack Exchange, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/77432/legal-difference-between-binary-options-regulated-by-cftc-and-gambling-regulated
44. FCA/CySEC/ESMA Collusion to Damage CFD/Forex/Binary Options Industry? – Cappitech, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.cappitech.com/blog/fca-cysec-esma-collusion-to-damage-cfd-forex-binary-options-industry/
45. FCA statement on ESMA’s temporary product intervention measures applied to retail CFD and binary option products, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/fca-statement-esma-temporary-product-intervention-retail-cfd-binary-options
46. ESMA adopts final product intervention measures on CFDs and …, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-adopts-final-product-intervention-measures-cfds-and-binary-options
47. ESMA Agrees to Prohibit Binary Options and Restrict CFDs – objectivus, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://objectivus.com/esma-agrees-to-prohibit-binary-options-and-restrict-cfds-to-protect-retail-investors/
48. UK Financial Conduct Authority Statement On ESMA’s Temporary Product Intervention Measures Applied To Retail CFD And Binary Option Products – Mondo Visione, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://m.mondovisione.com/news/uk-financial-conduct-authority-statement-on-esmas-temporary-product-interventio/
49. Binary options scams | FCA, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/binary-options-scams
50. CFTC Charges “Prediction Market” Proprietor Banc de Binary with Violating the CFTC’s Off-Exchange Options Trading Ban and Operating as an Unregistered Futures Commission Merchant, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/6602-13
51. Investing Vs. Gambling: Understanding Risk-Adjusted Performance – Forbes, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesfinancecouncil/2022/06/01/investing-vs-gambling-understanding-risk-adjusted-performance/
52. Prediction Markets: What They Are, How They Work and Risks – NerdWallet, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/investing/what-are-prediction-markets
53. NerdWallet’s culture of experimentation | Signals & Stories – Mixpanel, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://mixpanel.com/blog/building-a-culture-of-product-experimentation-at-nerdwallet/
54. Options vs. Futures: What’s the Difference? – Investopedia, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/difference-between-options-and-futures/
55. Options Trading: Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners – NerdWallet, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/investing/how-to-trade-options
56. Unbelievable $100k Withdrawal – Discover His Winning Binary Options Strategy! – YouTube, accessed on April 19, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ohh20tTakU